我算故我在分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/metanb

博文

Terms of awareness/ use

已有 795 次阅读 2022-7-9 12:59 |个人分类:博客办公室|系统分类:生活其它

[注:下文是我的群邮件协议的内容备份,邮箱地址不在此处公开。]

{Begin of Terms ----

When the contents of the flock emails sent from me are used for any purpose, the users agree with the following "Terms of use" first, with a full understanding of the "Terms of awareness" below. If the users of contents do not agree with the "Terms of use" here, or do not understand the "Terms of awareness" below, they are not permitted to use the contents of the flock emails sent from me.

While viewing of the contents of the flock emails is not subjected to the "Terms of use" here, viewers are assumed to understand the "Terms of awareness" below.

Terms of awareness

.

Definition: by "recipient" or "recipients", I refer to those who receive flock emails sent by me from my accounts of xxx@xxx.com or xxx@xxx.edu.cn.

Definition: by "the contents of the flock emails", I refer to the contents sent by me from my accounts as above.

.

0. I do not assume any endorsement from any recipient. Recipients do not bear responsibilities for the contents of the flock emails sent to them or copied to them.

.

1. How do I think? I think freely toward a direction at a moment, yet at the same time I do not exclude the possibility that the right direction is opposite or perpendicular to the direction that I happens to run to at that moment. Like anyone, I cannot see everything at the same time. I do not conceal opinions but I'm invertible upon new understandings.

.

2. What do I assume on the reactions from the possible viewers? I assume they might take it a question to think, especially when the contents appear negative.

.

3. Do I hold a kind of racism in my mind? I admit the differences of different groups of people as well as their seemingly invariant nature. If a large portion of a group of people are publicly reported many times of bad deeds, or harms, the individuals of that group might share the collective reputation. I do not apply actions on the level of individuals based on their collective reputation.

.

4. Do I have a forbidden zone in my mind? Basically, I think everything can be discussed on a rational level, yet topics might arise in an emotional way. I do not exclude the possibilities that truths might be located in a place surrounded by a loop-like river of taboos. Anyone who tends to cross such a river may subject to misunderstandings from many others before the whole pictures are shown.

.

5. Do I have a belief? I do not join any religious group. I do not apply worship or admiration to anyone or any "God", especially. I do think "God" is one of the most important inventions of human imagination. Just like the concept of "imagined number", I agree that "God" may have a usage. I'm somewhat religious in research.

.

6. How do I view research? Research is designed to favor the advancement of knowledge, to warm each other by the way, other than pursue a position of livelihood. I prefer to leave a blank instead of a pile of ad hoc works. I may appreciate bright works by others, but I appreciate and respect my own thoughts the most. I may read and interpret works by others, but I believe that totally different inventions might eventually arise from a seemingly expository actions.

.

7. Do I behave differently in the school or the department where I work? Not essentially. Around 2/3 of the colleagues has viewed all my posts in a chatting group of school level. Sometimes, I do receive encouragements from colleagues publicly, on the contents or styles.

.

8. How do I treat others' work tentative to publish? I've never applied rejections. Instead, I favor evolving of a work toward a satisfactory status if premature.

Terms of use

.

Definition: by "Users of contents", I refer to any individual or any collection of individuals who use "the contents of the flock emails" defined above.

.

1. Users of contents DO NOT favor mute actions or unaware reports to damage reputations of mine;

2. Users are able to understand any content from me with positive thinking;

3. Users agree that criticism is a way to help;

4. Users agree that these terms are applied to the past or future sending;

5. Users agree that all the contents are subjected to an expiring duration of one week since sent;

6. The owner of these terms may apply proper revisions or updates.

.

End of Terms}




https://m.sciencenet.cn/blog-315774-1346538.html

上一篇:绝妙的洞察
下一篇:[March for reflection |Oops!] Touch of atom

1 李宏翰

评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-4-16 14:02

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部