Eucommia的个人博客分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/Eucommia

博文

《Cell》撤稿,“倒念”刘实

已有 5785 次阅读 2010-11-6 07:19 |个人分类:未分类|系统分类:观点评述|关键词:学者| 刘实, 撤稿, 《Cell》

首先说明,这篇博文的题目是“风马牛相集”的结果。
 
本来,《Cell》撤稿与刘实无关,因为所撤之稿非刘实所写。
 
但《Cell》撤稿却又与刘实相集,因为它是刘实“狂言”的“CNS生命科学论文至少三分之一是错的而应撤稿”之“刘论”的具体体现之一。
 
Cell》的最新一篇撤稿是:
Cell, Volume 143, Issue 3, 485, 29 October 2010
doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.011
Alvar TruccoImre Gaspar and Anne Ephrussi
(Cell 139, 983 998; November 25, 2009)
In this paper, we used cryoimmuno-electron microscopy and live-cell imaging to investigate the sequential assembly of oskar mRNA into an mRNP competent for transport from the Drosophila nurse cells to the oocyte posterior pole. We have recently identified instances in all of the figures where the cryoimmuno-EM data were inappropriately manipulated by the first author. The manipulations do not affect the live-cell imaging data. We are in the process of reanalyzing the raw experimental cryoimmuno-EM data but can already state that the published conclusions are not fully consistent with the raw data. We are therefore retracting the paper. We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience that this might have caused.
 
而刘实在“双规”前几天还发表了“《细胞》撤稿,一大群作者的成就感大减”一文。调侃《Cell》把另一篇几十名作者合写的一篇论文给撤了,并说:“这一撤稿,好多人的成就就被打了水漂”。
 
所以,现在“倒念”起刘实来,我还真被他的英明折服,更为他的勇敢感动。
 
下面是我从刘实的“求真”网站上找到的一篇刘实投给《Cell》而被拒稿、但后来发表在“高人”所编的真顶尖(锐)杂志的文章。按他的文章所指,《Cell》撤稿的力度还远远不够。而这篇文章所列的还是刘实2008年前的投稿。好像他后来还给《Cell》投过一些也被拒稿。但他的文章现在“倒念”起来还都是对的(在我看来)。
 
A Summary of Cell’s Rejections on Shi V. Liu’s Submissions
 
Title
Submitted
Rejected
Published*
Searching for the Deep Root and
Fundamental Mechanism of Biotic Aging
20050311
20050318
LB 5:89-91, 2005
"Cellular Senescence": What Does It Really Mean?
20051004
20051016
LB 5:308-310, 2005
Piggyback on a Nobel Prize or Show Its True Spirit
20060109
20060203
LB 6:12-15, 2006
Stop Playing the Cell Differentiation Tune for Caulobacter
20060405
20060407
LB 6: 31-32, 2006
Cell Division versus Cell Reproduction
20060816
20060817
LB 6:62-64, 2006
Revisit Semi-Conservative DNA Replication and Immortal DNA Strand Hypothesis
20060824
20060825
LB 6:54-61, 2006
Why we keep losing excellence in young scientists?
20060820
20060825
LB 6:65-66, 2006
Are Stem Cells Really Immortal Cells?
 
20060909
20061002
LB 6:71-75, 2006
Sorry, I Am Not Your Grandfather
20061117
20061118
Pioneer 1: 5-7, 2006
Stem Cells’ Self-Renewal or Cell Biologists’ Self-Cheating?
20061219
20061223
LB 6:106-109, 2006
What Is a Stem Cell?
 
20070129
20070130
LB 7:12-17, 2007
Liu’s Message Blocked by “Top” Journals
 
20070314
20070315
Sci. Ethics 2: 5-6, 2007
Respecting Published Answers for Important Questions on Epigenetics
 
20070320
20070411
Top Watch 2: 19-20,2007
No Real Evidence for Round Trip in Spermatogenesis
20070423
No Reply!
LB 7:26-28, 2007
Immortal Strand Does Not Exist but
Nonrandom Strand Segregation Should Be Universal
20070722
20070803
LB 7:26-28, 2007
An alternative view on nonrandom DNA segregation and cell life
 
20080810
No Reply
Unpublished
Induction of pluripotency: where is the evidence?
 
20081125
No Reply
Top Watch 2:94, 2007
iPS cells are man-made cancer cells
20080121
No Reply
LB 8: 16-18, 2008
Evidence for Selection of Pre-existing Stem Cells Rather than Induction of iPS Cells
20080501
No Reply
LB 8: 52-54, 2008
*LB = Logical Biology. This and other journals can be read at http://im1.biz
 
原文链接在:HTM, PDF


https://m.sciencenet.cn/blog-84542-380873.html

上一篇:Nature这样改错也是好的!
下一篇:刘实本性难改:“双规”还管“国事”、修“奶车”

0

发表评论 评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-5 23:39

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部