导师不可以既是第一作者又是通讯作者吗？ 科学边缘人罗德海教授分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/ldh 中国科学院大气物理研究所研究员,中国海洋大学教授,四川人.研究方向:气候动力学 已有 5813 次阅读 2012-4-7 10:38 | 个人分类: 科研心得 | 系统分类: 观点评述 | 关键词:通讯 论文 office 科学网有位博主发表一博文《通讯作者该放什么位置？》对导师（ PI) 在论文中所处的位置谈了自己的看法，并上纲上线指出 “ 如果很多文章都自己既是第一作者又是通讯作者，就会让人严重怀疑这个导师的人品 ” 。 得到了很多网友的支持 (32 位推荐，点击 5000 多次 ) ，我不知道这位博主是学生或是导师。但他的一些观点我是严重地不同意。就拿我来说吧，我是搞理论研究的，我写的很多文章自己既是第一作者又是通讯作者。在这位博主看来，我既不该是第一作者，也不该是通讯作者，否则人品有问题。 象我所从事的大气动力学研究，需要坚实的数理基础和多年的积累，没有十，八年的积累，很难写出高水平的论文，也很难在国外发表。以前我在国外发表的很多论文很多都是独立作者 (05 年以前），都是我独立完成的。后来一些老师建议我，发表文章时，即便学生没有干什么活或干一点小活 ( 查文献或画一两幅图），也要把学生名字挂上，这样一来学生好毕业，二来可以反映你的团队强大。当时我并没同意，担心受到误会，说不清。现在的学生动不动就攻击导师。如果把学生的名字放在第二作者，怕别人认为我是侵占学生的成果。果不其然，上次我把我的论文清单发在网上 ( 科学网），受到很多网友 ( 可能是学生）的质疑，怀疑我是有侵占学生成果的嫌疑。我早就不在乎论文数量了，学生发的毕业论文我是不愿署名的，我也给我的很多学生说过，你们发的论文可以不署我的名，但我可以帮你们修改，发表费我也可以给你们出。但学生不愿意，认为我是不是看不起他 / 她们的工作。现在中国是论文满天飞，我只是希望我不要发太多的论文而已，一年出一两篇或几篇就行了。 在我们这个领域，在国外发表论文是很慢的，从投稿到发表至少需要一年的时间。单位规定，博士毕业至少需要一篇 SCI( 学生必须是第二作者或第一作者），否则就不能按期毕业找到工作。没办法我只好把学生挂在第二的位置上，叫她 / 他们干一点辅助性的工作。当然在我的有些论文中，学生一点活没干的也有。只要学生愿意作一些辅助性工作，或参与讨论或画图，我也会把他 / 她们的名字放在论文中。当然，不可能叫他 / 她们当第一作者或通讯作者。他 / 她们自己的论文随便当什么作者都行。 例如 05 年发的论文： Luo , D., 2005: A barotropic envelope Rossby soliton model for block-eddy interaction. Part I: Effect of topography, J. Atmos. Sci ., 62, 5-21 . Luo , D., 2005: A barotropic envelope Rossby soliton model for block-eddy interaction. Part II: Role of westward-traveling planetary waves, J. Atmos. Sci ., 62, 22-40 . Luo , D., 2005: A barotropic envelope Rossby soliton model for block-eddy interaction. Part III: Wavenumber conservation theorems for isolated blocks and deformed eddies, J. Atmos. Sci ., 62, 3839-3859 Luo , D. ， 2005: A barotropic envelope Rossby soliton model for block-eddy interaction. Part IV: Block activity and its linkage with sheared environment, J. Atmos. Sci . 62, 3860-3884 。 Luo , D., 2005: Interaction between envelope soliton vortex pair block and synoptic-scale eddies in an inhomogeneous baroclinicity environment, Quart. J. Roy. Meteoro. Soc ., 131, 125-154 . Luo , D., 2005: Why is the North Atlantic block more frequent and long-lived during the negative NAO phase, Geophys. Res. Lett ., 32, L20804, doi:10, 1029/ 2005GL022927. Luo D. and H. Wan, 2005: Decadal variability of wintertime North Atlantic and Pacific blockings: A possible c ause, Geophys. Res. Lett ., 32, L23810, doi: 10. 1029/2005 GL024329. 06 年以后我自己写的和发表的论文 ( 挂有学生的名字）： Luo D. and Z. Chen, 2006: The role of land-sea topography in blocking formation in a block-eddy interaction model, J. Atmos. Sci . ， 63 ， 3056-3065 。 Luo , D., A., R. Lupo and H. Wan, 2007a: Dynamics of eddy-driven low- frequency dipole modes. Part I: A simple model of North Atlantic Oscillations. J. Atmos. Sci ., 64, 3-28. Luo , D., T. Gong and A., R. Lupo, 2007b: Dynamics of eddy-driven low- frequency dipole modes. Part II: Free mode characteristics of NAO and diagnostic study. J. Atmos. Sci ., 64, 29-51. Luo , D., T. Gong and Y. Diao, 2007c: Dynamics of eddy-driven low-frequency dipole modes. Part III: Meridional shifts of westerly jet anomalies during two phases of NAO. J. Atmos. Sci . 64 ， 3232-3243 Luo, D., T. Gong and Y. Diao, 2008: Dynamics of eddy-driven low-frequency dipole modes. Part IV: Planetary and synoptic wave breaking processes during the NAO life cycle. J. Atmos. Sci . , 65, 737-765. Luo , D., T. Gong and L. Zhong, 2008b: Dynamical relationship between the phase of North Atlantic Oscillations and meridional excursion of a preexisting jet: An analytical study. J. Atmos. Sci . , 65, 1838-1858 Luo , D., Z. Zhu, R. Ren, L. Zhong and C. Wang, 2010a: Spatial pattern and zonal shift of the North Atlantic Oscillation. Part I: A dynamical interpretation. J. Atmos. Sci . ， 67 ， 2805-2826 Luo, D., L. Zhong, R. Ren and C. Wang, 2010b: Spatial pattern and zonal shift of the North Atlantic Oscillation. Part II: Numerical experiments. J. Atmos. Sci. ， 67, 2827-2853 Luo , D., Y. Diao and S. Feldstein, 2011: The variability of the Atlantic storm track activity and North Atlantic Oscillations: A link between intraseasonal and interannual variability, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 577-601 . Luo , D., W. Zhou, and K. Wei, 2010: Dynamics of eddy-driven North Atlantic Oscillations in a localized shifting jet: zonal structure and downstream blocking, Climate dynamics, 34 , 73-100. DOI 10.1007 /s00382-009- 0559-y. Luo, D., T. Gong , Y. Diao and W. Zhou, 2007: Storm tracks and Annular Modes. Geophys. Res. Lett . ., 34, L1780110.1029/2007GL030436. Luo, D. and T. Gong, 2006: A possible mechanism for the eastward shift of interannual NAO action centers in last three decades. Geophy. Res. Lett ., 33, L24815, doi:10.1029 /2006G L027860. 学生发表的博士论文有我名字的论文（排名）： Y. Diao, J. Li and D. Luo , 2006: A new blocking index and its application: Blocking action in the Northern Hemisphere, J. Climate , 19, 4819-4839 . Wang, Y., S. Li, and D. Luo , 2009, Seasonal response of Asian monsoonal climate to the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, J. Geophys. Res . , 114, D02112, doi:10.1029/2008 JD010929 。 T. Gong, S. B. Feldstein and D. Luo , 2010: The impact of ENSO on wave breaking and Southern annular mode events. J. Atmos. Sci . , 67, 2854-2870 。 现在中国学术环境很糟糕，学生和老师相互攻击的事时有发生。尽管如此，但好的导师还是有的，我身边就有这样的老师。 不良的导师哪里都有，请不要抹黑中国的导师！！！ 本文引用地址： http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-1882-556340.html
Who is more important in an article, the corresponding author or the first author? It seems no one can answer this question certainly. In most people's mind, the first author is the most important author in one article. He/she should be responsible for the whole process from material collecting, experiemental design, data collecting and analysis, and the paper writing while the corresponding author is only responsible for the correspondence with the edition boards. Usually, the corresponding author is mostly the supervisor or the project director who makes suggestions on your experiment, data analysis or paper writing. Now, many units take great importance on the corresponding author. Most units hold equal importance to the first writer and the corresponding author. But the interllectural property of the paper belongs to the corresponding author and his representative unit. Therefore, from this point, the corresponding author seems to be more important. If your article is mostly done by yourself, and especially based on your own creative idea, it's better for you to be both the first author and the corresponding author. I know many people in fact have no choice when involed in the issue of authorship. There are many discussions on the issue of the first author and the corresponding author. Follows are three links obtained from the internet. Link One: http://zhidao.baidu.com/question/18447161.html 写论文通讯作者有什么含义？必须是导师吗？ 日前被同学问及什么是通讯作者。仅仅知悉跟研究生导师指导学生做科研论文署名有关，没能很好的回答。今日特查询了一番。虽仍为一头雾水，但还是有所收获。观点1第一作者当然不用多说了；而通讯作者一般指整个课题的负责人。以前国内一般注重排名，老板要排在第2，现在有变化了，所谓和国际接轨哦，投国外杂志时老板可放在最后，并注名是通讯作者。当然有些老板还是看中排名的，最好要和他商量一下。观点2通讯作者往往指课题的总负责人，他要负责与编辑部的一切通信联系和接受读者的咨询等。应该说，通讯作者多数情况和第一作者是同一个人，这样的话实际上是省略了通讯作者。只有在通讯作者和第一作者不一致的时候，才有必要加通讯作者。我不赞成一味地模仿国外杂志，加不加通讯作者应根据需要而定。观点3现在国内很多地方也改革了，很是看重通讯作者的，如果是自己很有分量的文章不要随便将别人作为通讯作者（当然这个别人是指老板，主任，领导etc). 实际上如果从知识产权上来说，研究成果算是通讯作者的。有这样贪得无厌的老板，研究室的一切文章包括研究生、博士后的都要算作他的通讯作者，实际上他连***都不懂。观点4通讯作者是课题负责人，承担课题的经费，设计，文章的书写和把关。他也是文章和研究材料的联系人。最重要的是，他担负着文章可靠性的责任。通讯作者的好处是能和外界建立更广泛的联系。一些杂志会约你申稿，写综述。这些会大大地提高你在科学界的地位。 所以，老板一般不会将通讯作者让给手下的人。第一作者一般是本文工作中贡献最大的研究人员。此作者不仅有最多和最重要的图表 (即体力上的贡献)，也是文章初稿的撰写人(即对本文的智力贡献)。一些反映老板重要观点的文章，老板也不会放过既是第一又是通讯作者。有些杂志甚至声明只有体力上的贡献不可以作文章的作者，但可以致谢。通讯作者即文章最重要的作者,在论文投稿、修改直至被接受发表的过程中的一切联络工作一般由通讯作者负责。通讯作者应该是论文对外责任的承担者 Link Two: http://www.hjcz.org/bbs/read.php?tid-93838.html 从美国化学学会会刊(JACS)主编给中国通讯作者的一封信谈起 We received your submitted article on 04/26/2004. Please have each of your co-authors directly send us an individual message from their own email address. In each message, that particular author should include the following confirmation statements: 1. I verify that I have seen and have approved the submitted manuscript; 2. I consent to having my name appear in the list of authors and, thereby, take responsibility for the results contained in the manuscript. 3. I have read and am in compliance with the ACS Ethical Guidelines: https://paragon.acs.org select: Ethical Guidelines http://www.pubs.acs.org/instruct/ethic.html , We look forward to receiving individual messages from each of your co-authors, so that processing may continue on your manuscript. Sincerely, Peter J. Stang （1）谁应该是作者 《英国皇家化学学会：发表论文的道德准则》 As a minimum, authors should take responsibility for a particular section of the study. The award of authorship should balance intellectual contributions to the conception, design, analysis and writing of the study against the collection of data and other routine work. If there is no task that can reasonably be attributed to a particular individual, then that individual should not be credited with authorship. All authors must take public responsibility for the content of their paper. The multidisciplinary nature of much research can make this difficult, but this may be resolved by the disclosure of individual contributions. 作者至少要对研究的一个特定的部分负责。确定作者应该基于平衡考虑他对研究工作的构思、设计、分析和撰写所做的脑力贡献，而不是数据的收集或者其它常规的工作。如果没有什么任务可以归功于某个个人，那么这个人就不应该成为作者。所有的作者必须对他们的论文内容负起社会责任。这样做对于许多研究工作因其多学科性质而会有困难，但是这个问题可能通过明示每个作者的贡献来解 决。 （2）谁不应该是作者 哪些人最容易混入作者名单？ 1.资助者，包括实验室的导师。 2.行政领导。 3.仅仅是收集数据，没有参加分析，讨论，撰写等等的实验员。 4.和资深作者或主要作者有特殊关系的人。 谁应该是第一作者？ 论文的第一作者通常是具体工作的主要执行者，对主要实验结果负责。 资历浅的年轻人优先。 在大多数情况下，按字母排序是不合理的。 有时候将两个作者名字下注明：他们有相同的贡献。 通讯作者的具体责任 《英国皇家化学学会：发表论文的道德准则》 9. To give due acknowledgement to all workers contributing to the work. Those who have contributed significantly to the research should be listed as co-authors. On submission of the manuscript, the corresponding author attests to the fact that those named as co-authors have agreed to its submission for publication and accepts the responsibility for having properly included all (and only) co-authors. The corresponding author signs a copyright licence on behalf of all the authors. 给予所有对此工作有贡献的人员恰当的承认。那些对研究工作有显著贡献的人应该被列入共同作者。在投稿时，通讯作者要确认所有被列入作者名单的人都同意投稿，承担包括所有共同作者并且仅仅包括共同作者的责任。通讯作者代表所有作者签署版权证书。 谁应该是通讯作者？ 1，一般是比较资深的研究人员。 2，没有任何学术地位，职务的要求。学生，博士后都行，只要他们能够负起责任。 3，年轻人做通讯作者，有利于培养他们的独立工作能力。 Link Three: Difference between Corresponding author and First author and what are all their responsibilities? 通讯作者与第一作者的区别以及各自的责任 https://www.researchgate.net/post/Difference_between_Corresponding_author_and_First_author_and_what_are_all_their_responsibilities Alok Nahata · · Dr. Harisingh Gour University First author is usually the student /researcher who has undertaken the research work. First author is often also referred as the presenting author. He /She is responsible for doing the research practically along with the co-authors who might assist him/ her in the research work or might be the colleagues from the same work group. He is also responsible for preparing the manuscript and analyzing the data. Corresponding author is usually the senior author who provides the intellectual input and designs and approves the protocols to be followed in the study. He is responsible for the manuscript correction, proof reading, whole correspondence during the paper submission, handling the revisions and re-submission of revised manuscripts upto the acceptance of the manuscripts. This is the usual practice in most cases. In some cases, when the work is done in collaboration with some other institutes, the actual researcher or the first author and corresponding author remains the same, but co-authors increase depending on the number of helping hands in the paper along-with the senior collaborator or senior scientist with whom you liaised with. I would like to focus on other side also. There are some institutes also where corresponding author becomes the first author also. The person doing the work or the actual researcher/ Student becomes the second author or even a co-author also. This is, in my opinion, unethical or injustice on part of the actual researcher/ student. But this practice is prevalent in some institutions and the students are bound to stick to it being the beginners in most cases. Another situation which I have seen in some institutes is that the head of the institute or the director is a part of every paper arising from that institute, no matter it is relevant with him/her or not. So this are the practices prevalent now-a-days regarding the inclusion of names in research papers. Hope you have a better idea of the roles and responsibilities as you mentioned in your question as well as the prevailing scenario. George Komis · Palacky University of Olomouc First author is the one who carries out the bulk of the experiments, while having an important contribution to experimental design, data analysis, interpretation and writing of the paper. The corresponding author is in most cases the principal investigator. He has major contribution in the design of the work, he will supervise experiments, he will verify or even contribute to data analysis and most importantly he will take over most of data interpretation and writing of the manuscript. Of course variations to the above scheme may occur. Difference between Corresponding author and First author and what are all their responsibilities? Andrew Davis · Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology The meaning of 'first author' differs between subjects and between geographical area. It's therefore better to follow international guidelines and use a contributorship statement to indicate who did what work and how much of it (see http://www.icmje.org/ and www.ease.org.uk/ for access to such guidelines). The 'the corresponding author' is the person who acts as the link between editor and coauthors. The term 'author for correspondence' should really be used for 'the point of contact with outside researchers'. (Although I know that these terms are frequently confused, even by some journals.)
标签: 第一作者
