科学网

 找回密码
  注册

tag 标签: Stephen

相关帖子

版块 作者 回复/查看 最后发表

没有相关内容

相关日志

review: The case for RAMCloud
jiangdm 2012-9-9 10:29
review:  The case for RAMCloud
The case for RAMCloud by John Ousterhout, Parag Agrawal, David Erickson, Christos Kozyrakis, Jacob Leverich, David Mazières, Subhasish Mitra, Aravind Narayanan, Diego Ongaro, Guru Parulkar, Mendel Rosenblum, Stephen M. Rumble, Eric Stratmann, and Ryan Stutsman CACM july 2011 | vol. 54 | no. 7 remark: With scalable high-performance storage entirely in DRAM, RAMCloud will enable a new breed of data-intensive applications. 1 RAMCloud Overview 2 Motivation the two styles of applications in Figure 1. 2.1 Scalable storage for existing applications. NoSQL 2.2 Technology trends. 2.3 Research Challenges The case for RAMCloud.pdf
个人分类: Hardware|3842 次阅读|0 个评论
[转载]耶鲁教授 Stephen Stearns 致北大学生的一封信
yzcck 2012-8-17 09:22
背景: Prof. Sterns 是耶鲁大学知名进化生物学家,本学期在北大开设Key Issues in Evolut ion 和 Principles of Evolution 两门课程,总计40余名学生。 在12月初,有一位学生交的期 末论文中发现明显剽窃,为此教授公开宣布判此人零分并致函所有同学以示告诫。 而所有论文都递交之后,又发现两人有严重剽窃行为。教授因此非常伤心,致函如下: To my students in Beijing, Fall 2007: While grading papers today I encountered two more cases of plagiarism. One was sophisticated but serious. The other was so blatant that it was almost unbelievable. That makes a total of three students who have failed my courses because of plagiarism. 今天批阅论文的时候,我又遇到了两例剽窃行为。一例手法老练但是情节严重,另一例则是厚颜无耻得令人难以置信。这样总计就有三名学生因为剽窃而在我的课程中不及格。 If I had not warned you and given you the opportunity honestly to correct your essays, there would have been several more. I thank those of you who were honest and showed me what you had copied. 假如我前些时候没有警告过你们,并给你们一次机会去诚实地改正你们的文章,这种事情还会多好几例。有些同学诚实地告诉了我他们都抄袭了哪些部分,我向他们表示感谢。 Plagiarism disturbs me greatly, both because it corrodes my relationship with you as my students, and because it tells me things about China and Beida that neither you nor I want to hear. 这些剽窃行为让我非常苦恼,不但因为它损害了你我之间的师生关系,也因为它告诉了我一些关于北大、关于中国的事情,而这些事情是你我都不愿意听到的。 It corrodes my relationship with you because I work hard to be a good teacher, I take time to prepare good lectures, and I spend many hours providing detailed feedback on essays. It is hard work. You cannot imagine what it is like to correct the details of the 500th essay until you have done it yourself. I do that to help you learn to think more clearly, to express yourself convincingly, and to develop your intellectual power, your ability to understand the world. I also do it because I value you, I value your ideas, and I think the world will be a better place when you can all think clearly and behave intelligently. Later in life, some of you will be leaders with important positions. I want you to be competent and honest, for I have seen too often what terrible things can happen when leaders are incompetent and dishonest. Leadership aside, I want all of you to be able to create value in your lives, whatever you end up doing, and you cannot do that if you deceive. 它伤害了我们之间的关系,因为我为了当一名好老师而付出了许多努力。我花了许多时间准备课堂讲授,又花了许多时间给你们的文章写下详尽的反馈。这些工作都很辛苦。你无法想象,当改到第500篇文章的细节的时候你是什么感觉,除非你亲身经历。我做这一切,是为了让你们学会更清晰地思考问题,学会有说服力地表达自己的观点,学会培养自己的理性,锻炼自己理解世界的能力。我做这一切,也因为我珍视你们,珍视你们的想法,而且我想,如果你们都能够清晰地思考、明智地行动的话,这个世界也会变得更加美好。在以后的人生道路里,你们当中有的人会成为身居要位的领导,我希望你们能够德才均备,因为无德无才的领导者所能带来的可怕灾难,我已经见过太多了。就算不当领导,我也希望你们所有人都能在你们的生命中创造一些有价值的东西,无论你们最后从事什么。而如果你欺骗的话,你是做不到这一点的。 When a student whom I am teaching steals words and ideas from an author without acknowledgment, I feel cheated, dragged down into the mud. I ask myself, why should I teach people who knowingly deceive me? Life is too short for such things. There are better things to do. 当我所教的学生从别人那里偷窃话语和思想的时候,我感到受了欺骗,心情沉重如同跋涉泥沼。我会问自己,我为什么要给那些存心欺骗我的人上课呢?生命是如此的短暂,太不值得。有比这好得多的事情可以做。 Disturbingly, plagiarism fits into a larger pattern of behavior in China. Cxiaoneinternational intellectual property rights. Beida sees nothing wrong in copying my textbook, for example, in complete violation of international copyrightagreements, causing me to lose income, stealing from me quite directly. No one in China seems to care. I can buy DVDs in stores and on the street for about one US dollar. They cost $20-30 outside China; the artists who produced them are losing enormous amounts of stolen income, billions of dollars each year. China has become notorious for producing defective products that have to be recalled because the pose health threats to consumers. A recent cartoon in an American newspaper shows the Central Committee reacting to an accusation that they have violated human rights. The response? "Wait until they see what we put in their toothpaste next!" Corruption is a serious problem in a booming economy. For example, in the mining industry, about 5000 miners die each year and mine owners cut corners in violation of the law. The social fabric breaks when workers die because owners are greedy. The Mandate of Heaven is lost. 让人不安的是,剽窃已经成为整个中国行为模式的一部分。中国忽视国际知识产权。比如说,复印我的书彻头彻尾违反了国际版权协议,使我损失了收入,对我而言近乎直接的偷窃,然而北大人却对此安之若素。再比如,我只花大约一美元就能在街头和店铺买到DVD光碟,这些碟片在别国要卖上二三十美元。创作它们的艺术家因此损失的大笔收入全是被偷走的,每年几十亿。因为生产劣质商品对消费者造成潜在的健康威胁而不得不召回,中国已经是臭名昭著了。最近美国报纸上刊载的一幅漫画描绘了中央委员会被指责侵犯人权。猜他们怎么回答?“往他们牙膏里搁点东西,看他们还敢吭声不?”经济繁荣的背后,腐败已经成为严重的问题。就拿矿业来说,每年大约有五千名矿工死去,就因为矿主为了省事为了利润而不惜违反法律 。(译注:cut corners 指贬义的抄近道,此为意译。)矿主的贪婪导致工人死去,象征着社会阶层之间纽带的断裂。天道已丧。 China appears to have lost her way. Confucius said, do not do to others what you do not want them to do to you. He also said, a gentleman is honest. Honesty and reciprocity are the basis of trust and community. We cannot get along in a world filled with deceit and defection; such a world becomes a Hobbesian war of all against all, nasty and brutal. We cannot do science if we cannot trust what others publish. There is no reason to try to replicate a result if it cannot be trusted. It would not be worth the effort.Without replication there can be no shared knowledge that is tested and trustworthy -that is, no science. Without science, there can be no technology. And without technology, there can be no steady increase in productivity, economic growth, and a better life for all. 中国似乎已经迷失了她的道路。孔子说过,己所不欲勿施于人。他还说过,人而无信不知其可。(直译是君子有信,不过一时想不起原话是怎么说的了。) 诚实互惠是信任与社群的基础。在一个充满欺诈和背叛的社会中,我们无法生存,这样的世界成了霍布森(是他吧?哲概的东西快忘干净了)式的“每个人与每个人为敌”的战争,险恶而野蛮。若是我们不能相信别人发表的东西,我们就没法做科研。谁都没有理由去企图重复一个不可信的结果,不值得费那功夫;而没有重复就不会有经过验证而可信靠、可共享的知识,也就没有科学。没有科学就不会有技术,没有技术就不会有生产力的稳步发展,经济水平的持续增长,也就不会给所有人都带来更美好的生活。 The penalties for plagiarism that you will encounter later in life are very serious. If you do it as a graduate student, you can be expelled from university, and you will not get your degree. If you do it as a faculty member, you can lose your job. I know you may not believe that, for the sociology professor at Beida who translated an entire book into Chinese and published it with his name on it only lost his administrative positions but kept his professorship and salary. But things are not like that elsewhere . When plagiarism is detected in the United States, it can end the career of the person who did it. That is also true in Europe. 在你们今后的人生里,剽窃将会遇到极为严厉的惩罚。身为研究生如果剽窃,就会直接开除,没有学位。身为教员如果剽窃,就会丢掉饭碗。我知道你们可能不信,因为北大那位把整本书翻成中文就署上自己名字出版的社会学家 (这是谁啊...) 仅仅丢了行政职务,却仍然保有教授之位和薪水。然而事情在别处并非如此。在美国如果发现有人剽窃,此人的职业生涯可以就此毁于一旦。欧洲亦然。 The fact that I have encountered this much plagiarism at Beida tells me something about the behavior of other professors and administrators here. They must tolerate a lot of it, and when they detect it, they cover it up without serious punishment, probably because they do not want to lose face. If they did punish it, it would not be this frequent. 我在北大遇见了如此之多的剽窃,这一事实说明了其它教授和行政官员的所作所为。他们必然是对此颇为容忍,而当发现有人剽窃时,他们未加严厉惩罚就遮掩过去,很可能是因为他们不愿丢脸。假如他们真的施以惩罚,剽窃决不会这么猖獗。 I have greatly enjoyed teaching some of you. I have encountered young minds here that are as good as any in the world. Many of you are brave, most of you work very hard, most of you are honest, and some of you are brilliant. But I am leaving with very mixed feelings. It is quite sad that so many promising young Chinese think it is necessary to cheat to succeed. They damage themselves even more than the people from whom they steal and the people whom they deceive with stolen words. 给你们当中一些人上课的时候,我感受到了极大的喜悦。我在这里遇到的年轻的头脑,和世界上任何地方比起来都毫不逊色。你们当中许多人都很勇敢,大部分人都很努力,大部分人都很诚实,有些人相当聪明。然而当我离去时,心情是复杂的。这么多前途无量的中国年轻人认为要靠作弊才能成功,让我十分伤心。比起那些被他们窃走思想的人,和那些被他们用窃来的的话语所欺骗的人,他们伤害得还要多的,是他们自己。 Sincerely, Steve Stearns Updated Friday 2:28 a.m. A Yale biology professor who taught at Peking University this fall as part of a joint program between the two schools has accused the Chinese school of turning a blind eye toward plagiarism, raising questions about the academic integrity of an institution that is a central partner in Yale’s internationalization efforts. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology professor Stephen C. Stearns ’67 sent a passionate, 958-word statement to his students at Peking this month, bemoaning the rampant cheating he witnessed while teaching two courses at the university. In his message, Stearns said he was “leaving with very mixed feelings” because of the behavior he had observed. “The fact that I have encountered this much plagiarism … tells me something about the behavior of other professors and administrators here,” Stearns wrote. “They must tolerate a lot of it, and when they detect it, they cover it up without serious punishment, probably because they do not want to lose face. If they did punish it, it would not be this frequent.” Launched in 2006, the Peking University–Yale University Joint Undergraduate Program allows Yale students to spend a semester living and studying with Peking University students on the school’s Beijing campus. Through the program Yale students take classes in English with Peking University and Yale faculty and receive full course credit at Yale. Stearns’ e-mail raises questions about whether Peking University’s courses are as rigorous as Yale’s. Allegations of plagiarism at Yale nearly always result in a hearing before the Executive Committee, the College’s student disciplinary body. Students found guilty typically face probation, suspension or expulsion, assistant Yale College dean and ExComm Secretary Jill Cutler told the News in September. In an e-mail message to the News on Sunday, Stearns said he has been inundated with over 100 e-mails from China and beyond regarding his message, which he said was originally intended as advice for his students at Peking, not for a wider audience. His missive has since been posted in English and in Chinese on several Chinese Web sites and was the subject of a report on the Web site of the Chronicle of Higher Education last week. Stearns said he allowed his students to post the message online because they thought it would be helpful to students elsewhere. In his e-mail, Stearns said three students in his courses this fall received failing grades for plagiarism. Rampant academic dishonesty “fits into a larger pattern of behavior in China” that includes widespread sale of pirated DVDs and a disregard for international intellectual property standards, he added. Stearns said in the letter one Peking University sociology professor who copied an entire book into Chinese and published it in his own name did not lose his job when he was caught. “China ignores international intellectual property rights,” Stearns said. “ sees nothing wrong in copying my textbook, for example, in complete violation of international copyright agreements, causing me to lose income, stealing from me quite directly. No one in China seems to care.” In a message circulated at Peking University, the dean of the College of Life Sciences at Peking, Yi Rao, vowed that any faculty member he has hired since assuming his position would be fired if found to have been academically dishonest. “We do encounter many problems,” Rao said in his message, “but it is the hope for an increasingly better future that keep us working to improve the university, to make it great in one day when it contributes more to the world than it takes from the world.” “We will regain our long held tradition of honesty and trust,” he said. Stearns, meanwhile, said he met with senior administrators at Peking before returning to the United States last month and was assured the university would take his feedback to heart. “They told me that they took plagiarism very seriously and are going to work actively to reduce it,” he said, adding, “Their stance is constructive and gives hope.” But the professor is not the only one to raise questions about academic integrity at Peking University. In an e-mail message, a Yale senior, who studied abroad through the Peking program last spring said the university “definitely” had a more relaxed attitude toward plagiarism than Yale. The student, who asked to remain anonymous, said he and another Yalie who participated in the program both witnessed overt acts of plagiarism while at Peking. “All of both witnessed and heard about … acts of plagiarism,” said the senior. “We had Chinese partners in many of our classes who would take excerpts from books without notating them or changing them in any way.” Copying and pasting from Internet sources was also common, the student said. Students were never told they could not lift material word-for-word and present it as their own, the student said. Academic corruption is widespread across China, according to experts on higher education in China. Fang Shi-min, a Chinese molecular biologist and de facto plagiarism watchdog, told the Chronicle last year that he has tracked nearly 500 cases of plagiarism and other forms of misconduct at the country’s leading universities, which he chronicles on a Web site devoted to the subject. And last year, more than 100 top academics across the country signed an open letter urging Chinese officials to crack down on academic corruption “Even when a case is exposed,” Fang told the Chronicle, “the university will usually try to cover it up — particularly when the accused is a big shot — to protect the fame and gain of the university.” Yale administrators who oversee the Peking University–Yale University Joint Undergraduate Program could not immediately be reached for comment. Peking University, sometimes called “the Harvard of China,” has a student body of about 30,000, including 15,000 undergraduates. It is also a member of the International Alliance of Research Universities, the ten-school consortium of which Yale was a founding member. 注释:本文转自《耶鲁新闻报》(Yale News,作者:Thomas Kaplan)
20 次阅读|0 个评论
[转载]Stephen Cole Kleene (斯蒂芬·科尔·克林或克莱尼)
geneculture 2012-7-21 18:49
Stephen Cole Kleene Born: 5 Jan 1909 in Hartford, Connecticut, USA Died: 25 Jan 1994 in Madison, Wisconsin, USA Stephen C Kleene 's father was Gustav Adolph Kleene , a professor of economics at Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut at the time of his son's birth. He remained there for the rest of his career. He retired, becoming professor emeritus, and died at his summer home in Union, Maine in August 1946. This home was on a farm in Maine which had been Gustav's father's and both Gustav and his son Stephen considered this farm their 'real home.' Gustav wrote books such as The problem of medical charity (1904) and Profit and wages: A study in the distribution of income (1916). Stephen 's mother was Alice Lena Cole who was a poet and writer of plays. Before marrying she published poems such as The lawsuit published in The Youth's Companion (1892), The dead bee published in The Century (1899), The lost spell published in Atlantic Monthly (1900) and Escape published in Atlantic Monthly (1900). After her marriage she published KIRSTIN; KIRSTIN. Play in Four Acts (1914) under her married name Alice Cole Kleene. It was described by a critic in the New York Times as a "pretty play with graceful lyrics." Stephen Kleene studied for his first degree at Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts, being awarded his Bachelor's Degree summa cum laude in 1930. He then went to Princeton University where his doctoral studies were supervised by Alonso Church . It had been Oswald Veblen who had proposed that the development of logic required careful analysis by mathematicians . Church , one of Veblen 's students, had been appointed to Princeton in 1929 and was making remarkable advances in this area. J Barkley Rosser was also a doctoral student of Church 's at Princeton, arriving in 1933 while Kleene was there. It was certainly an exciting place to be undertaking research applying mathematical techniques to logic with visitors such as Kurt Gdel - Kleene attended a course he gave at the Institute for Advanced Study. Kleene received a doctorate from Princeton for his thesis entitled A Theory of Positive Integers in Formal Logic in 1934 . He writes in the Introduction to his thesis: ... we shall be concerned primarily with the development of the system of logic based on a set of postulates proposed by A Church . Our object is to demonstrate empirically that the system is adequate for the theory of positive integers, by exhibiting a construction of a significant portion of the theory within the system. By carrying out the construction on the basis of a certain subset of Church 's formal axioms, we show that this portion at least of the theory of positive integers can be deduced from logic without the use of the notions of negation, class, and description . After the award of his doctorate Kleene taught at Princeton until he joined the University of Wisconsin at Madison as an Instructor in 1935. He was promoted to Assistant Professor at Wisconsin in 1937 before leaving in 1941 (unhappy at his failure to be promoted) to become Assistant Professor back at Amherst College where he had studied for his first degree. In 1942 he married Nancy Elliot ; they had four children, Paul, Kenneth, Bruce, and Nancy . Nancy Elliot was the daughter of George Roy Elliott, professor of English at Amherst College and a literary critic who specialized in Shakespeare. Also in 1942 Kleene left Amherst College to undertake war service with the US Navy as a navigation instructor at the Naval Reserve Midshipmen's School in New York. Later he was a project director at the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington DC . By the time he left the navy after the end of World War II, Kleene had risen to the rank of lieutenant commander . He returned to the University of Wisconsin at Madison in 1946 as an associate professor being promoted to full professor two years later. In 1964 he was named Cyrus C Duffee Professor and continued to hold that chair until he retired in 1979. He served two terms as the Chair of the Department of Mathematics and one term as the Chair of the Department of Numerical Analysis (later renamed the Department of Computer Science). He also served as Dean of the College of Letters and Science in 1969-74. During his years at the University of Wisconsin he was thesis advisor to 13 Ph.D. students. In 1970 Kleene's wife Nancy died. Eight years later he remarried Jeanne Steinmetz. He died of pneumonia aged 85. Kleene's research was on the theory of algorithms and recursive function theory , an area which he created and retained an interest in throughout his life. He developed the field of recursion theory with Church , Gdel , Turing and others. He contributed to mathematical Intuitionism which had been founded by Brouwer . In particular he lectured on Recursive functions and intuitionistic mathematics at the International Congress of Mathematicians in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 1950 . In this lecture he spoke about how his interpretation of intuitionistic number theory by means of a "realization" might extend to intuitionistic set theory . He explored these ideas further in the book The foundations of intuitionistic mathematics, especially in relation to recursive functions (1965) written jointly with Richard Vesley. Chapters I, II, and IV of the book were written by Kleene while Chapter III is by Vesley. G Kreisel writes in a review:- Chapter I is by far the best introduction to intuitionistic logic which is at present available for a mathematical logician. Michael Dummett, a leading authority, was also greatly impressed:- ... chapter one of this book provides the first systematic exposition of the foundations of intuitionist analysis set out as an axiomatic system treating Brouwer 's fan theorem, the bar theorem, and the continuity principle ( called Brouwer 's principle ) . In these respects, this was far superior to the earlier well-known axiomatization by Heyting . Kleene's work on recursion theory helped to provide the foundations of theoretical computer science . By providing methods of determining which problems are soluble, Kleene's work led to the study of which functions can be computed. He spent the summer of 1951 at the RAND Corporation and discovered an important characterisation of finite automata. His RAND report on his work that summer has been very influential for theoretical computer science. At a lecture in the University of Chicago in 1995, Robert Soare described Kleene's work in these terms:- Kleene's formulation of computable function via six schemata is one of the most succinct and useful, and his previous work on lambda functions played a major role in supporting Church 's Thesis that these classes coincide with the intuitively calculable functions . From 1930's on Kleene more than any other mathematician developed the notions of computability and effective process in all their forms both abstract and concrete, both mathematical and philosophical. He tended to lay the foundations for an area and then move on to the next, as each successive one blossomed into a major research area in his wake. Kleene developed a diverse array of topics in computability: the arithmetical hierarchy, degrees of computability, computable ordinals and hyperarithmetic theory, finite automata and regular sets with enormous consequences for computer science, computability on higher types, recursive realizability for intuitionistic arithmetic with consequences for philosphy and for program correctness in computer science. Kleene's best known books are Introduction to Metamathematics (1952) and Mathematical Logic (1967). Kleene writes in the first of these :- The aim of this book is to provide a connected introduction to the subjects of mathematical logic and recursive functions in particular, and to the newer foundational investigations in general. J R Shoenfield, reviewing the second, writes:- The growth of the undergraduate curriculum in mathematics has given rise to a number of texts treating serious mathematical results in a slower and more detailed manner than is customary in graduate texts . Since the number of such texts in the field of logic is quite small, this book by an outstanding authority in the field is especially welcome. ... The author clearly feels that a fairly thorough treatment of a few topics is preferable to a little bit of everything . ... Difficult proofs are broken down into a large number of simple cases ; some of these cases are usually left to the reader. There are many illuminating examples; the author is usually more interested in giving enough examples to illustrate the important points of the proof than in giving complete details of the proof. Clarity and simplicity are never sacrificed for elegance. Historical notes and bibliographical references are frequent, but are not allowed to overshadow the mathematics. Among the awards and honours that Kleene received for his outstanding contributions we mention the Leroy P Steele Prize which he was awarded by the American Mathematical Society in 1983:- .. for three important papers which formed the basis for later developments in generalized recursion theory and descriptive set theory "Arithmetical predicates and function quantifiers", "On the forms of the predicates in the theory of constructive ordinals ( second paper ) ", and "Hierarchies of number-theoretic predicates". Perhaps his most prestigious award was the National Medal of Science presented by President Bush at a White House East Room Ceremony on 13 November 1990:- For his leadership in the theory of recursion and effective computability and for developing it into a deep and broad field of mathematical research . Other honours included election to the National Academy of Sciences (1969), election as President of the Association for Symbolic Logic (1956-58), president of the International Union of the History and the Philosophy of Science (1961) and of the Union's Division of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (1960-62). He was editor of the Journal of Symbolic Logic for twelve years. In , Keisler describes Kleene's interests outside mathematics:- Kleene had a strong interest in nature and the environment and visited his family farm in Maine almost every summer. He discovered a variety of butterfly Beloria Todde Ammiralis Ba Kleenei. He was an avid climber and, until well into his seventies, led the biannual logic picnic at Madison ( now the Kleene Memorial Logic Picnic ) on hikes up the cliffs at Devil's Lake. Steve Kleene's knowledge of mushrooms was legendary. Mac Lane . in , recounts an experience climbing with Kleene:- In 1949 he and I, about to attend a meeting at Dartmouth of the American Mathematical Society , got together on a project to climb all the peaks in the Presidential range, and we were joined by a third climber, a vacationing bellhop. Then, as we three stood finally on top of the last peak ( Mount Madison ) , a thunderstorm struck. Kleene bounded down from the peak shouting, "Get down; it's lightning." I stepped down a bit, searched for our third companion only to find him flat on the ground, unconscious. Steve ( quicker by way of his height ) went down to the Madison Pass hut for help. When we got the injured man there we found that the lightning had singed his scalp and left a blister on his foot opposite a hobnail. We ferried him to a hospital, and I ( complete with a burned-out seat of the pants ) notified his employer at the elegant Eastern Slopes Inn. He later recovered. Steve and I continued to climb assorted mountains and Steve kept on rock climbing. Keisler also describes his personality:- Although a private man, he was a skilful and enthusiastic teller of anecdotes. He possessed a powerful voice that always made it possible for others to know without seeing him whether he was in the maths building. Article by: J J O'Connor and and E F Robertson Click on this link to see a list of the Glossary entries for this page List of References (8 books/articles) Mathematicians born in the same country Honours awarded to Stephen C Kleene (Click below for those honoured in this way) Speaker at International Congress 1958 AMS Steele Prize 1983 Cross-references in MacTutor History Topics: Word problems for groups Other Web sites Encyclopaedia Britannica Mathematical Genealogy Project from: http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Kleene.html
个人分类: 学术研究|1 次阅读|0 个评论
Notes——Mathmatica for theoretical physics:Baumann【1】
Irasater 2012-5-20 15:16
Recently I have read the book that was written by Gerd Baumann.The following blog articles will be the Readnots for Mathmatica for theoretical physics. Introduction Mathematica is a computer algebra system which allows the following calculations: symbolic numeric graphical acoustic.Mathematica was developed by Stephen Wolfram in the 1980s and is nowavailable for more than 15 years on a large number of computers for different operating systems (PC, HP, SGI, SUN, NeXT, VAX, etc.).Before discussing the solution steps for several problems of theoretical physics, we will present a short overview of the organization of Mathematica. If we wish to terminate our calculations and exit the Mathematica environment,we type the termination function Quit := and the related output label is Out =. an exponent is generated by CTRL+6 on your keyboard.Multiplication of two numbers can be done in two ways. In this book, the multiplication sign is replaced by a blank: 2 5=2*5 For each Mathematica function, you will find a short description of its functionality and its purpose if you type the name of the function preceded by a question mark. For example, the description of Solve .Integration of a function is executed byIntegrate . The expansion of a function f(t) in a Taylor series around t = 0 up to third order is given by Series , {t, 0, 3}].The calculation of a finite sum follows from. The Laplace transform of the function Sin is calculated using the standard function LaplaceTransform ,t,s] Classical Mechanics Classical mechanics denotes the theory of motion of particles and particle systems under conditions in which Heisenberg's uncertainty principle has essentially no effect on the motion and,therefore, may be neglected. It is the mechanics of Galilei, Newton, Lagrange, and Hamilton and it is now extended to include the mechanics of Einstein. Atpresent, the most refined form of theoretical physics is called quantum field theory, and the theory most accurately confirmed by experiment is a special case of quantum field theory called quantum electrodynamics. According to this discipline, the interactions among electrons, positrons, and electromagnetic radiation have been computed and shown to agree with the results of experiment with an over all accuracy of 1 part in 10 9 . Unfortunately, analogous attempts to describe the interactions among mesons, hyperons, and nucleons are at present unsuccessful. This section introduces some of the mathematical tools necessary to efficiently describe mechanical systems. The basic tools discussed are coordinates, transformations, scalars, vectors, tensors, vector products, derivatives, and integral relations for scalars and vector fields. We must now establish rules whereby it is possible to multiply two matrices. Let us take a column matrix for the coordinates. The multiplication of a matrix A and a matrix B is defined only if the number of columns of A is equal to the number of rows of B. For such a case, the product A.B is given by It is evident that matrix multiplication is not commutative.(A.B is not equal to B.A) An important operation on a matrix is the transposition.The transposition of a matrix A is denoted by A T Another property of matrices is that any matrix multiplied by the identity matrix is unaffected.The problem is to find the inverse matrix such that In Mathematica, the inverse of a matrix is calculated by the function Inverse[].For orthogonal matrices, there exist a connection between the inverse matrix and the transposed matrix. This connection is This symbol was introduced by Leopold Kronecker (1823–1891). the combination of two or more numbers in an array are called vectors.Vectors consist of components specifying a direction in space. The term vector is used to indicate a quantity that has both magnitude (a scalar) and direction. A vector is often represented by an arrow or a directed line segment. The length of the arrow represents the magnitude of the vector and the arrow points in the direction of the vector. Physical quantities can be of still higher complexity than scalars and vectors. For example, the inertia of a rigid body is described by a tensor. Tensors are distinguished by their rank. The combination of n vectors in an array generates, in general, an n-rank tensor. In this scheme, scalars are tensors of rank zero and vectors are first-rank tensors. We next consider another method for the combination of two vectors, the so-called vector product or cross-product. For example, the angular momentum of a body is defined as Angular momentum = Radius arm ä Linear momentum= Distance * Linear momentum* sin( ).First, we assert that this operation ä does, in fact, produce a vector. The product considered here actually produces an axial vector, but the term vector product will be used in order to be consistent with popular usage The gradient of a scalar function is of extreme importance in physics expressing the relation between a force field and a potential field. The successive operation of the gradient operator produces This important product operator is called the Laplacian and is also written The vector which results from the volume integration of a vector function throughout a volume V is given by The integral over the surface S of the projection of a vector function onto that surface is defined to be where da is an infinitesimal element of area of the surface.we calculate the work done with a force exerted on a particle that varies along the path, . where we used the Einstein summation convention to sum over the m components. Moving Particle Motion on a Helix As a first example of kinematics, let us consider the motion of a bead with constant orbital velocity confined to a helix. This motion can be divided into two parts. Motion of a Projectile we neglect the air resistance. Furthermore, we consider only kinematics; we also demand that the projectile follows a parabolic orbit with a vertical symmetry axis and with constant horizontal velocity. The motion of the ball takes place in a three-dimensional space; thus, the velocity and the location of the ball is a certain vector with three components, respectively. The general equation of the path yHxL can be obtained be eliminating the variable t in the track representation:
个人分类: Notes|2192 次阅读|0 个评论
组学的未来
kejidaobao 2012-5-10 11:14
文/贾 伟 Stephen Friend(曾经是国际著名的制药公司Merck Co.的副总裁,现在是Sage Bionetworks的总裁)曾对“组学”的未来作了极具煽情的展望: 今天,“组学”在我们的生物学中已经到了无处不在的地步,而在未来的25年内,它们将在生物学中占据“老大”的地位——如果还不是垄断地位的话。为什么这么说呢?因为我们正在经历着一种专家们称之为“相位移动”式的技术进步,这种新的科学技术将不仅动摇我们知识大厦的根基,而且会改变我们对自身(生命)的看法。换句话说,如同一场技术革命的东风,“组学”注定将吹遍并改变我们生存社会的每一个角落。 作为组学研究队伍中的一个成员,我不确定是否完全赞同Friend对组学技术的这种(准确地说是)抬到了至高无上的极至地位的评价。但这几年来我的确能感受到西方科学从“点”到“面”到“系统”的思维认识上的“相位移动”,而组学技术无疑是实现这种“相位移动”的最为有效的科学工具。 组学(Omics)包含了很多个具体的组学技术。基因组学(Genomics)主要研究生物系统的基因结构组成,即DNA的序列和表达;转录组学(Transcriptomics)是在整体水平上研究细胞中基因转录的情况及转录调控规律的一门学科;蛋白组学(Proteomics)主要研究由生物系统表达的蛋白质及其由外部刺激引起的差异;代谢组学(Metabolomics)则研究生物体(包括细胞、组织或个体)在不同条件下所产生的代谢产物的变化。 什么是代谢组学呢?我们知道生物体由基因调控下的生化反应以及与环境相互作用所形成的所有的生命活动几乎都发生在代谢层面,都会在代谢物的范围内留下变化印迹。我们称细胞内的代谢物变化为代谢指纹(Metabolic Fingerprints),细胞外的代谢物变化为代谢足迹(Metabolic Footprints),生物体的代谢组实质上最接近于其生理表型,在这个角度下,也可以说我们的生物世界其实是由各种代谢组组成的,也正是这些不同的代谢组让我们生物界呈现出五彩缤纷、气象万千的表型。地球上的各种植物含有几十万种(大约25—50万种植物化学分子)代谢物,微生物包含几万种代谢物,而哺乳动物体内拥有5—7千种小分子代谢物(分子量小于1500)。这三类代谢组互相渗透,循环往复,植物和微生物的代谢物通过食物、营养补充、药物等形式进入我们人体的代谢网络,也使我们每一个人的代谢表型呈现出各自的特征。 由于组学技术一次分析能够观察到成百上千的生化指标的变化,在疾病诊断和生物标志物的发现方面已经“登堂入室”,开始强势进入主流的研究领域。以药物基因组为例,一个病人的独特的DNA序列对单个药物反应的相互关系可以用来判断其治疗效果和副作用,从而找到与该病人个体基因组或单核苷酸多态性(SNP)相契合的最佳疗法。目前药物基因组学已经进入临床,开始扮演起支撑临床个体化医学发展的转化医学技术体系的核心角色,国际上正在广泛开展的肿瘤代谢研究就是一个新兴的传统分子生物学结合代谢组学的研究方向,该方向积聚了大量的来自于医药企业和高校研究机构的研究人员,他们通过代谢组学的手段探测肿瘤分子内的特征性代谢异常,然后采用其他手段如蛋白质分析或分子药理学等方法对关键代谢酶和调控基因进行表征并施加影响,以寻找新型的肿瘤治疗药物靶点。Friend在这篇短文中展望:在不久的将来……研究人员、患者和医生之间的关系就好比人人皆可编辑的维基百科中词条编辑者、审核者和登录维基获取知识的大众读者一样。人们会发现运用组学信息,他们也可以成为疾病模型的搭建者,像飞行中的副驾驶员和机长商量飞行方案一样,跟医生一起决定什么情况下用什么药物,或制订和实施新的治疗方案。 组学的发展现状有“君临天下”的态势,其应用前景是辉煌灿烂的。但需要认识到的是,它的实质也就是一种科研工具,并不能包打天下!作为一个从事或即将从事组学研究的实验室应该头脑清醒,把握好趋势,寻找好自己的位置和发展契机。以我不成熟的观点来看,未来几年组学技术将以前所未有的速度商品化,我们日常科研工作中需要的绝大多数组学工具将成为一种服务,可以按较低廉的价格从专业公司购买到,因此对于尚未搭建组学平台的许多科研实体,需要详细地调研和冷静地思考是否有必要花巨资(一哄而上)进行这样的重复性(甚至是低水平)建设。另外,组学技术将进一步自动化和规模化。从代谢组学的领域来看,我个人预计未来3—5年将有一系列简便实用的新技术问世,它们包括① 高通量、全定量代谢组学技术,针对大批量生物样本尤其是临床样本进行全谱分析;② 采用同位素标记物质的代谢通量分析技术,针对性地研究某一关键代谢通路中的代谢物流量的动态变化和代谢节点(代谢酶)的功能;③ 代谢组试剂盒,市场将推出针对某一类代谢物进行定量的代谢组试剂盒,如胆碱类代谢物、脂肪酸类代谢物等。因此,从事组学技术研究的实验室需要寻找该技术领域内的不足之处,通过“错位竞争”建立自己的技术优势和平台特点,避免旷日持久的全面铺开建设或依样画葫芦式的跟踪性研究。另外,不同组学技术之间的交叉使用和数据关联,组学技术和传统的分子生物学手段有机结合都将是未来转化医学研究的重要手段。 每个时代都有流行曲,我们生命科学界昨天时兴的是基因,今天是组学,明天又会是什么呢?还会有比组学更新的技术问世的。在时间的纬度里,不断变幻着的是技术工具,不变的,是我们心里的Science。 (源自科学网2012-3-25博客,有删节) (责任编辑 王芷)
个人分类: 栏目:科技纵横捭阖|4128 次阅读|0 个评论
[转载]Stephen S. Roach: America's Renminbi Fixation
whyhoo 2012-5-2 10:57
For seven years, the United States has allowed its fixation on the renminbi’s exchange rate to deflect attention from far more important issues in its economic relationship with China. The upcoming Strategic and Economic Dialogue between the US and China (May 3-4 in Beijing) is an excellent opportunity to examine – and rethink – America’s priorities. Since 2005, the US Congress has repeatedly flirted with legislation aimed at defending hard-pressed American workers from the presumed threat of a cheap Chinese currency. Bipartisan support for such a measure surfaced when Senators Charles Schumer (a liberal Democrat from New York) and Lindsey Graham (a conservative Republican from South Carolina) introduced the first Chinese currency bill. The argument for legislative action is tantalizingly simple: the US merchandise trade deficit has averaged a record 4.4% of GDP since 2005, with China accounting for fully 35% of the shortfall, supposedly owing to its currency manipulation. The Chinese, insists a broad coalition of politicians, business leaders, and academic economists, must revalue or face sanctions. This reasoning resonates with the US public. Opinion polls conducted in 2011 found that fully 61% of Americans believe that China represents a serious economic threat. As such, the currency debate looms as a major issue in the upcoming US presidential campaign. “Enough is enough,” President Barack Obama replied, when queried on the renminbi in the aftermath of his last meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao. Obama’s presumptive Republican challenger, Mitt Romney, has promised to declare China guilty of currency manipulation the day he takes office. But, however appealing this logic may be, it is wrong. First, America’s trade deficit is multilateral: the US ran deficits with 88 nations in 2010. A multilateral imbalance – especially one that it is traceable to a saving shortfall – cannot be fixed by putting pressure on a bilateral exchange rate. Indeed, America’s major threat is from within. Blaming China merely impedes the heavy lifting that must be done at home – namely, boosting saving by cutting budget deficits and encouraging households to save income rather than rely on asset bubbles. Second, the renminbi has now appreciated 31.4% against the dollar since mid-2005, well in excess of the 27.5% increase called for by the original Schumer-Graham bill. Mindful of the lessons of Japan – especially its disastrous concession on sharp yen appreciation in the Plaza Accord of 1985 – the Chinese have opted, instead, for a gradual revaluation. Recent moves toward renminbi internationalization, a more open capital account, and wider currency trading bands leave little doubt that the endgame is a market-based, fully convertible renminbi. Third, there has been significant improvement in China’s external imbalance. The International Monetary Fund estimates that China’s current-account surplus will narrow to just 2.3% of GDP in 2012, after peaking at 10.1% in 2007. American officials have long bemoaned China’s saving glut as a major source of global instability. But they should look in the mirror: America’s current-account deficit this year, at an estimated $510 billion, is likely to be 2.8 times higher than China’s surplus. Finally, China has evolved from the world’s factory to its assembly line. Research shows that no more than 20% to 30% of Chinese exports to the US reflect value added inside China. Roughly 60% of Chinese exports represent shipments of “foreign invested enterprises” – in effect, Chinese subsidiaries of global multinationals. Think Apple. Globalized production platforms distort bilateral trade data between the US and China, and have little to do with the exchange rate. Rather than vilifying China as the principal economic threat to America, the relationship should be recast as an opportunity. The largest component of US aggregate demand – the consumer – is on ice. With households focused on repairing severely damaged balance sheets, inflation-adjusted private consumption has expanded at an anemic 0.5% average annual rate over the past four years. Consumer deleveraging is likely to persist for years to come, leaving the US increasingly desperate for new sources of growth. Exports top the list of possibilities. China is now America’s third largest and most rapidly growing export market. There can be no mistaking its potential to fill some of the void left by US consumers. The key to realizing that opportunity lies in access to Chinese markets – all the more significant in light of China’s upcoming pro-consumption rebalancing. Historically, China has had an open development model, with imports running at 28% of GDP since 2002 – nearly three times Japan’s 10% import ratio during its high-growth era (1960-1989). As a result, for a given increment of domestic demand, China is far more predisposed toward foreign sourcing. As the Chinese consumer emerges, demand for a wide variety of US-made goods – ranging from new-generation information technology and biotech to automotive components and aircraft – could surge. The same is true of services. At just 43% of GDP, China’s services sector is relatively tiny. There is enormous scope for America’s global services companies to expand in China, especially in transactions-intensive distribution sectors – wholesale and retail trade, domestic transportation, and supply-chain logistics, as well as in the processing segments of finance, health care, and data warehousing. The US needs to refocus the US-China trade agenda toward expanded market access in these and other areas – pushing back against Chinese policies and government procurement practices that favor domestic production and indigenous innovation. Some progress has been made, but more is needed – for example, getting China to join the World Trade Organization’s Government Procurement Agreement. At the same time, the US should reconsider antiquated Cold War restrictions on Chinese purchases of technology-intensive items. For a growth-starved US, the opportunities of market access far outweigh the currency threat. The long-dormant Chinese consumer is about to be unleashed. This plays to one of America’s greatest strengths – its zeal to compete in new markets. Shame on the US if it squanders this extraordinary chance by digging in its heels with same timeworn approach in its imminent Economic and Strategic Dialogue with China. Stephen S. Roach, a member of the faculty at Yale University, was formerly Chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia, and is the author of The Next Asia. 原文见 http://www.chinausfocus.com/slider/americas-renminbi-fixation-2/
个人分类: 外交|1191 次阅读|0 个评论
[转载]Stephen Greenblatt wins Pulitzer prize
davidzsguo 2012-4-21 13:59
[转载]Stephen Greenblatt wins Pulitzer prize
The Swerve: How the World Became Modern 是一本研究古罗马的书,得了两个奖。 Established in the will of newspaper publisher Joseph Pulitzer in 1904, the Pulitzer Prize is among the most prestigious honors in U.S. journalism and literature. L ast year, Stephen Greenblatt, the John Cogan University Professor of the Humanities, took home a National Book Award for nonfiction for “ The Swerve: How the World Became Modern .” Today he was recognized with another prestigious literary prize. Greenblatt’s book, which describes how an ancient Roman philosophical epic helped pave the way for modern thought, was awarded the 2012 Pulitzer Prize for general nonfiction . In its citation, the Pulitzer board described “The Swerve” as “a provocative book arguing that an obscure work of philosophy, discovered nearly 600 years ago, changed the course of history by anticipating the science and sensibilities of today.” The book tells the story of Lucretius’ “ On the Nature of Things ,” which 2,000 years ago posited a number of revolutionary ideas — that the universe functioned without the aid of gods, that religious fear was damaging to human life, and that matter was made up of very small particles in eternal motion, colliding and swerving in new directions. Once thought lost, the poem was rediscovered on a library shelf in the winter of 1417 by a Poggio Bracciolini. The copying and translation of the book fueled the Renaissance, inspiring artists such as Botticelli and thinkers such as Giordano Bruno; shaped the thought of Galileo and Freud , Darwin and Einstein ; and had a revolutionary influence on writers such as Montaigne and Shakespeare and even Thomas Jefferson . Greenblatt’s book argues that the influence of Lucretius’ work washed over modern thought like a tidal wave, anticipating not only social thought, but whole branches of modern science. “It argues that the universe consists of atoms, void, and nothing else,” Greenblatt explained earlier this year at the third in a series of book talks given by Harvard faculty and alumni as part of Wintersession programming. “The atoms are eternal and always moving. Everything comes into existence simply because of the random movement of atoms, which, given enough time, will form and reform, constantly experimenting with different configurations of matter from which will eventually emerge everything we know, and into which everything we know will collapse.” Other parts of the poem presage Darwin’s theory of evolution, and suggest that humanity is not at the center of the universe, physically or spiritually. Lucretius argued that “the universe wasn’t created for human beings,” said Greenblatt. “Humans are not unique. The Earth is not the center of the universe. There are an infinite number of worlds. The soul is a material thing, just like the body. Therefore, there’s no afterlife, and no judgment, rewards, or punishments. The moral order that we have exists simply because we need to organize societies as cooperative beings. And the highest goal in life would have to be not pain or piety but pleasure, which all creatures seek.”
2011 次阅读|0 个评论
[转载]揭开美国顶尖生物医学实验室成功的法宝
热度 1 孙学军 2012-4-21 11:46
本人很少转发博文,但此文很有价值,特此转发 --- 仅以此文奉献给我的母校哈尔滨医科大学 2005年3月我有幸加盟了哈佛医学院布里根妇女医院(Brigham and Women’s Hospital)Stephen Elledge 实验室,在Elledge 教授直接领导下工作了整整六个年头。Stephen Elledge (后文皆称Steve)是美国生物医学界天才级科学家,他博士毕业于麻省理工学院(MIT)生物学系,在斯坦福大学生物化学系做的博士后。1989年成为著名的贝勒医学院(Baylor Medical College )生物化学系的助理教授。短短几年后便于 1993年当选为霍华德休斯医学研究所的研究员(HHMI Investigator)。2003 年他当选为美国科学院院士。2003年初,他被美国哈佛医学院布里根妇女医院特聘为遗传学冠名终身教授。他在多个研究领域,如细胞周期调控、DNA 损伤应答机制、肿瘤细胞生物学、泛素连接酶的组成与调控、新型生物技术的开发与利用以及病毒的感染机制方面均有杰出贡献。他发现肿瘤抑癌基因TP53的直接下游靶点为P21,他发现DNA 损伤后ATM、ATR蛋白激酶激活下游CHK1、CHK2等信号传导通路,他发现抑癌基因REST、PTPN12等,揭示泛素连接酶F-box 家族,优化了酵母双杂交系统(Yeast two hybrid system)、Magic DNA 载体高通量转换系统、全蛋白组水平分析蛋白稳定性的GPS 系统及与Gregory Hannon 首创小发卡核苷酸干扰文库(shRNA library)。50岁出头的他,光在Cell 、Nature 、Science 杂志上就已经发表了二十几篇文章,其数量与质量就是在哈佛医学院这样大师云集的地方也名列前茅。Steve 的科研思维与科研能力当属超一流,他堪称科学家中的科学家。在Steve 手下先后工作的中国同胞为数不少,其中很多人颇有成就,但能够回归祖国并将Steve 实验室成功经验总结出来的人不多。现在我就将我在他实验室工作的感受写出来,呈献给国内广大的生物医学科技工作者,特别是正在成长的、肩负承上启下重任的轻年科学家们。希望我的文章能对他们的成长有所启迪和帮助,这样便达到了我写作此文的初衷。下述内容很多都是我的亲历亲为,所有证据皆出自已经发表的文献,所有的观点仅代表我个人的观点,如有争议,本人因时间和精力有限,恕我不能回应。 成功法宝之一,选择最重大的科研方向。第1,研究对人类健康危害最严重的重大疾病,如恶性肿瘤、HIV感染,探索它们发生发展的机制、寻找新的药物治疗靶点。揭示肿瘤细胞周期调控、DNA 损伤与修复、细胞转化因子、影响HIV 、HBV、HCV等病毒感染的宿主因子是Steve实验室正在探索的关键性问题。研究上述课题还有一个比较实际的好处就是,美国的科研经费大部分是投在上述领域,这样就保证了他的实验室在经费资助方面有一个比较持续和稳定的态式。第2,功能筛选是关键。生物学研究有很多方式和方法,Steve 最推崇遗传学功能筛选(Functional Genetic Screen)。为了达到课题的新颖性和原创性,他一般不去做别人已经领跑的项目, 而是通过测定细胞周期检测点、细胞老化、病毒感染率等指标,筛查全基因组中的相关调控因子,然后从待选基因中,选择有价值的进行功能性验证。他所发表的文章多数是此种研究套路的结晶。第3,善于开发并利用新的生物技术。Steve 有一个观点,他认为新生物技术的创立是基础科学研究和应用技术创新的原动力。近几十年来,以获得过诺贝尔奖的生物技术为例,从单克隆抗体杂交瘤技术、PCR技术、核磁共振技术、GFP荧光蛋白示踪技术、蛋白质谱测序技术到RNAi干扰技术均充分证明生物技术的每一次飞跃都会大大推动科学技术的发展,并形成了一系列的相关产业,对人类的经济与社会发展做出重大贡献。他研发的三项标记酵母双杂交系统大大降低了筛选相互作用蛋白质时的假阳性率,他研发的Magic DNA 载体转换系统彻底改变了传统的一对一的、费时费力的限制性内切酶方法,使得DNA载体高通量转换变得轻而易举。GPS 系统使得在全基因组水平筛选泛素连接酶的底物成为现实.。他研发的shRNA 文库已成为功能缺失型筛选的首要工具。最近,他又在开发全蛋白组水平的噬菌体多肽表面展示技术,用它来筛选人体血浆中的肿瘤特异性蛋白,以期发现肿瘤特异性生物标记,为肿瘤的早期发现提供诊断学上的理论依据。 成功法宝之二,选用优秀的人才并合理配置。每年都有很多人发电子邮件给Steve, 要求加入他的试验室团队。我发现他在用人方面有三个特点:第1,名门之后一定要录取。如诺贝尔奖的门生、各领域中大师们的学生。这些人一般都出自美国一流学府,受到很好的科学熏陶。一旦加盟,Steve 均给予苗头较好的课题,使他们在较短的时间内可能有高质量的产出。看来我们老祖宗的名师出高徒,强将手下无弱兵的道理在美国的科学界也是行得通的。第2,后起之秀的门徒,这些人一般出自各类青年才俊的实验室,虽然学校牌子可能不太亮,PI名头不太响,但这些青年才俊正在引领各领域研究的新潮流,部分人正在成为领军性科学家。出自这些实验室的学生们还有另外一个特点,就是大多数都发表过很好的文章,而且他们在实验技能方面的训练也比较正规和系统。最后一类人,既没有美国的学校教育背景,也没有经大师或后起之秀的熏陶,但有却几篇像样的文章,并有丰富的实验经验,Steve 也会将他们纳入门下,让他们承担一些周期长、风险大的课题,主要是为实验室的可持续性发展提供潜在性课题,并为苗头好的项目进行技术方面的配合及支持,使该课题得以快速推进。 成功法宝之三,严密而科学的管理模式。他的实验室配备有行政秘书(Administrative Assistant)一名,一般仅有高中以上学历,对科学了解甚少,主要负责日常的人事安排、试剂订购、财政预算及与管理部门之间的沟通。还配备有实验室主任一名(Lab Manager)一般是由本土资深博士后担当,此人主要负责特殊试剂的订购,仪器的使用与维护,及与试剂公司、仪器公司进行沟通。这样Steve 本人基本不过问这方面的问题,从而使得他可以全身心地投入到与科研相关的工作中。在科研管理方面,每周二上午9:30-11:00是文献阅读活动时间(Journal Club),每次出两个人各自讲解一篇文章,文章的选择上以跟本人课题相关的,发表在Cell、Nature、Science杂志上的文章为主,也可选择一些非相关性领域但有重要理论指导意义或技术应用价值的文章。每个讲解人均要回答Steve及其他同事的提问。这个文献阅读活动的好处是促使讲解人认真阅读文章内容并整理有关背景知识,是一种很好的科学训练过程,当然Steve本人及实验室的其他同事们也获得一次学习交流的机会。实验室每周四上午12:00-13:00是实验室会议时间(Lab Meeting),每次出一个研究生或博士后报告其课题的最近进展情况,包括基础背景知识、近期数据汇报和下一步发展方向,每个人大约不到半年就要轮上一次。这种实验室会议对课题的进展具有极大的促进作用,每个人都得非常认真的准备,并加班加点以期增加阳性数据,希望能够通过Steve及周围同事的检验。一般在每次实验室会议结束之时会有一个不到五分钟的实验室管理上的讨论,这时多数是实验室主任提几个试验或者仪器方面的注意事项,但一般非常简短,Steve一般不会过多干预,仅问问解决方案是什么。因此Steve实验室会议主要是课题进展汇报会。每星期五从上午9:00 到下午15:00是面对面汇报时间(Friday Meeting),每次由秘书安排六个人轮流进入Steve的办公室向他汇报近期的工作及遇到的问题,一般每人每次面谈需要大约30分钟,并要携带上原始数据让Steve审阅。当然如果一个课题是他最关心的或者是正在准备发文章的时候,他也会随时随地与该作者在试验台边进行沟通。尽管他的实验室有30多人,近20个独立的科研课题, 但通过上述管理模式,他却对每个项目的进展都了如指掌。这种严密的管理也无形中对博士后、研究生们产生了巨大的压力和动力,大家经常夜以继日地做实验,希望尽快得到好的结果。因此在他的实验室里,懒人是根本混不下去的。 成功法宝之四,注重高水平的学术交流。Steve本人是著名科学家,收到的会议邀请自然不少。大家没准猜想他会像个大忙人,经常在天上飞来飞去。其实不然,他很少参加波士顿以外的远程会议,除非是与自己的领域特别相关或非常重要的会议。相反,他却积极参与在哈佛医学院内举行的相关国际学术会议,这样既能够进行学术交流,又不至于浪费很多时间。Steve也积极参与系里举办的学术讲座(Seminar)。他的实验室不仅挂靠在布里根妇女医院,也挂靠在哈佛医学院遗传学系。哈佛医学院遗传学系每周安排某个实验室出一个讲演者汇报课题进展,演讲内容基本上是代表了这个实验室的最新研究进展,Steve实验室非常积极的参与这种讲座。因为哈佛医学院遗传系十几个PI中,光是美国科学院院士就有6人,HHMI研究员也有5人,可见其实力之强悍。其中George Church教授既非院士也非HHMI成员,但他在二代DNA测序技术、合成生物学(Synthetic Biology)、个人化基因组分析(Personal Genome Sequencing)有极大贡献,也是一个像Steve一样的科学天才。与此相反的是Steve对布里根妇女医院遗传系的科研讲座却不冷不热,因为这个医院遗传系的PI们水平大多一般,出类拔萃之辈很少,看来他喜欢与高水平的同行进行学术交流。人以类聚、物以群分,在科学家中也是如此。 成功法宝之五,勤奋出天才。在我的印象里,他极少因为个人的私事不来实验室,即使是出差刚返回波士顿,他也要从机场先回到实验室。一般情况下他星期六、星期日均来到实验室工作,有时候他也会找几个人谈谈研究进展情况。他工作效率极高,从不浪费时间。他喜欢你敲他办公室的门,向他汇报最新的数据,如果有使他欣喜的数据,他会立马停下手头的工作与你进行研究讨论,但如果是他认为不重要的事情,他也会很快打发你。他经常在半夜时分给部下发电子邮件。在我的经历中,不论我什么时候通过电子邮件给他汇报试验进展情况,不出半小时他就会给我回复并加以点评。多么勤奋的Steve呀! 成功法宝之六:精明的处事技巧。虽然美国学术圈非常著重研究实力,但一定的人际交往还是必要的。哈佛医学院遗传学系每周五下午4:30有一个大约一小时的周末聚会活动(happy hour)。每个试验室轮流做东,提供一些小吃及啤酒,研究生、博士后及PI们聚在一块畅所欲言。Steve多数时间会参加此种活动,与大家同吃Pizza饼,喝瓶装啤酒。他非常愿意与别的实验室的PI,研究生、博士后们讨论问题,他这种平易近人的作风也博得别的实验室的好感。另外他对下属按功行赏,对发表了大文章的人有求必应,从善如流。他每年圣诞节都会邀请全实验室的人包括家属及小孩以及他夫人实验室的全班人马到他家进行圣诞节聚会。每当实验室有人找到新工作,有人结婚,有人生小孩,他都会让实验室秘书买吃的或写庆贺卡表示庆祝。有申请他实验室的人,不管申请人能否加入他的实验室,他都出资好好款待,并让申请人给全实验室做一个学术报告。 成功法宝之七,幸福的家庭是后盾。Steve的夫人也是布里根妇女医院的教授,在果蝇X-chromosome功能代偿性调节机制方面有杰出建树,也曾是HHMI前研究员。大家经常看到他和他夫人在哈佛医学院遗传系的讲座上夫唱妇和。我不止一次问过他,“你在事业上如此成功,在生活中也是个顾家的好男人,你是怎么做到的?”他回答说:“很简单”,他在家庭里主要做好三件事,驾驶员(Driver)、采购员(Shopper)和清洁工(Cleaner),这就是他家庭为什么这么和谐。其实熟悉他的人都明白,他大部分精力都投入到科学研究上,正是他的夫人黙黙地承担了大部分家务及孩子的培养教育。 综上所述,可以说Steve的非凡成就主要在于他天资聪慧、头脑敏锐、善于发现机遇、事事都走在别人前头。当大家还在分析RNAi的机制时,他已经在构建shRNA文库了,当大部分人要用shRNA进行功能筛选时,他已经发表了很多成果了。现在勤奋聪明的他又在为他的实验室寻找和积累下一个学科增长点了。从不服输、永争第一正是他性格的真实写照。他的这种性格在他家一年一度的圣诞节乒乓球比赛中也被体现的淋漓尽致。在我所参加的5次圣诞节聚会中,他几乎年年蝉联乒乓球比赛冠军。在我的记忆里,他只输过一次,那是还他故意输给了他的儿子丹尼尔。丹尼尔的球技实在太一般了,但他太想赢得一个乒乓球冠军了,Steve终于极不情愿的把冠军头号让给了丹尼尔,谁叫丹尼尔是他的宝贝儿子! PS:给大家强力推荐此文,写的很不错,可能有的朋友已经看过了,我刚搜索了一下,这个实验室确实很强啊!实验室链接: http://elledgelab.bwh.harvard.edu/index.html
个人分类: 研究生培养|3542 次阅读|0 个评论
[转载]Stephen C. Stearns 教授給研究生的建議 相見恨晚啊!!!
josh 2011-12-26 19:09
转自: http://blog.renren.com/blog/244073669/473431388 作者: 吴浩Tony Stephen C. Stearns 网站: Some Modest Advice for Graduate Students http://www.yale.edu/eeb/stearns/advice.htm 另一篇文章: Designs for Learning http://www.yale.edu/eeb/stearns/designs.htm Always Prepare for the Worst. Some of the greatest catastrophes in graduate education could have been avoided by a little intelligent foresight. Be cynical. Assume that your proposed research might not work, and that one of your faculty advisers might become unsupportive - or even hostile. Plan for alternatives . Nobody cares about you. In fact, some professors care about you and some don't. Most probably do, but all are busy, which means in practice they cannot care about you because they don't have the time. You are on your own, and you had better get used to it. This has a lot of implications. Here are two important ones: 1. You had better decide early on that you are in charge of your progr am. The degree you get is yours to create. Your major professor can advise you and protect you to a certain extent from bureaucratic and financial demons, but he should not tell you what to do. That is up to you . If you need advice, ask for it: that's his job. 2. If you want to pick somebody's brains, you'll have to go to him or her, because they won't be coming to you . You Must Know Why Your Work is Important. When you first arrive, read and think widely and exhaustively for a year . Assume that everything you read is bullshit until the author manages to convince you that it isn't. If you do not understand something, don't feel bad - it's not your fault, it's the author's. He didn't write clearly en ough. If some authority figure tells you that you aren't accomplishing anything because you aren't taking courses and you aren't gathering data, tell him what you're up to. If he persists, tell him to bug off, because you know what you're doing, dammit. This is a hard stage to get through because you will feel guilty about not getting going on your own research. You will continually be asking yourself, "What am I doing here?" Be patient . This stage is critical to your personal development and to maintaining the flow of new ideas into science . Here you decide what constitutes an important problem. You must arrive at this decision independently for two reasons. First, if someone hands you a problem, you won't feel that it is yours, you won't have that possessiveness that makes you want to work on it, defend it, fight for it, and make it come out beautifully. Secondly, your PhD work will shape your future . It is your choice of a field in which to carry out a life's work . It is also important to the dynamic of science that your entry be well thought out. This is one point where you can start a whole new area of research. Remember, what sense does it make to start gathering data if you don't know - and I mean really know - why you're doing it? You must establish a firm psychological stance early in your graduate career to keep from being buffeted by the many demands that will be made on your time . If you don't watch out, the pressures of course work, teaching, language requirements and who knows what else will push you around like a large, docile molecule in Brownian motion . Here are a few things to watch out for: 1. The initiation-rite nature of the PhD and its power to convince you that your value as a person is being judged. No matter how hard you try, you won't be able to avoid this one. No one does. It stems from the open-ended nature of the thesis problem. You have to decide what a "good" thesis is. A thesis can always be made better, which gets you into an infinite regress of possible improvements. Recognize that you cannot produce a "perfect" thesis. There are going to be flaws in it, as there are in everything. Settle down to make it as good as you can within the limits of time, money, energy, encouragement and thought at your disposal. You can alleviate this problem by jumping all the explicit hurdles early in the game. Get all of your course requirements and examinations out of the way as soon as possible . Not only do you thereby clear the decks for your thesis, but you also convince yourself, by successfully jumping each hurdle, that you probably are good enough after all . 2. Nothing elicits dominant behavior like subservient behavior . Expect and demand to be treated like a colleague. The paper requirements are the explicit hurdle you will have to jump, but the implicit hurdle is attaining the status of a colleague. Act like one and you'll be treated like one. 3. Graduate school is only one of the tools that you have at hand for shaping your own development . Be prepared to quit for awhile if something better comes up. There are three good reasons to do this. First, a real opportunity could arise that is more productive and challenging than anything you could do in graduate school and that involves a long enough block of time to justify dropping out. Examples include field work in Africa on a project not directly related to your PhD work, a contract for software development, an opportunity to work as an aide in the nation's capital in the formulation of science policy, or an internship at a major newspaper or magazine as a science journalist. Secondly, only by keeping this option open can you function with true independence as a graduate student. If you perceive graduate school as your only option, you will be psychologically labile, inclined to get a bit desperate and insecure, and you will not be able to give your best. Thirdly, if things really are not working out for you, then you are only hurting yourself and denying resources to others by staying in graduate sc hool. There are a lot of interesting things to do in life besides being a scientist, and in some the job market is a lot better . If science is not turning you on, perhaps you should try something else . However, do not go off half-cocked. This is a serious decision. Be sure to talk to fellow graduate students and sympathetic faculty before making up your mind. Avoid Taking Lectures - They're Usually Inefficient. If you already have a good background in your field, then minimize the number of additional courses you take . This recommendation may seem counterintuitive, but it has a sound basis. Right now, you need to learn how to think for yourself. This requires active engagement, not passive listening and regurgitation. To learn to think, you need two things : large blocks of time , and as much one-on-one interaction as you can get with someone who thinks more clearly than you do . Courses just get in the way, and if you are well motivated, then reading and discussion is much more efficient and broadening than lectures. It is often a good idea to get together with a few colleagues, organize a seminar on a subject of interest, and invite a few faculty to take part. They'll probably be delighted. After all, it will be interesting for them, they'll love your initiative - and it will give them credit for teaching a course for which they don't have to do any work. How can you lose? These comments of course do not apply to courses that teach specific skills : e.g., electron microscopy, histological technique, scuba diving. Write a Proposal and Get It Criticized. A research proposal serves many functions. 1. By summarizing your year's thinking and reading, it ensures that you have gotten something out of it. 2. It makes it possible for you to defend your independence by providing a concrete demonstration that you used your time well. 3. It literally makes it possible for others to help you. What you have in mind is too complex to be communicated verbally - too subtle, and in too many parts. It must be put down in a well-organized, clearly and concisely written document that can be circulated to a few good minds. Only with a proposal before them can they give you constructive criticism. 4. You need practice writing. We all do . 5. Having located your problem and satisfied yourself that it is important, you will have to convince your colleagues that you are not totally demented and, in fact, deserve support . One way to organize a proposal to accomplish this goal is: a. A brief statement of what you propose, couched as a question or hypothesis. b. Why it is important scientifically, not why it is important to you personally, and how it fits into the broader scheme of ideas in your field. c. A literature review that substantiates (b). d. Describe your problem as a series of subproblems that can each be attacked in a series of small steps. Devise experiments, observations or analyses that will permit you to exclude alternatives at each stage. Line them up and start knocking them down. By transforming the big problem into a series of smaller ones, you always know what to do next, you lower the energy threshold to begin work, you identify the part that will take the longest or cause the most problems, and you have available a list of things to do when something doesn't work out. 6. Write down a list of the major problems that could arise and ruin the whole project. Then write down a list of alternatives that you will do if things actually do go wrong. 7. It is not a bad idea to design two or three projects and start them in parallel to see which one has the best practical chance of succeeding. There could be two or three model systems that all seem to have equally good chances on paper of providing appropriate tests for your ideas, but in fact practical problems may exclude some of them. It is much more efficient to discover this at the start than to design and execute two or three projects in succession after the first fail for practical reasons. 8. Pick a date for the presentation of your thesis and work backwards in constructing a schedule of how you are going to use your time. You can expect a stab of terror at this point. Don't worry - it goes on like this for awhile, then it gradually gets worse. 9. Spend two to three weeks writing the proposal after you've finished your reading, then give it to as many good critics as you can find. Hope that their comments are tough, and respond as constructively as you can . 10. Get at it. You already have the introduction to your thesis written, and you have only been here 12 to 18 months. Manage Your Advisors. Keep your advisors aware of what you are doing, but do not bother them. Be an interesting presence, not a pest. At least once a year, submit a written progress report 1-2 pages long on your own initiative. They will appreciate it and be impressed. Anticipate and work to avoid personality problems . If you do not get along with your professors, change advisors early on . Be very careful about choosing your advisors in the first place. Most important is their interest in your interests. Types of Theses. Never elaborate a baroque excrescence on top of existing but shaky ideas. Go right to the foundations and test the implicit but unexamined assumptions of an important body of work, or lay the foundations for a new research thrust. There are, of course, other types of theses: 1. The classical thesis involves the formulation of a deductive model that makes novel and surprising predictions which you then test objectively and confirm under conditions unfavorable to the hypothesis. Rarely done and highly prized. 2. A critique of the foundations of an important body of research. Again, rare and valuable and a sure winner if properly executed. 3. The purely theoretical thesis. This takes courage, especially in a department loaded with bedrock empiricists, but can be pulled off if you are genuinely good at math and logic. 4. Gather data that someone else can synthesize. This is the worst kind of thesis, but in a pinch it will get you through. To certain kinds of people lots of data, even if they don't test a hypothesis, will always be impressive. At least the results show that you worked hard, a fact with which you can blackmail your committee into giving you the doctorate. There are really as many kinds of theses as their are graduate students. The four types listed serve as limiting cases of the good, the bad, and the ugly. Doctoral work is a chance for you to try your hand at a number of different research styles and to discover which suites you best: theory, field work, or lab work . Ideally, you will balance all three and become the rare person who can translate the theory for the empiricists and the real world for the theoreticians. Start Publishing Early. Don't kid yourself. You may have gotten into this game out of your love for plants and animals, your curiosity about nature, and your drive to know the truth, but you won't be able to get a job and stay in it unless you publish . You need to publish substantial articles in internationally recognized, refereed journals. Without them, you can forget a career in science . This sounds brutal, but there are good reasons for it, and it can be a joyful challenge and fulfillment. Science is shared knowledge . Until the results are effectively communicated, they in effect do not exist . Publishing is part of the job, and until it is done, the work is not complete. You must master the skill of writing clear, concise, well-organized scientific papers . Here are some tips about getting into the publishing game. 1. Co-author a paper with someone who has more experience. Approach a professor who is working on an interesting project and offer your services in return for a junior authorship . He'll appreciate the help and will give you lots of good comments on the paper because his name will be on it. 2. Do not expect your first paper to be world-shattering. A lot of eminent people began with a minor piece of work. The amount of information reported in the average scientific paper may be less than you think. Work up to the major journals by publishing one or two short - but competent - papers in less well-recognized journals. You will quickly discover that no matter what the reputation of the journal, all editorial boards defend the quality of their product with jealous pride - and they should! 3. If it is good enough, publish your research proposal as a critical review paper. If it is publishable, you've probably chosen the right field to work in. 4. Do not write your thesis as a monograph. Write it as a series of publishable manuscripts, and submit them early enough so that at least one or two chapters of your thesis can be presented as reprints of published articles. 5. Buy and use a copy of Strunk and White's El ements of Style . Read it before you sit down to write your first paper, then read it again at least once a year for the next three or four years. Day's book, How to Write a Scientific Paper, is also excellent . 6. Get your work reviewed before you submit it to the journal by someone who has the time to criticize your writing as well as your ideas and organization. Don't Look Down on a Master's Thesis. The only reason not to do a master's is to fulfill the generally false conceit that you're too good for that sort of thing. The master's has a number of advantages. 1. It gives you a natural way of changing schools if you want to. You can use this to broaden your background . Moreover, your ideas on what constitutes an important problem will probably be changing rapidly at this stage of your development. Your knowledge of who is doing what, and where, will be expanding rapidly. If you decide to change universities, this is the best way to do it. You leave behind people satisfied with your performance and in a position to provide well-informed letters of recommendation. You arrive with most of your PhD requirements satisfied. 2. You get much-needed experience in research and writing in a context less threatening than doctoral re search. You break yourself in gradually. In research, you learn the size of a soluble problem. People who have done master's work usually have a much easier time with the PhD. 3. You get a publication. 4. What's your hurry? If you enter the job market too quickly, you won′t be well prepared. Better to go a bit more slowly, build up a substantial background, and present yourself a bit later as a person with more and broader experience. Publish Regularly, But Not Too Much. The pressure to publish has corroded the quality of journals and the quality of intellectual life . It is far better to have published a few papers of high quality that are widely read than it is to have published a long string of minor articles that are quickly forgotten. You do have to be realistic. You will need publications to get a post-doc, and you will need more to get a faculty position and then tenure. However, to the extent that you can gather your work together in substantial packages of real quality, you will be doing both yourself and your field a favor. Most people publish only a few papers that make any difference. Most papers are cited little or not at all. About 10% of the articles published receive 90% of the citations . A paper that is not cited is time and effort wasted . Go for quality, not for quantity . This will take courage and stubbornness, but you won't regret it. If you are publishing one or two carefully considered, substantial papers in good, refereed journals each year, you're doing very well - and you've taken time to do the job right. Acknowledgements Thanks to Frank Pitelka for providing an opportunity, to Ray Huey for being a co-conspirator and sounding board and for providing a number of the comments presented here, to the various unknown graduate students who kept these ideas in circulation, and to Pete Morin for suggesting that I write them up for publication. Some Useful References. Day, R.A. 1983. How to write and publish a scientific paper . 2nd ed. iSi Press, Philadephia. 181 pp. wise and witty. Smith, R.V. 1984. Graduate research - a guide for students in the sciences . iSi Press, Philadelphia. 182 pp. complete and practical. Strunk, W. Jr, and E.B. White.1979. The elements of style . 3rd Ed. Macmillan, New York. 92 pp. the paradigm of concision.
个人分类: Engineering Cybernetics|2673 次阅读|0 个评论
[转载]如何避免审稿人的大斧
cjls2000 2011-12-21 20:48
如何避免审稿人的大斧 Stephen D. Senturia (译者序:本文是发表在最近一期 IEEE/ASME J MEMS的一篇关于如何撰写科技论文的文章。作者Stephen D. Senturia(MIT电子系教授)从自己作为论文作者和审稿人双重角色的经验出发,对如何撰写科技论文发表了一些非常中肯也非常重要的建议。大家知道,尽管IEEE系列杂志在SCI中的影响因子相对 基础 研究的杂志还很低,甚至有的杂志还不是SCI收录期刊,但是IEEE系列杂志在电子工程的众多领域中几乎都是名列前茅的,其审稿非常严格。作者作为IEEE系列杂志中几个杂志的审稿人、编辑,对这些杂志有透彻的了解,因此,相信这些建议会对大家有些帮助;同时,作者的建议是通用的,对其它领域的作者也会有所帮助。 原文并不长,但是考虑到其中作者使用了一些非科技词汇,查找这些词汇会用去不少时间,因此译者试图根据自己的理解翻译此文,希望能为大家节约一点时间。错误之处难免,请谅解。 编辑注:Stephen D. Senturia从1992年IEEE/ASME J MEMS(2002年影响因子2.8,译者注)创刊以来就一直是该杂志的编委会成员,并在1998年被提名为高级编辑。这些连同他1985年-1995年作为IEEE T Electron Dev(2002年影响因子1.9,译者注)Solid-State Sensor s的编辑的经验,作者已经累计具有17年作为IEEE杂志编辑的经验。这些年里,Steve(作者名字的简称,译者注)总结了论文作者们给审稿人带来的大量的问题,因此我们邀请他撰写了下面的这篇“给作者的建议”,告诉大家如何使审稿人满意,并且让他们“没有别的选择”,只能同意论文发表。 ) 一、 序言 由于这是我个人的评论,因此在后面的叙述中我将使用第一人称,不过严格一些的作者不会在科技文献中使用第一人称。在我35年研究工作的生涯中,我撰写了很多科技论文,每次当我打开从杂志编辑部寄来的装有我宝贝一样的手稿的信的时候,我总是迫不及待地拆开信封,结果是或者做一些小的修改,或者大幅度重写,甚至是判处死刑——只能把手稿扔进垃圾桶。 现在,我也已经作为编辑和审稿人有17年了,从我审过的无数的论文和与论文数量几乎相等的不幸的作者身上,我感觉到审稿人打击或者拒绝某些论文的根本原因还是这些论文确实存在很多缺点。即使不是绝大多数,也是很多作者都不同意这一点,至少现在。因此,我想如果我能够给出一些实际的建议使他们能够避免审稿人的大斧和致命一击,将会对论文作者们有所帮助。 一篇科技论文的主要目的是与感兴趣的读者交流新的信息,并教给他们一些新的 知识 。许多作者忘记了这一点;相反,他们把写作过程视为炫耀自己、让读者注目他们的机会,甚至于从某种程度上影响读者,例如给出了太多或者太少的内容和材料。考虑到论文的种类比较多,我这里选择一个实验论文作为假设的例子。这个文章的作者对实验方法进行了一点小改进,然后用这个方法得到了一些新的结果,并把这些结果与同样也只是对已发表的理论模型做了一点小改进而得到的结果进行对比。(呵呵,很精辟的例子,已经理解了为什么这个现象会出现,希望给出他们自己的解释,尽管他们尚未做过权威的实验来证实他们的假设。 二、 Senturia的提纲 作者们如何考虑安排和撰写这篇论文呢?我给出一个简单的提纲列在下面,同时给出一些更为深入的讨论: n (几乎)没有任何事情是新的 n 依靠可信度指数 n 谨慎使用投机性词汇 n 不要学朗费罗 n 不要把兔子从帽子里拿出来 n 彻底挖掘所有的金矿 n 记住:审稿人都是不善辞令的, 作者(某种程度上)是偏执的违背 above每一条所解释的原则都会导致审稿人生气,一旦他们开始生气,他们就会拿出大斧,并有目的地挥舞砍去。我从来不相信一篇论文已经写到无法再提高的程度,也许一个正常的审稿人可能会认为作者已经基本完成了一个较高水平的研究工作,但是一个发怒的审稿人却比这个正常的审稿人更能够发现问题,不管是研究工作内容还是写作方法。如果这样使审稿人更加生气,显然是十分愚蠢的。 第一、(几乎)没有任何事情是新的 地球人都知道现在天底下已经没有什么新东西了,除了那些比较有信心的人自以为他的工作还是独一无二的。也许偶尔还会有几个真正独特和令人惊异的结果发表以外,我们绝大多数人的工作都是建立在别人工作的基础上的。 每个作者都有责任和义务写清楚明确的上下文,以便读者通过序论和文献引用(是作者真正读过的,而不是从其它参考文献中简单拷贝过来的)能够知道你的新工作属于哪部分。如果作者不知道相关文献,他应该上网去查一查。我曾经告诉我的研究生,“首先决定你做什么,然后去图书馆找找!”他们也许找不到他们做的,但是可以找到所有相关的材料,仔细阅读这些材料来确定真正相关的子集,这些需要引用。 另外有一些原则需要遵循: 如果你有一个主题相近的论文已投给会议正在审稿或者已被杂志接收但尚未印刷,你有责任告诉编辑和审稿人并且提供该论文的复印件帮助审稿过程的进行。如果审稿人发现你有相关论文掩藏起来——也许这是使审稿人气愤的唯一最重要的原因。这是真正的气愤——审稿人会认为你在欺骗审稿过程,于是大斧来了。 如果一个文献与你的研究足够相关而使你引用它,那么它和你的结果也是相关的。许多作者在论文开始堆砌很多参考文献进行装饰,但是后面却从来不把自己声称的新结果与究者对结果进行证实和对比,如果论文的工作没有一点与前人的比较,审稿人会很恼火,于是他们会抽出大斧。 第二、 依靠可信度指数 科学进步的本质是结果的可信度,这些结果能够被不同的研究者重复和检验。如果这样定义的话,那么真正新的研究结果在被别人重复以前是没有经过科学验证的。这就引出了可信度指数的概念。 前面假定的论文在实验方法和理论模型都有些小改进,并出现了一些比较奇怪的结果,在编写这个论文的提纲的时候,作者应该仔细考虑提纲不同要素的可信度。显然,已经出版的文献结果(姑且不管它正确与否)是高度可信的。另外基本物理规律、已经建立的理论和模型,以及被广泛使用的实验方法等也都是高度可信的。所有这些具有很高的可信度指数。 与此相反,新东西的可信度指数是非常低的。如果一个结果还没有被其他人重复,那么它就不是已经“确定的”,因此不如已经被同行验证的结果可信,而作者关于新结果的猜测和想象则是最低的可信度。但是如果一个新实验结果在论文里有足够多的证明,审稿人可能会接受它,即使他们不同意作者对于新现象猜测性的解释。所有这些导致了可信度指数原则,它能够自动确定论文内容的顺序。 按照可信度递减的顺序安排论文内容。 这种做法的优点不言而喻。如果一个论文是按照可信度递减的顺序安排的,所有的读者都会同意最开始论述的内容,因为它有最高可信度;但是到后面读者会犹豫是否接受一个新的实验结果(如果恰到好处地解释,就会接受)或者推测性的解释。一个好的论文永远不要在第一个中等或者低可信度内容出现以后再出现重要的、高可信度的内容。那些不同意作者观点的读者,也能够得益于能够在出现不同意见以前了解所有高可信度的材料,因此可以将不同意见集中在正确的问题上。 试样准备方法应该真实反应作者所做的工作,应当具备较高的可信度并且应该放在文章的开始部分。作者经常犯的一个错误是直到论文后面低可信度部分才给出新试样的制备等内容,让读者莫名其妙。这种写作方法会使论文看上去杂乱无章,非常难以阅读和理解,而难以阅读的论文当然会使审稿人非常恼火。 当你报告一个新的实验过程的时候,为了保持它的高可信度,你应该用例子说明你是如何从原始数据得到精炼数据,并最终得到 分析 结果的。同样,对于校准也需要做这样的说明(如果不是基于商用仪器的精度指标),包括样品数量、数据与误差带之间的关系(满量程吗?平均值的概率偏差等)。如果新方法能够给出一个大家都熟悉的例子所期望的结果,无疑这是可信度的基础。这有助于提高你新实验结果的可信度,大概也是撰写论文需要首先考虑的要点。 如果要报道一个新模型,你需要把模型建立在一个高可信度的起点,并在需要清楚地说明从哪儿开始是你采用尚未经过证明的假设而使得可信度开始变化的。 至于模型和实验谁在前面,这大概需要取决于爱好了。如果这两者都有新结果,那么需这种方法最令人高兴的结果是,作为作者,你被引导着在所有比较可信度的材料,如新的实验结果,已经展示完全后才开始假设和猜测。这有时会给作者带来不小的困难。现在的趋势是提出结果,给出评论和意见;然后再提出一些新的结果,再给出评论。在开始假设和猜测以前给出所有的高可信度材料。这样,审稿人会喜欢你。 第三、 谨慎使用投机性 读者可能会奇怪为什么我在这里对投机性词汇感兴趣。关于这方面的认识,我要感谢MIT的Arthur Smith教授。 我和他在70年代初期共同写过一篇论文,他提醒我尽量不要使用被他称为“投机性”词汇的一些词,如“obviously”,“probably”,“certainly”,“undoubtedly”等。这是因为从技术的角度看,如果你需要使用表示可能性的词汇,这说明你不能无法证明你的观点,而是在进行假设和猜测。因此:如果你发现自己愿意使用投机性词汇,它意味着你不知你在说什么,因此这些材料的可信度自然非常低。用明确表示你在进行假设的词汇来代替投机性的词汇,并将相关的评论和低可信度的假设放在论文合适的地方。 第四、 不要学朗费罗 在小说“路边酒店的故事”中,作者朗费罗借用坐在酒店炉火旁的旅客的嘴描写了一系列的故事。尽管朗费罗是一个极好的故事作者,我们在写作科技文献的时候不能采用他的方法。这种方法确实比较吸引人,讲个事实,再讲一段故事来解释一下事实;然后再讲另一个事实和解释它的故事,直到所有的事实讲完。(特别是化学研究人员比较喜欢使用这种方法)。这种方法错误的地方在于它与可信度降低原则相违背。因此,故事很好,但是那可能是虚构的;科学写作需要的是不是虚构,而是真实。要抵抗住现代朗费罗式的诱惑,把所有的高可信度内容都提出以后,再用类似“Discussion”或者“Interpretation”之类的标题来表述你开始进行假设的部分。 第五、 不要把兔子从礼帽里拿出 我们都能回忆起孩童时代坐在学校拥挤的礼堂里,兴奋地看着前来表演的魔术师从他的礼帽里变出一只兔子的情形。有一些科技文献作者试图去模仿魔术师,但是他们的这种表演却很乏味。他们把一个验证性的实验藏起来,却引导读者进入歧途,然后这时,也只有这时,他们才拿出读者希望看到的能够证明作者观点的实验。这种方法有两个问题:一是显然与可信度递减原则相违背,他们(大概)在一些低可信度的解释后面才提出高可信度的材料;二是这会给推理过程带来很大的问题和缺点。审稿人顽强地寻找着缺点,却遇上了从礼帽里变出来的兔子。原则很简单:不要这样做。 第六、 彻底挖掘所有的金矿 想象一下你正走在一个荒凉的峡谷里面,拿着几铲看上去希望很大的泥土,把他们装进坛子里,然后在附近的一个小溪边冲洗它们。这时你突然发现了几块金子,你非常高兴,于是决定跑到最近的采矿办公室申请提出自己的所有权。于是,你对世界声明你的所有权,但是很令人费解地是再也没有回去挖掘那里的金子。 如果你这样做,每个人都会认为你是个傻子,但是事实上,很多科技文献作者恰恰没有回去挖掘他们的金子。获得好的数据要用去大量的时间和努力(同时还有大笔费劲心思得来的经费),这些数据就好比能产出几个金块的泥土。宣布所有权类似于发表论文-通过这个过程你告诉全世界这附近有金子。考虑到这些数据的成本,如果不努力找出所有的金子实际上一件非常傻的事情,至少,也要找出你已经挖掘的这些泥土里的所有金子。 很遗憾,在我的观点看来,很多作者过早地放弃了从数据中获得更多内容的机会。如果你能够证明你对所获得的数据说明什么或者不说明什么有深入的理解,尽管这可能对你挖掘到的金子能不能发表是不关键的,但是你在审稿人那里成功的机会就大大增加了。 例如,有的作者仅着眼于从能够进行测量的信号,但是却忽略了噪音谱可能会引起限制可 检测 能力的信息。另外有些作者未能发现掩藏在结果下面的相互关系,这些关系或许能够提供发现新的或者重要东西的线索。简而言之,要有耐心。试着从数据中挖掘所有并且有潜在的兴趣,审稿人会为你的勤奋和坦诚鼓掌。 第七、 记住:审稿人是不善言辞 我给出一个关于如何对待审稿人意见的方针,作为本文的结束。 当审稿人抱怨文章的某些内容时,这是一个非常好的机会来了解文章中的问题。不是所有审稿人的所有意见都是正确或者合适的批判,但是我敢说我遇到的批评中90%以上都在某种程度上是有价值和益处的。 但是,审稿人是不善辞令的。审稿人经常非常恶劣地表达他们的想法,这使他们的意见看上去非常武断和随意,甚至反复无常。于是作者变得非常气愤和偏执。那么该怎么办呢? 作为作者,你有责任逐条回复审稿人的批判意见。你对此所持的态度对论文能否顺利发表有很大的影响。如果象有些作者一样,你试图威胁审稿人(或者编辑)不做建设性的反馈而投稿,审稿人(和编辑)都会用同样的方式对待你,把你放在一边。 我曾经见过很多例子,愤怒的作者有力地反驳审稿人的意见,但是最后他们的论文却没办法发表,因为他们没有把反驳中的精华用于修改他们宝贝一样的论文。自负妨碍采取建设性的反馈措施,而偏执则会削弱这些措施。 维护自己工作的科学性是一项需要从谦逊和尊重别人已经建立的知识的基础上来完成的任务。尽管这很困难,当你收到审稿人的意见的时候,压住自己的火气和反驳,试着想想为什么审稿人会在这一点上找麻烦?作为作者,如果你能够指出为什么审稿人会给出这个意见,你就能够同时发现提高论文和使审稿人满意的方法了。通常,一篇论文的失败不是刚好在审稿人提出问题之处,而是往往在其它的地方,如没有精心安排的主题和评论的次序,或者在文章其它什么地方省略了几个解释用的词等。阅读审稿人的信的时候需要抱着非常虚心的态度,这能使你缩短论文发表的时间。 当然,有些审稿人的意见非常明显的是错误的,如果你能够非常礼貌并且非常职业地处理相关的意见,编辑会比较容易同意你对审稿人的反驳意见。因此,我的建议是重新列出审稿人的每条意见和你对此意见的评论,以及你如何在论文中进行修改的。如果你对此做了足够好的工作和努力,编辑就有可能决定接收论文而不需要再把论文寄给审稿人重新进行审稿,这会节约几个星期的发表时间。另外,你因为注意审稿人不善辞令而建立起来的声誉,会使你的职业生涯受益匪浅。同时,下次你会写出更好的论文
1481 次阅读|0 个评论
A Talk by Stephen Chu
热度 7 何毓琦 2011-12-3 16:20
Fornew readers and those who request to be “ 好友 good friends” please read my 公告 栏 first. Stephen Chu, the Nobel Prizewinning physicist and current U.S. Secretary of Energy, gave a talk at Harvardon “ The Role of Science, Technology and Innovation in Solving the EnergyChallenge” on December 1, 2011. The audeince filled the auditorium. Harvard had to arrange FOUR extra large lecture rooms equipped with live broadcast to satisfy the demand. Hestarted his talk by reviewing the role of scientific innovation in agriculture,information technology, and transportation showing how each subject wastransformed by discoveries and key breakthrough. To those who are versed in thesubject matter, they are well known matters in the history of science viewednow with the benefit of hindsight. For example, I am familiar with electronicsand IT. But in agriculture and transportation, new facts and insights werelearned. Henry Ford was often thought ofas the father of the automobile. But the technology of internal combustionengine was actually invented in Germany. But Ford made possible the productionof a desirable object with low cost and efficiency. From this Chu invented theverb “Henry-Forded” to say that one person or country managed to take advantageof breakthrough elsewhere and made it practical. He gave the recent example onhow SunTech (China) managed to “Henry-Ford” solar cell production to make itthe leading producer of solar power in the world. Chu concluded his talk byquoting from the work of Micheal Spence, another Nobel winning economist, ontradable and non tradable labor. Example of the former category ismanufacturing labor which can be out-sourced to any country; the example of thelatter are barbers who cuts hair, school teachers, etc. who perform personalservices. Spencenoted from extensive data analysis that for the past half century the tradablejobs in the US are steadily decreasing (being out-sourced) while the nontradable jobs held steady. This implies that US is increasing her foreign debtcontinuously in exchange for outside labor to produce “invented in the US butmade in China” goods - another phrase coined by Chu and an economic fact that cannot be long sustained. No bigsurprise but real worry some according to Chu.
15384 次阅读|13 个评论
[转载]Stephen Jenkins
zhao1198 2011-11-23 07:48
Stephen Jenkins (born 1956, New Zealand) is Professor of Economic and Social Policy at the London School of Economics. He was Professor of Economics at the Institute for Social and Economic Research at the University of Essex 1994-2010, and was ISER Director April 2006-August 2009. He was previously Professor of Applied Economics at the University of Wales Swansea (1991-94), Lecturer in the School of Social Sciences at the University of Bath (1983-91), Research Fellow, University of York (1979, 1981-83), Junior Lecturer in Economics, Massey University (1978). He received his D.Phil in 1983 from the University of York. He is also currently a Research Professor at the DIW-Berlin. He was Chair (President) of the Council for the International Association for Research on Income and Wealth 2006-8, and President of the European Society for Population Economics in 1998. Stephen's first published papers were about the intergenerational inheritance of income and the economics of English provincial repertory theatre, but most subsequent ones have been about inequality and poverty measurement issues and applications using British and US data. His current research focuses on income and poverty dynamics, and uses the British Household Panel Survey. Alongside this he maintains an active interest in modelling benefit spell durations and labour force transitions. Stephen's publications have appeared in a wide range of international journals and edited volumes. He recently co-edited The Distribution of Household Welfare and Household Production (CUP, 1998, joint with Arie Kapteyn and Bernard van Praag) and The Dynamics of Child Poverty in Industrialised Countries (CUP, 2001, joint with John Micklewright and Bruce Bradbury). He joined IZA as a Research Fellow in September 2000. Email | CV | Homepage IZA,艾萨克斯大学,Stephen P. Jenkins教授:“Has income mobility in Britain changed over the last two decades?” http://www.wise.xmu.edu.cn/viewNews.asp?id=2732 被阅览数:563次 发布时间:2010/12/6 17:44:17 2010年10月26日,“WISE-IZA” 2010 秋季联合讲座第二讲在经济楼D110室顺利开讲,来自艾萨克斯大学的Stephen P. Jenkins教授通过远程视频给WISE学生做了题为“Has income mobility in Britain changed over the last two decades?”的学术报告。 首先,Jenkins教授介绍了论文背景,其即将出版的著作 《 Changing Fortunes:Household income dynamics in Britain》涉及到了论文的内容。在谈及研究的动机时,他提到一是为了对英国的收入流动性有更深入的了解,二是在Jarvis 以及他本人之前研究基础上进行拓展,三是为了解决在英国收入流动性是上升还是下降,与美国相比英国的流动性格局有什么不同等一些问题。另 外,Jenkins教授还列举了收入流动性的多种解释,并指出流动性对于社会福利的影响并不确定,多种概念也意味着有多种流动性的测度方式。 接着Jenkins教授正式介绍论文内容。他先说明了本文所使用的数据以及个人收入等几个相关定义。数据来源于British Household Panel Survey(BHPS)1991-2006年的工资数据。然后,Jenkins教授从多个角度展示了研究结果。相对位置的流动性的变化,通过可视性和数 学总结两种方法可以看出在两个连续的年度流动性的趋势并不显著,个人层次的收入的平均增长也是上下波动的。 在会计年度内,并没有流动性减少长期不平等的趋势;专注于黄金年龄的男性雇员的收入时,可能会有一些流动性的下降。 在个人层面上, 每个家庭每一年的流动性变化很大 。 流动性的变化由永久性和暂时性成分两部分组成 ,这两部分的变化趋势有广泛一致性,但当样本扩展到所有家庭时一致性减弱。 通过分析,得出以下的结论 :在英国当短暂性差异消除后,收入的变化不大,显著的永久性差异依然存在; 英国和美国的收入性格局存在差异 ,Jenkins教授对此给出了几种可能的解释。 在最后的提问环节, WISE的博士生与Jenkins教授进行了积极的互动,给Jenkins教授留下了深刻印象。这场报告在热烈的掌声中落下了帷幕。 (WISE2010级博士生 王彰龙 WISE2010级硕士生 王越娓 蔡利容 孙桃龙 可钦峰)
个人分类: Econ.经济学家|2005 次阅读|0 个评论
[转载]根本不存在天堂,那只是个神话(霍金Stephen Hawking: 'There is
AIPBeijing2010 2011-5-31 13:54
Stephen Hawking: 'There is no heaven; it's a fairy story' Stephen Hawking dismisses belief in God in an exclusive interview with the Guardian. Photograph: Solar Heliospheric Observatory/Discovery Channel A belief that heaven or an afterlife awaits us is a "fairy story" for people afraid of death, Stephen Hawking has said. In a dismissal that underlines his firm rejection of religious comforts, Britain's most eminent scientist said there was nothing beyond the moment when the brain flickers for the final time. Hawking, who was diagnosed with motor neurone disease at the age of 21, shares his thoughts on death, human purpose and our chance existence in an exclusive interview with the Guardian today. The incurable illness was expected to kill Hawking within a few years of its symptoms arising, an outlook that turned the young scientist to Wagner, but ultimately led him to enjoy life more, he has said, despite the cloud hanging over his future. "I have lived with the prospect of an early death for the last 49 years. I'm not afraid of death, but I'm in no hurry to die. I have so much I want to do first," he said. "I regard the brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail. There is no heaven or afterlife for broken down computers; that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark," he added. Hawking's latest comments go beyond those laid out in his 2010 book, The Grand Design , in which he asserted that there is no need for a creator to explain the existence of the universe. The book provoked a backlash from some religious leaders, including the chief rabbi, Lord Sacks, who accused Hawking of committing an "elementary fallacy" of logic. The 69-year-old physicist fell seriously ill after a lecture tour in the US in 2009 and was taken to Addenbrookes hospital in an episode that sparked grave concerns for his health. He has since returned to his Cambridge department as director of research. The physicist's remarks draw a stark line between the use of God as a metaphor and the belief in an omniscient creator whose hands guide the workings of the cosmos. In his bestselling 1988 book, A Brief History of Time, Hawking drew on the device so beloved of Einstein, when he described what it would mean for scientists to develop a "theory of everything" – a set of equations that described every particle and force in the entire universe. "It would be the ultimate triumph of human reason – for then we should know the mind of God," he wrote. The book sold a reported 9 million copies and propelled the physicist to instant stardom. His fame has led to guest roles in The Simpsons, Star Trek: The Next Generation and Red Dwarf. One of his greatest achievements in physics is a theory that describes how black holes emit radiation. In the interview, Hawking rejected the notion of life beyond death and emphasised the need to fulfil our potential on Earth by making good use of our lives. In answer to a question on how we should live, he said, simply: "We should seek the greatest value of our action." In answering another, he wrote of the beauty of science, such as the exquisite double helix of DNA in biology, or the fundamental equations of physics. Hawking responded to questions posed by the Guardian and a reader in advance of a lecture tomorrow at the Google Zeitgeist meeting in London, in which he will address the question: "Why are we here?" In the talk, he will argue that tiny quantum fluctuations in the very early universe became the seeds from which galaxies, stars, and ultimately human life emerged. "Science predicts that many different kinds of universe will be spontaneously created out of nothing. It is a matter of chance which we are in," he said. Hawking suggests that with modern space -based instruments, such as the European Space Agency's Planck mission, it may be possible to spot ancient fingerprints in the light left over from the earliest moments of the universe and work out how our own place in space came to be. His talk will focus on M-theory, a broad mathematical framework that encompasses string theory, which is regarded by many physicists as the best hope yet of developing a theory of everything. M-theory demands a universe with 11 dimensions, including a dimension of time and the three familiar spatial dimensions. The rest are curled up too small for us to see. Evidence in support of M-theory might also come from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at Cern , the European particle physics laboratory near Geneva. One possibility predicted by M-theory is supersymmetry, an idea that says fundamental particles have heavy – and as yet undiscovered – twins, with curious names such as selectrons and squarks. Confirmation of supersymmetry would be a shot in the arm for M-theory and help physicists explain how each force at work in the universe arose from one super-force at the dawn of time. Another potential discovery at the LHC, that of the elusive Higgs boson, which is thought to give mass to elementary particles, might be less welcome to Hawking, who has a long-standing bet that the long-sought entity will never be found at the laboratory. Hawking will join other speakers at the London event, including the chancellor, George Osborne, and the Nobel prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz.
个人分类: 杂谈|1860 次阅读|0 个评论
哈佛大学两位牛教授大PK: Stephen Elledge vs 庄小威
热度 16 wsyokemos 2011-4-14 01:03
哈佛大学两位牛教授大PK: Stephen Elledge vs 庄小威
今日在科学网的论坛上看到一篇标题为“ 揭开美国顶尖生物医学实验室成功的法宝 ”的精华贴,文中提到哈佛医学院 Stephen Elledge 教授的成功的经验,当然这些牛人的成功经验也许不像唐骏一样“可以复制”,但是像我等凡夫俗子确实也可以从牛人身上学点什么,看到这个介绍 Stephen Elledge (以下简称 Steve )帖子,让我想起了也是在哈佛的另外一位牛人:庄小威(以下简称“庄”),本文无意将两者 PK 一把,看看谁更牛,只是想对两者比较一下,发现共同点很多(详见下),感觉如果套用 托翁的一句话就是:“牛人总是相似的,俗人各有有各的俗”(比如我的“俗”就是数一数牛人的“牛”)。 先看看两者的共同点 / 相似点: 1) 都是哈佛正教授,其中庄 34 岁便是; 2 )都是著名期刊 CELL 的 Editorial Board 的 member ;顺便说一下,庄和许田是进入这个编委成员的仅有的毕业于中国大陆大学的两位。 3) 都是霍华德休斯医学研究所的研究员( HHMI Investigator ); 4 )实验室的规模都相当大:都是至少 30 余人(这在非常“烧钱”的生物医学领域很罕见了) 5 )都同时雇佣了两个秘书 : 行政秘书和学术秘书(或 lab manager ) ; 6 )当然都不差钱,都有包括 HHMI,NIH 等资助的大量经费; 7 )都很聪明: Steve 的天才,上述帖子已经详述,庄的天才在下面会谈及; 8 )都受到了非常好(甚至可以说是世界顶级)的教育,原贴对 Steve 的教育背景已经介绍,庄的教育背景为: 苏州中学科大少年班预备班(高中) -- 〉中国科技大学少年班(本科) -- 〉加州大学伯克利分校( UC Berkeley ,博士) -- 〉史坦福大学 (Stanford, 博士后 ) ; 9 )都很勤奋:和 Steve 一样,庄也是经常周末来实验室,晚上工作很晚才回家; 10) 都自己的研究都很有兴趣:这一点虽然放到最后,但我却觉得这是牛人成功的最大的共同点,只有对自己的研究或者工作有狂热的兴趣,才有可能充分发挥自己的天分,辛勤工作也不觉得累,做自己喜欢的工作,工作本身就是一种乐趣。 11) 都有许多 Nature, Science 和 Cell 等牛文。 对于庄再多说两点: 1 ) 2003 年 获奖金高达 50 万美金的美国 “ 天才奖 ” ( Genius Awards ); 2 )其发明的 STORM 荧光成像技术最近已经转让给尼康 (Nikon) 公司,基于这种新技术的荧光显微镜已经上市。 不同点: Steve 是美国科学院 (NAS) 院士,庄还不是,但是凭其学术成就和年龄(尚不足40岁),应该也是早晚的事,另外 Steve 为男士,庄则是位女科学家(被 N 多网友赞称为美女教授),上述的 “ 天才奖 ” ,庄是第一位华裔女科学家荣获此奖,当然她还有 N 多的其他奖, 比如科学网刚刚报道的 2011 年赛克勒国际生物物理学奖 , 当然最牛的诺贝尔奖,庄还没有, Steve 也还没有,但是两者显然都很有潜力。 总之:我所理解的牛人的成功经验可以简单概括为:兴趣+天分+勤奋 。  更多关于庄的介绍可见 百度百科 和 其实验室主页 。 后记:写此博文仅仅一年多,就得知庄当选 美国科学院 院士 。 (作者:王守业,引文地址: http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=spaceuid=563591do=blogid=432902 )
个人分类: 乱弹杂谈|32075 次阅读|21 个评论
宾夕法尼亚州立大学化学家Stephen Benkovic的论著被引用情况
xupeiyang 2010-10-18 15:43
2010年度美国国家科学奖章获得者名单公布 http://news.sciencenet.cn//htmlnews/2010/10/238863.shtm , AS Kang, RA Lerner, SJ Benkovic - Proceedings of the , 1991 - National Acad Sciences ... CARLOS F. BARBAS III*, ANGRAY S . KANG*, RICHARD A. LERNER*, AND STEPHEN J. BENKOVICt ... Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037; and tDepartment of Chemistry, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 Contributed by Stephen J. Benkovic , June 21 ... Cited by 747 - Related articles - All 10 versions Accelerated Alzheimer-type phenotype in transgenic mice carrying both mutant amyloid precursor protein and presenilin 1 transgenes , E McGowan, X Yu, S Benkovic , P Jantzen, K Wright - Nature medicine, 1998 - nature.com Genetic causes of Alzheimer's disease (AD) include mutations in the amyloid precursor protein (APP), presenilin 1 (PS1), and presenilin 2 (P52) genes 1 . The mutant APP K670N,M67M transgenic line, Tg2576, shows markedly elevated amyloid -protein (AP) levels at an early age and, ... Cited by 692 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 4 versions Generation of a large combinatorial library of the immunoglobulin repertoire in phage lambda , AS Kang, M Alting-Mees, DR Burton, SJ Benkovic , RA - Science, 1989 - sciencemag.org 66. TA Stewart, PK Pattengale, P. Leder, Cell 38, 627 (1984). 67. C. Schoenenberger et al., EMBO J. 7, 169 (1988). 68. U. Ruther, C. Garber, D. Komitowski, R. Muller, EF Wagner, Nature 325, 412 (1987); U. Ruther, D. Komitowski, FR Schubert, EF Wagner, Oncogenie 4, 861 ... Cited by 670 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 10 versions Bioorganic mechanisms TC Bruice, SJ Benkovic - 1966 - WA Benjamin Cited by 564 - Related articles - Find in ChinaCat - All 2 versions Catalytic antibodies , K Janda, AD Napper, SJ Benkovic , RA - Cold Spring Harbor , 1987 - symposium.cshlp.org ... A. TRAMONTANO,* K. JANDA,* AD NAPPER, t SJ BENKOVIC , t AND RA LERNER* ~Department of Molecular Biology, Research Institute of Scripps Clinic ... There are about 10 s primary binding specificities in the im- munologic ~1 repertoire, and each can generate, by a process ... Cited by 404 - Related articles - All 10 versions Colloidal Au-enhanced surface plasmon resonance for ultrasensitive detection of DNA hybridization , FG Salinas, SJ Benkovic , MJ Natan, CD - J. Am. Chem. , 2000 - ACS Publications ... Lin He, Michael D. Musick, Sheila R. Nicewarner, Frank G. Salinas, Stephen J. Benkovic , Michael J. Natan, and Christine D. Keating*. ... Metal deposition occurred at a pressure of 2 10 - 6 mbar at 0.2 nm/ s , monitored by an internal QCM. ... Cited by 404 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 4 versions At the crossroads of chemistry and immunology: catalytic antibodies RA Lerner, SJ Benkovic , PG Schultz - Science, 1991 - sciencemag.org ... variable amino acids. R Hirschmann, A. Smith 3rd, C. Taylor, P. Benkovic , S . Taylor, K. Yager, P. Sprengeler, and S . Benkovic (1994) Science 265, 234-237 | Abstract | PDF Expanding the scope of RNA catalysis. Prudent JR ... Cited by 428 - Related articles - All 7 versions A perspective on enzyme catalysis SJ Benkovic , S Hammes-Schiffer - Science, 2003 - sciencemag.org The seminal hypotheses proposed over the years for enzymatic catalysis are scrutinized. The historical record is explored from both biochemical and theoretical perspectives. Particular attention is given to the impact of molecular motions within the protein on the enzyme's catalytic ... Cited by 359 - Related articles - All 9 versions Linkage of recognition and replication functions by assembling combinatorial antibody Fab libraries along phage surfaces from pnas.org , CF Barbas, KD Janda, SJ Benkovic , - Proceedings of the , 1991 - National Acad Sciences ANGRAY S . KANG*, CARLOS F. BARBAS*, KIM D. JANDA*, STEPHEN J. BENKOVICt, AND RICHARD A. LERNER** *Departments of Molecular Biology and Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, 10666 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037; and tDepartment of ... Cited by 303 - Related articles - All 11 versions Mechanism of DNA strand transfer reactions catalyzed by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase JA Peliska, SJ Benkovic - Science, 1992 - sciencemag.org ... articles. Mechanism of DNA strand transfer reactions catalyzed by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. JA Peliska and SJ Benkovic Department of Chemistry, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802. ... Y. Li and S . Carpenter (2001) J. Gen. Virol. ... Cited by 258 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 5 versions V Mizrahi, PA Benkovic , KA Johnson, SJ Benkovic - Biochemistry, 1987 - ACS Publications ... complexes. The rate is not limited by the actual polymerization but by a separate step, possibly important in ensuring fidelity Network of coupled promoting motions in enzyme catalysis from pnas.org , PT Rajagopalan, SJ Benkovic , S - Proceedings of the , 2002 - National Acad Sciences A network of coupled promoting motions in the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase is identified and characterized. The present identification is based on genomic analysis for sequence conservation, kinetic measurements of multiple mutations, and mixed quantum/classical ... Cited by 190 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 17 versions A combinatorial approach to hybrid enzymes independent of DNA homology from 128.111.114.12 M Ostermeier, JH Shim, SJ Benkovic - Nat. Biotechnol, 1999 - 128.111.114.12 ... Marc Ostermeier, Jae Hoon Shim, and Stephen J. Benkovic * ... ITCHY A IT-A18 1100 G 101203 2 (1) IT-A8 1113 114203 9 (4) IT-A5 1129 130203 3 (1) IT-A26 1136 137203 1 (1) IT-A3 1140 141203 3 (1) IT-A1 1144 145203 3 (1) IT-A12 1144 S 146203 ... Cited by 202 - Related articles - View as HTML - All 13 versions Construction and evaluation of the kinetic scheme associated with dihydrofolate reductase from Escherichia coli CA Fierke, KA Johnson, SJ Benkovic - Biochemistry, 1987 - ACS Publications ... 4b H2F 0.5 f 0.3 0.22 f 0.06 H4F 0.06 f 0.01 0.1 f 0.01b K. Taira and S . J. Benkovic . Dersonal communication. bThis DaDer. served with the inhibitor methotrexate (Williams et al., 1979; Blakley Cocco, 1985b). Second, the ... Cited by 198 - Related articles - All 6 versions R EPLISOME-M EDIATED DNA R EPLICATION from uprm.edu SJ Benkovic , AM Valentine, F - Annual Review of , 2001 - annualreviews.org ... 70: 181-208 (Volume publication date July 2001). Stephen J. Benkovic , Ann M. Valentine, and Frank Salinas. Department of Chemistry ... helicase, T7 polymerase catalyzes the polymerization of tens of thousands of nucleotides at a rate of approximately 300 nucleotides s 1 . The ... Cited by 170 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 5 versions Kinetic mechanism whereby DNA polymerase I (Klenow) replicates DNA with high fidelity RD Kuchta, P Benkovic , SJ Benkovic - Biochemistry, 1988 - ACS Publications ... Robert D. Kuchta, Patricia Benkovic , and Stephen J. Benkovic * ... The template base( s ) to be copied along with the 3'-ter- minal base( s ) of the primer/template is (are) included in the text after each DNA . bThe labels containing a letter have a mismatched primer ... Cited by 162 - Related articles - All 3 versions Production of cyclic peptides and proteins in vivo from pnas.org , M Wall, DC Wahnon, SJ Benkovic - Proceedings of the , 1999 - National Acad Sciences ... Contributed by Stephen J. Benkovic . ... An expressed fusion protein (F) folds to form an active protein ligase (1). The enzyme catalyzes an N-to- S acyl shift (2) at the targetI N junction to produce a thioester intermediate (T), which undergoes transesterification (3) with a side-chain ... Cited by 155 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 11 versions Metallo- -lactamase: structure and mechanism Z Wang, W Fast, AM Valentine, SJ Benkovic - Current Opinion in chemical , 1999 - Elsevier ... Zhigang Wang, Walter Fast, Ann M Valentine and Stephen J Benkovic E-mail The Corresponding Author. ... The S . maltophilia L1 enzyme shares the lowest sequence identity with the other known metallo--lactamases and belongs to class Bc. ... Cited by 152 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 4 versions Relating protein motion to catalysis S Hammes-Schiffer, SJ Benkovic - Biochemistry, 2006 - annualreviews.org Abstract This review examines the linkage between protein conformational motions and enzyme catalysis. The fundamental issues related to this linkage are probed in the context of two enzymes that catalyze hydride transfer, namely dihydrofolate reductase and liver alcohol ... Cited by 147 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 3 versions Mice deficient in TNF receptors are protected against dopaminergic neurotoxicity: implications for Parkinson's disease from fasebj.org K Sriram, JM Matheson, SA Benkovic , DB Miller, MI - The FASEB Journal, 2002 - FASEB ... disease Krishnan Sriram, Joanna M. Matheson, Stanley A. Benkovic , Diane B. Miller, Michael I. Luster and James P. O'Callaghan ... Key words: brain neurodegeneration neuroprotection MPTP T he neuropathological basis of Parkinson' s disease (PD) involves a progressive ... Cited by 150 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 5 versions Kinetic mechanism of DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment): identification of a second conformational change and evaluation of the internal equilibrium constant ME Dahlberg, SJ Benkovic - Biochemistry, 1991 - ACS Publications ... and KF-DNA,+l-PPi complexes was not observed in correct incorporation 14/20-mer as described earlier (Dahlberg Benkovic , 1991). ... Cited by 142 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 3 versions Cloning of the immunological repertoire in Escherichia coli for generation of monoclonal catalytic antibodies: construction of a heavy chain variable region-specific from pnas.org , BN Hay, KD Janda, SJ Benkovic , RA - Proceedings of the , 1989 - National Acad Sciences ... (catalytic antibodies/variable gene repertoire/antigen bhding) L. SASTRY*, M. ALTING-MEESt, W. D. HUSEt, J. M. SHORTt, J. A. SORGE*t, BN HAY*, KD JANDA*, SJ BENKOVIC *t, AND R. A. LERNER* ... 36, 1-44. 2. Lerner, R. A. Benkovic , SJ (1988) BioEssays 9, 107-112. ... Cited by 136 - Related articles - All 9 versions Chemical basis for enzyme catalysis from ucsb.edu TC Bruice, SJ Benkovic - Biochemistry, 2000 - ACS Publications ... Correlative motions appear to participate in the formation of NACs in the catechol O-methyltransferase E S complex and in the rate of turnover of dihydrofolate reduction. ... 5. Cannon, WR, and Benkovic , SJ (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2625726250. ... Cited by 137 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 8 versions Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase: spatial and temporal relationship between the polymerase and RNase H activities from pnas.org , JA Peliska, SJ Benkovic - Proceedings of the , 1992 - National Acad Sciences ... Department of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, 152 Davey Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802 Contributed by Stephen J. Benkovic , July 20 ... was 50 1.l; aliquots (5 Al) were removed from the reaction mixture at each time point and quenched by addition of S Al of ... Cited by 132 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 7 versions DNA Polymerase Fidelity: Kinetics, Structure, and Checkpoints CM Joyce, SJ Benkovic - Biochemistry, 2004 - ACS Publications ... S ., Sawaya, MR, and Ellenberger, T. (1999) An open and closed case for all polymerases, Structure7, R31R35. ... 17. Dahlberg, ME, and Benkovic , SJ (1991) Kinetic mechanism of DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment): identification of a second conformational change and ev. Cited by 133 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 4 versions Induction of an antibody that catalyzes the hydrolysis of an amide bond. KD Janda, D Schloeder, SJ Benkovic , RA - Science (New York, , 1988 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov 1. Science. 1988 Sep 2;241(4870):1188-91. Induction of an antibody that catalyzes the hydrolysis of an amide bond. Janda KD, Schloeder D, Benkovic SJ, Lerner RA. Department of Molecular Biology, Research Institute of Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA 92037. ... Cited by 142 - Related articles - All 6 versions Creating multiple-crossover DNA libraries independent of sequence identity from pnas.org GL Moore, CD Maranas, SJ Benkovic - Proceedings of the , 2001 - National Acad Sciences We have developed, experimentally implemented, and modeled in silico a methodology named SCRATCHY that enables the combinatorial engineering of target proteins, independent of sequence identity. The approach combines two methods for recombining genes: incremental ... Cited by 124 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 21 versions Ferritin, transferrin, and iron in selected regions of the adult and aged rat brain SA Benkovic , JR Connor - The Journal of Comparative , 1993 - Wiley Online Library ... O 1993 WILEY-LISS, INC. Page 2. 98 SA BENKOVIC AND JR CONNOR al., '87). ... Scale bars = 10 pm in A, B, DF; 20 pm in C. Page 3. Page 4. 100 TABLE 1 Summary of Cellular Distribution of Ferritin, Transfernn, and Iron in the Rat Brain' SA BENKOVIC AND JR CONNOR ... Cited by 123 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 4 versions Backbone Dynamics in Dihydrofolate Reductase Complexes: Role of Loop Flexibility in the Catalytic Mechanism Osborne, J Schnell, SJ Benkovic , HJ Dyson, PE - Biochemistry, 2001 - ACS Publications ... Michael J. Osborne, Jason Schnell, Stephen J. Benkovic , H. Jane Dyson, and Peter E. Wright* . ... 1000 s - 1 ) exhibits a deuterium isotope effect of 3, an indication that no kinetically significant reorganization of the Michaelis complex is necessary in the catalytic step (3). ... Cited by 120 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 6 versions A DNA fragment with an alpha-phosphorothioate nucleotide at one end is asymmetrically blocked from digestion by exonuclease III and can be replicated in vivo from pnas.org SD Putney, SJ Benkovic , PR - Proceedings of the , 1981 - National Acad Sciences ... Abbreviations: dATP , the Sp diastereomer of 2'-deoxyadenosine 5'-O-(1-thiotriphosphate); dAMP and dNTP are corresponding a-thio analogs; kb,kilobase( s ); bp, base pair( s ). 7350 Thepublication costs ofthis article were defrayedin partbypagecharge payment. ... Cited by 113 - Related articles - All 8 versions Iron regulation in the brain: histochemical, biochemical, and molecular considerations JR Connor, SA Benkovic - Annals of neurology, 1992 - interscience.wiley.com ... only in oligodendrocytes, but also in microglial cells in both human 1211 and rat brains ( S . A. Benkovic and JR Connor, unpublished observations). Also in rat brain (investigations in human brain are in progress), ferritin and iron are found in tanycytes that line the ventricles. ... Cited by 111 - Related articles - All 4 versions Isoforms of ferritin have a specific cellular distribution in the brain Connor, KL Boeshore, SA Benkovic , - Journal of , 1994 - interscience.wiley.com ... Connor JR, Benkovic SA (1992): Iron regulation in the brain: Histo- chemical, biochemical and molecular considerations. Ann Neurol 32:S51-S61. Connor JR, Menzies SL, St. Martin S , Mufson EJ (1991): The cellular distribution of transfemn, femtin, and iron in the human hrdin. ... Cited by 95 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 5 versions Combinatorial protein engineering by incremental truncation from pnas.org , AE Nixon, JH Shim, SJ Benkovic - Proceedings of the , 1999 - National Acad Sciences ... Contributed by Stephen J. Benkovic . ... Building on classic examples of protein fragment complementation, such as ribonuclease S (1) and -galactosidase (2), researchers have used protein fragment complementation to examine theories of protein evolution (3), protein folding ( ... Cited by 105 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 18 versions Peptide synthesis catalyzed by an antibody containing a binding site for variable amino acids , AB Smith 3rd, CM Taylor, PA Benkovic , SD Taylor, KM - Science, 1994 - sciencemag.org ... Sci. Tech- nol. B 9, 1061 (1991). 7. J. S . Foster and JE Frommer, Nature 333, 542 (1988). ... Ralph Hirschmann,* Amos B. Smith 111,* Carol M. Taylor, Patricia A. Benkovic , Scott D. Taylor, Kraig M. Yager, Paul A. Sprengeler, Stephen J. Benkovic * ... Cited by 91 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 9 versions A fluorescence-based assay for monitoring helicase activity from pnas.org , LC Sowers, DP Millar, SJ Benkovic - Proceedings of the , 1994 - National Acad Sciences ... Duarte, CA 91010; and $Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037 Contributed by Stephen J. Benkovic , March 30 ... Aliquots (10 1d) of the unwinding reaction mixture were taken at 10- s intervals and added to 10 Adof quench solution. ... Cited by 96 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 10 versions Dynamics of a flexible loop in dihydrofolate reductase from Escherichia coli and its implication for catalysis CJ Falzone, PE Wright, SJ Benkovic - Biochemistry, 1994 - ACS Publications ... This exchange process was altered (either removed or made fast on the NMR time scale) by deleting three hairpin turn forming residues from the loop and filling the gap with a singleglycine from jbc.org , ME Dahlberg, SJ Benkovic , ND Grindley, CM - Journal of Biological , 1992 - ASBMB ... duplex, the 13/ 20-mer, whose preparation, purification, and quantitation have been described previously (Kuchta et al., 1987; Dahlberg and Benkovic , 1991). ... mixing were 10, 30, and 50 p ~ . The reaction was quenched with 0.1 M EDTA at time points between 0 and 5 s and the ... Cited by 102 - Related articles - All 4 versions A mass spectrometric solution to the address problem of combinatorial libraries from psu.edu CL Brummel, INW Lee, Y Zhou, SJ Benkovic , N - Science, 1994 - nxw.chem.psu.edu ... R Milberg, and S . Mullen for helpful discussions, 5 November 1993; accepted 23 February 1994 A Mass Spectrometric Solution to the Address Problem of Combinatorial Libraries Christopher L Brummel, Irene NW Lee, Ying Zhou, Stephen J. Benkovic ,* Nicholas Winograd* The ... Cited by 97 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 9 versions The nucleotide analog 2-aminopurine as a spectroscopic probe of nucleotide incorporation by the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli polymerase I and MW Frey, LC Sowers, DP Millar, SJ Benkovic - Biochemistry, 1995 - ACS Publications ... Previous studies with Klenow fragment from ucsc.edu DD Cox, SJ Benkovic , LM Bloom, FC - Journal of the , 1988 - ACS Publications ... DD Cox,+ S . J. Benkovic ,$ LM Bloom,' FC Bradley,+ MJ Nelson,$ L. Que, Jr.,*+ and DE Wallickt Contribution from the Department of Chemistr , University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. ... (9) Wallick, DE; Bloom, L. M.; Gaffney, BJ; Benkovic , S . J. Bio- chemistry 1984, 23, 1295-1302. ... Cited by 85 - Related articles - All 3 versions Transition-state stabilization as a measure of the efficiency of antibody catalysis JD Stewart, SJ Benkovic - 1995 - nature.com ... | ChemPort |. 12. Stewart, JD, Roberts, VA, Thomas, N., Getzoff, ED Benkovic , SJ Biochemistry 33, 19912003 (1994). 13. Posner, B., Smiley, J., Lee, I. Benkovic , S . Trends biochem. Sci. 19, 145150 (1994). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |. 14. Stewart, JD et al. Proc. natn ... Cited by 69 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 6 versions Antibody remodeling: a general solution to the design of a metal-coordination site in an antibody binding pocket from pnas.org , BL Iverson, SA Iverson, SJ Benkovic , - Proceedings of the , 1990 - National Acad Sciences ... Department of Molecular Biology, Research Institute of Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA 92037; and tDepartment of Chemistry, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 Contributed by Stephen J. Benkovic , June 1, 1990 ... Cited by 80 - Related articles - All 9 versions Evidence for a Functional Role of the Dynamics of Glycine-121 of Escherichia coli Dihydrofolate Reductase Obtained from Kinetic Analysis of a Site-Directed Mutant CE Cameron, SJ Benkovic - Biochemistry, 1997 - ACS Publications ... 19 from the catalytic center of the enzyme has large-amplitude backbone motions on the nanosecond time scale [Epstein, DM, Benkovic , SJ, and ... Single-turnover experiments indicated that hydride transfer was reduced by 200-fold to a rate of 1.3 s - 1 and was the rate-limiting ... Cited by 82 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 5 versions
个人分类: 引证分析|6191 次阅读|0 个评论
科学家 Stephen J Benkovic (生物化学)
xupeiyang 2010-7-21 07:40
Stephen J Benkovic Department of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, USA Head of Section: Chemical Biology Biocatalysis 部分名著与科研绩效: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=0q=Stephen+J+Benkovichl=enas_sdt=2000 A perspective on enzyme catalysis SJ Benkovic , S Hammes-Schiffer - Science, 2003 - sciencemag.org The seminal hypotheses proposed over the years for enzymatic catalysis are scrutinized. The historical record is explored from both biochemical and theoretical perspectives. Particular attention is given to the impact of molecular motions within the protein on the enzyme's catalytic ... Cited by 341 - Related articles - All 10 versions 科学杂志检索结果: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/search?session_query_ref=rbs.queryref_1279668350094COLLECTIONS=hw1JC=sciFULLTEXT=%28Stephen+AND+J+AND+Benkovic%29FULLTEXTFIELD=lemcontentTITLEABSTRACTFIELD=lemhwcomptitleabsRESOURCETYPE=HWCITABSTRACTFIELD=lemhwcompabstractTITLEFIELD=lemhwcomptitle Science Magazine Search Results Results 1 to 10 of 64 found
个人分类: 名人传记|3965 次阅读|0 个评论
一种新科学(译文)
perfcat 2009-9-7 23:41
大约二十年前,我在一次计算机试验中得到了一个不曾预料的结果,在当时看来是个小发现而已,可经过进一步的深入调查,我逐渐发现了传统学科中基础部分的一个漏洞,从而也就带我发现了一整个新的科学。 这本书积累了我二十年以来在这种新科学方面的研究精华。我并未打算花这么久的时间来研究它,
个人分类: 未分类|28 次阅读|0 个评论

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-23 18:23

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部