在线投稿后,大家最关心的就是稿子的状态了。 最近爱思唯尔更新了投稿系统(EVISE),其旗下的不少杂志投递审稿逐步转移到新版投稿系统了,新版投稿系统看起来比较简洁。投稿状态和原投稿系统(EES)的状态有些不同,网上收集了一下,希望对大家有所帮助,详情如下: What does the status of my submission mean in EVISE? Status Description Submission Initiated The Author has initiated a submisѕion, but has not yet completed it. This submisѕion and its status is only visible for the author. With Journal The submisѕion has been received by the journal, but has not yet been assigned to an Editor. No Editor Invited An Editor has not yet been invited to handle the submisѕion. Editor Invited An Editor has been invited to handle the submisѕion. With Editor The submisѕion has been assigned to an Editor. Reviewer Invited At least one Reviewer has been invited to review the submisѕion, but none have yet accepted to review. Under Review At least one Reviewer has accepted to review the submisѕion, however the required number of reviews for the submisѕion have not yet been received. Ready for Decision The required number of reviews for the submisѕion have been completed. Decision Pending The handling Editor has submitted a decision and the submisѕion is now pending the higher level Editor's decision. Decision in Progress The final Handling Editor in a journal with split decision and author notification tasks has submitted a decision but the Administrative Editor has not yet notified the author. Rejected (这是一个令不少作者崩溃的状态!) The Editor has submitted a reject decision to the Author. Status Description Accepted (这个是所有的文章作者都喜欢的状态!) The Editor has submitted an accept decision to the Author, but the submisѕion has not yet been sent to Production. Sent to Production The accepted submisѕion has been sent to Production. Transmittal Failed The submisѕion has not reached Production although the send to Production task has been completed. Resubmisѕion Requested The submisѕion has been sent back to the Author. Under Resubmisѕion The Author has initiated a resubmisѕion, but has not yet completed it. Declined to Resubmit The Author has declined to resubmit their submisѕion. Revision Requested The Editor has submitted a revise decision to the Author, who has not yet agreed or declined to revise. Submit Revision The Author has initiated a revision, but has not yet completed it. This revision and its status is only visible for the author. Under Revision The Author has agreed to revise their submisѕion. Declined to Revise The Author has declined to revise their submisѕion. Withdrawn The submisѕion has been withdrawn from the journal. In Copy Editing The submisѕion has been assigned to a Copy Editor. Status Description Article Transfer Offered The Editor has submitted a reject and offer transfer decision to the Author, who has not yet accepted or declined the Article Transfer Service offer. Transferred The Author has accepted a transfer offer and the submisѕion has been transferred to another journal. Not Transferred The Author has declined a transfer offer and the submisѕion has not been transferred. 更多的说明详见 http://i.youku.com/elsevier?from=timeline SCI 投稿全过程信件模板一览:Cover letter催稿信等 一、最初投稿Cover letter Dear Editors: We would like to submit the enclosed manu entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manu, and manu is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manu that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name A E-mail: ××××@××××2) Name B E-mail: ××××@××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manu, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@×××× 二、催稿信 Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manu titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文 章稿 号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manu has been sent to reviewers or not?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards! Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author: Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@×××× 三、修改稿Cover letter Dear Dr/ Prof..(写上负责你文章编辑的姓名,显得尊重,因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑,只能用通用的Editors):On behalf of my co- authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manu, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manu entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文 章稿号). We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manu according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@×××× 四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见(最重要的部分) List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manu entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文 章稿 号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××。。。。。。逐条意见回答,切忌一定不能有遗漏针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用:We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestionAs Reviewer suggested that……Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见:Special thanks to you for your good comments. Reviewer #2: 同上述Reviewer #3: ××××××Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”2. Line 107, “……” was added 3. Line 129, “……” was deleted ×××××× We tried our best to improve the manu and made some changes in the manu. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper. {nextpage} We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions. 五、文章接受后可以考虑感谢一下负责你文章的编辑或主编(根据需要) Dear Prof. ××××××:Thanks very much for your kind work and consideration on publication of our paper. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@×××× 六、询问校稿信件(如果文章接受后时间较长) Dear ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of our accepted manu titled “Paper Title” (ID: 文 章稿 号), since the copyright agreement for publication has been sent to you two months ago. I am just wondering that how long I can receive the proof of our manu from you?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time for a reply. I am very pleased to hear from you.Thank you very much for your consideration.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@×××× 七、文章校稿信件 Dear Mr. ×××:Thanks very much for your kind letter about the proof of our paper titled “Paper Title” (ID: 文 章稿 号) for publication in “Journal Name”. We have finished the proof reading and checking carefully, and some corrections about the proof and the answers to the queries are provided below. Corrections:1. In ****** should be **** (Page ***, Right column, line***)2. In **** the “*****” should be “****” (Page ****, Right column, line****)Answers for “author queries”:1. *********************.2. **********************3. **********************We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××
邮箱收到一封题为“MANUSCRIPTS SUBMISSION”的邮件,如下。 ELSEVIER BUILDING INSIGHTS; BREAKING BOUNDARIES MANUSCRIPTS SUBMISSION On behalf of all the Editors-in-chief of Elsevier Journals, we wish to Communicate to you that we are currently accepting manuscripts in all Fields of human Endeavour. Authors are invited to submit manuscripts reporting recent developments in their fields. Papers submitted will be sorted out and published in any of our numerous journals that best Fits. This is a special publication procedure which published works will be discussed at seminars (organized by Elsevier) at strategic Cities all over the world. Please maximize this opportunity to showcase your research work to the world. The submitted papers must be written in English and describe original research not published nor currently under review by other journals. Parallel submissions will not be accepted. Our goal is to inform authors about their paper(s) within one week of receipt. All submitted papers, if relevant to the theme and objectives of the journal, will go through an external peer-review process. Submissions should include abstract, 5-10 key words, the e-mail address of the corresponding author. The paper Length should not exceed 30 double-spaced pages including figures and references on 8.5 by 11 inch paper using at least 11 point font. Authors should select a category designation for their manuscripts (article, short communication, review, etc.). Papers should be submitted electronically via email in Microsoft Word or PDF attachments; and should Include a cover sheet containing corresponding Author’s name, Paper Title, affiliation, mailing address, phone, fax number, email address etc. Would-be authors should send their manuscript to: elseviereditorials2014e@gmail.com Kind Regards, Rex Hammond (Prof.) PS: Pls. show interest by mailing elseviereditorials2014e@gmail.com if your Manuscript is not ready but will be ready soon. 这明显是封冒充Elsevier(爱思唯尔)的邮件: 1)写着Elsevier,还用了爱思唯尔官网所用的橙色; 2)“ Elsevier Journals”,不清楚的人还以为是爱思唯尔的刊物;但这个不知道是期刊还是出版商的名字Google不到,没有网址; 3)“ All submitted papers, if relevant to the theme and objectives of the journal ”,哪儿也没写什么期刊主题和收录范围是什么,也没期刊名字; 4)这封邮件发件人为“ elseviereditorials2014c elseviereditorials2014c@gmail.com ”,首先爱思唯尔肯定不用Gmail作为官方联系邮箱,其次投稿时到这个地址“ elseviereditorials2014e@gmail.com”,看见没,这两个地址差了个字母,2014c和2014e; 5)写了不少,就是封垃圾邮件。你们或许也收到过?爱思唯尔知道不?
5个月前,在硅谷开公司的数学博士Tyler Neylon,受到英国数学家Tim Gowers一篇有关抵制世界上最大的出版商爱思唯尔集团博文的启发,建立了一个网站( http://thecostofknowledge.com/ ),命名为“知识的代价”。这个网站提供了一个窗口,让各学术界人士公开抗议学术出版公司爱思唯尔( Elsevier )的运作方式。到我写这篇博文为止,全球已有12224位人在上面签名了,他们许诺,不在爱思唯尔旗下的期刊发表论文,不做审稿人,或者不担任编辑。有人用“学术之春”形容这场运动。大家抵制出版巨头的原因很简单:爱思唯尔集团使得人们获取“知识的代价”过于高昂。 “知识的代价”网站具体的号召内容如下: 多年来学者抗议爱思唯尔的商业活动并没有取得什么效果。他们的反对意见如下:(1)他们对订阅单个期刊收取不可思议的天价;(2)许多图书馆面对这样的天价,只得选择同意购买大量的“捆绑”杂志,而其中许多杂志并非是这些图书馆本想要的。从而,爱思唯尔依靠一些重要杂志获取了巨大的利润;(3)支持诸如“禁止网络盗版法案”(SOPA)、“保护知识产权法案”(PIPA)和“研究成果法案”(RWA)的活动,旨在限制信息的自由交流;(4)所有这些问题的关键,是作者希望他们的成果容易被他人获取的权利受到了限制。如果你想公开发布成果,你将不会支持任何爱思唯尔期刊的做法,除非他们从根本上改变这样的运作方式。那么,你可以通过填写本页的表格来表达你的详细意见。 附原文( http://thecostofknowledge.com/ ): Academics have protested against Elsevier's business practices for years with little effect. These are some of their objections: (1) They charge exorbitantly high prices for subscriptions to individual journals. (2) In the light of these high prices, the only realistic option for many libraries is to agree to buy very large "bundles", which will include many journals that those libraries do not actually want. Elsevier thus makes huge profits by exploiting the fact that some of their journals are essential. (3) They support measures such as SOPA, PIPA and the Research Works Act, that aim to restrict the free exchange of information. (4) The key to all these issues is the right of authors to achieve easily-accessible distribution of their work. If you would like to declare publicly that you will not support any Elsevier journal unless they radically change how they operate, then you can do so by filling in your details on this page. 对于SOPA, PIPA和RWA,这里进行一下注释: 禁止网络盗版法案(Stop Online Piracy Act): 当法案通过后,美国司法部及其他版权持有人将可以更便捷地申请法院禁令以对付盗版及贩售冒牌货的网站。而向法院申请的禁令包括:禁止网络广告公司向涉嫌网站投放广告、禁止支付网站向涉嫌网站提供支付服务、禁止搜索引擎出现涉嫌网站的网址,甚至可以要求互联网服务供应商拒绝用户访问涉嫌网站。该法案提高了对互联网用户未经授权在网络上分享版权内容的刑罚,如:六个月内分享10份音乐或电影类的版权作品将面临最高五年的监禁。该法案将给予那些自愿采取措施打击网络盗版和侵权的互联网服务提供商以司法豁免权,同时也允许版权持有人向任何一个明知却谎称不知进而提供侵权内容或盗版产品的网站索要连带赔偿。( http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOPA ) 保护知识产权法案(Protect Intellectual Property Act): 这是美国一项待审议通过的法律。它的目的是赋予美国政府和知识产权拥有者更多的法律手段来干预“专门发布侵犯知识产权的内容或者虚假内容的非法网站”,特别是那些在美国境外注册的。这项法案由美国国会议员帕特里克·李希(英语:Patrick Leahy)和另外11个来自两党的联合发起者于2011年5月12日提出。( http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/PIPA ) 研究成果法案(The Research Works Act): 2011年12月16日,Darrell Issa和Carolyn Maloney联合提交了此议案,同时提交给政府改革与监督委员会。从本质上看,这个议案试图禁止联邦机构以拨款为条件要求公共资金资助的研究文章、报告供公众在网上免费获取。 ( http://www.open-access.net.cn/5f00653e83b753d652a86001/20125e74/20125e741-26708/53cd5bf9research-work-act-h.r.-3699-4e004e2a59a8788d516c4f178d4452a9987976ee78147a766210679c5f00653e83b753d6768465b06cd56848 ) 至于这样的抵制活动能达到什么效果?今天的新闻《万名科学家抵制出版巨头称获取知识的代价高昂》( http://book.sina.com.cn/cul/c/2012-07-06/084597981.shtml )如此说: “有时候,引起雪崩只需一块小石头。”有国外媒体这样评价今年的这场“学术之春”运动。然而,“学术之春”能否真正为科学界争取到春天还很难说。这些年来,科学界与出版界,这两个文质彬彬的行业,总在“知识的代价”这个问题上唇枪舌剑。“学术之春”的发起人Tim Gowers表示,对于这场运动,自己持有“谨慎的乐观态度”,相信不会虎头蛇尾。 美国加州大学洛杉矶分校数学教授,英国皇家学会院士,2006 年获菲尔兹奖获得者陶哲轩公开发布:“ 就我自己而言,尽管过去有大约百分之九的文章发表在爱思唯尔期刊上(包括一两篇正在排版的) ,我决定从今天起,不再向爱思唯尔投稿,也拒绝成为其期刊的编委,尽管我将继续为这些杂志审一些稿件。就在撰写此文的时候,在抗议网站建立的短短4天之内已经有500多位数学家以及其他学科的科学家签了名。我很幸运,自己已经没有在一批指定的期刊上发表文章的压力了。正因为如此,对这个抗议采取什么样的行动是每个人自己的选择,我不会做任何建议。然而,我认为将我们对这一事件的看法广为传播是值得的,至少使大家知道存在这样一个抗议活动(更多的呼吁和相关内容可在上面提到的网站找到)。 ”( http://www.global-sci.org/mc/issues/3/no1/freepdf/95.pdf )