Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:29 PM 我收到来自innominate@yeah.net的匿名举报，说是Donghuan Qin等作者在Nanoscale Research Letters刚上线的论文是重复发表。 Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:40 PM 我马上就把举报电邮转发给Donghuan Qin，要求他作出解释。同时我开始对比举报人所附的两篇所谓重复发表的文章。令我诧异的是，这两篇重复发表的可能性很小。 Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:10 PM 在一个半小时后，我就收到了Donghuan Qin的答复电邮，迅速果断。明确指出两篇文章的不同，同时说明两篇文章已经前后引用。 Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:31 PM 21分钟后，Donghuan Qin又发来电邮，指出两篇涉嫌论文中更多的不同之处，同时合理地猜测举报人可能是只是从论文题目推论重复发表嫌疑。 Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:52 PM 又是21分钟后，我把Donghuan Qin的两次答复转发举报人。 Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:14 AM 在两个小时二十二分钟后，举报人答复说，他们还是认为有70%以上的内容重复。并说知道我在科学网的博客，建议让更多人来判断两篇论文是否重复发表。 2009-5-21 16:20:39 （北京时间） Donghuan Qin首次在我的博客再用中文答复，我也由此知道他的中文名字是覃东欢。 2009-5-21 22:11:40（北京时间） 2009-5-21 22:35:46（北京时间） 2009-5-21 22:37:13（北京时间） 2009-5-21 22:38:11（北京时间） 随后，覃东欢又连续四次或英文或中文评论，坚决果断地捍卫自己的学术声誉。 科学网博主们马上就做出了自己的判断： 2009-5-22 5:30:18（北京时间） andrewsun“感觉举报人基本上是没看懂” 2009-5-22 11:35:57（北京时间） nanowires反问举报人“有否仔细看过两篇文章”。 2009-5-22 14:12:53（北京时间） 吴伟“觉得只是几句语句很相似把”，“文章侧重点确实有差别”。 Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:28 AM 我给举报人答复如下： Dear Innominate, I believe this is not your real name though. Since you know my blog at sciencenet, I won't repeat what's going on there. Please read the following blog post by yourself: http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=233382 Accordingly, I would like to conclude that "the final paper (NRL one) contains a lot of new finding" and "there are no self-plagiarize in this paper". If you have any further argument, please let me know. Best regards, Zhiming M. Wang, Editor-in-Chief of Nanoscale Research Letteres 到现在，投诉人也没有进一步的反驳意见。我作为NRL期刊主编也就在此作结： 覃东欢等作者的这个NRL文章没有重复发表问题。我感谢覃东欢把经受住考验的论文投稿NRL，也欢迎他继续支持NRL，把更多的好文章投过来。 请大家也更多引用支持覃东欢等的这篇NRL论文： Solution Grown Se/Te Nanowires: Nucleation, Evolution, and The Role of Triganol Te seeds HongTao, XudongShan, DapengYu, HongmeiLiu, DonghuanQin, and YongCao, Nanoscale Research Letters , 10.1007/s11671-009-9346-2 , 2009. 我非常欣赏覃东欢对此学术不端指控迅速而果断的反应，希望更多中国科研工作者向他学习。 同时，希望覃东欢考虑加入科学网，加入纳米圈，让我们一起在科学网建设一个真正的专业学术圈。 注：谢谢吴伟的提醒，我也应该感谢Innominate对NRL的关心和要求，也希望Innominate考虑加入科学网，加入纳米圈。很高兴听说覃东欢已经在科学网开博。欢迎！
Solution Grown Se/Te Nanowires: Nucleation, Evolution, and The Role of Triganol Te seeds HongTao, XudongShan, DapengYu, HongmeiLiu, DonghuanQin, and YongCao, Nanoscale Research Letters , 10.1007/s11671-009-9346-2 NRL作者答复（中文）—— 标题：关于Se-Te的论文 发表评论人： 覃东欢 ip:222.16.35.* “王老师： 您好！我无意中发现了你开的博客，而且确信就是您本人，关于在NRL上发表的论文存在重复的问题，我已经详细回复了，由于英文能力有限，在这里不妨来详尽解释。学术声誉对于一个研究人员来说是非常重要的，我对于“剽窃”绝对说不。这两篇文章（旧的暂且定为1，新的为2）是这样的： 在中国化学物理上的发表的1. 主要是讨论SDBS表面活性剂合成V型Se-Te和Te纳米线，我们当时是意外发现V-型Se-Te纳米晶可以用Te晶种合成，所以报道在该期刊上，也是中国纳米会议推荐的论文，后来发表的论文2.我们开展了更全面的工作，主要是想知道Te纳米晶种的作用，考查不同Te晶种长度对合成Se-Te形貌的影响，发现长的Te晶种可以得到直型的Se-Te纳米线（这是前面1没有发现的，也是我们首先发现可以通过晶种诱导生长）；另外我们还观察了反应时间，以便观察V型Se-Te的形成过程（在1也是没有的），同时我们还用HRTEM更详尽观察了V-Se-Te纳米线在中部、两端的高分辨图像，证实其为单晶，直型的Se-Te纳米线也得到了相应的结果（这在1中是没有的或者不全面）；另外给出了三种V-Se-Te纳米线的XRD图（1中也没有）；唯一用到的一点1的数据是V-Se-Te纳米线的不同部分含量分析，但是我们后面做的更加全面（同时把直型-Se-Te纳米线也附上了）；给出的三种V型Se-Te纳米线也进行了系统的统计（1是没有的），因为更容易得到合理的机制；我们在文中已经把1引入，而且强调我们2的工作的主要新点；所以如果自己剽窃的话绝对不会把自己发表的论文也引上；我们的表征得到北大王大鹏教授研究小组的单旭东博士（现在在王中林那里做博士后）的很大支持。两篇论文题目有点相似，但后者已经重点放在其机制，最后我重申尊重NRL的调查，但是我绝对没有任何作弊的可能，因为论文无论从内容及机理解释方面都是可以接受任何检验的，也欢迎指出。” NRL作者答复1（英文）—— date Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:10 PM subject there are no self-plagiarize in this paper “Dear professor, The two paper is quite different, there are no self-plagiarize in this case. The main different can be seen in the following: in the previous paper "D. Qin, H. Tao, Y. Cao, Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 20, 670 (2007). doi: 10.1088/1674-0068/20/06/670-674."(we have cited in this paper, reference 24), we just report the finding on v-shaped Se-Te NWs and Te NWs by using SDBS surfactant but we do not further investigate the whole preparing process. Such as the important of Te nano-seeds, the straight morphology of Se-Te NWs still haven't obtianed in the previous paper, the previous paper is for nano-meeting in chinese on 2007. After that, we do a lot of research on Se-Te NWs in order to find out the exact grow mechanism on Se-Te nanowires and the whole V-shape Se-Te NW formation(Figure 5, there are no Figure show before) is investegated. Further more, we first time obtain straight and self-assemble Se-Te NW by using long Te nanorods as seeds(Figure 2, please check, this is different from the previous paper on straight Te NW). We also add new XRD data on Se-Te NW(Figure 3 different Se to Te ratio).Although these two paper all talk about the V-shape Se-Te NWs, the characterize of V-shaped Se-Te NWs is more detail by the help of professor Dapeng Yu research group( we also cited the previous paper in reference24). So by comparing these two paper, we can conclude that the final paper contains a lot of new finding, and the mechanism is more accepted, there are no self-plagiarize in this paper. Self-plagiarize is a very serious problem and we never do this in our research group. We are very appreciated that NRL is a very severe journal. please let me know what i can do further help for prove the different of these two-papers regard Donghuan Qin” NRL作者答复2（英文）—— date Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:31 PM “Dear Professor, I further read this letter you send for me. People who think that this paper is self-plagiarize may just read the title of these two papers( one title is Controlled Synthesis of Se/Te Alloy and Te Nanowires and one title is Solution Grown Se/Te Nanowires: Nucleation, Evolution, and The Role of Triganol Te seeds). So one may think that this two papers is the similar. In fact, a lots of different contained in the new paper( including all the figure used in new paper). The paper in previous is just the finding on the V-shaped Se-Te NW and straight Te NW by using SDBS surfactant. The grow mechnism is just a guess as no further experiment was done. The paper on NRL including the whole synthesized of V-shaped Se-Te NW(Fig1) straight Se-Te NW (Fig 2) and the V-shaped Se-Te NW formation process(Figure 5) . By the helping of Prof. Dapeng Yu, The HRTEM characterized of V-shaped and straight Se-Te NW is more detail(Fig 4) regard Donghuan Qin” 重复发表投诉人就NRL作者两个英文电邮答复的反馈（英文）： “If you read and compare the two paper carefully, you will found the two papers similar part more than 70%, includs introduction part, experimental section (Se/Te ratio), the figures, the results and discussions. NRL paper is only change some descriptions in some degree. We know your blog in sciencenet, you can unfurl the two papers for getting more pepole's adjudges!”
这是我今天收到的重复发表嫌疑指控。说的是Nanoscale Research Letters和Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics的两篇文章。我作为NRL期刊主编，就对此公开调查。我认为，对重复发表这样的调查，科学网上大部分认真的读者都有资格判断，请评论吧。我们采取无罪推论。在我综合大家意见作出最终判断之前，被控告者并无重复发表不端问题。 Subject: A new paple is self-plagiarize in your journal Dear Editor, We found two paper is self-plagiarize, and one is the new on-line paper in Nanoscare Res. Lett., please check it, thank you! Sincerely! ******** * 2009-5-21 Paper info.: Controlled Synthesis of Se/Te Alloy and Te Nanowires D Qin , H Tao , Y Cao - Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics, 2007 - iop.org Solution Grown Se/Te Nanowires: Nucleation, Evolution, and The Role of Triganol Te seeds http://www.springerlink.com/content/c46686wm4gul50r5/?p=75fac75d004d4f81a0cac9feb0d283fbpi=1
标签: 重复发表
