以下的内容来自海外学者的分析,特转发在这里供科学网网友参考. 关于“转基因粮食是安全有全球共识”。 那是中国挺转帮特别是中国农业部既得利益官员学者们搞的欺骗宣传。且不说全球,转基因种子公司被赶出了欧洲,拉丁美洲和非洲一些国家已经颁布了禁止转基因食品作物的法令,那是什么“安全共识”?就是转基因最大推销国美国,也没有那个“共识”;举例,这里是美国的官方文字: Questions Answers on Food from Genetically Engineered Plants FDA, 04/07/2013 http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/Biotechnology/ucm346030.htm 。 3. Are foods from genetically engineered plants safe? Foods from genetically engineered plants must meet the same requirements,including safety requirements, as foods from traditionally bred plants. FDA hasa consultation process that encourages developers of genetically engineeredplants to consult with FDA before marketing their products. This process helpsdevelopers determine the necessary steps to ensure their food products are safeand lawful. The goal of the consultation process is to ensure that any safetyor other regulatory issues related to a food product are resolved beforecommercial distribution. Foods from genetically engineered plants intended tobe grown in the United States that have been evaluated by FDA through theconsultation process have not gone on the market until the FDA’s questionsabout the safety of such products have been resolved. Genetically engineered foods http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002432.htm Potential risks include: Modified plants or animals may have genetic changes that are unexpected and harmful. Modified organisms may interbreed with natural organisms and out-compete them, leading to extinction of the original organism or to other unpredictable environmental effects. Plants may be less resistant to some pests and more susceptible to others. 美国主管部门FDA-对转基因食品是否安全的问题之回答是不置可否;卫生部的公民常识普及材料则说明了转基因食品“潜在效益”的同时也说明了“潜在风险”、且是危害足够严重的风险。那叫什么“安全共识”? 2013 年 07 月,美国农业部的业务报告说:要在中国推销转基因食品作物,需要注意的问题之一是 “ 缺乏科学界的一致声音 ” ( Lacking of unified voices from scientists and weak risk communication,the public are concerned about safety of biotech products.) 。美国官方最大的转基因食品作物推销机构也不承认有什么 “ 共识 ” 。 至于美国国防部等国家安全部门,则是明确指出转基因食品及其农作物可以成为搞生物战争或恐怖袭击的武器。因而有了个对比: 中国的“一号文件”讲的是“转基因大跃进”,而美国的“一号文件”则讲的是以防御转基因技术武器攻击或袭击的“农业反恐” 。