科学网

 找回密码
  注册

tag 标签: 榜样

相关帖子

版块 作者 回复/查看 最后发表

没有相关内容

相关日志

如果施一公和饶毅这样做的话会是什么效果
热度 53 jiangjiping 2012-6-11 07:54
如果施一公和饶毅这样做的话会是什么效果 蒋继平 2012 年 6 月 11 日 清华大学生命科学院院长兼教授施一公和北京大学生命科学院院长兼教授饶毅是科学网的两位知名博主,是中国科教领域的知名人物, 是中国科学界的两颗新星, 更是广大年轻学子的崇拜偶像。 他们两位在当今中国的科教界的影响力是相当大的。 正因为如此, 他们两人的一言一行都会在中国的科教界引起足够的重视。 比如说, 他们两人双双落选院士,就引发了科技界的 一片议论, 几乎形成一股轩然大波。 据我本人的分析和观察, 他们两人的知名度和影响力是由两个方面构成的。第一, 他们的学术成果比较出色,最明显的例子是他们经常在国际上很有影响力的期刊上发表论文, 不管这些论文对人类社会有哪些实质性的贡献,那也是一种才能的展示 。 第二, 他们善于展示爱国的抱负, 有一个振兴中华的胸怀。 这后者受到执政者的青睐。 鉴于此, 他们两人经常被邀请在各种场合作演讲。 他们演讲的内容除了专业方面的相关话题外, 主要是对年轻学子爱国主义的教育。 他们的主要论点是, 他们主动放弃国外的优厚生活待遇, 全身心地回国服务, 为的是振兴中华。 在我看来,他们说的是事实。 可是,这只是事实的一部分, 是对他们有利的一个事实, 他们没有说出其他的事实,比如说,美国的职业竞争是非常激烈的, 因而,生存压力很大。 我这样说并不是反对他们的爱国主义教育,而是认为这种口头上的爱国主义教育是否能起到应有的作用。据我所知, 这两位大牛已经在中国的这两个最著名的大学任教 5 年多, 而且担负着重要的岗位。 事实上, 正是这两个高等学府的学生积极地寻求出国的机会,而且也是中国出国人员比例最高的两所大学。 这个事实是不用争辩的。 由此可见,这样的爱国主义教育的效果是很有限的。 为什么会出现这样的结果呢? 我认为关键是一些做法和策略上出了问题。 所以,我想,要是施一公和饶毅能够更加实事求是地给年轻学子们介绍一些美国社会的实际情况, 这些情况不但应该包含大学校园的环境, 更应该包含社会各种阶层的总体情况。这是因为大学只是社会的一个部分,而且是一个较小的部分。 人们在大学接受教育后,绝大多数是要进入社会生活的,不可能永远生活在大学中。 要是一味地说美国的生活是如何如何的舒服, 那不等于为美国作免费的广告吗? 还有,要是真心地和有效地改变目前中国科教界的一些不良倾向,他们两人首先应该带头把自己的研究成果发表在国内的期刊上, 而不是发表在国际著名的期刊上。 要是连这点也做不到, 那么, 中国的科技影响力何时才能被国际认可? 既然要讲爱国, 就应该拿出实际行动来, 树立起民族的品牌, 即使牺牲自己的短期利益, 也应该在所不惜! 人们不是看您说的,而是看您做的!
个人分类: 观点交流|9430 次阅读|149 个评论
子犹如此,父何以堪?
热度 2 hailang0 2012-5-17 15:13
母亲节的时候,俺声讨了一下犬子的“罪”行。后来想了一想,得出“有其父,有其子”的结论,现在又不由得自我好好检讨一番我的“罚”! 话说当年读初中,一二年级根本一点感觉都没有,浑浑噩噩(我儿比我当年强)。最糟糕的是我的数学,上几何的时候被那个 sunju 仙老师弄得一塌糊涂,加上又跟她顶嘴,结果就被她判处了死刑: 我交上去的练习本,不管对还是错,她统统地打上对钩“√”。错了我也不知道。 结果可想而知,这个学期我的数学只得了总评三四十分的最差成绩! 拿到那个成绩单的我,真是羞辱地无地自容。姥姥看到我的这个分数,好像是说今年三十,明年二十的样子。我母亲则平常总是拿我隔壁的小红对比,说: 你瞧瞧,男孩连个女孩子都不如?亏你还是! 知道我考了这个数学分数,更是气得脸都发青了。 犹记得小学的时候我们姐弟们打架,不团结,老妈生气就不让大家吃饭——说做了这种事,你们还有脸吃? 这下子我成了家里和学校的臭狗屎了。我这人脸没处搁。第二个学期开始学苏秦一样悬梁刺股。英语课文,没有人能够全篇背诵下来的,我敢! 每天一段,次晨巩固;再背下一段……英语老师对我刮目相看了。 英语成绩上去了,其他功课的难关我也随之逐一攻破。到中考的时候,我们这铁路子弟学校的学生参加全县的统考,我考了 366 分!在全年级名列第二! 高中更是我全面发力的时候。那个小红本来是跟我在一个班念文科的,她班长、我学习委员。后来她转到理科班(高考名额更多),我继续兼任班长、团支书、体育委员,一口气和中考第一名的同学一样考上了大学,并成为“湖大”中文录取分数最高的学生,据说离武大只差 4 分——如果我的路局优秀三好的奖励加分能够算上,则超过录取线,不过却被不知晓帮我们办理的学校害苦了。而我的邻居同学却榜上无名,第二年又转回到文科班复读。 犹记得那个 sunju 仙老师听说我考上了大学,惊讶的表情在她的脸上悬挂了好久! 她无法理解“苏老泉,二十七,始发愤”后会产生什么样的结果? 我这个儿子恐怕有点接代,不到他自己羞辱得抬不起头的时候,他可能不会有自知之明。惟愿那个时候的他,一鼓作气,三年不鸣,鸣必冲天! 是为记。 2012-5-17 下午
个人分类: 追 忆|443 次阅读|3 个评论
荒唐的新闻,荒唐的“榜样”。
热度 33 yanjx45 2012-5-2 13:20
在五一劳动节期间,《武汉晚报》的一则新闻被媒体疯传,似乎是发愤要狠狠地感动中国 ( 甚至世界 ) 一把: “武汉动物园 保育员舔猴屁股 1 小时帮其排便” ( 还配发了事主舔小猴子屁股的照片 ) 。 有网友正面评论:“五一,向劳动者致敬!向工作在一线的劳动模范致以崇高的敬礼!” “你们是共和国的功臣。劳动最伟大!” “让人敬佩,很敬业,劳动最光荣。” “如果我们少一些贪腐,多一些像张师傅这样的劳模,国家就大有希望。” 在科学网,也有人提供了该新闻的链接。 动物保护主义者最先被感动,立即给予高度评价:“ 爱护动物,到了极致”。仰慕之情,溢于言表。 另有其他网友随后也赞扬:“ 保育员是爲了干革命工作。赞!” 对发生肠梗阻或便闭的动物可以如此“敬业”,对有类似疾病的人类当然更没有理由不如法炮制。以后是否要号召所有的医务工作者都学习这样的榜样呢? 游客将花生扔给小猴,确实可能危及小猴的生命。但一粒花生进了消化道 ---- 没有误入气管,没有卡住呼吸道,难道真的就有生命危险吗? 按常识,如果只有一粒完整的花生进入消化道,通常危险并不大,因消化道有较大的伸缩性。似只有多粒花生同时进入肠道,才可能引起肠梗阻。 照此推理,这位保育員只舔一小时,只舔出一粒花生,显然是不夠的。他至少还应当再 舔 24 小时,舔出全部的花生,才能真正让小猴脱离生命危险,才算真正敬业,才能更有力地感动中国甚至世界。 …… 科学发展到今天,治疗肠梗阻或便闭,还需要用如此令人恶心、违背基本卫生常识的方法吗? 如果这种方法真的有特殊的优点,科学网的博主们是否应当专门申请一项国家课题,论证该方法在治疗肠梗阻或便闭方面的优越性、甚至是不可替代性,将该方法推广到全世界,写入相关的医疗规范,从而在彻底感动全世界的同时,为世界医学作出更大的贡献? 遗憾的是,许多网友并未受到感动,甚至心狠口辣,大唱反调: “我就不相信除了用舌头舔没其它替代方法。用棉签不行吗?” ( 天机不可泄露啊? ) “科学不发达的悲哀 ! 添屁股是很有意义的中国文化 ???? ” “除了无知、无能之外,就只剩下恶心了!” “病态!严重的病态!让人恶心的病态!” “报道的记者更变态 ! 小编太无聊!” 呜乎,真是世风日下,人心不古 ! ?
个人分类: 媒体纠错|12236 次阅读|41 个评论
榜样的力量与榜样的反动力
szc009 2012-2-27 11:14
榜样是一种动力,我们常说榜样的力量一般是指向这个动力而言的,比如榜样作为追求与向往的目标,则是励志成才的动力。然而榜样总是一种力量,这种力量并不总表现为动力,也可以是反动力。就好像有压力就有动力一样,压力也可以是反动力。比如,老王家孩子读了个好大学,老李家有人做了大官,老张家发了大财,很容易成为了周边人追捧的榜样。至于这榜样到底是不是力量还真不好说,榜样本身其实就是标榜的样板,说得不好听些就是古板——尽管未必都是古代的版本,就算是最新的也是过去了的,古板是极好的称谓。 如果榜样是好的,也可能会极端化,美化甚至被神化,人总是有个共性,总是把标榜的极端化了、美化了才能去瞻仰与向往。不然作为榜样是不够格的,如果老王家的孩子读书很用功却没考中大学则是很可惜的,而老张家只是在田间勤俭劳作有点节余而没发大财的话则不被称道。榜样不仅要好,而且要大,触手可及的话多不屑于为之,更是不值得一提的。有时候真的有人提起,即使不是以榜样来提的,很快就会有人说,“那个不是小儿科嘛”,一副不屑一顾的样子,意思就是说我也可以,说不定做得更好哩。大学前面得有个好字的,当大官发大财本来就是好的,加上好字就多此一举了。 看来作为一个榜样是不那么容易的,而真的能够成为一个榜样应该不是谈笑间的工夫。就好像读个大学很容易,读个好大学就不一般了。而作为勉励人的话,你可以随处听到,还拿老王家孩子考上个好大学来说吧:东家邻居听到了会跟自己孩子说,“你看老王家儿子有出息了,好好干,孩子你也要考个这么好的大学”;西家邻居听到了说,“你给老子也考上,给咱争争光。”至于这东家的孩子与西家的孩子是否都读了大学就不得而知了,也许东家的孩子辍学去创业了,发了财成了新的榜样或者被他老子骂做一辈子没出息连孙子都抬不起头来;而西家的孩子可能被他老子逼疯了,倒是还没拿刀子去捅人,也或者读了个好大学,只是没看出有出息的样子,他老子也感叹还不如不读大学的,也不早发了,他到死也不知道孩子在大学干了些什么。 好的榜样也不总是那么好的,就好像有个农夫在地里面忙活,有一个兔子撞到了他地里面的树桩上死掉了,他就丢掉了手里的活计,期待着天天有兔子肉吃,自己的田地却颗粒无收。这是几千年守株待兔的故事,虽说是个不好的榜样,但确实很多现代人的榜样,尽管很多人一边学着这个农夫一边耻笑这个农夫是何等的傻帽。事实上只是换了不同的兔子与木桩,不同的人在守而已,看看这个故事的现代版就知道这个故事已经演绎到了何种程度:很多人听说可以有不劳而获这等好事,就各自在自己田地里栽了一些树桩,有的人栽的多些,有的人栽的少些,就等着兔子来撞。比如美国就有个巴菲特,被世界人民成为股神的,其他的则不怎么听说,至于多少家破人亡的更不得而知了,“一将成名万骨枯”,“一将”的名字被载入了史册,但并太不多,“万具枯骨”是没得说话的份,更谈不得做榜样了。喊自己的孩子读书,功成名就,也只是换了一个手法而已,并不算太高明。现代人聪明达到聪明的不那么显然的程度,而愚蠢更是不那么显然,很多人很难达到。充分体现了现代人学习的高层次与高境界性,真是与时俱进,日新月异! 榜样的反动力确是存在的,哪怕是好的榜样。不好的当然不会被人拿出来当众膜拜,也不会标榜出来,可能会被不断的声讨,从越来越多也越来越高的声讨声来判断,不好的榜样也确乎是存在的。比如开着车子撞人的甚至杀人的,一个比一个牛气,确乎也是榜样的力量。如果这个例子不算很好的佐证,到各地的拆迁现场用心观摩一番,你就会发现榜样的力量是无穷的,只是这力量是反动力,甚至是反动的。这里的反动是物理学上的说法,至于历史上或政治上的反动,指的是开历史的倒车,与无产阶级思想行为不符的反动派。不可也不要混为一谈。 我们不能批判榜样,尽管存在榜样的诸多不好处,也有很多不好的榜样,那些都是不足以效法的。惟一好的榜样与榜样的好并存的榜样是以自己为榜样,既可以做自己又可以做好的自己,也不需要标榜出来,更可以每天有一个新的且好的榜样,也省却了诸多诸多的麻烦!
个人分类: 躬省力行|3722 次阅读|0 个评论
希望儿子向曹操学习
热度 15 chrujun 2011-11-26 17:34
儿子转到新学校后,虽然打架的次数不多,但每次都把同学打得很惨,引起了老师的极大担忧。我告诉儿子,要向曹操学习,要靠谋略和智慧去征服人,而不是靠自己的拳头去征服人。 我进一步说,你看看《三国演义》,三国演义中武功最强的几个人,有几人有好下场? 我说:“如果你知道为什么曹操比诸葛亮强多了,知道为什么曹操最值得学习,证明你看懂了《三国演义》。”
个人分类: 教学心得|4711 次阅读|37 个评论
【麻雀博文】树立榜样还是打击劣质?
热度 7 陈安博士 2011-4-30 16:20
  鸿飞兄认为,解决中国学术水平低下的要义在于树立榜样,告诉大家什么才是好的科研。   我们树立榜样的做法其实在很早以前就做过了,建国后的那段时间一直都有各种各样的榜样出现在公众面前。应该说,在一个对外界缺乏了解和接触的环境中,榜样的力量还是很大的。   不过,今天,如果依然只以树立榜样为主来促进科研,就难了。   树立榜样的另外一个角度是打击劣质,打击造假,打击腐败。   中国学术界最大的问题是什么?   是劣质的挤占了优质的发展空间,柠檬效应,挤出效应,劣币占优。   而且基于面子的考虑,又没人会主动出来笑话那些科研做得差还很自信地抢钱抢位子的人。   我国国人,也只有在亡国灭种的关头才会让真正的优秀者带大家“出埃及”;一旦转换到和平时期,几乎是立刻,劣质货第一时间就能把优质货挤走。   所以,榜样的力量,在我国历史上,一直都是难以持续的。而反对劣质的战争,在历史上也从来没有发生过,倒是宽容劣质的做法一直在持续。   俺们觉得,如果能两者兼顾就好了,如果不能兼顾,也许把树立榜样的事情放在扫除劣质之后跟恰当。
个人分类: 事论|3549 次阅读|14 个评论
韩国是我们的榜样,亮剑吧!
wangdw 2010-9-19 14:55
韩国是我们的榜样,亮剑吧! 关键词:韩国 独岛 钓鱼岛 榜样 亮剑 两岸军事合作 想念毛泽东 凤凰卫视的 9 月 18 日的节目《时事开讲》中郑浩的讲话启发了我。他说:韩国与日本之间也存在有争议的岛屿,韩国叫独岛,日本叫做竹岛。 18 日,香港民众举行大规模反日示威游行 早在 1953年的时候,当时有一名退伍的韩国上士,23岁,叫做洪淳七。他在退役之后有一天他看到了有一个报道,就是日本的军人在独岛上有一个碑子,宣示这是日本的领土,因此他非常的气愤。他就和40多名叫独岛义勇军守碑队购买了武器,然后在4月20号的时候,分两路登上了独岛,并且把日本的守军全部都赶走了。从1953年4月份开始成功的夺回了独岛之后,他用了长达三年零八个月的时间独自的来守护这样一个岛屿,这上面也有义勇的守备军,并且在1953年到1957年这段时间里面,一直是和日本方面进行作战,击溃了五十多次日本的军人,试图要重夺这个岛屿这样的一种行动。到了1958年的时候,正式的开始由韩国的海上警备部队来进行接管,然后在这个岛上立了一个灯塔。到了1981年的时候,由韩国的军方海军,开始派出正规的部队来守护这个岛屿,而且不断的扩大海上的一些军事的攻势。在2006年为了要展现这种韩国守护岛屿的决心,韩国的海军还专门打造了一个两栖攻击舰独岛号,这个名字叫独岛号,实际上它是一个准航母,能够搭载数十架的直升机,另外还可以升降,垂直起落的战斗机。 看完这一报道,我豁然开朗了!韩国人是我们的榜样,钓鱼岛本来是我国的领土,美国在二战结束时硬要划给日本。上一篇博文就谈到这一问题。现在是,日本派军舰控制了钓鱼岛。抓了我们的船长到现在还不送还。甚至放话说还想延长羁押,气焰十分嚣张。独岛的例子启发我们,必须以具体的实际行动来捍卫国家的领土和主权。军队必须在关键时刻亮剑!难道我们连韩国都不如? 我们的台湾军队总是出动为保钓人员护航,甚至在 1990年曾经计划武装夺取钓鱼岛。我们解放军还不出去算什么?难道还不如国军?我们完全可以与台湾军事合作,一举拿下钓鱼岛。这是两岸军事合作的好机会,何乐而不为? 我们想念毛泽东!在毛泽东时代,二败美国军队,大长了中华民族的志气!现在别人都欺负到家了,还不亮剑?要相信群众,相信我们的军队。
个人分类: 保钓斗争|3418 次阅读|3 个评论
蒋高明研究员是榜样
gaojianguo 2010-9-12 15:46
(生机勃勃的蒋家庄,图片来自蒋高明的博客) 初来乍到科网时,看了蒋高明老师的文章尽是些农场啊、生态啊、养鸡养牛啊什么的,给人一种不那么高端的感觉,心里想此人是个正儿八经的民科,比较低端。后来留意到蒋研究员不仅是首席,还是博导什么的,一大堆的职称( http://www.bbioo.com/bioer/2008/22125.shtm ),看的我眼花缭乱,最重要的是还是科网博客特别推荐的专家。回过头想想我那时还太年轻,真是有眼不识泰山,看低了蒋研究员 今天看到蒋老师的博文我组投稿经历中一稿接收的高分SCI论文( http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=361351 )中介绍的一篇文章Biomass energy utilization in rural areas may contribute to alleviating energy crisis and global warming: A case study in a typical agro-village of Shandong, China,彻底否定了之前认为蒋老师的研究有点绣腿花拳的看法,无知者无畏嘛,呵呵。花了近一个上午的时间仔细研读了这篇论文,过了一个没有纳米、基因和PCR、假说的周末,感到很放松,文章中充斥着的秸秆、牛粪和沼气使我倍感亲切(谁让俺高家都是农民出身呢~)。 我相信科网中有近90%的人都在异地他乡工作,近一点的可能是北井、上海和内蒙古uu,远一点的有可能是米国、英格儿,或奥大力(还没听说有在太空中上班的科网博主),但很少有人回自己家乡搞科研的,像蒋首席研究员这样能使用大量国家资源游刃有余地建设蒋家庄的更是凤毛麟角。蒋研究员通过这种方式不仅实现了报效国家的高级理想,还实现了自己衣锦还乡的儿时梦想,确实值得广大博主学习,特别适合刚下两个蛋还没把窝暖热的龟龟们。 将研究员能使一批接着一批的研究生、博士后到蒋家庄从事真正意义上的调查和科研是需要勇气和毅力地,当然更重要的是能力(什么时候俺也整个高家庄示范基地,哈哈)。希望蒋老师的这种能缓解能源压力、减少碳排放的生态系统模型尽快得以推广。 向蒋研究员致敬! 博文版论文: 从南马庄到蒋家庄: http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=332795 广西、河南、山东三省农民互助合作社代表参观弘毅生态农场: http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=324879 未来的生态农庄: http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=232002 中美来宾欢聚弘毅生态农场: http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=332834 不进农村,学问就没有立脚点: http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=45856 农民为何不愿搞绿色食品: http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=22244 中国农业:小农户还是大农场?: http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=14651 关于加快山东省生态循环农业建设的建议: http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=6048 食物安全与生态安全可共赢: http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=5767 让生态农业循环起来: http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=3967 把秸秆变成牛羊的面包: http://www.sciencenet.cn/m/user_content.aspx?id=3811 Biomass energy utilization in rural areas may contribute to alleviating energy crisis and global warming: A case study in a typical agro-village of Shandong, China
个人分类: 生活点滴1|4594 次阅读|1 个评论
这个社会需要唐骏的道歉,唐骏的成功也需要一个道歉
jiasf 2010-7-18 21:30
唐骏学历门的事实部分已经基本清楚了,那就是打工皇帝在多个场合自我宣称或被动默认的海外博士是假的!日本名古屋大学的博士学位是假的,美国加州理工学院的博士学位是假的,只有那个West Pacific University 的博士文凭是真的,但遗憾的是所谓的西太平洋大学却是美国教育部门不承认的野鸡大学!据 2010年07月16日 法制晚报 ( http://tech.sina.com.cn/i/2010-07-16/19174438146.shtml )报道:本报记者连线美国高等教育认证委员会(CHEA)和密歇根州教育厅(美国密歇根和俄勒冈是定期公布文凭工厂名单的两个州),获得了两份最新公布的虚假或不合格大学的黑名单,共曝光了1500多所大学,它们颁发的学位就业时不被认可。在美国教育机构的野鸡大学名单中明明白白有西太平洋大学的大名,而且该校还曾在中国设办学点!因此,可以确认:那些力挺唐骏学历、说自己确实曾经在北京上过西太大学的唐骏的校友们,拿到的也肯定是假文凭! 比起以上文凭造假的事实,更可气的是唐骏的言论:你欺骗一个人没问题,如果所有人都被你欺骗到了,就是一种能力,就是成功的标志。在他那里似乎没有了诚信的任何位置。 鉴于唐骏的知名度和影响力,鉴于唐骏想给青年们立榜样的愿望,如果唐骏真还对这个社会有些责任心,我建议唐骏做一件这个社会非常需要的事情:坦诚地给曾受你欺骗的人们和社会道一个歉!如果您能勇于承担所有后果、并重新建立自己的信用而获得成功,那才是这个社会真正需要的榜样!
个人分类: 社会观察|3751 次阅读|0 个评论
对于CCTV这种国家宣传工具,白岩松那种为唐骏开脱的评论,实在影响太坏!怎么使中国有个好的国家形象,实在令人深思。
yuncn 2010-7-14 20:55
对于CCTV这种国家宣传工具,白岩松那种为唐骏开脱的评论,实在影响太坏!怎么使中国有个好的国家形象,实在令人深思。 关于唐骏学历造假事件报道要适度,不再渲染,炒作。 由唐骏的博士门引发的社会公众就学历诚信话题的广泛讨论日渐激烈,甚至开始蔓延到了官员等公职人士。 http://sinaurl.cn/7xm32 联合早报:中国公众应感谢造假的唐骏 http://sinaurl.cn/7xj8x 舆论穷追唐骏学历门,并不是非要和唐骏过不去,更不是在窥视唐骏的隐私,而是因为这件事牵涉精英的诚信。在中国,诚信有问题的精英实在是不胜枚举,其中最为普遍的就是学历涉嫌造假!
个人分类: 生活点滴|4797 次阅读|2 个评论
作假是要付出代价的。。。
yuncn 2010-7-9 23:34
在国外,如果有文凭问题,哪个公司也不会再任用你了,你还有能力吗? 用能力来掩盖文凭的真实性,是掩耳盗铃的做法! 唐骏没有在微软被罢免,是因为微软不知道他的真实面目! 《我的成功可以复制》应该这样解释: 【 我的造假成功可以复制 】,在太平洋西部大学的复制的知名人士还真不小呢? 唐骏学历门外有门 多名国企管理者疑其校友 http://sinaurl.cn/7Ia7i 【先做人,后做事!】 多么大的讽刺? 任意篡改讲话内容,北邮本身就存在着信用危机? 有其母,必有其子! @方舟子 :北邮方滨兴校长在校友唐骏欢迎会上的致辞:84届毕业生唐骏就是这十余万学子中最杰出的一位:他在北邮获应用物理专业学士学位,在美国加州理工大学获计算机专业博士学 http://sinaurl.cn/7fFeU 有没有能力和诚信是完全两码事!诚信是根本,能力是次要的。如果让一个没有诚信而有能力的人来控制我们这个社会,这世界将成为什么世道!不管在哪里,我们 去求职时都要求我们申报学历? 为什么呢!不知道尔盖茨是否是因为就这位打工皇帝是日本硕士而让他主宰中国微软?这点恐怕我们问微软了! 只有你知道俺的名字,肯定能找到我的博士导师,因为我发表的论文肯定有我教授的名字。在网上,可以查到俺的博士论文的摘要。 做博士研究拿到博士学位的,其博士论文在图书馆和因特网上都可以查到的。真真假假,一查便知。那专利就更好查了,到美国专利网,日本专利网,都可查到,免费的。所以说有论文的,有博士学位的,有专利的人,几乎没有任何隐私,想藏起来,几乎没门! 谁说瑕不掩瑜?瑕不但掩瑜,而且能毁玉!要想成为玉,得要付出多大的努力呀,还不见得成为玉; 可是要因为一点瑕疵,摔在地上,一下子就碎! @方舟子 :新华社的报道:唐骏学历门引爆社会精英诚信话题 http://sinaurl.cn/7Mzup
个人分类: 生活点滴|3182 次阅读|2 个评论
[转载]生物技术全明星队
KONGX 2010-5-5 06:31
Biotechnology All-Stars Eric W. Pfeiffer, 05.31.99 George Rathman is the Bill Gates of biotechnology...if Bill Gates would look and act a bit more paternal. Like his high tech counterpart, Rathmann has an uncanny knack for timing: He pinpointed a new industry ripe for rapid growth, one that needed both a technologist and an entrepreneur. Like Gates, he built the single most prosperous company his industry has ever known, the Southern California-based Amgen. And like Gates, he has become a legend in the process, taking on, at times, a godlike aura in the eyes of industry insiders. When you walk into a room, even if you don't know who George is, you know he is someone, says one former colleague. You look into his eyes and see there is a lot going on in there. When the founders of Amgen picked Rathmann to be the company's first CEO and employee in 1980, the biotechnology industry was just beginning. While Genentech and Cetus (part of Chiron) had proven that the new science could indeed be turned into a business, the industry was long on hope, and short on commercial products. The few biotech companies that did exist were run by scientists with little business background, and even though the industry was desperate for commercial products, RD was typically run by academics. Enter Rathmann, now 71, who had both the science credentials (a B.S. in chemistry from Northwestern, which he earned at the ripe age of 20, and a Ph.D. in chemistry from Princeton) and the business acumen gleaned from 21 years at 3M, where he learned how to turn science into commercial offerings and codeveloped, among other products, Scotchgard. Then after a brief, unsuccessful stint at Litton Industries, he became head of diagnostic research at Abbott Laboratories, where he again practiced the fine art of managing RD. George clearly had a grasp of business, and he was a true scientist, says Gordon Binder, the current CEO of Amgen, who was CFO under Rathmann. That was a tough combination to find. A lot of people can't do both. I came as a rude shock to many people in biotech, recalls Rathmann, who grew up in Wisconsin and whose teenage penchant for chemistry often led to dangerous pyrotechnic displays. There was a very strong sentiment that you needed a top scientist to run your biotech company. And then there was a strong countersentiment that said, 'That's a mistake, a scientist is going to take you to the poorhouse. What you need is a person really good at marketing.' As it turned out, the answer lay in between. Rathmann's combination of science and business was precisely what biotech needed: someone who could inject a little dollars and sense into the RD process but who also understood the scientific method and was willing to shield scientists from nitpicking middle managers and the burden of the bottom line. George saw from the very beginning, says Binder, that the company with the best RD would win. Operating within this duality was not always easy. One time, after giving a presentation to his scientists, Rathmann was waylaid by one of his managers. Remembers Rathmann, He came in and said, 'George, some people were rather offended by your presentation. We've got to be careful of the 'p' word. And I said, 'Thanks for telling me. Christ, I don't want to smother feedback, even if it hurts a little bit. But tell me what the 'p' word is that you're talking about.' ' Products . You used the word products .' Golden Throat managed to do what nobody had before: convince the world's richest man to invest in biotech. Yet for all his support of research, Rathmann's most important legacy to biotech is financial. In an industry known for its legendary burn rates, and for a company that was more than once down to less than six months of cash in the bank, Rathmann managed to raise crucial capital without, for the most part, giving away the company jewels. The Golden Throat, as he is often called, raised $19 million for Amgen, at the time the largest first-round financing for any biotech venture. By his own account, that investment was the single most important event in Amgen's history. We had $19 million to do what we thought were the very best things to do, he says. We didn't have to sign on with a pharmaceutical firm and do their bidding. That capital, combined with Rathmann's support for RD, ultimately produced Amgen's two billion-dollar drugs (Epogen for anemia and Neupogen to stimulate white blood cell growth). Rathmann's other contribution to biotech was his uncanny ability to recruit the best and brightest. When Lowell Sears was looking to get out of a career in oil and move to biotech, he hooked up with Rathmann through a mutual friend. We were supposed to go out for a 45-minute breakfast, which turned into three hours, remembers Sears, who in 1986 was hired as treasurer and then served as CFO at Amgen from 1988 to 1994. George sold me on the vision of the future, on the company's potential. His energy, his intellect, and his interest in people convinced me. Rathmann had a knack for identifying people who could grow with the growing company. (He would even hire smart, driven individuals without knowing exactly what they would do once they started work.) He recruited Kirby Alton, who started out as a molecular biologist and is now senior VP of development at Amgen. He also helped hire the two scientists instrumental in developing Amgen's blockbuster drugs, as well as Phil Whitcome, who went on to cofound Neurogen. Of course, even a record like Rathmann's has a few blemishes. In 1985 Rathmann cut a complicated, many would say bad, corporate partnership deal with Johnson Johnson to share in the revenues of Epogen. The result was an accounting and management nightmare that is still not resolved. The JJ debacle was one of the most difficult times for Rathmann and Amgen, and it was one time where Rathmann's diplomacy and enthusiasm did not win the day. In the JJ situation, George got very frustrated, says Kathleen Wiltsey, who worked with Rathmann on Amgen's first product. He was very disappointed, distraught, but he never once said, 'I can't stand those JJ people.' Rathmann, says Wiltsey, is too much of a humanist to bad-mouth colleagues, although he is emotional and has been known to raise his voice a few decibels, particularly when he's defending his company. Bill Gates has achieved many things in his career, but the label humanist is not one of them. On the other hand, Gates has managed to do what Rathmann and other startup CEOs have not: remain with his company as it left behind the fast-growing startup years and entered maturity. After 10 years of service, Rathmann left Amgen in 1990. By all accounts Amgen was Rathmann's extended family, and the family was getting big--too big and mature for a single patriarch. He's wonderful at managing uncertainty. But as soon as things become routine, it doesn't excite him, says Wiltsey. After only a brief stab at retirement, Rathmann became CEO of a second startup, the Bothell, Washington-based biotech company Icos, for which he raised $33 million, breaking his record set at Amgen. Icos, believe it or not, is where the lives of Rathmann and Gates literally meet. The Golden Throat managed to do what nobody had before: convince the world's richest man to invest in biotech. In 1990 Gates invested $5 million in Icos, and in subsequent years has invested more than $17 million, Rathmann says. Most of those who know Rathmann well are betting he will be as successful with his second startup as he was with his first. Granted, some have criticized Rathmann for becoming starstruck, for courting Gates and packing the Icos board with famous names like former Citicorp CEO Walter Wriston. Yet, if biotechnology is, as many say, primed to enter its golden age, then Rathmann's effort to broaden its leadership may be just another example of his legendary timing. Gordon Binder Binder is among biotech's most respected business minds, owing to his shepherding of Thousand Oaks, California-based Amgen to the $2.5 billion company it is today. He joined as CFO in 1982, and six years later, he took the helm from biotech legend George Rathmann to serve as CEO. Binder's ability to combine financial management with a clear biotech vision is nearly unrivaled. Gordon is a fabulous thinker and a terrific financial mind, says biotech investor Jeffrey Casdin. If he has a strategy involving a thousand steps, he'll personally figure out each one. Herbert Boyer Stanley N. Cohen These two M.D.'s created the biotech tool--recombinant DNA--that launched genetic engineering and biotechnology as we know it. In 1973 Boyer, a biochemist, genetic engineer, and professor at the University of California at San Francisco, teamed with Stanford genetics professor Stanley N. Cohen, a pioneer in the area of antibiotic resistance, to make history. As of 1997, their gene-splicing technology had been licensed to more than 470 companies, including Amgen and Eli Lilly, and spawned scores of molecular medicines--netting their two universities $241 million in royalties. Their accomplishments don't end there. Cohen, now 64, and Boyer, now 62, are both part of a select group of luminaries who have won both the National Medal of Science and the National Medal of Technology. In 1976, Boyer cofounded Genentech. He is still a company director. Brook Byers Byers, 53, is the most active venture investor in biotech on the planet. In his 20 years in biotech financing, the bright and driven Byers has backed more than 50 life sciences companies, a record second to none. In 1972 his E.E. from Georgia Tech and M.B.A. from Stanford won him a post at Silicon Valley's marquee venture capital firm, Kleiner Perkins Caufield Byers. In 1978 Byers met two scientists from the University of California at San Diego and together they started Hybritech, the first antibody company. He took a leave of absence from KPCB to run it as its first president for six months. Hybritech went on to be a public company and was acquired by Lilly for $300-plus million in 1986. Since then, most of the life sciences ventures Byers has touched have turned to gold. One is IDEC Pharmaceuticals, which he started from scratch in 1998, hiring a team of scientists to work on biotech treatments for lymphoma, the disease that took his mother's life 20 years ago. Stanley Crooke Crooke, chairman and CEO of Isis Pharmaceuticals in Carlsbad, California, is biotech's premier mind in antisense drug development. The idea behind anti-sense is to produce drugs so disease specific they have few side effects, yet so adaptable they can be engineered to treat everything from psoriasis to cancer. Analysts and colleagues say it would be hard to find anyone better suited to the antisense quest. Crooke has, at age 54, an encyclopedic memory of everything ever published about antisense and is himself one of the most published CEOs in biotechnology. Tenacity, formidable intellect, and business acumen have made Crooke a success in a tough business. When he gets an idea it's like taking a T-bone away from a dog, says Mark Skaletsky, an Isis board member. Carl Feldbaum Feldbaum is biotech's chief mouthpiece on Capitol Hill. The soft-spoken lobbyist, 55, is president of the Bio-technology Industry Organization {BIO}, the umbrella organization for more than 850 companies, academic institutions, and biotech centers nationally. He helped create BIO in 1993 by combining two competing advocacy groups--the Association of Biotechnology Companies and the Industrial Biotechnology Association--into one. Feldbaum gets the credit for merging the two into a perfect Washington-style marriage. It wasn't easy. It was like combining Don Quixote and Don Corleone, Feldbaum says. A tough job, but Feldbaum has had tough jobs before. Prior to heading BIO, he served as a special Watergate prosecutor, as an assistant secretary of energy during the Carter era, and as Senator Arlen Specter's chief of staff. Fred Frank Stelios Papadopoulos Frank and Papadopoulos are the dynamic duo of Wall Street. Frank is a 67-year-old vice chair and director of Lehman Brothers. He is generally referred to as the dean of the investment bankers working the biotechnology sector, says G. Steven Burrill, a merchant banker in the biotech industry. And no wonder. Frank has engineered--and reengineered--the complex financial architecture of biotech, overseeing seminal deals like the Genentech and Hoffmann-La Roche Holdings merger. Among the other high-profile notches on his belt: Frank took public Applied Biosystems, the first gene-sequencing machine manufacturer {now owned by Perkin-Elmer}. And in 1993, he worked with Craig Venter and William Haseltine in a $125 million collaboration between Human Genome Sciences and SmithKline Beecham. At the time, this was the largest biotech alliance in history. Papadopoulos so trumpeted the virtues of biotech stocks on Wall Street that without him, most agree, the industry never would have been capitalized. A Ph.D. in biophysics, Papadopoulos was bitten by the biotech bug in 1980 when he saw a New York Times article on Genentech's IPO pinned to a bulletin board. He soon swapped his lab coat for a suit and tie, joining Donaldson, Lufkin Jenrette in 1985 as its first biotechnology analyst. Papadopoulos, 50, has played a crucial role in the funding of such companies as Agouron, Icos, and Exelixis. Had it not been for Wall Street, there would not be biotech,he says. It's the intersection of exciting ideas with people on the capital side willing to take risks. Dave Goeddel Goeddel is not only, as one biotech insider puts it, a brilliant, brilliant scientist but he was likely biotech's original brilliant scientist. In 1978 he was Genentech's third employee, and the company's first scientist who was not affiliated with a university. He worked on insulin--the company's (and biotech's) first product--as well as on growth hormone and interferon, two other Genentech early breakthroughs. Goeddel was just a powerhouse, a power cloner, says Fred Dorey, ex-president of the Bay Area Bioscience Center. He was a driven, very focused, and extremely hardworking industrial scientist. Goeddel, now 48, spent more than 15 years at Genentech. In 1991 he cofounded Tularik, based in South San Francisco, where he's now CEO. Maurice Hilleman Colleagues refer to him as the godfather of vaccines, but Hilleman is also a godfather of sorts to the millions of children who have thrived thanks to his work on pediatric vaccines. From 1957, Hilleman, now 79 and the director of the Merck Institute for Therapeutic Research, has devoted his career at Merck to developing safe vaccines for childhood diseases. In fact, the familiar mumps, measles, and rubella shots administered to every American baby today are the products of his research. In the past decades, Hilleman also has made his mark on vaccines for adult diseases, including hepatitis A, hepatitis B, chicken pox, Japanese B encephalitis, and others. Leroy Hood A toolmaker of sorts, Hood is responsible for the development of four vital biotech tools: the DNA sequencer, DNA synthesizer, protein sequencer, and protein synthesizer. Without Hood's inventions, deciphering the human genome would be akin to reading ancient Sanskrit without a lexicon. An early advocate of the Human Genome Project and its commercial applications, Hood, now 60, founded a leading molecular instrumentation company, Applied Biosystems, in Foster City, California, in 1980 (now a division of Perkin-Elmer). He also was a scientific founder of Amgen, SyStemix, and T Cell Sciences. Hood now heads the molecular biology department at the University of Washington School of Medicine, where he has created one of the nation's hottest interdisciplinary departments for combined research in chemistry, computer science, engineering, applied physics, and biology. Eric Lander Lander is a--if not the--driving intellectual force in the field of genome research.As the director of his own research center, the Whitehead/MIT Center for Genome Research in Cambridge, Massachusetts, the lanky 42-year-old has a list of accomplishments in genomics few can rival. Since 1992, Lander, a Rhodes scholar with a Ph.D. in mathematics from Oxford, has been in on building the government's Human Genome Project maps. His Whitehead Genome Center also has built most of the DNA maps of the human and mouse chromosomes, making it possible to trace heredity, locate genes, and organize the reading of the complete sequence. He was involved in launching the drive to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms, called SNPs, which account for variations in genes. In 1993 he co-founded Millennium Pharmaceuticals in Cambridge, a leading genomics company, where he serves on the board. And oh, this former recipient of a MacArthur Foundation genius grant is a popular professor, too. His Millennium cofounder, Mark Levin, says Lander is theatrical in the classroom, pacing the room like Phil Donahue as he lectures. Robert Langer Langer arrives on our list thanks to his pioneering discoveries in the field of tissue engineering and plastic-based drug delivery systems. His work at MIT--he is the Germeshausen Professor of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering there--with polymers (that's plastics to us layfolk) has given rise to numerous medical breakthroughs. By combining polymer scaffolds with cells, he has discovered a way to build real tissue in the human body. Langer also has helped to develop varieties of patch, implant, and even aerosol-type therapies. A Langer-inspired treatment for brain cancer, for example, was the first polymer-based treatment to deliver chemotherapy to a tumor site. The 50-year-old scientist originally combined his work in bioengineering with that of the cellular biologist Joseph Vacanti; he now shares or solely holds more than 350 patents. Mark Levin Levin's knack for cutting deals--big ones--has put his six-year-old company, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, on the map and lands him on our Top 25 list. This 48-year-old former venture capitalist turned CEO forged the biggest biopharmaceutical alliance to date last September: a $465 million agreement with German drug behemoth Bayer AG. Since founding his Cambridge, Massachusetts-based genomics company in 1993, Levin has accumulated $1.3 billion in contracts from pharmaceutical partnerships. It's not just the magnitude but the quality of Levin's deals that make him the envy of fellow biotechies. Levin inks deals while maintaining Millennium's rights. Wall Street has taken notice. In the current poor climate for biotech stocks, Millennium's shares are up 250%. At its 1996 IPO, Millennium was trading at $12. Now it's hovering at $30-plus. The company's valuation exceeds $1 billion. Arthur D. Levinson Genentech surprised industry observers in 1995 by tapping Levinson--a scientist with relatively little management experience-- to become the firm's CEO. He has since silenced skeptics, transforming Genentech from an aging, financially stagnant operation with a flagging product line into an industry heavyweight once more. What Levinson has done, says Joel Sendek, analyst for Gerard, Klauer, Mattison, is turn the Titanic around. In the last two years, Genentech has launched two successful monoclonal antibody drugs, Rituxan, a treatment for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and Herceptin, which inhibits the expression of the gene associated with an aggressive type of breast cancer. Both drugs are products of what Genentech calls its BioOncology research program, part of the long-range strategy Levinson developed after he took the helm. His emphasis on increased RD and the renegotiation of the firm's Roche Holdings buyout agreement are behind such successes. H. Stewart Parker We hate to admit it, but the 43-year-old Parker lands on our list because she is one of the few female CEOs in the biotech business. While that distinction may be dubious, her accomplishments are not. She has led two biotech companies--Immunex and Targeted Genetics--to success, a feat few men in the industry can claim. An M.B.A. from the University of Washington, Parker (the H stands for Haley, but she prefers to go by Stewart) joined Seattle-based Immunex in 1981; she was the company's first employee. In her decade with Immunex, which develops immune system drugs, she served as vice president of corporate development. In 1992 Parker took on the risky sector of gene therapy when she spun Targeted Genetics out of Immunex. Her colleagues credit her with Targeted Genetics' survival; it's one of only two of the original gene therapy pure plays to last through the decade. Edward Penhoet Penhoet, 58, is one of the three pioneering biologists behind Chiron, the billion- dollar Emeryville, California-based company responsible for a wide variety of genetically engineered drugs and blood-testing products. More important, Penhoet recognized that advances in molecular biology could produce preventive drugs, replacing the time- honored trial and error approach to drug development. With fellow biologists William Rutter and Pablo Valenzuela, Penhoet launched Chiron in 1981. People thought I'd lost my mind, he says. There was a substantial gulf between university research and the business world. Thanks to companies like Chiron, that's no longer the case. After serving with Rutter and Valenzuela as co-CEO of Chiron for more than a decade, Penhoet left last year to become dean of the School of Public Health at UC Berkeley. Dennis Purcell No one is more bullish or brash on biotech than Purcell. This Wall Street firecracker is managing director of Hambrecht Quist's life sciences department, making him the industry's biggest cheerleader in the biggest life sciences banking outfit in the country. Since 1994 when he joined HQ, Purcell has completed more than 200 transactions worth more than $10 billion. Under his tenure as managing director, HQ has been the lead underwriter of life sciences four years running. Cynthia Robbins-Roth Consultant, writer, and self-proclaimed biogoddess, Robbins-Roth has been in the eye of the biotech hurricane from the start. Since Genentech first recruited her in 1981 as a lab scientist, the 46-year-old Robbins-Roth has had a seat at nearly every biotech table: researcher, business developer, consultant, journalist. These days she works largely as a writer; she founded and has contributed to three industry publications: BioWorld, BioPeople, and BioVenture View. She is a columnist for Forbes and a guest editor for Forbes ASAP on this issue. William Rutter Rutter is not only the cofounder and chairman of Chiron, one of the largest biotech companies in the world, but one of the premier minds in biotech research. While he was a professor in the 1970s at the University of California at San Francisco, his lab succeeded in cloning the human insulin gene. Next he developed a vaccine for hepatitis B (in collaboration with Pablo Valenzuela). Rutter, now 71, also is credited with pioneering Chiron's research into retroviruses, which led the company to discover the viral cause of AIDS: Chiron was the first company to find the HIV virus sequence. Roger Salquist Salquist is the man behind the first-ever agricultural biotech product, the Flavr Savr tomato. And while you can't find this delicacy at your local market--it was just too expensive to produce--Salquist nevertheless gets credit for producing the first genetically engineered food. A one-time CFO for a biopesticide company, Salquist was hired to run a California-based startup called Calgene in 1984. He ran Calgene as chairman and CEO until it was bought by Monsanto in 1996, overseeing the development of the Flavr Savr. The tremendously arrogant--but infinitely charming--Salquist, 57, is now a managing partner of Bay City Capital, a private merchant bank in San Francisco devoted to funding life sciences companies. He cofounded it in 1997. Randy Scott Roy Whitfield As founders of the only genomics company ever to consistently turn a profit, Scott, 41, and Whitfield, 45, have earned their bragging rights. Their Incyte Pharmaceuticals in Palo Alto, California, reported profits of $6.9 million in 1997 and $15.5 million (excluding acquisition-related charges) a year later. Whitfield, CEO, and Scott, president and chief scientist, figured out how to make money in genomics by tossing out the tried-and-true business model for biotech companies. Instead of developing its own drugs, Incyte opted to create, package, and sell its gene-sequencing information to pharmaceutical firms. Voil! Profits. Robert Swanson Swanson is the visionary who took biotech out of the lab and into the business world. The now famous story goes like this: In 1976, Swanson, then a 29-year-old venture capitalist with Kleiner Perkins Caufield Byers, heard of a revolutionary discovery known as recombinant DNA, one of the key tools of genetic engineering. He courted one of its two codiscoverers, University of California at San Francisco's Herbert Boyer, and convinced him that his gene-splicing technology had commercial value. Genentech was subsequently born, and Swanson quit Kleiner Perkins to become CEO. By 1978 insulin--biotechnology's first genetically developed product--was successfully produced using recombinant DNA technology. Bob is the father of the industry, says investment banker Stelios Papadopoulos. He saw it all before anybody else did. He is now chairman of Tularik, a company with strong ties to Genentech. Henri Termeer Termeer gets kudos for being a CEO who understands how to turn a little biotech company into an industry powerhouse. His Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Genzyme is one of the biggest in the business--its market cap is $4.2 billion, and revenues last year reached an impressive $670 million. His secret? He's got a few. First Termeer, 53, created separate divisions at Genzyme, each with its own specialty--drugs, diagnostics, and surgical products. This allowed the company to engage in creative RD financing and offset divisional losses. The Netherlands native aggressively pursued licensing agreements with other companies, a unique strategy in an industry traditionally focused on internal drug development. And he proved that orphan drugs-- those targeted at rare diseases big pharma tends to ignore--can be moneymakers. Craig Venter One of the true mavericks in biotech, Venter, 52, is out to beat the feds in the mapping of human genes. As founder of Celera Genomics, a private firm funded by Perkin-Elmer, Venter claims Celera will complete the sequencing of the human genome by the end of 2001--beating the government-funded Human Genome Project to the punch by two years. Critics call the Celera project folly, but the company's formation in 1998 spurred the government to move its own timeline for gene mapping up two years. A Vietnam vet with a Ph.D. in pharmacology and physiology, Venter's contribution to the world of gene sequencing has been phenomenal, if controversial. As investment banker Stelios Papadopoulos puts it, He's nuts, but he belongs on ASAP's top 25 list. Alejandro Zaffaroni Zaffaroni, 76, is the entrepreneur whose ideas and discoveries have given rise to more biotech companies than any other person in the field. This native of Uruguay and 1995 recipient of the National Medal of Technology has conceived or collaborated on more than 40 patents and hundreds of scientific processes and products--ranging from the Pill to the Nicoderm patch. Lately, the unretirable Zaffaroni focuses much of his time on developing projects for his Zaffaroni Foundation, which, among other things, studies the genetic aspects of addictions and new ways to cure them. -- Reporters: Suzie Amer, Alex Frankel, Toni Logan, Sally McGrane, Carol Pickering, Chiori Santiago, and Evantheia Schibsted.
个人分类: 科学家和医学家|893 次阅读|1 个评论
身价13亿美金的人
KONGX 2010-5-5 06:20
为了写论文不得不看看古老的文章,看着看着就觉得这个世界上牛人太多,贴个传奇人物: David V.Goeddel 第一:发表的文章; 25 篇 Nature , 16 篇 Science , 12 篇 Cell 第二: Genetech 聘任的首位科学家,成功开发基因工程胰岛素,干扰素,生长因子等等 第三: 1991 年创立 Tularik 公司,任 CEO , 2004 年 13 亿美金卖给安进公司
个人分类: 科学家和医学家|774 次阅读|2 个评论
青年科研工作者需要及早确立自己学习的榜样
xinliscau 2010-4-14 13:09
来科学网这么长时间,很少见到有科研大牛的特写。其实可以适当地增设这一栏目,用于介绍某个领域国际国内的领军人物的成长历程及其科研成绩,一方面可以使青年科研工作者快速把握某个领域的前沿阵地,另一方面也可以为更多的青年科研工作者提供一个学习的榜样。 伟大的革命导师列宁曾说:“榜样的力量是无穷的。”邓小平同志也多次强调:“身教重于言教。” 事实上,世界上任何一个锐意进取、着力发展的民族,都不会漠视榜样的力量。我国古代大圣人孔子的著书立传不乏道德指引和规范,现代社会,又有了雷锋、张海迪等。在美国,无论是华盛顿还是林肯,至今都被民众视为民族英雄。向公众陈列展示历任总统的画像、履历及功绩,成为一种传统。这些榜样在社会中确实起到了重要的作用。榜样带给我们的精神指引,是时代的精华、未来的方向。 同样,科研也不例外,每个科研工作者都需要有很好的榜样作为指引。不断发掘榜样,树立榜样无疑应成了推动我国青年科研工作者不断进步的一种重要的方法。其实,榜样到处存在。无论是我国科学的泰斗钱学森,还是像纳米研究领域的华裔新星杨培东,更近的像我们科学网博主施一公等,都可以成为我们年轻人学习的榜样。 在科学网,应该而且有必要树立更多的科研榜样,因为,榜样的力量是无穷的。
个人分类: 励志文章|1300 次阅读|2 个评论
上看下看
xu782219 2010-2-7 10:53
上看下看 常听人说,向下看你就快乐,向上看你就苦恼,快乐和苦恼本来就这么简单。这是地地道道的庸人哲学,只能让人颓废,甘愿停滞不前。这要用于生活方面,尚且危害不大;但若用于政治或经济或治学方面,定会遗害无穷。而积极向上的人生哲学应是:天行健,君子以自强不息。向下看你会因成就而感到自豪,向上看你会因看到方向而倍受鼓舞。 唐代白居易也曾满足于生活上富于黔娄,寿于颜渊,饱于伯夷,乐于荣启期,健于卫叔宝,但作诗著文却从不知足,仅传下来的诗就有三千多首;做杭州、苏州地方官,也为民做了不少受益至今的好事。我国现代医学普通外科的主要开拓者,肝胆外科、器官移植外科的主要创始人和奠基人裘法祖说:做人要知足,做事要知不足,做学问要不知足。这才是我们要学习的榜样。 上看看,下看看,智者仁者弹各弦。 上看苦恼下看乐,人生价值全落偏。 天若有情天亦老,地上沧海变桑田。 万物进化乃主流,个事停滞是瞬间。 上看未来有方向,下看成就自浩然。 知足定然孳生惰,明欠才是动力泉。 轰轰烈烈干事业,热热闹闹度余年。 世上没谁能万岁,更该分秒效先贤。
个人分类: 未分类|3466 次阅读|3 个评论
以身教的力量
wido 2010-1-22 17:25
前段时间和女友逛街,(研究生也是需要浪漫生活的,对吧?)回来的时候碰到一件事情,深有感触。 主人公是我(A),一个小孩(B),一个带着孩子的妇女(C)。 故事中间没有责备或者要谴责的意思,只是要看到的人思考而已。 公交车过来。 A上车,此时C在公交车后门的垃圾桶附近,周围站了几个人。 A走近以后发现C晕车了,于是掏出几张纸巾递给C。 B始终注视着这一切。看A做完这些之后,给A鼓掌。 故事讲完。 其实,我想说,被人表扬还是很high的,尤其是被一个小孩子。 我们有一天始终是要成家立业的,会有孩子,我们该如何去教育自己的子女,以言教?以身教?言传身教!以身作则的力量是无穷的,我们称之为榜样。 让孩子相信书上的故事是真的,这个世界上还有童话,还有可以憧憬的未来,让他们成为善良的人。
个人分类: 被生活打败|3358 次阅读|0 个评论
生活仍在继续
xuleilei08 2009-11-24 11:12
早上给色谱售后打了电话,他们不可能过来,他们提了几点建议,可是昨晚试了一下不是怎么管用啊,哎,也许这就是考验我忍耐力的困难吧,我离成功更近了,加油啊! 现在感觉与外界隔离了,昨天有一个同学(辰辰)给我QQ留言,让我估算一下做重整反应所需要的费用,泵、流量计以及炉子应该不会超过3万的吧。昨晚和隔壁的博士师兄讨论了一下,那个师兄今年毕业已经发了十几篇SCI,要去美国了,羡慕啊!的确要想提高自己需要和牛人在一起,经过师兄的点播感觉明朗多了,他研二就出文章了,其中一篇现在已经被cited 20多次了,榜样的力量是无穷的,我想我会努力,加油,Corey!
个人分类: 生活点滴|1036 次阅读|0 个评论
做人当如袁隆平(转)
eagerss2008 2009-11-23 09:22
在青年人的眼中,袁隆平先生不仅是一位受人尊敬的科学家,还是一位睿智的长者、一位亲切可爱的邻家大伯伯,我们喜欢他,喜欢他讲的大实话!近日,这位八旬老人又坦言:用财富衡量科学家价值太低级、太庸俗。他还坦承自己的财富观钱是要的,因为要生活,但君子爱财取之有道;钱是拿来用的,该用则用,不挥霍不浪费,不小气不吝啬。(《长江日报》) 袁隆平先生的这番大实话,让多少糊涂人从浑浑噩噩的名利追逐中警醒,又该让多少聪明人在纸醉金迷的挥霍中汗颜,更让我们从心底里要为先生叫声好! 这位世界杂交水稻之父一生都致力于米的研究,他为国家和社会乃至世界都创造了巨大的财富,赢得了巨大的声誉,按理说他这样一位杰出的科学家,自家口袋装有多少米都不为过,也不会遭人非议,可他的生活或者说是他的生活态度却仅仅愿意停留在小康水平线上,身价 1008 亿,却独爱 15 元衬衫,这让多少聪明人困惑和摇头!细细想来,如果先生当初是为了日进斗金而搞科研的,他就不可能几十年如一日地在田间地头忙碌,先生的身上有着一种强大的信念在支撑,这种信念是孜孜追求人类文明、科技进步的伟大精神,是对国家前途、民族命运的深深忧虑和无疆大爱,是反哺社会和人民的生动写照,也是中华民族传统美德淡泊名利、艰苦奋斗的最好诠释,这种信念注定超越了任何物质财富!人不能只靠吃米而活着,袁隆平先生解决了十几亿人口的吃米问题已让举世惊叹,但他身上体现出来的人格魅力,更像一袋袋精神食粮,同样也营养、滋润着我们浮躁的心灵,影响着这个社会! 用财富衡量科学家价值太低级、太庸俗这句话对于现实社会有着深刻的启示意义!建国六十年来,我国发生了翻天覆地的可喜变化,社会的物质财富也空前高涨,社会成员萌发了对财富的无限渴望,功利化的思维也开始泛滥。如果任其泛滥,必然陷入拜金主义、享乐主义的深渊,小富即安、奢靡之风盛行,我们的步伐也将停滞不前。志当存高远,一个青年如此,一个民族、一个国家也如此,提倡不以财富衡量价值,将引导社会成员尤其是青年一代向更高的层次追求,像我们的祖先一样,艰苦奋斗,持之以恒,创造出超越物质财富更为可贵的巨大精神财富,这些精神财富才是中华民族的立本之基,强国之道!有了精神追求和崇高信仰,我们才能在民族伟大复兴的前进道路上,坚定不移地迈出一个又一个坚实的脚印。 今天,袁隆平先生展示给世人的财富观和精神境界,再次给我们青年人做出了榜样,让我们不禁从心底要再为先生的这番大实话叫声好! (曾佑平 刊发时间: 2009-10-20 16:00:14  光明网 - 光明观察)
个人分类: 做人与为学|2803 次阅读|0 个评论
最值得学习的人!关于向邓玉娇同志学习的号召(转帖)
chrujun 2009-5-14 01:11
关于向邓玉娇同志学习的号召 (转帖) http://www.wyzxsx.com/Article/Class22/200905/83619.html 邓玉娇同志,女,湖北巴东县人,从事修脚工作。2009年5月10日晚,邓玉娇同志正在休息室洗涤衣物时,巴东县野三关镇农业服务中心副主任黄德智、招商办公室主任邓贵大与该镇办公室邓姓工作人员,忽然闯入。黄德智见到邓玉娇同志后,首先用言语调戏在前,称要其提供特殊服务。邓玉娇同志严词拒绝,并对黄进行痛斥,黄之同伙邓贵大称:怕我们没有钱么?并拿出一叠钞票进行利诱,邓玉娇同志,不予理睬,起身欲摆脱纠缠。邓贵大丧心病狂,突然将她按在沙发上,欲行不轨。邓玉娇同志奋起反抗,挣扎起身,不料被身强力壮的邓贵大又一次按住,欲行不轨,黄德智等人相视而笑,值此千钧一发之际,邓玉娇同志抓起劳动工具修脚刀,毅然刺向正在实施强暴的邓贵大。率先言语侵犯她的黄德智此刻也直扑上来,邓玉娇同志势如猛虎,修脚刀挥处,邓贵大三创而死,黄德智一创重伤,邓姓公务员为邓玉娇同志的英勇行为所震慑,不敢靠近。一场公共场所的强奸案得到终止。邓玉娇同志遂打电话通知警方到来。 孟子曰:富贵不能淫、贫贱不能移、威武不能屈,此之谓大丈夫。在剥削阶级腐朽思想的侵蚀下,当今社会,明星卖淫,商贾买春,官员奸幼之丑恶现象层出不穷,有很多女性或畏于强暴,逆来顺受,垂泪以从,使凶焰暴长;更有惑于金钱,自干堕落,为虎作伥,令世风日下。惟邓玉娇同志,虽处身处贫贱而自尊、自强,不为权势所侮,不为金钱所诱,更为难能可贵的是,面对强暴,发愤一击,使强梁毙命于刹时,帮凶重伤于一刻,同恶敛气于当场,海内小丑为之惊骇,国中正人为之赞叹:邓玉娇者诚女中之大丈夫也,是为时代女性是楷模,当世人权之典范。因此,笔者不揣冒昧,向广大网民发出向邓玉娇同志学习之号召。我们要学习邓玉娇同志面对强权坚决反抗的勇气。邓玉娇同志面对具有强势的官员对她尊严、自由和道德底线的侵犯,不畏惧强权,进行了合理合法的反击,完全遵循了《刑法》中关于面对抢劫、杀人、强奸、纵火等重大犯罪可实施无限防卫的原则,及时制止了罪恶的得逞,弘扬了社会正气。这充分体现了毛泽东思想中的斗争精神,是新时代里的宝贵精神财富,这不单应体现在女性对待不轨之徒的侵犯上,更应该体现在全社会面对通敌**、徇私枉法、贪污纳贿、欺压人民、抢劫偷盗等丑恶现象上,不管恶势力有多强大,多嚣张,都要义无反顾地去斗争!我们要学习邓玉娇同志面对金钱不受诱惑的气节。 邓玉娇同志,面对邓贵大大把钞票的诱惑,采取的是极端蔑视和面对羞辱而愤怒的态度,她用实际行动证明了什么叫尊严无价。这充分体现了社会主义核心价值体系中的八荣八耻的道德观,尊严、公正等最基本的道德底线是不容被金钱所收买的。这一点,在当前贪污腐败横行,很多人为了享受不惜出卖肉体和灵魂,为了金钱不惜出卖法纪的良知的情况下,很有教育意义,很多坐在主席台上的官员,很多出入豪华酒店的商贾,很多站在讲坛上的学者,很多衣着光鲜的艺人面对邓玉娇同志的气节,应该汗颜,应该洗心革面。邓玉娇同志才应该是我们这个时代的英雄。 我们要学习邓玉娇同志面对贫穷辛勤劳动的操守。邓玉娇同志,做的是修脚工的职业,虽然是在一个灯红酒绿的场所,但是她坚信,身正不怕影邪,靠自己的勤劳的双手、靠自己踏实的劳动、靠自己不断提高的业务技能,一样能够通过为人民服务,为社会服务体现自己的人生价值,体现自己的尊严,走向自己的幸福生活。当今社会,需要的就是 邓玉娇同志,勤勤恳恳劳动,守得住贫穷,耐得住寂寞的精神。社会各界,都应该看到学习邓玉娇同志先进事迹对建设文明、健康、向上的社会主义和谐社会的重大意义,在舆论上声援她,在行动上支持他,在工作和生活上学习她的勇气、她的气节和她的操守,用全社会的共同努力,让黑暗和罪恶在正义的光辉中灰飞烟灭。
个人分类: 转载精品|4871 次阅读|0 个评论
不想做榜样的人不是好人
moxj 2009-4-3 22:05
今天又有位哥们引用了那句 古话:不想做将军的士兵不好士兵这。看来认可这个观点的人还是相当多的。先不对它做其它剖析,既然有如此多的人信奉它,那么这句话在很大程度上对这些人有公理的作用了。 你信奉吗?我是有点相信的。大概你是一位士兵的几率不会太大。所以你常把这句话引用到自己的领域:不想考第一的学生不是好学生;不想发财的商人不是好商人;不想当总理的公务员是好公务员吗?不想获诺贝尔奖的科学工作者也不是个好科学工作者 如果你认同不想做将军的士兵不是好士兵,那你对上面那些都认同吗? 如果你认同了,那你怎样看待自己的生活呢?一直在追求每一方面的最高吗?你没有挫折的时候吗?你说过自己只想做个平凡的人吗?毕竟最好的只有一个,那你在各个方面的目标又是什么呢? 有研究显示, 动物发现自己做了错误的选择后,不是把先前的错误全都抛弃从来,最多是在原来的基础上修正,一般是为原来的选择找合理的借口。这是一种本能行为 。 包容确实是一种不错的东西,这方面的话题太大了,先不聊。但就在你包容自己的时候,你变成了一个普通人,如果我借用榜样来指代一种标准的话,你不再能成为圣人。即使你没有放弃这个念头,你嘴里只能说自己愿意成为一个普通人。 其实,每一个人都有这样的时候。我们的那些圣人 榜样从哪里来呢?圣人是怎样对待自己的过失呢?能反省自己就是圣人了吗?他们自己觉得自己还是榜样吗?比喻今天的各类明星。 如果不是,如果这样他们会更紧张,他们会处在生活的更大压力和困绕下,那问题又出在哪里呢? 你不知道为什么的时候,回头去看看你最信奉的公理。它在那里没有什么变化。你是怎么理解这句话的? 士兵和将军仅仅是等级的差别吗?还是有一个人会跳出来说是能力的差别?还有别的吗? 有多少人用这样的等级来衡量优差呢?这种思维方式真的对吗? 如果是苛刻的等级让你如此困惑,那又是什么让这个社会常常也十分困惑呢? 你还有成为榜样的动力吗?如果有,是什么?没有?你觉得生活的社会很充实还是很空洞? 一切终究平静下来了,如果说平凡才是真正的伟大。那你将怎样回头去看你过去的选择和判断?还是用研究结果显示的动物本能吗?平凡的榜样里有军衔吗?如果连榜样都平凡了,等级还会存在吗?世界将被夷平吗?
个人分类: 未来文明|3397 次阅读|0 个评论

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-6-7 01:35

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部