张凤珠, 马亮, 吴建南. (2011). "多元资助格局下的科学基金绩效评估:案例研究与学术履历分析." 科学学与科学技术管理 32(6): 5-11. 多元资助格局下的科学基金绩效评估_案例研究与学术履历分析.pdf 多元资助格局下的科学基金绩效评估:案例研究与学术履历分析 【作者】 张凤珠; 马亮; 吴建南; 【机构】 国家自然科学基金委员会医学科学部; 西安交通大学管理学院; 西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院; 【摘要】 国家科研经费投入的快速增长既为科技创新提供了支持,也对科学基金划分科研成果归属并开展绩效评估提出了挑战。探讨了多元资助格局对科学基金绩效评估提出的方法论挑战,认为深入的项目资助案例研究与受资助者的学术履历分析是破解这一难题的两条重要途径。阐述了两种方法的特点与用途,并对多元资助格局下的科学基金绩效评估问题进行了分析,最后提出了改善多元资助格局的对策建议。 【关键词】 科学基金; 绩效评估; 多元资助; 案例研究; 学术履历; Science Funding Agency Performance Evaluation in the Pattern of Multi-Funding Sources:Case Study and Curriculum Vitae Analysis 【Author】 ZHANG Fengzhu1,MA Liang2,WU Jiannan3 (1.Department of Health Sciences,National Natural Science Foundation of China,Beijing 100085,China;2.School of Management,Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710049,China;3.School of Public Policy and Administration,Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710049,China) 【Abstract】 The rapid increasing of national ST expenditure not only gives more support for ST innovation,but also makes science funding agencies encounter difficulties to delimit ownership of ST achievements and conduct performance evaluation.The paper discusses the methodological challenges issued by the regime of multi-funding sources on science funding agency performance evaluation,and argues that in-depth case studies of granted projects and analyses of grantees’ curriculum vitas are two key avenues to reconcile the paradox.The characteristics and usage of the former mentioned approaches are elaborated,and recommendations for science funding agency performance evaluation in the regime of multi-funding sources are also concluded. 【Key words】 science funding agency; performance evaluation; multi-funding sources; case study; curriculum vitae;
科学基金绩效报告与绩效问责美国NSF的的叙事分析 A narrative analysis of performance accountability and performance reportslessons from National Science Foundation(NSF) 【作者】 阎波; 吴建南; 马亮; 【Author】 YAN Bo1,WU Jian-nan2,MA Liang1(1.School of Management,Xi,an Jiaotong Universty,Xi'an 710049,China;2.School of Public Policy and Administration,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi,an 710049,China) 【机构】 西安交通大学管理学院; 西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院; 【摘要】 通过对美国国家科学基金会(NSF)绩效报告的叙事分析,展现了其来由和历史变化,提炼出对国家自然科学基金委员会绩效评估与绩效管理的启示。分析表明,NSF从成立初期就实施了年度报告制度,近年来面对着外部环境的变化和众多利益相关者的问责,其绩效报告不断发生着变化;对2006~2008连续三年绩效报告的比较发现,NSF绩效报告形式有简洁且系统的趋势,绩效评估的内容与战略紧密挂钩且更加关注实现结果的过程,绩效信息整合程度和可读性等呈现出进一步增强的趋势,进一步突出了对 NSF的问责。结合上述分析给出了关于国家自然科学基金绩效评估和绩效报告的思考。 【Abstract】 The paper made a narrative analysis of National Science Foundation(NSF)'s performance report in order to illustrate the origin and history of performance reporting by NSF,as well as providing recommendations to performance evaluation and management of National Natural Science Foundation of China(NSFC).It was found that there has been annual report system since NSF was founded,whereas the report system was changing according to external environmental change and multi-accountability from stakehold. 【关键词】 绩效报告; 绩效评估; 问责; 科学基金; 叙事分析; 【Key words】 performance report; performance evaluation; accountability; science fund; narrative analysis; 引用:阎波, 吴建南, 马亮. 科学基金绩效报告与绩效问责--美国NSF的的叙事分析 . 科学学研究, 2010, 28 (11): 1619-1628. 论文