科学网

 找回密码
  注册

tag 标签: 屠杀

相关帖子

版块 作者 回复/查看 最后发表

没有相关内容

相关日志

1934年川北国共战争杀戮之惨
热度 7 龚胜生 2015-3-20 00:30
战争中,共产党军队杀百姓吗?民国时期的《申报》多有记载,是否属实,无从考证。这里有两处报道,或是污蔑,读者自断。 川团体报告四川“赤祸”实况 查通、南、巴第一次被陷,适值旧历残冬,人民家中,多少尚有一点存储,故达能勉强逃难,且当时“共匪”所占区域尚少,影响不大,故流离之民众,不过十余万。洎乎二次被陷,“共匪”屠戮之惨,倍甚于前,人民畏其杀戮,皆相率弃家而逃,通、南、巴三县人民,纷 向顾庆 、阆中、仪陇、南部、营山、达县、渠县、宣汉等地逃避,以致川西北各县,无处不有灾民,颠沛流离之惨,直非言语所能形容。值此盛暑,各地灾民,多为数十百人群居一处,暑热熏蒸,饥病交迫,其因时疫传染而死者,不可以数计,甚至全家死绝者,真可为极尽人间之悲惨事也。《申报》 1933-09-09 : 16 版 川北劫后惨象 川北各县陷入匪区,现虽次第收复,但人民受害极深,死者达百万以上。即幸得生存,其大半皆无家可归,流离异乡。余小半归还本乡者,亦皆无衣无食,无牛无种,无法耕作。…… 广元匪区调查报告。……“赤匪”所经,屠杀极重,计旺苍坝附近屠杀有保卫局名册可查者,约一万七千余人;四乡屠杀无可考查者一百余坑,约七八千人;普子岭杀二千余人;木门杀三千一百余人;长池杀三万余人;罗家坝杀八百余人;五郎庙杀三百余人;平河、大河坝一带,共杀九百余人;琉璃寺、分水岭共杀二百三十余人;大雨会、后坝场杀一百七十余人。……《申报》 1934-05-23 : 07 版 
个人分类: 价值史料|2229 次阅读|14 个评论
[反思]敦促全国“文革余孽”尽快向人民道歉
热度 3 冯用军 2013-6-18 10:58
引子 61岁的刘伯勤,退休前任济南市文化局文物处处长。日前,这位当年的红卫兵在媒体上刊登广告,向在“文革”中受到自己批斗、抄家和骚扰的众多师生、邻里道歉。他说,虽有“文革”大环境裹挟之因,个人作恶之责,亦不可泯。不对的事,就应该道歉。 评论 善有善报,恶有恶报,如有未报,时候未到。一切对人民犯下之罪行,必须得到清算;一切对人民犯下之罪行,必须进行检讨。 不能因为有大时代背景,你就可以为自己的罪行找到豁免的理由,这正如不能说因为有了菜刀,杀人者就可以得到豁免一样。 敦促还有一点良知、耻辱感还未完全泯灭的“文革”期间对人民犯过罪行的人们,勇敢地站出来吧,为你曾经的罪行向人民道歉,并期望获得被残害者及其后人的同情吧! 人非圣贤孰能无过,过也,人皆见之,及其更也,人皆仰之。 就像红会不深刻公开调查“郭美美门”就无法翻身一样,“文革”期间对人民犯过罪行的人不真诚道歉不诚心检讨就无法睡得踏实,死后也会留下骂名! 历史是人民创造的,也终归是人民评价的。人民如水,当如舟,水可载舟亦可覆舟。我们党过去、现在和未来对人民所犯下的罪行(比如冤假错案、暴力拆迁、武装镇压、防民之口,等等),早晚都必须有人来承担、早晚都可能被历史所清算。 党要管党,从严治党;只有依法治党,才能依法治国;全党、全军、全国各族人民、党员、公务员、群众、任何社会组织,都必须在《宪法》的治理框架内依法发言、依法办事,不得有任何凌驾于法律之上的政党、组织和个人,也不得有任何凌驾于法律之上的特权,只有实行中国特色社会主义宪政,才是实现“中国梦”的根本法治保障。 当个人高于组织的时候,老百姓就只能去崇拜个人;当权力大于法律的时候,老百姓就只能去找政客;当法律高于权力的时候,老百姓就会去找律师;当《宪法》高于一切的时候,老百姓就会依法办事。 前事不忘后事之师,前车之鉴高度警惕,别忘残酷而毫无人性的历史悲剧重演。 观点 同济大学文化批评研究所教授朱大可在微博上评价,“在一个没有忏悔传统的国度,该信可视为人性觉醒的稀有证据。” 知错能改善莫大焉,希望在刘伯勤的带领下,有越来越多的在“文革”期间对他人犯过罪行的“红卫兵们”出来公开声明、真诚道歉、努力忏悔、乞求原谅,让冤死的人死得瞑目,也让自己死无牵挂。 参考文献: http://news.163.com/13/0618/05/91KMKUL100011229.html 文革红卫兵登广告道歉:个人作恶之责不可泯 2013-06-18 05:57:11 来源: 燕赵都市网 (石家庄)
个人分类: GHCRC全球人类浩劫研究中心|2154 次阅读|6 个评论
[转载]a Turkish town had 10,000 Armenians, now one土耳其大屠杀
yue 2013-6-11 10:31
In a Turkish town that had 10,000 Armenians, now there is only one http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/in-a-turkish-town-that-had-10000-armenians-now-there-is-only-one/2013/06/06/d893197a-c93e-11e2-9f1a-1a7cdee20287_story_1.html By Chris Bohjalian , Chris Bohjalian is the author of 16 books. His new novel, “The Light in the Ruins,” comes out on July 9. A woman I met last month in southeastern Turkey is going to die, probably sometime soon. Asiya’s death will not be covered by any news service, and for all but a few people in her small village of Chunkush, she will not be missed. Even the relatives who love her will probably think to themselves, well, she was 98 years old. Or 99. Or, if she survives until 2015, somewhere in the neighborhood of a century. She will have lived a long life. When I met Asiya in May, her daughter brought me strong Kurdish tea and fresh strawberries from their yard, and when I return to her village someday and find that she has indeed passed away, I suspect I’m going to weep. Why cry for a woman I met but once, who lived a long life and who couldn’t understand a word I said? Who spoke only Turkish, a language in which I know how to say only “please” and “thank you”? Because Asiya is what some people call a hidden神秘 Armenian, and she is the last surviving Armenian in Chunkush. I met her when I was traveling with six Armenian American friends through a part of Turkey that many Armenians (including me) refer to as Historic化石 Armenia. We were in a region that today is largely Kurdish but as recently as 98 years ago was a mixture of Kurds, Turks, Assyrians and Armenians. We were making a pilgrimage to view the ruins of Armenian churches and monasteries, the remnants of a culture obliterated消除 from this corner of the Earth in the Armenian genocide. During the First World War, 1.5 million Armenians were systematically annihilated消灭 — three out of every four living in the Ottoman奥斯曼土耳其 Empire. On our fifth day, we visited Chunkush, where until 1915 there was a thriving community of 10,000 Armenians. The ruins of the church loom隐约 over you. The town was almost entirely Armenian. Over a few nightmarish噩梦 days that summer, Turkish gendarmes宪兵 and Kurdish chetes — killing parties团伙 — descended on降临 the village and marched almost every Armenian two hours away to a ravine悬崖 called Dudan, where they shot, bayoneted 刺刀 or simply threw them into a chasm悬崖 of several hundred feet. One of the gendarmes pulled Asiya’s mother from the line at the edge of the ravine, however, because he thought she was pretty. He decided he’d marry her. And so she was spared救 — one of the very few Armenians who were saved that summer day in 1915. My companions and I hadn’t expected to find Asiya when we journeyed to Chunkush. We simply wanted to see the ruins of the church. Most of the villagers acknowledged that once upon a time Armenians had lived in Chunkush, but they were quick to add — whenever we asked what had happened to them — that at some point they had all “moved away.” The truth was, they were still there, whatever remained of their bones deteriorating毁灭 at the bottom of the Dudan chasm. We didn’t think there were any living Armenians in the town. But as we were leaving, a thin fellow in his 60s, with a deeply weathered 饱经风霜face and a ball cap, raced up to our van and banged on the door. We had been there an hour, and word had spread that Americans were in town. We had to meet his mother-in-law, he said. Our Kurdish driver worried that this was the beginning of a nasty艰难 international incident: Seven Americans kidnapped or killed. But the fellow was desperate, so we agreed to come meet Asiya. My friend Khatchig Mouradian, editor of the Armenian Weekly in the United States, speaks Turkish and translated. I have met survivors of the Armenian genocide before, including my grandparents(存在都是此在). But meeting Asiya was different. She wasn’t in Washington or Paris or Beirut. She wasn’t a part of the Armenian diaspora 移民, where we usually find the few remaining survivors of the genocide. Here was someone whose mother had been at the edge of the gorge峡谷 — and who was still living where, more than likely, her grandparents and her father had been executed. Where her ancestral culture had been exterminated. After the massacre大屠杀, the town of 10,000 Armenians was reinvented as a town of 10,000 Kurds. Here was someone whose mother had heard the endless gunshots. The crash of the bodies on the rocks. The wails哭泣 of the children. She and her mother had grown up and grown old, aware of who and what they were — Armenian — but forced to conform and remain silent. That was the price of survival in the days after the genocide, and it’s a custom that, in small villages such as Chunkush, endures today. That is, perhaps, the very definition of a hidden Armenian. Whenever we asked Asiya about being Armenian, she would shake her head ruefully悲哀 and grow silent. One time her daughter chimed重复,敲钟 in: “No. We can’t talk about that.” Whenever we asked what her mother had told her of the chasm峡谷, she would look down and murmur: “I was too young. I don’t remember.” Sometimes she would begin a sentence, “My mother said . . .” but then her voice would trail off. At one of those moments when she paused, I took her hand. It was a reflex, and I had no idea if this was a cultural faux pas失礼. But she wrapped my fingers in hers; her grip was powerful. She looked at me from beneath her headdress with eyes that were at once among the saddest and the strongest I’ve ever seen. I understood instantly why her son-in-law, a very good man, wanted us to meet her: It was because she wanted to meet us. She wanted to meet other Armenians. Today there are but a handful of living survivors of the Armenian genocide. When the centennial百年 arrives in 2015, there will be fewer still. I hope that Asiya will be with us, because I plan to return to Chunkush that year. No one from the village is going to commemorate the 10,000 who died in that chasm, so it will be up to people like me to make that effort — and, yes, to embrace the Asiyas of the world who were there. andi88 6/7/2013 11:36 AM GMT+0800 I had a professor whose mother and grandmother survived the genocide. He said his grandmother gave birth on a forced march and the Ottoman officers kicked the baby around like a soccer ball. It's important that we not only remember, but do something to prevent this from happening again. MT84 6/8/2013 1:36 AM GMT+0800 The denial is the greater sin. All nation states are born out of some degree of ethnic cleansing or fierce assimilation. The ethic cleansing of Armenians, Greeks and other non Turks during the creation of modern Turkey was particularly horrific, but it is their continued denial of this massive crime that is even worse. In the Turkey Nobel literature prize authors who acknowledged the genocide was jailed. Historians who mention it are fired and often jailed. Newspapers or periodicals that mention it are taken to court for criminal slander against the nation. And Turkey has spent tens of millions in lobbying in the US alone to fight the recognition -- which all but a handful of bought off and discredited historians acknowledge as -- the first major modern industrial age genocide. The fact that these genocides were committed by Turkey nationalist secularists, the Young Turks who wrote and discussed striving for an ethnic purity in a direct forerunner to Hitler's views is also part of the picture. If more of that had been understood and not buried the language of Hitler would have been more alarming earlier.
个人分类: 我的阅读|1902 次阅读|0 个评论
[转载]云易:中国式的“遗忘”——从文革大屠杀说起
热度 3 Helmholtz 2012-12-1 15:29
“人们总是把善良的美称加在一切弱者头上。殊不知有些弱者之所以显得善良,仅仅是因为他们暂时没有做恶的条件”——胡平,《哲思手札》 最近在网上读到有关文革大屠杀的信息,很有几番感触。首先是这些大屠杀的受害者数量之多,迫害手段之残忍,决不次于南京大屠杀;其次,参与者之众,之“普通”,让人不寒而栗;最后,感触更深的,还是这样惨绝人寰的事,居然能在发生之后如此“完美”地在几十年间几乎销声匿迹。 鲁迅不止一次地指出过中国人健忘的特征。不过鲁迅说的好像是古代的事。而在鲁迅死去大半个世纪之后,中国人连在短短几十年的事都会忘得干干净净,这种“咄咄怪事”,不得不使我提笔,对中国人最近的一次集体“遗忘”的作一点反思。 来美国后,我曾经从一个年龄比我大得多的画家朋友那里听说过文革期间在广西某县上发生的人吃人现象,包括活吃人脑等等惊心动魄而不可思议的事。我当时虽然倾向于相信,但还有几分似信非信。而在读到了谭合成的《血的神话 —公元1967年湖南道县文革大屠杀纪实》(以下简称为《血的神话》)一书之后,加上在网上搜索到一些信息,我对这些发生在自己的有生之年的人间惨剧不再怀疑。 《血的神话》一书记载了湖南道县的大屠杀,其血腥令人发指。而后笔者又在网上读到关于广西南宁大屠杀纪事文章,其规模和手段似乎更为惨烈,被害死的人数更多,也证实了我以前的道听途说。对那些惨绝人寰的细节,我没有作家莫言所具有的兴趣,所以在此我不再重复,而只想指出这些事件中(在我看来)的两个非常显著的特征:参与者的众多和“普通”,以及手段的野蛮。而这两个特征,我认为是作为中国人,或者任何一个对人性有兴趣思考的人,都无法回避,并且也是不应该回避的。这两个特征向我个人证实了一个这样一个事实:人性中善良的一面的缺失,和“恶”的一面的凸显,在中国人(这个民族)中的确是一种普遍存在。 所谓“普遍存在”,在此并不一定是指“大多数”,更不是指“所有中国人”,而是指一种远远大于“个别”的现象。就像儿童虐待一样,虽然不是每家每户都发生,但它的存在远远超出了几家几户,所以在中国这个人口世界第一的土地上,受害者就不是以几个,或几十个来记,而是以成千上万来记。这样的数目,如果仅仅因为不是“大多数”就采取忽略,那在我来看就是一种对他人的痛苦漠不关心的麻木心态,也是人性善的缺失的体现。 那么,人性善的缺失,或者人性恶的凸现这一现象产生的原因是什么呢?我个人觉得在一些暂时的和表面的问题上– 如制度上去找答案是不够的,而只有在文化,甚至更深的因素- 历史和进化规律中去挖掘,似乎才可能找到相对圆满的答案。所以,这是个巨大的题材,不是本文和笔者的当前能力所及的。本文想要回答的,只是一个非常简单的问题:自称数学那么好,那么聪明的中国人,怎么会在如此短暂的时段中“忘记”如此惊心动魄的发生自己身边的事? 笔者基本上和文革同岁,在大陆生活了三十年才出国。在这三十年中,现在还记得的,是一次听说过知青在乡下吃死婴的事,另一次是文革中一个教授的手指被钉过竹签的事。但这些消息传出来,都是非常小心翼翼,并且都似乎是“个别现象”。更不必说,随着时光流逝,这样的“流言蜚语”,都在众人的心中淡化,最后消失了。为什么?是因为中国人害怕残暴和血腥吗?可我看到的是,但在中国民间,对日本人的残暴侃侃而谈刻骨铭心的中国人多了去。那么,是因为政府和媒体的消息封锁吗?很多人会认可这个理由,不加思考地把责任推给政府,但我个人认为,即使政府有意掩盖,民间却不可能连一点蛛丝马迹都找不到的。比如尽管大陆官方对日本在二战中屠杀中国人的残暴有长期的的掩盖,但关于日本人的残暴中国人都或多或少地知道很多。也许,是因为中国人心态“积极”,凡事讲究“喜庆”,看问题总是看到积极的一面,从而把丑陋的一面刻意漏掉?如果真的是这样,那又不能完全解释前面提到的中国人总对日本人在二战中的残暴耿耿于怀的事实。总之,以上这几点,虽然都或多或少地是原因之一,但我总觉得,能够让如此大的事件那么迅速地石沉大海,一定还有更潜在的原因。 答案,还要去事实中,或者历史中寻找。有些事,单个地看,怎么也看不出什么特点来,而和其他事情对比之后,其特殊的一面就会自然显露出来。我个人认为,文革这样的灾难,在人类历史上是“独树一帜”的。之所以这样说,是因为在历史上,很难找到和它相似的事件。二战中的纳粹杀犹太人,是有组织的种族灭绝,针对性极强,所以和文革的群众运动不是一个性质;日本人在二战中杀中国人,也有种族歧视的原因在里面,加上战争的疯狂,和文革运动也有很大的本质差异;斯大林的肃反运动,从我个人有限的知识来看,是一种从上至下的有组织的迫害,和文革的群众运动还是有很大差别;法国大革命在现象上倒是和文化大革命有一比,其在最疯狂的时候,也大概是人人参与,胡杀一气血流成河。不过,法国大革命的性质,是两种意识形态的极端冲突,其后果,除了其极大的破坏性之外,还有着非常积极的一面:它把平等和自由观念传播到整个欧洲,使欧洲社会的制度和结构在进化史上更上了一个台阶。中国文化大革命之所以史无前例,是因为它是一场几乎无目的性的,发生在无知的群众中的互相迫害。你整我,我杀你,大家都站在毛泽东共产党一边,根本说不出个明白的理由。似乎也不需要说出什么理由。 毛泽东深谙群众“力量”,他知道发动群众的力量是一种达到他自己目的的既省力又“效果”最佳的手段。他个人唯一要做的,就是给这些“力量”以爆发的机会。至于爆发之后如何操作,从来对领导万般体贴的群众们是不会让毛主席他老人家来操心的。也是在这一点,笔者认为毛泽东的“智慧”比斯大林还要“高”一筹。 不是吗?湖南道县就是“红派”与“毛派”之间的残杀。两派都自以为是毛泽东的忠实信徒。挖眼,凌迟,火烧,活埋,摔死儿童等等各种人类文明的“创举”,都在群众运动中此起彼伏地再现了,哪里还需要毛主席的指示?在杀人疯狂的时候,你要想自杀都得悄悄而迅速地干,否则会被大家“救活”,然后再慢慢地把你折腾致死。据“血的神话”一书记载,湖南道县短短的三个月间就害死了9千多人,而广西的大屠杀更是配合着吃人的惨剧,害死了更多的无以计数的人。文革究竟死了多少人,没有人能统计得清楚。据网上的消息,邓小平说过,那将是一个天文数字(网上来源)。 显然,这样的惨剧,把责任简单地推给制度,或者共产党,似乎都是非常牵强附会的。但是,又有谁愿意把这个责任推给自己呢?那些在屠杀中挖了别人眼睛,吃了别人的脑髓心肝的人,不大都在事件之后平平安安地没有受到任何惩罚么?不但不受成法,还反而成了“受害者”,还得以善终。这,就是“遗忘”的好处。 逃避责任,是集体主义给个体带来的最大好处。因为,无论做了什么事,责任都不在个人身上。一句“大家都是这样”,就可以免掉各种惩罚,甚至良心的惩罚。面对着这种不堪回首的往事,大家似乎都搞不清楚,究竟是什么恶魔俯身,让自己作出了如此不可思议的事情。于是,遗忘,自然地变成了群体的最佳选择。 在这种集体遗忘下,中国的统治者和被统治者一唱一和,在历史的一治一乱的重复中,写下了一部几千年在人性道德上原地踏步甚至倒退的华夏“文明”史。在乱世之中,太多的个人都找到借口宣泄自己,和着“大多数”一起滥杀无辜,而在和平时期,官方封锁信息,民间主动配合,大家又开始“忘记”过去,一心向前,在人性枯竭的脸上强拉出一份欢笑,扮演起一片“盛世”的“繁荣”。 当然,不光是被遗忘了的,还有正在发生的,如法轮功的成批受酷刑折磨,高智晟的被非人地折磨致死,计划生育的执行者们的滥用职权,对超生者的非人性处理,等等这些,都是中国人的“积极思维方式”刻意回避的。可悲的是,遗忘,并不是解决问题的方式。可能谁也不能担保悲剧会仅仅因为“遗忘”而不再上演。如果真是这样,中国的历史就得改写了。 回到本文开篇引用的胡平的话:“人们总是把善良的美称家在一切弱者头上。殊不知有些弱者之所以显得善良,仅仅是因为他们暂时没有做恶的条件”,不难看出,往事之所以不堪回首,正是因为这些残忍不是出于,或者完全出于统治者之手,而是出于“你”,“我”,“他/她”,等等,这些所谓的“普通人”之手。当然,我绝对不是说民众中没有善良的无辜的人,而是说民众中的“恶”,是非常隐蔽的,而且是大量存在着的。“大众”,决非一般人所理解的那样,在各种人为灾难中都是“受害者”。即使在纳粹和日本军人在二战中的杀戮中,那些士兵,都不能完全逃脱良心的惩罚,更不必提像文革,或者“大跃进”等等这些群众运动了。我认为在这些群众运动中所产生的血腥事件,“大众”,“老百姓”,往往比运动的发动者有更直接的责任。 所以在此我希望每一个读到此文的读者,能否扪心自问一下:如果再来一次大乱,作为中国人,或者一个普通人,你会有什么样的信念,使你不会投身于运动中,成为残杀生命的一员?
个人分类: 综合性资料|1976 次阅读|3 个评论
东坡肘子在什么情况下才可能是一种美食?
热度 6 jiangjinsong 2012-11-18 00:35
在餐桌上, 血腥的事实不可以碰触, 我们绝不可以讨论肘子的真正来历, 不能谈论所涉及的屠杀、苦难和血腥, 否则大家会公认此人冒犯失礼, 因为那样会倒了大家的胃口。 大家都知道, 却故意假装不知道, 不但不愿意去谈论, 而且不愿意去思考这一问题。 东坡肘子, 只有在食客们自欺的情况下才可能成为一种美食。 东坡肘子作为东坡肘子而存在的条件就是食客的自欺。 肉食文化是一种自欺的文化。
个人分类: 敬畏自然|4281 次阅读|24 个评论
98年,印尼屠杀华人事件,太血腥,惨不忍睹啊
firefive 2011-8-31 10:04
以前只看了一些文字描述,今天看到了很多图片,真是惨不忍睹啊。 想起多年起为印尼海啸捐款的事,真他妈的傻B,中国上上下上基本都是傻B。。。 太他M恶心了,中国真伟大,在需要你的时候你在哪?? http://www.chnqiang.com/article/2011/0829/mil_49669_1.shtml 封锁得真不错,要是知道98年印尼这么恶劣的对待华人,2004年会有华人给印尼捐款么?!! 这就是所谓的强大的祖国,强大的党和正腐,越看越傻B。 http://bbs.tiexue.net/post_3999640_1.html 中国人的耻辱!
个人分类: 个人感想|3995 次阅读|0 个评论
动物权利手册36.没有买卖就没有杀戮
热度 4 jiangjinsong 2011-6-4 06:29
蔣科學按: 有些肉食者會說,我並沒有殺動物。動物已經被殺,不吃白不吃。但是,要知道,現在是市場經濟,生產是由需求決定。正是因為你吃肉才會創造需求,屠宰場才有市場。如果大家都不吃,屠殺就不再有利可圖。只要你還在吃肉,你其實就在殺戮。 36. 我并没有杀生? 那些买肉的人应对动物的死亡负完全的责任,单单是在英国,每年就有超过7亿的动物因此而死。这些杀戮之所以会发生是因为他们的需求,也因为有了他们的金钱这些杀戮才得以能维持。他们的罪过是无法逃避的。
个人分类: 素食天地|3097 次阅读|10 个评论
丧心病狂之看客为孽
zhangt10 2010-4-30 19:41
看了这三天的新闻,再看看科网首页的几篇评论,实在让人齿寒。当看客们津津评点的时候,是否意识到自己不负责任的行径正在鼓励着恶行一而再再而三地发生。 不知道那些看客们家里有没有孩子。我要讨论只是做人最起码的一点认识:七八岁的孩子们,无论其家事如何,到底有没有生存的权利?不要和我打岔说什么民工孩子下岗工人等等社会问题,因为我问的只是最简单的人性道德:不管是谁,以暴力剥夺一个无辜的孩子的生命,只有一个形容:丧心。病狂。 让我极其不理解的是,居然这样的懦夫卑劣行为居然会得到同情。诸位看客们居然忍不住的把自己的立场世界投射到这些无辜孩子的悲剧上面。 一会儿说幼儿园条件太好,一会儿讨论民愤话语权云云。俨然屠杀幼儿的行为是不应受谴责鞭挞的。 这些人居然更加寻找理由给凶手话语权。 这就难怪更多的凶手用屠杀孩子这样丧心病狂的手段来表达自己。 三天三个屠杀!这些助纣为孽的无聊看客们终究也逃不了自己手上染上的孩子的鲜血。
个人分类: 生活点滴|3293 次阅读|3 个评论
日本鬼子尽不干人事
weizhangsuda 2010-2-6 15:23
http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMTQyODMyMDg4.html
个人分类: 生活点滴|3665 次阅读|1 个评论

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-6-2 19:50

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部