科学网

 找回密码
  注册

tag 标签: acquisition

相关帖子

版块 作者 回复/查看 最后发表

没有相关内容

相关日志

[转载]【Christopher Manning课件】词汇习得Lexical Acquisition
lcj2212916 2019-2-19 07:50
本课件主要内容包括: 1. 综合测度 2. 子类别框架 3. 子类别框架的学习 4. 词汇因素的重要性 5. 简化模型 6. 关于问题的示例NYT 7. 构建模型 8. 词汇习得 9. 应用举例:关于选择的偏好 10. SPS示例 11. 我们如何衡量单词的相似性呢? 12. 二元向量的相似性度量 13. 实值向量空间 14. Cosine度量 15. 示例:在NYT上用于语义相似度衡量的余弦表示 16. 概率度量 下载英文原文地址: http://page2.dfpan.com/fs/7l4cfja2d2715229163/ 更多精彩文章请关注微信号:
1370 次阅读|0 个评论
Early words—a few facts about the acquisition of word for children
carldy 2010-2-22 22:19
Early wordsa few facts about the acquisition of word for children 有关儿童语言习得的话题:词类习得的顺序 When we discuss the acquisition of words for the children, we will ask this question: Whats the order of acquisition for word categories? As far as major lexical categories go, childrens early production vocabularies exhibit a preponderance of nouns, typically used to refer to objects in the childs immediate environment (e.g. mummy, daddy, dolly, car).Alongside these, children are often quick to develop a small number of general purpose verb (Radford et al 1999/2000: 212). In a study of the 1970s, Roger Brown and his colleagues at Harvard reported the results of their detailed longitudinal work with three children. It included a number of verbal inflections within which Brown distinguished between regular and irregular past tense inflections (as in jumped and came ) and between regular and irregular third person singular present ( walks , does ). His research shows that the verbal inflections were acquired as the following orders: 1) progressive ing 2) past tense irregular 3) past tense regular 4) third person singular present regular 5) third person singular present irregular (cf. Radford et al 1999/2000: 215) This reason for the progressive morpheme coming first is its regularity. Unlike the past tense and third person singular morphemes, the progressive morpheme has no variation realizations as allomorphs. As a verbal suffix, it attaches in a fixed form to the vast majority of English verbs, and this, coupled with its relatively transparent semantics in signaling ongoing activities, may be sufficient to account for its accessibility to children. ( 这里我保留一种疑问:对于中国学习者来说,动词过去时的不规则变化与规则变化的习得顺序,是否不同于英语母语学习者? Of course, Brown et al 1999/2000:216 present their suspicions and observations on this order of acquisition: First, the irregular forms, while relatively small in number, include some of the most frequently occurring verbs in English (was, had, came, went, brought, took, etc.). Second, the regular patterns does indeed prevail but only after a period during which the irregular forms are correctly produced. So, here comes the phenomenon of overregularization which needs another chapter to discuss.
个人分类: 读书心得体会 Harvest|3475 次阅读|0 个评论

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-6-11 07:40

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部