第四届复杂系统之统计物理与数学 国际学术研讨会 4th International Workshop on Statistical Physics and Mathematics for Complex Systems SPMCS 2014 Yichang 12 –16 October 2014 Photos First Line (from left): D. Tayurskii ( Kazan Federal University, Russia) ； S.S. Liaw 廖思善 , ( National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan)； Z. Struzik ( The University of Tokyo)； Sumiyoshi Abe ( Mie University, Japan)； 郑胜（三峡大学） ； Xu Cai 蔡勖 （ Central China Normal University）， Robledo Alberto (Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico) ； C.K. Hu 胡进锟 , ( Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taiwan)； B.H. Wang 汪秉宏, (U niversity of Science and Technology of China) 2nd Line (from left): 罗丽娜 ; Paul Bourgine ( école Polytechnique) ; 惠子 ; 杨纯斌(华中师范大学) ; 欧聪杰（华侨大学） ; 吕金虎（中科院系统所） ; 池丽平(华中师范大学) ; 刘宗华（华东师范大学） 3rd Line (from left): 郭龙（中国地质大学） ; Mauricio Porto Pato ( Universidade de S~ao Paulo ); 邓为炳（University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ） ; 刘婷婷 ; 刘非易 ; 仇康 ; 王有贵（北京师范大学 系统科学学院） ; 郑志刚（北京师范大学 物理学院） ; 周炜星（华东理工大学商学院） ; 朱陈平（南京航空航天大学物理学院） ; 江健（武汉纺织大学） 4th Line (from left): 柯谱 ; 何长洋 ; 粟柱 ; 张文俊 ; 徐新平; 邓盛峰 ; 邹以江 ; 王冰冰 ; 王春阳（曲阜师范大学） ; 刘光环 ; 朱月英; 王可 First Line (from left): D. Tayurskii ( Kazan Federal University, Russia) ； S.S. Liaw 廖思善 , ( National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan)； Z. Struzik ( The University of Tokyo)； Sumiyoshi Abe ( Mie University, Japan)； 郑胜（三峡大学） ； Xu Cai 蔡勖 （ Central China Normal University）， Robledo Alberto (Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico) ； C.K. Hu 胡进锟 , ( Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taiwan)； B.H. Wang 汪秉宏, (U niversity of Science and Technology of China) 2nd Line (from left): 罗丽娜 ; Paul Bourgine ( école Polytechnique) ; 惠子 ; 杨纯斌(华中师范大学) ; 欧聪杰（华侨大学） ; 吕金虎（中科院系统所） ; 池丽平(华中师范大学) ; 刘宗华（华东师范大学） 3rd Line (from left): 郭龙（中国地质大学） ; Mauricio Porto Pato ( Universidade de S~ao Paulo ); 邓为炳（University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ） ; 刘婷婷 ; 刘非易 ; 仇康 ; 王有贵（北京师范大学 系统科学学院） ; 郑志刚（北京师范大学 物理学院） ; 周炜星（华东理工大学商学院） ; 朱陈平（南京航空航天大学物理学院） ; 江健（武汉纺织大学） 4th Line (from left): 柯谱 ; 何长洋 ; 粟柱 ; 张文俊 ; 徐新平; 邓盛峰 ; 邹以江 ; 王冰冰 ; 王春阳（曲阜师范大学） ; 刘光环 ; 朱月英; 王可
International Workshop on Computational, Cognitive and Behavioral Social Science (CCB) 计算认知与行为社会科学国际学术研讨会 台湾政治大学 December 6-8, 2013 Call for Papers This workshop is motivated by the constant efforts made to search for a unified framework for social sciences. Among several different threads which have been developed over the last decade, a major one is the use of the agent-based model as a unified framework to study the complexity of social dynamics. This development is built upon a view that Stephen Wolfram (Wolfram, 2002; Zenil, 2013) coined as computational equivalence (CE), i.e., social processes, characterized as interactions of heterogeneous agents, can be regarded as an equivalent of computation, or even more, universal computation. A similar view is widely shared among social scientists (Axelrod, 1997; Albin and Foley, 1998; Velupillai, 2000, 2010; Miller and Page, 2007; Mirowski, 2007). While the historical root of CE can be traced all the way back to Alan Turing and other pioneers before or around the 1950s, it is the extensive use and studies of cellular automata, such as John Conway's Game of Life initiated in the late 1960s or Stephen Wolfram's Elementary Cellular Automata in the early 1980s, that enhances the general awareness of the computational nature of social sciences and facilitates the emergence of this new discipline, known as computational social science (CSS). Thomas Schelling's work on the segregation model (Schelling, 1971) is considered as one of earliest and classic work in this CSS. This work is an enlightenment for many physicists who later become interested in social sciences (Buchanan, 2007). A milestone of the development of computational social science is the recent publication of the 4-volume collections of 66 influential articles written over the last four decades, edited by Nigel Gilbert (Gilbert, 2010). This collection not only clearly indicates what computational social science was and is, but also feature its possible becoming. This CCB workshop can be considered as a part of this long endeavor. In addition to the computational social science, we also notice another unified efforts emanating from cognitive science and psychology, which is known as the cognitive and behavioral social science. The attempt to have a cognitive social science has an even longer history than computational social science. Herbert Simon had a great influence on initiating this development. In his academic lifetime, he constantly called for the conversation between cognitive science and social sciences. The endeavor was followed by Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky, Paul Slovic, Richard Thaler, Reinhard Selten, Gerd Gingerenzer, Vela Velupillai, to name a few. This long series of efforts prompts the advent of the name cognitive social science (Turner, 2001; Sun, 2012). This line of development has extended into a blend of various methodologies, some using laboratory approach (partially accompanied by the recent progresses in neuroscience), some relying on computation modeling and simulation approach. For the former, the success of experimental economics has gradually spread to other social disciplines, such as political sciences, sociology, and management; as to the later, the early mathematical psychological model of reinforcement learning (Bush and Mosteller, 1955) has been further extended by behavioral economists into generalized reinforcement learning model (Camerer and Ho, 1999), not to mention the fusion of various heuristics borrowed from computer scientists and psychologists, such as case-based decisions, decision trees (fast-and-frugal heuristics), and many other computational intelligence tools. They together provide social sciences a foundation from brain to mind and further to decision-making, which enhance our understandings of preference and expectation formation, choice and judgement making, learning with experiences, and risk management. Computational social science has the interactions of heterogeneous agents following different rules as the main theme, but it may not pay much attention to the fine details on who these agents are, their cognitive constraints, and their behavioral rules. Nonetheless, in the empirical-oriented, agent-based models, data from human-subject experiments are, however, employed to design reasonable artificial agents. This development is convincing enough that there will be more fruitful collaborations between computational social science and cognitive and behavioral social science in the future. In fact, both the upward causation and downward causation of agent-based modeling may involve genes, neurons, personality, and culture as part of the mechanisms. to put it alternatively, these fine details are the subroutines or modules to be seen everywhere in the interaction processes. While it is not necessary for all agent-based models to have genes or neurons as their elementary units, knowledge of cognitive and behavioral social science can help us decide, for example (just as a convenient metaphor), among the 256 rules in Wolfram’s one-dimensional cellular automata, which ones are more human-like? On the other hand, it is also desirable to know how these fine details can amplify them in the social emergence; for example, how amygdala can help herding behavior and enhance instability of financial markets. Can we design a treatment that people can easily develop trust relation, which in turn beef up the team production, GDP and happiness index? The exemplar questions may not be rigorously shaped, but they give the idea and the flavor. Being capable of addressing the question with that depth of individuals (foundation) and breath of the society (aggregation) is the purpose of bringing together these two different but closely related treads. We believe that the cross-fertilization of these two unified social sciences is the next step of each of the two, and we believe that computational, cognitive and behavioral social science is the future of an integrated social science. The uniqueness of this workshop is to bring together the scholars from both strands and begin the constructive and fascinating conversation. We welcome submissions addressing various social dynamics, such as, but definitely not limited to, voting, identity, segregation, social exclusion, discrimination, financial instability, urban dynamics, social networks, leadership, congestion, disease transmission, gossip and mass media, culture and social norms, interpersonal relations, pro-social behavior, using (agent-based) computational, cognitive and behavioral modeling, laboratory and field experiments, learning, decision-making under risky environment, gambling, crime, national security, etc. We sincerely welcome participants from different sister disciplines, such as economics, ecology, political science, public health, sociology, social anthropology, ethnology, geography, psychology, communication, law, management science, linguistics, religion, cultural studies, biology, physics, computer sciences, mathematics, neuroscience and genetics,…etc. Organizers Shu-Heng Chen , National Chengchi University, Taiwan Ming Hsu , University of California at Berkeley, USA Akira Namatmae , National Defense Academy, Japan Leonid Perlovsky , Harvard University, USA David Sallach, University of Chicago, USA John Staddon , Duke University, USA Paul Wang , Duke University, USA Yingxu Wang , University of Calgary, Canada International Program Committee Yuji Aruka , Chuo University, Japan Shih-Fen Cheng , Singapore Management University, Singapore Siew Ann Cheong , Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Ya-Chi Huang , Lunghwa University of Science and Technology, Taiwan Kai Pui Lam , Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Honggang Li , Beijing Normal University, China Sai-Ping Li , Academia Sinica, Taiwan Chia-Yang Lin, National Chengchi University, Taiwan Wen-Jong Ma , National Chengchi University, Taiwan Akira Namatame , National Defense Academy, Japan Heping Pan , Chongqing Institute of Finance, China Da Ren, Tianjin University, China Kwok Yip Szeto , Hong Kong University of Science and Technoloygy, Hong Kong Chung-Ching Tai , Tunghai University, Taiwan Bing-Hong Wang , University of Science and Technology of China, China Guocheng Wang , Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, China Zhijian Wang , Zhejiang University, China Zhongyu Wang , Harbin Institute of Technology, China Haijun Yang , Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, China Chia-Hsuan Yeh , Yuan Ze University, Taiwan Nai-Shing Yen , National Chengchi University, Taiwan Tongkui Yu , Southwest University, China Wei Zhang , Tianjin University, China Yu Zhang , St. John's University, USA Wei-Xing Zhou , East China University of Science and Technology, China Chia-Ling Chang, National Chengchi University, Taiwan Paper Submissions All papers are to be submitted electronically through the TAAI 2013 submission website: https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=taai2013 . Each submission should be regarded as an undertaking that, if the paper is accepted, at least one of the authors must attend the conference to present the work. Templates · 8.5 x 11 Word Template (ZIP) · 8.5 x 11 double-column LaTex Package (ZIP) Important Dates Call for papers 15 March 2013 Manuscripts due 23 August 2013 Acceptance notification 4 October 2013 Camera-ready versions due 14 October 2013 Paper author registrations due 14 October 2013 Early-bird registration due 28 October 2013 Conference dates 6-8 December 2013 Sponsors New Mathematics and Natural Computation AI-ECON Research Center, NCCU
【备注】 这里引用的是两次The International Symposium on Using Corpora in Contrastive and Translation Studies (UCCTS语料库及语言对比与翻译国际研讨会) 在线论文，供参考： UCCTS2010： Edge Hill University, UK http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/projects/corpus/UCCTS2010Proceedings/ UCCTS2008：Zhejiang University, China www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/corplang/UCCTS2008Proceedings
【备注】本文即将在《中国英语教育》杂志刊出，录下与大家共享： 第二届基于语料库的语言对比与翻译研究国际学术研讨会综述 戴光荣 肖忠华 福建工程学院 浙江大学 1 引言 自从二十世纪八十年代以来，语料库研究方法在语言研究几乎所有领域掀起了一场革命，特别是多语种语料库（包括对应语料库与可比语料库）的迅速发展，为语言对比与翻译研究创造了良好的条件。恰如Laviosa（1988：474）指出的，通过理论阐述与实践经验相结合，语料库研究途径已发展成为一种复合型的研究范式，以此解决一系列与翻译理论、翻译描写以及翻译实践相关的问题。Tymoczko（1998）也曾指出，基于语料库的研究方法对于翻译研究来说至关重要，使之作为一门学科充满活力，得以发展。在语言对比研究方面，语料库也发挥着重要作用。自二十世纪九十年代以来，多语种语料库资源给一度失宠的语言对比研究注入了新的生机与活力（Salkie 2002）。当语料库方法促进语言对比与翻译研究的同时，这些研究本身也大大拓展了语料库语言学的研究范畴。 基于语料库的语言对比与翻译研究（以下简称UCCTS）国际研讨会顺应了这一发展趋势，在众多学者的关注下，盛大出场。第一届UCCTS国际研讨会于2008年9月25-27日在浙江大学成功举行，该次大会吸引了来自海内外14个国家和地区38家高等院校近60位专家教授与会。会上宣读的论文以论文集的形式在网上出版，其中23篇论文经作者修改后由英国剑桥学者出版社结集出版(Xiao 2010，肖忠华2009)。 自第一届UCCTS会议以来，国内外语料库研发迅猛，语言对比与翻译研究领域成果频出，如Gilquin Papp (2008)，Rodrigo (2008)，Angelelli et al (2009)，Beeby et al (2009), Morgenstern (2009)，Munday (2009)，Suomela-Salmi Dervin(2009)，Ji (2010) ，Laviosa (2010) ，Xiao McEnery (2010)等等。国内学者在创建各类翻译语料库基础上，也取得了可喜的成绩，如北外王克非教授主持创建的大型平行语料库，在这两年内成果迭出，如王克非 胡显耀(2008)，王克非 秦洪武 （2009），秦洪武 王克非（2009）等；浙江大学肖忠华教授主持创建的世界上第一个汉语译文语料库ZCTC，专门用以研究汉语译文的语言特征（参阅肖忠华 戴光荣2010, 戴光荣 肖忠华2010等）。 第二届UCCTS国际研讨会在众多学者的呼唤声中，于2010年7月27－29日在英国知山大学(Edge Hill University)拉开帷幕，迎来了来自六大洲31个国家和地区、59所高校和科研单位的67位与会代表。本文对该次大会做一个简单综述，以期为大家提供最新资讯。 2 会议主题报告及分论坛研讨内容介绍 本次会议的主题相比第一届会议有所增加，大致如下：（1）可比或平行语料库的研制，（2）多语语料库的加工，（3）平行语料库在翻译研究和教学中的运用，（4）语料库在语言对比中的运用，（5）基于语料库的本族语源语、译语和本族语目的语之间的对比研究，（6）基于语料库的语言对比和翻译研究接口研究，以及（7）语料库在术语学、词汇学与词典编纂中运用。 大会共录用并宣读论文62篇，内容涵盖上述所有主题。会议按照主题报告、翻译研究、对比研究、语料库与工具开发、翻译教学与培训五大块进行探讨，因此下文对上述主题及各分论坛研讨内容分别加以介绍与评论。 2.1 主题报告 在介绍分论坛内容之前，先介绍一下四项主题报告的内容。此次会议邀请了四位主题报告人，他们都在语料库与翻译及语言对比领域做出了巨大贡献。他们的报告，把大家带入到了语料库研究的精彩境界。 挪威奥斯陆大学的Hilde Hasselg?rd教授做了题为平行语料库与对比研究的报告（Parallel corpora and contrastive studies）。她指出，单语种语料库在语言研究中做出了开创性的工作；而自20世纪90年代以来，多语与双语语料库在语言对比与翻译中得到广泛运用，并取得了很大的突破。她还通过具体个案研究，探讨了语料库在语言描写的不同领域为实现不同目的运用情况。 意大利巴里大学的Sara Laviosa博士在题为语料库翻译教学中的跨文化概念的报告（A transcultural conceptual framework for corpus-based translation pedagogy）中，探讨了语料库在翻译教学中的运用。她分别介绍了译者培训、译者教育并区分了两者在教学方法、教学设计及教学过程中的差异。她还指出，跨文化概念对于学习语言与翻译的学生来说非常重要。 英国布莱顿大学的Raf Salkie 教授就翻译：几个难题及解决方案（Translation: some tough questions and some answers）展开探讨，分别从语言之间的表达间距（expressive gap）、表达偏好（expressive (dis)-preference）以及表达差异（expressive difference）这三个问题入手，探讨如何通过语料库来解决翻译中遇到的难题。 芬兰赫尔辛基大学的Anna Mauranen教授在她题为翻译语料库与探寻翻译共性（Translation corpora and the quest for Translation Universals）报告中，高屋建瓴，从语言共性出发，引出并详细探讨了翻译共性（translational universals）。她通过具体个案研究，探讨可比语料库、平行语料库等多语种语料库在探讨翻译共性中发挥的作用。 上述四位学者分别就语料库与翻译、语料库与语言对比、语料库用于翻译教学与培训，以及语料库翻译研究中最热门的话题展开了深入研究，展示了基于语料库的语言对比与翻译研究领域的最新研究动态。 2.2翻译研究分论坛 翻译研究分论坛约有20多位学者报告了其最新研究成果，话题涉及宏观与微观层面，范围较广。宏观层面如探讨翻译共性、语料库翻译学最新进展与动态，微观层面如明晰化、简化、源语透过效应、归化与异化翻译。语言研究层面涉及到语篇（如译者语篇风格研究、文学语篇研究）、句子（如被动句式）、短语（如习语、词簇）及词语（如话语重述标记）；研究范围涉及到翻译课堂教学中语料库的运用、基于语料库的口译与视译研究等。他们在研究与教学中使用的语料库包括单语语料库、双语平行语料库、多语可比语料库，研究方法大多采用定量与定性相结合，理论联系实践，既有理论层面的探讨，也有具体个案的研究。他们的务实不空谈的研究作风，在语料库翻译研究方面做出了有益探索，赢得了与会者的一致好评。 2.3语言对比研究分论坛 对比研究分论坛话题涉及面也非常广，如学术英语中句法省略、专业语料库在语言变体研究中的作用、系动词的对比研究、术语的代表性、语体与语域变体研究、所有格对比研究、配价理论在语言理解中的作用、虚拟条件句研究、认知表达对比研究等。 该论坛研究中涉及的语种很多，有英语、德语、捷克语、法语、荷兰语、意大利语、挪威语、土耳其语、汉语等；研究题材也很广泛，如军事语言、法律语言、学术语言、语言变体、医学语言等。 研究的语言层面也涉及到语篇、句法、词组（如I wish you/someone/people would）、词（如英语、法语及荷兰语中关联动词的对比研究）及词缀（如比较英语与法语的前缀）等。理论方面的探讨也很深入，如认知层面的探讨、术语层面的研究等。 2.4语料库与工具开发分论坛 该分论坛探讨语料库的创建与工具开发，体现出很强的应用意识。会议上呈现给大家的，有许多是大型团队研究项目，如Per-Fide Project项目（葡萄牙语及其六种不同语言的平行语料库创建），英国英语与中国英语，与英国国家语料库BNC配套的波兰语可比语料库，IAC（动态语料库获取接口研究）、法律双语及双系统词典编纂等。除此之外，还涉及到许多在线语料库的创建以及语料库如何实现在线检索技术的探讨、中介语语料库的创建及研究等。研究所涉及的语对有英语－挪威语/葡萄牙语/西班牙语/俄语/法语/意大利语/德语/汉语/波兰语/斯洛文尼亚语等。从这里可以看出，英语作为一种强势语言，在语料库研究中具有举足轻重的作用。当然这说明，语料库技术还有很大的发展空间，世界上这么多语言，正好可以满足语料库迅猛发展的需要。 2.5 翻译教学与培训分论坛 语料库技术的发展，多语种语料库的开发，都有其各自的特色和目的。其中用途最为广泛的首推翻译教学与译者培训。本论坛涉及的话题非常具体，大多来自一线的翻译课堂与译者培训，如基于语料库的口译研究、基于语料库的视译评价与考核、语料库在实用翻译课程中的运用（如旅游翻译语料库、航空航天翻译语料库、总统演讲中英文平行语料库）。特别值得提出的，是Laviosa博士在主题报告中总结归纳的基于语料库的译者培训与教育的各类方法（包括教学工具、语料涉及、教学步骤等），为语料库翻译教学与培训提供了很好的借鉴。 3 会议影响及评价 此次国际研讨会相比第一届研讨会来说，有几个突出的特点： 1，会议规模扩大：参会人员来自31个国家和地区，影响波及面广； 2，会议主题更体现出语料库研究与发展趋势，增加了术语学研究、词典编纂、口译、视译、网站本土化翻译等方面的话题； 3，研讨内容更深入，话题更鲜明，质量更高。与会人员通过近三天的全称探讨，纷纷表示受益匪浅，并期盼下一次有更好、更新的话题，更多更新更全的技术交流。 4 展望 毋庸置疑，语料库已成为当前语言对比翻译研究中广泛使用的平台与工具。作为语言研究的重要资源，语料库数据能广泛运用于语言描述、语言教学、语言对比、翻译研究、词典编纂等诸多领域。基于语料库的语言对比与翻译研究必将在今后的发展中体现出更强的实用性，具有更加广泛的运用前景，并将产生更加深远的积极影响。 参考文献： Angelelli, Claudia V. and Jacobson, Holly E. (2009) Testing and Assessment in Translation and Interpreting Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Beeby, A., Rodrguez Ins, P. and Snchez-Gijn, P. (eds) (2009). Corpus Use and Translating: Corpus Use for Learning to Translate and Learning Corpus Use to Translate. John Benjamins. Gilquin, G and Papp, S. (2008) Linking up Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Ji, M. (2010) Phraseology in Corpus-Based Translation Studies. Berlin: Peter Lang. Laviosa, S. (1998) The corpus-based approach: A new paradigm in translation studies. Meta 43(4): 474-479. Laviosa. S, (2010) Corpora. In Yves Gambier and Luc Van Doorslaer (eds) Handbook of Translation Studies (Volume 1),8086. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Ldeling, A. and Kyt?, M. (2009) Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter. Morgenstern, K. (2009) Corpus Linguistics-Differences and Similarities between German and English Fairy Tales. Altstadt: GRIN Verlag. Munday, J. (2009) The Routledge Companion to Translation Studies. London and New York: Routledge. Peters. P., Collins, P and Smith, A. (eds) (2009) Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and beyond. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Rodrigo, E. Y. (2008) Topics in Language Resources for Translation and Localisation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Salkie, R. (2002) How can linguists profit from parallel corpora? In L. Borin (ed.) Parallel Corpora, Parallel Worlds, 93-109. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Suomela-Salmi, E. and Dervin, F. (2009) Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Academic Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Tymoczko, M. (1998). Computerized corpora and the future of translation studies. Meta 43(4): 652-660. Xiao, R. (ed.) (2010) Using Corpora in Contrastive and Translation Studies. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Xiao, R. and McEnery, A. (2010). Corpus-Based Contrastive Studies of English and Chinese. London and New York: Routledge. 戴光荣、肖忠华.(2010) 基于自建英汉翻译语料库的翻译明晰化研究. 《中国翻译》(1): 76-80. 秦洪武、王克非. (2009) 基于对应语料库的英译汉语言特征分析.《外语教学与研究》（2）：131-136. 王克非、胡显耀.(2008) 基于语料库的翻译汉语词汇特征研究.《中国翻译》(6):16-21. 王克非、秦洪武(2009) 英译汉语言特征探讨基于对应语料库的宏观分析. 《外语学刊》（1）：101-105. 肖忠华. (2009) 基于语料库的语言对比与翻译.《国际学术动态》(5):3-4. 肖忠华、戴光荣. (2010) 寻求第三语码：基于汉语译文语料库的翻译共性研究. 《外语教学与研究》(1):52-58.
2010 4 th International Symposium on Bioanalysis, Biomedical Engineering and Nanotechnology (ISBBN 2010) Meeting Schedule June 4, 2010 Symposium Opening Session Morning, June 4, 2010 Hunan University Fulin Building Auditorium 201 Presiders: Weihong Tan and Kemin Wang 8:30-9:00 Opening Ceremony Hunan University Fulin Building Auditorium 201 9:00-9:10 Photo Session 1. Plenary and Invited Session Morning, June 4, 2010 Hunan University Fulin Building Auditorium 201 Presiders: Weihong Tan 9:10-9:55 Dr. Leroy Hood , Institute for Systems Biology (USA) My experiences in bringing engineering to biology: history and emerging technologies 9:55-10:20 Dr. Xianen Zhang , Ministry of Science and Technology of China Mini-review of life sciences and biotechnology in China 10:20-10:45 Dr. Belinda Seto , NIBIB, NIH, (USA) Biomedical Reaserch at NIH 10:45-11:00 Coffee Break and Viewing Posters Session 2. Plenary and Invited Session Morning, June 4, 2010 Hunan University Fulin Building Auditorium 201 Presiders: Kemin Wang 11:00-11:30 Dr. Erkang Wang , Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, CAS A Study of DNA Stabilized Fluorescent Silver Nanoclusters 11:30-12:00 Dr. Chunhua Yan , Beijing University Synthesis, Surface Modification and Optical-Probe Application Research of Rare Earth-Based Luminescent Nanomaterials Session 3. Plenary and Invited Session Afternoon, June 4, 2010 Hunan University Fulin Building Auditorium 201 Presiders: Huangxian Ju and Bingcheng Lin 2:00-2:30 Dr. Shaojun Dong , Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, CAS Self-Powered and Intelligent Logic Aptasensors. 2:30-2:55 Dr. Charles Cao, University of Florida (USA) Nanocrystals for Biomedical Diagnosis 2:55-3:20 Dr. Doo Soo Chung , Seoul National University (Korea) Single drop microextraction for capillary electrophoresis 3:20-3:45 Dr. Xiaogang Peng, University of Arkansas (USA) Non-Cadmium Quantum Dots as Fluorescent Labels for Biological Applications 3:45-4:00 Coffee Break and Viewing Posters Session 4. Plenary and Invited Session Afternoon, June 4, 2010 Hunan University Fulin Building Auditorium 201 Presiders: Chunhua Yan and Xiaogang Peng 4:00-4:30 Dr. Shouzhuo Yao, Hunan University Biosensors Based on Nanomaterials and Biocompaticle Polymers 4:30-4:55 Dr. Huangxian Ju , Nanjing University Bioanslysis and Specific Assay of Cell Surface Carbohydrates Based on Biofunctionalization of Nanomaterials. 4:55-5:20 Dr. Bingcheng Lin , Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, CAS Lab on a Chip: A Key Platform for Bioanalysis and Biotechnology 5:20-5:45 Dr. Chaoyong Yang , Xiamen University Amplification Techniques for Ultrasensitive Bioanalysis with Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels 5:45-6:10 Dr. Swadeshmukul Santra , University of Central Florida (USA) Engineered multimodal/multifunctional nanoparticles for bioimaging and sensing applications June 5, 2010 Session 5. Plenary and Invited Session: Honoring Dr. Richard N. Zare Morning, June 5, 2010 Hunan University Fulin Building Auditorium 201 Presiders: Chenghao Zhang, Yonghe Zheng and Jonathan Sweedler 8:00-8:10 Dr. Chenghao Zhang, China National Sciences Foundation 8:10-8:15 Dr. Yonghe Zheng, China National Sciences Foundation 8:15-8:20 Dr. Yijia Cao, Vice President, Hunan University Presiders: Yukui Zhang and Jonathan Sweedler 8:20-8:50 Dr. Zhongqun Tian, Xiamen University Nanostructure-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Electrochemistry and Molecular Devices 8:50 -9:20 Dr. Leroy Hood, Institute for Systems Biology (USA) Systems biology and the revolution of P4 (predictive, personalized, preventative and participatory) medicine 9:20-9:50 Dr. Shuming Nie , Emory University (USA), Hunan University Biomedical Nanotechnology for Molecular Imaging, Spectroscopic Detection, and Image-Guided Surgery 9:50-10:05 Coffee Break and Viewing Posters Session 6. Plenary and Invited Session: Honoring Dr. Richard N. Zare Morning, June 5, 2010 Hunan University Fulin Building Auditorium 201 Presiders: Zhongquan Tian and Takehiko Kitamori 10:05-10:35 Dr. Renato Zenobi, ETH Zurich (Switzerland) Single Cell Metabolomics 10:35-11:05 Dr.Weihong Tan, University of Florida (USA), Hunan University Molecular analysis of cancer 11:05-11:35 Dr. Chao Yan , Shanghai Jiaotong University Novel Separation Media for Pressurized Capillary Electrochromatography 11:35-12:05 Dr. Xiaohong Fang , Institute of Chemistry, CAS Intercellular transportation of quantum dots mediated by membrane nanotubes Session 7. Plenary and Invited Session: Honoring Dr. Richard N. Zare Afternoon, June 5, 2010 Hunan University Fulin Building Auditorium 201 Presiders: Edward Yeung and Renato Zenobi 2:00-2:30 Dr.Yukui Zhang, Institute of Dalian Chemical Physics, CAS Novel separation and identification techniques for proteome study 2:30-3:00 Dr. Jonathan Sweedler, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (USA) Measuring the chemical signaling between neurons with separations and mass spectrometry 3:00-3:30 Dr. Daniel Chiu, University of Washington (USA) Physical Tools for Probing Biological Complexity at the Single-Cell level Dr. 3:30-4:00 Dr. Julia Zhao ， University of North Dakota (USA) Metal-silica Nanocomposites: Synthesis and Bioapplications 4:00-4:15 Coffee Break and Viewing Posters Session 8. Plenary and Invited Session: Honoring Dr. Richard N. Zare Afternoon, June 5, 2010 Hunan University Fulin Building Auditorium 201 Presiders: Daniel T. Chiu, and Shuming Nie 4:15-4:45 Dr. Edward Yeung , Iowa State University (USA), Hunan University Single Molecule Biosensing based on Darkfield Imaging of Metal Nanoparticles and Nanorods 4:45-5:15 Takehiko Kitamori , University of Tokyo (Japan) Pico to Atto Litter Analytical Devices 5:15-6:05 Dr. Richard N. Zare ， Stanford University (USA) General Method for Making Drug-Loaded Nanoparticles June 6, 2010 Session 9. Plenary and Invited Session Morning, June 6, 2010 Hunan University Fulin Building Auditorium 201 Presiders: Xiaohong Fang and Jinghong Li 8:00-8:30 Dr. Ruqin Yu, Hunan University Design of piezoelectric and electrochemical sensing devices for SNP detection 8:30-8:55 Dr. Zhan Chen , University of Michigan (USA) Molecular Interactions at Cell Membranes 8:55-9:20 Dr. Qun Fang, Zhejiang University Automated Droplet-based Microfluidic Analysis Systems Based on Slotted-vial Array 9:20-9:45 Dr. Danke Xu , Nanjing University Ultrasensitive DNA electrochemical detection based on silver nanoparticles 9:45-10:10 Dr. Huan-Tsung Chang , National Taiwan University DNA Functionalized Nanoparticles for Sensing of Metal Ions 10:10-10:25 Coffee Break and Viewing Posters Session 10. Contributed Session Morning, June 6, 2010 Hunan University Fulin Building Auditorium 201 Presiders: Zhan Chen and Huan-Tsung Chang 10 :25-10:40 Dr. Wei Duan, Deakin University (Australia) Nucleic acid aptamer: the pearl in the crown of nanomedicine for molecular imaging of cancer 10:40-10:55 Dr. Xiaoling Zhang, Beijing Institute of Technology Engineering of pH-responsive hydrogels and pH sensor based on DNA i-motif formation and Duplex-Triplex transition 10:55-11:10 Dr. Jiong Li, Suzhou institute of Nano-tech and Nano-bionics, CAS Microarray-based label-free miRNA expression profilling from total RNA. 11:10-11:25 Dr. Yiming Zhu, Suzhou institute of Nano-tech and Nano-bionics,CAS Identification of tumor targeting peptides using modified bacterial display methods 11:25-11:40 Dr. Xingcan Shen, Guangxi Normal University Molecular Mechanism of Carbonbased Nanomaterials Cytotoxicity 11:40-11:55 Miss. Jieyuan Teng, East China University of Science and Technology Disposable acetylcholine esterase biosensor based on screen-printed electrode for pesticide detection Session 11. Plenary and Invited Session Afternoon, June 6, 2010 Hunan University Fulin Building Auditorium 201 Presiders: Yingfu Li and Chaoyong Yang 2:00-2:25 Dr. Jinghong Li , Tsinghua University Electrochemical biosensing of Graphene 2:25-2:50 Dr. Nongyue He , Southeast University Current advances in high throughput SNP genotyping based on magnetic nanoparticles 2:50-3:15 Dr.Ronghua Yang, Hunan University Combination of Functional Nucleic Acids and Nanomaterials: Efficient Tool for Molecular Recognition 3:15-3:40 Dr. Bangce Ye, East China University of Science Technology Peptide-Functionalized Nanomaterials for Real-Time Sensing of Protease Activity 3:45-4:00 Coffee Break and Viewing Posters Session 12 . Plenary and Invited Session Afternoon,June 6,2010 Hunan University Fulin Building Auditorium 201 Presiders : Nongyue He and Bangce Ye 4:00-4:25 Dr.Yingfu Li , Mcmaster University (Canada) Expanding the Function and Utility of Nucleic Acids 4:25-4:50 Dr. Huanghao Yang , Fuzhou University Graphene: A New Platform for Optical Biosensor 4:50-5:15 Dr. Zhen Huang, Georgia State University (USA) Development of RNA Microchip for Pathogen Rapid Detection 5:15-5:40 Dr. Dihua Shangguan, Institute of Chemistry, CAS Sensor design based on a streptavidin binding aptamer with variable sequence 5:40-6:05 Dr. Junjie Zhu, Nanjing University Biosensing based on quantum dots. 6:0 5-6:15 Closing
标签: 国际学术研讨会
