张凤珠, 马亮, 吴建南. (2011). "多元资助格局下的科学基金绩效评估:案例研究与学术履历分析." 科学学与科学技术管理 32(6): 5-11. 多元资助格局下的科学基金绩效评估_案例研究与学术履历分析.pdf 多元资助格局下的科学基金绩效评估:案例研究与学术履历分析 【作者】 张凤珠; 马亮; 吴建南; 【机构】 国家自然科学基金委员会医学科学部; 西安交通大学管理学院; 西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院; 【摘要】 国家科研经费投入的快速增长既为科技创新提供了支持,也对科学基金划分科研成果归属并开展绩效评估提出了挑战。探讨了多元资助格局对科学基金绩效评估提出的方法论挑战,认为深入的项目资助案例研究与受资助者的学术履历分析是破解这一难题的两条重要途径。阐述了两种方法的特点与用途,并对多元资助格局下的科学基金绩效评估问题进行了分析,最后提出了改善多元资助格局的对策建议。 【关键词】 科学基金; 绩效评估; 多元资助; 案例研究; 学术履历; Science Funding Agency Performance Evaluation in the Pattern of Multi-Funding Sources:Case Study and Curriculum Vitae Analysis 【Author】 ZHANG Fengzhu1,MA Liang2,WU Jiannan3 (1.Department of Health Sciences,National Natural Science Foundation of China,Beijing 100085,China;2.School of Management,Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710049,China;3.School of Public Policy and Administration,Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710049,China) 【Abstract】 The rapid increasing of national ST expenditure not only gives more support for ST innovation,but also makes science funding agencies encounter difficulties to delimit ownership of ST achievements and conduct performance evaluation.The paper discusses the methodological challenges issued by the regime of multi-funding sources on science funding agency performance evaluation,and argues that in-depth case studies of granted projects and analyses of grantees’ curriculum vitas are two key avenues to reconcile the paradox.The characteristics and usage of the former mentioned approaches are elaborated,and recommendations for science funding agency performance evaluation in the regime of multi-funding sources are also concluded. 【Key words】 science funding agency; performance evaluation; multi-funding sources; case study; curriculum vitae;
The role of case studies in research is a paradox. On the one hand, case studies are widely used by many communities in business research; for example case study research has consistently been one of the most powerful methods in operations management, particularly in the building of new theory. It is clearly accepted that case study research in management can be rigorous, as is evidenced by case-based papers in both top European and US journals. On the other hand there is strong resistance to case study research in some communities and its use has been rather narrow, often restricted just to exploratory research. In addition there is confusion in the minds of many as to what exactly is case study research: is it about practice or theory, and is it about theory-building or testing? 详见: Case Study【Book】
【文献出处】 科学学研究,2010 年05期 【作者】吴建南; 马亮; 郑永和 【作者机构】西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院; 西安交通大学管理学院; 国家自然科学基金委员会计划局 【摘要】 从国际评估的委托方、评估目的、被评估方、评估方、评估议题、评估方法与信息来源、评估程序与周期、评估报告、评估效果与影响等维度,对包括德意志研究联合会、日本学术振兴会、欧盟第六框架计划、挪威研究理事会、奥地利科学基金和国家自然科学基金中德科学中心等在内的6个科学资助机构的国际评估案例进行了系统分析,总结了科学基金国际评估的共同特点与主要特色,为设计国家自然科学基金资助与管理绩效国际评估的方案设计与组织实施提供了借鉴与启示。 【关键词】 国家自然科学基金; 国际评估; 绩效评估; 公共部门; 案例研究; 跨国比较 【基金】国家自然科学基金委主任基金项目(J0910011);; 国家自然科学基金项目(J0910012,70873092);; 西安交通大学腾飞人才特聘教授项目 The framework,issues and methods of international evaluation of national science funding institutions:a cross-national comparative multi-case study 【Author】WU Jian-nan1; MA Liang2; ZHENG Yong-he3 【Affiliation】(1.School of Public Policy and Administration; Xian Jiaotong University; Xian 710049; China; 2.School of Management; Xian Jiaotong University; Xian 710049; China; 3.Bureau of Planning; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Beijing 100085; China) 【Abstract】 The principals,agents,objects,purposes,issues,methods and sources of information,procedures and duration,results and reports,as well as effectiveness and impact of international evaluation of several national science foundations,including Japan Society for the Promotion of Science(JSPS),Austrian Science Fund(FWF),Research Council of Norway(RCN),Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft(DFG),the Sixth Framework Programmes(FP6),and Sino-German Center for Research Promotion(SGCRP),are comprehensively analyzed,which in turn results in a summary of common attributes and characteristics of international evaluation.Such analysis supplies suggestions and directions for the design and implementation of international funding and management performance evaluation of NSFC in the future. 【Key words】 national natural science foundation; international evaluation; performance evaluation; public sector; case study; cross-national comparison 【Source】Studies in Science of Science, 2010 (5) 论文