刘实同志壮烈牺牲已有一周时间了吧。过去他博动时还不觉得他存在的重要，有时还烦他博得过多，让我老花眼看都看不过来。特别是他的博风---事事都给原文出处，让我老朽之躯还要凭求真之劲奔波于各链接之间累死人也。不过比某些人说话不靠谱，抄袭不引文，因此相信那些惊人之语却看不到一点依据还是好得多。 刘实同志被双规看来是真的了。要不然他一周都不发一声恐怕也会被憋出病来。总盼望他能尽快结束双规，开始正常的博动，所以我每天还是要光顾一下这个把我的博客当同志的人的博客看看。不过我没看到任何新的刘文，却看到如下牛粪类评论： 新浪网友 2010-10-25 08:24:30 善有善报，恶有恶报，如今满口喷牛屎的人也闭嘴了，可见天有眼。 新浪网友 2010-10-25 08:26:44 你也尝尝锤子的味道如何？ 新浪网友 2010-10-26 08:20:42 稽教授这一炮开得好，一下就把不在茅坑里拉屎的老牛打哑巴了！ 但刘实同志到底为何原因被双规？我想跟 稽教授的那一炮没关系，毕 竟稽教授也（还曾）是 刘实的同志。而且按 9-29 政治局集体学习是胡总的讲话精神，刘实同志的言语过激、顶多也是人民内部的矛盾。 我想，刘实同志的双规最可能还是与他袭击奶车有关。 刘实同志双规前曾给我及王德华教授发来下面一篇旨在投给《Nasture》的一封Correspondence的草稿。 Treating and dealing with biohackers SIR We are horrified by the classification of dedicated scientists as life hackers ( Nature News Feature 467, 650-652, 2010) or biohackers ( Nature Editorial 467, 634, 2010) when their exposed activities are nothing but only promoting life science and enhancing biology. Hacking is a very negative term that usually refers to re-configuring or re-programming of a system to function in ways not facilitated by the owner, administrator, or designer ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hack_(technology) ).The biohackers exposed by the Nature Editorial or life hackers detailed by the Nature News Feature are just some highly dedicated scientists who are seeking truth through alternative ways.Many of them squeeze their limited spare time and some of them even sacrifice their own careers to do something good for society at their own expense and cost.How could they be classified as hackers? The only way that these dedicated scientists can be treated as hackers is to treat their discoveries as nonsense (to conventional wisdom) and their insights as nuisance (to mainstream knowledge).Indeed, many established authorities and professional mainstreamers tend to do so when they heard of amateur discoveries.This attitude is actually vividly reflected by the editorial statements like Most biohackers are hobbyists who delight in crafting their own equipment and who tackle projects no more sophisticated than those found in an advanced high-school biology lab and garage labs are unlikely to solve the world's energy or health problems any time soon . However, history has shown that most truly great scientific discoveries were made in some unconventional ways.For example, Einstein made his greatest discoveries before he finished his college degree.It is his shoe-maker job that supported his basic living and his off-duty discovering efforts.In the ancient time, of course, there were not even any truly professional scientists.Those dedicated people engaged in scientific research would be called as hackers, if hacking was a known activity harmful to an establishment. Nowadays, most scientists do science in their career jobs and thus the goal of scientific research is even changed somehow: not for truth but for money.One outcome of this mutation in some scientists is the increasingly occurrence of faking discoveries in various ways.When well-paid scientists would rather engage in some truth-hiding and even lie-making activities, some hacking on this corrupted system may be necessary. Fortunately, there are still some odd scientists who would rather maintain a busy life in their spare time, spend their money on some non-leisure research and even give up their career in exchange for time spent on some truth-seeking research.However, how society has treated them so far? It was a true irony that a Breakthrough of the Year in Science (314, 1848-1849, 2006) was made by a lonely Perelman who solved a century-old mathematics problem by publishing his discovery only in a web archive and even refused to re-publish it in any peer-reviewed journal ( Top Watch 1: 18-20, 2006).It is also interesting to know that the winner for this years Nobel Prize for physics actually won a different kind of Nobel award the Ig Nobel ten years ago ( http://improbable.com/ig/ ).Shit! reported of saying that when Geim received the phone call from the Nobel Assembly ( Science 330, 159, 2010). He was not sure if he would display both the awards together in his office ( http://news.in.msn.com/international/article.aspx?cp-documentid=4446465 ). If Nature would insist on calling those dedicated scientists as hackers, we would recommend Nature run a special report on a most dangerous biohacker or life hacker in the scientific history.This man has self-claimed of making the greatest discoveries in life science in his spare time ( http://im1.biz/Liu_Discovery_English.htm ).But he has been called as a spammer three years ago by a Nature editor ( http://im1.biz/albums/userpics/10001/LB2009V9N2A9_Editorial.htm ) when he publicly criticizing iPS research as pseudo-science ( http://im1.biz/iPS.htm ).This man wrote to the Nobel Assembly three times in the past three years to block efforts for awarding Yamanaka, the father of iPS cells, a Nobel Prize ( Top Watch 3, 1-3, 2008 and 4, 36-37, 2009; Pioneer 5, 1-3, 2010).But he has been banned from publishing in Nature or even posting comment under his real name (http://im1.biz/Nature_Delete.htm , http://im1.biz/Nature.htm , http://im1.biz/albums/userpics/10001/SE2010V5N1A2_Macmillan.htm ) after taking Nature into court ( http://im1.biz/Truth.htm ).This man runs a powerful hacking system the Truthfinding Cyberpress (TFCP; http://im1.biz ) which hosts a fleet of new-generation scientific journals such as Logical Biology , Scientific Ethics , Top Watch , International Medicine , and Pioneer . Interestingly, this bio-hacker or life hacker announced the debut of his double-open (open access and open review) scientific journal Logical Biology 10 year ago in Nature , by inserting that advertisement into a Correspondence entitled Debating controversies can enhance creativity ( Nature 403, 592, 2000).Recently, his hacking was discovered but his hacking was not publicly denounced, even though secretly his TFCP website was repeatedly hacked.Most recently, the hacker even left a message on the hacked TFCP website saying hacked by uLTRATurK. What is the name of this bio-hacker in centuries?His name is Shi V. Liu. Let us expose all of his hacking activities and deal with them effectively. 刘实同志的这篇Correspondence不仅指责《Nature》把自费业余时间搞生物学科研的科学家当成bio-hacker or life hacker的不当，更把自己比《Nature》所黑的更黑的行径暴露于《Nature》，还公开叫板《Nature》处理他这个超一流的bio-hacker or life hacker。 如此看来，刘实同志真是一个豪杰。可惜他没击坏奶车，却可能已被奶车压死。 但刘实同志的这一死，是比泰山还重、还是比鸿毛还轻？ 为有牺牲多壮志，敢叫日月换新天！ 现在是不是黎明前的黑暗？
标签: 奶车
