科学网

 找回密码
  注册

tag 标签: 波音公司

相关帖子

版块 作者 回复/查看 最后发表

没有相关内容

相关日志

波音公司博物馆广场的大型飞机展示
热度 1 黄安年 2011-9-6 18:54
波音公司博物馆广场的大型飞机展示
波音公司博物馆广场的大型飞机展示 黄安年文 黄安年的博客 /2011 年 9 月 6 日发布 8 月 28 日 , 我在西雅图美国波音公司的总部,参观了在展览广场的 大型飞机展示 。 照片 14 张为即时拍摄。
个人分类: 美国纪行见闻(09-11)|4312 次阅读|1 个评论
波音公司博物馆的美国总统座机-----空军一号
热度 1 黄安年 2011-9-6 08:59
波音公司博物馆的美国总统座机-----空军一号
波音公司博物馆的美国总统座机 ----- 空军一号 黄安年文 黄安年的博客 /2011 年 9 月 5 日发布 8 月 28 日 , 我在西雅图美国波音公司的总部,参观了在展览广场展示的 美国总统座机 ----- 空军一号 , 并且登上了机仓 , 参观了内部设施和飞机外景。 展品片段照片 26 张为即时拍摄。
个人分类: 美国纪行见闻(09-11)|4161 次阅读|2 个评论
登上波音公司博物馆的协和号(Concorde)
黄安年 2011-9-6 04:06
登上波音公司博物馆的协和号(Concorde)
登上波音公司博物馆的协和号( Concorde ) 黄安年文 黄安年的博客 /2011 年 9 月 5 日发布 8 月 28 日 , 我在西雅图美国波音公司的总部,参观了在展览广场展示的协和号飞机 , 并且登上了机仓 , 参观了内部设施和飞机外景。 展品片段照片 28 张为即时拍摄。 ************************** Concorde From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation , search For other uses, see Concorde (disambiguation) . Concorde Role Supersonic airliner Manufacturer BAC (now BAE Systems ) Sud-Aviation , Aérospatiale (now EADS ) First flight 2 March 1969 Introduction 21 January 1976 Retired 26 November 2003 Status Retired from service Primary users British Airways Air France See Operators below for others Number built 20 (including 6 non-airline aircraft) Program cost 1.3 billion Unit cost 23 million in 1977 (122m in 2008 ) Aérospatiale-BAC Concorde was a turbojet -powered supersonic passenger airliner , a supersonic transport (SST). It was a product of an Anglo-French government treaty, combining the manufacturing efforts of Aérospatiale and the British Aircraft Corporation . First flown in 1969, Concorde entered service in 1976 and continued commercial flights for 27 years. Among other destinations , Concorde flew regular transatlantic flights from London Heathrow (British Airways) and Paris-Charles de Gaulle Airport (Air France) to New York JFK , profitably flying these routes at record speeds, in less than half the time of other airliners. With only 20 aircraft built, their development represented a substantial economic loss, in addition to which Air France and British Airways were subsidised by their governments to buy them. As a result of the type’s only crash on 25 July 2000 and other factors, its retirement flight was on 26 November 2003. Concorde's name reflects the development agreement between the United Kingdom and France. In the UK, any or all of the type—unusual for an aircraft—are known simply as "Concorde", sans article. The aircraft is regarded by many as an aviation icon and an engineering marvel. Contents · 1 Development o 1.1 Concept o 1.2 Naming o 1.3 Testing · 2 Design o 2.1 General features o 2.2 Movement of centre of pressure o 2.3 Engines o 2.4 Heating issues o 2.5 Structural issues o 2.6 Range o 2.7 Increased radiation exposure o 2.8 Cabin pressurisation o 2.9 Flight characteristics o 2.10 Droop nose o 2.11 Brakes and undercarriage · 3 Operational history o 3.1 Scheduled flights o 3.2 BA buys its Concordes outright o 3.3 Concorde Flight 4590 crash o 3.4 Retirement § 3.4.1 Air France § 3.4.2 British Airways o 3.5 Restoration · 4 Impact o 4.1 Environmental o 4.2 Public perception o 4.3 Records o 4.4 Comparison with other supersonic aircraft o 4.5 Replacements in development · 5 Operators · 6 Specifications · 7 Notable appearances in media · 8 See also · 9 References o 9.1 Notes o 9.2 Citations o 9.3 Bibliography · 10 External links Development Concept Concorde's final flight, G-BOAF from Heathrow to Bristol, on 26 November 2003. The extremely high fineness ratio of the fuselage is evident. Concorde on takeoff Pre-production Concorde 101 on display at the Imperial War Museum Duxford , UK. Concorde G-BOAB in storage at London Heathrow Airport . This aircraft flew for 22,296 hours between its first flight in 1976 and its final flight in 2000. In the late 1950s, the United Kingdom, France, United States, and Soviet Union were considering developing supersonic transport. The British Bristol Aeroplane Company and the French Sud Aviation were both working on designs, called the Type 223 and Super-Caravelle , respectively. Both were largely funded by their respective governments. The British design was for a thin-winged delta shape (which owed much to work by Dietrich Küchemann , then at the Royal Aircraft Establishment ) for a transatlantic-ranged aircraft for about 100 people, while the French were intending to build a medium-range aircraft. The designs were both ready to start prototype construction in the early 1960s, but the cost was so great that the British government made it a requirement that British Aircraft Corporation (which had been formed in 1960 as a consolidation of British aircraft companies, including the Bristol Aeroplane Company) look for international co-operation. Approaches were made to a number of countries, but only France showed real interest. The development project was negotiated as an international treaty between the two countries rather than a commercial agreement between companies and included a clause, originally asked for by the UK, imposing heavy penalties for cancellation. A draft treaty was signed on 28 November 1962. By this time, both companies had been merged into new ones; thus, the Concorde project was between the British Aircraft Corporation and Aérospatiale. At first the new consortium intended to produce one long range and one short range version. However, prospective customers showed no interest in the short-range version and it was dropped. The consortium secured orders (i.e., non-binding options) for over 100 of the long-range version from the major airlines of the day: Pan Am , BOAC and Air France were the launch customers, with six Concordes each. Other airlines in the order book included Panair do Brasil , Continental Airlines , Japan Airlines , Lufthansa , American Airlines , United Airlines , Air India , Air Canada , Braniff , Singapore Airlines , Iran Air , Olympic Airways , Qantas , CAAC , Middle East Airlines and TWA . Design work was supported by a research programme that investigated the characteristics of the low ratio delta wing. The supersonic BAC 211 tested the high speed range while the Handley Page HP.115 served for low speeds. Naming Reflecting the treaty between the British and French governments which led to Concorde's construction, the name Concorde is from the French word concorde ( IPA: ), which has an English equivalent, concord ( IPA: /ˈkɒŋkɔrd/ ). Both words mean agreement , harmony or union . The aircraft was initially referred to in the UK as Concorde , with the French spelling, but was officially changed to Concord by Harold Macmillan in response to a perceived slight by Charles de Gaulle . In 1967, at the French roll-out in Toulouse the British Government Minister for Technology , Tony Benn announced that he would change the spelling back to Concorde . This created a nationalist uproar that died down when Benn stated that the suffixed ‹e› represented "Excellence, England, Europe and Entente (Cordiale) ." In his memoirs, he recounts a tale of a letter from an irate Scotsman claiming: " ou talk about 'E' for England, but part of it is made in Scotland." Given Scotland’s contribution of providing the nose cone for the aircraft, Benn replied, " t was also 'E' for ' cosse ' (the French name for Scotland) — and I might have added 'e' for extravagance and 'e' for escalation as well!" Concorde also acquired an unusual nomenclature for an aircraft. In common usage in the United Kingdom, the type is known as Concorde without an article , rather than the Concorde or a Concorde . Testing Construction of two prototypes began in February 1965: 001, built by Aerospatiale at Toulouse, and 002, by BAC at Filton , Bristol . Concorde 001 made its first test flight from Toulouse on 2 March 1969, piloted by André Turcat , and first went supersonic on 1 October. The first UK-built Concorde flew from Filton to RAF Fairford on 9 April 1969, piloted by Brian Trubshaw . Both prototypes were presented to the public for the first time on 7–8 June 1969 at the Paris Airshow. As the flight programme progressed, 001 embarked on a sales and demonstration tour on 4 September 1971, which was also the first transatlantic crossing of Concorde. Concorde 002 followed suit on 2 June 1972 with a tour of the Middle and Far East. Concorde 002 made the first visit to the United States in 1973, landing at the new Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Airport to mark that airport’s opening. These trips led to orders for over 70 aircraft, but a combination of factors led to order cancellations: the 1973 oil crisis , financial difficulties of airlines, a spectacular Paris Le Bourget air show crash of the competing Soviet Tupolev Tu-144 , and environmental concerns such as the sonic boom , takeoff -noise and pollution. By 1976 four nations remained as prospective buyers: Britain, France, China, and Iran. In the end only Air France and British Airways (the successor to BOAC) took up their orders, with the two governments taking a cut of any profits made. In the case of BA, 80% of the profit was kept by the government until 1984, while the cost of buying the aircraft was covered by a state loan. The United States cancelled the Boeing 2707 , its supersonic transport programme, in 1971. Industry observers in France and the United Kingdom suggested that part of the American opposition to Concorde on grounds of noise pollution was orchestrated, or at least encouraged, by the United States Government , out of spite at not being able to propose a viable competitor, despite President John F. Kennedy 's impassioned 1963 statement of commitment. Other countries, such as India and Malaysia, ruled out Concorde supersonic overflights stating noise concerns. Demonstration and test flights were flown from 1974 onwards. The testing of Concorde set records that have not been surpassed; the prototype, pre-production and first production aircraft undertook 5,335 flight hours; 2,000 test hours were at supersonic speeds. During one such test flight, on 7 November 1974, 001 performed the fastest civil flight across the North Atlantic, setting a record that still stands. Unit costs were 23 million (US$46 million, EUR 50 million) in 1977, and development costs were six times the projected amount. Design General features Concorde cockpit layout Fuel pitch trim Concorde is an ogival (also "ogee") delta-winged aircraft with four Olympus engines based on those employed in the RAF's Avro Vulcan strategic bomber . Concorde was the first airliner to have an (in this case, analogue) fly-by-wire flight-control system; the avionics of Concorde were unique because it was the first commercial aircraft to employ hybrid circuits . The principal designer for the project was Pierre Satre, with Sir Archibald Russell as his deputy. Concorde pioneered the following technologies: For high speed and optimisation of flight: · Double delta ( ogee /ogival) shaped wings · Variable engine air intake system controlled by digital computers · Supercruise capability · Thrust-by-wire engines, predecessor of today’s FADEC -controlled engines · Droop-nose section for better landing visibility For weight-saving and enhanced performance: · Mach 2.04 (~2,170 kilometres per hour / 1,350 mph) cruising speed for optimum fuel consumption (supersonic drag minimum although turbojet engines are more efficient at higher speed ) · Mainly aluminium construction for low weight and conventional manufacture (higher speeds would have ruled out aluminium) · Full-regime autopilot and autothrottle allowing "hands off" control of the aircraft from climbout to landing · Fully electrically controlled analogue fly-by-wire flight controls systems · High-pressure hydraulic system of 28 MPa (4,000 lbf/in²) for lighter hydraulic components · Complex Air Data Computer (ADC) for the automated monitoring and transmission of aerodynamic measurements (total pressure, static pressure, angle of attack, side-slip). · Fully electrically controlled analogue brake-by-wire system · Pitch trim by shifting fuel around the fuselage for centre-of-gravity control · Parts made using " sculpture milling ", reducing the part count while saving weight and adding strength. · Lack of an auxiliary power unit , as Concorde would only visit large airports where ground air start carts are available. Movement of centre of pressure G-AXDN, Duxford, close up of pre-production engine nozzles. The nozzle/thrust reverser design was altered for production. When any aircraft passes the critical mach of that particular airframe, the centre of pressure shifts rearwards. This causes a pitch down force on the aircraft if the centre of mass remains where it was. The engineers designed the wings in a specific manner to reduce this shift, but there was still a shift of about 2 metres. This could have been countered by the use of trim controls , but at such high speeds this would have caused a dramatic increase in the drag on the aircraft. Instead, the distribution of fuel along the aircraft was shifted during acceleration and deceleration to move the centre of mass, effectively acting as an auxiliary trim control. Engines Main article: Rolls-Royce/Snecma Olympus 593 Concorde needed to fly long distances to be economically viable; this required high efficiency. Turbofan engines were rejected due to their larger cross-section producing excessive drag. Turbojets were found to be the best choice of engines. The engine used was the twin spool Rolls-Royce/Snecma Olympus 593 , a development of the Bristol engine first used for the Avro Vulcan bomber, and developed into an afterburning supersonic variant for the BAC TSR-2 strike bomber. Concorde's intake system schematics Concorde's intake system The intake design for Concorde’s engines was critical. Conventional jet engines can take in air at only around Mach 0.5; therefore the air has to be slowed from the Mach 2.0 airspeed that enters the engine intake. In particular, Concorde needed to control the shock waves that this reduction in speed generates to avoid damage to the engines. This was done by a pair of intake ramps and an auxiliary spill door, whose position was moved during flight to slow the air down. The effectiveness of the intake system is such that, during supersonic flight, 63% of the aircraft's thrust is attributed to the intakes whilst the exhaust nozzles generate 29% and the engines just 8% of the thrust. Engine failure causes problems on conventional subsonic aircraft; not only does the aircraft lose thrust on that side but the engine creates drag, causing the aircraft to yaw and bank in the direction of the failed engine. If this had happened to Concorde at supersonic speeds, it could theoretically cause a catastrophic failure of the airframe. However, during an engine failure, air intake needs are virtually zero, so in Concorde, the immediate effects of the engine failure were countered by the opening of the auxiliary spill door and the full extension of the ramps, which deflected the air downwards past the engine, gaining lift and streamlining the engine, minimising the drag effects of the failed engine. Although computer simulations predicted considerable difficulties, in practice Concorde was able to shut down both engines on the same side of the aircraft at Mach 2 without any of the predicted control problems. Concorde pilots were routinely trained in simulators to deal with a double engine failure. The aircraft used reheat ( afterburners ) at takeoff and to pass through the transonic regime (i.e., "go supersonic") between Mach 0.95 and Mach 1.7, and were switched off at all other times. Due to jet engines being highly inefficient at low speeds , Concorde burned two tonnes of fuel (almost 2% of the maximum fuel load) taxiing to the runway. To conserve fuel only the two outer engines were run after landing for taxiing. Heating issues Besides engines, the hottest part of the structure of any supersonic aircraft is the nose . The engineers wanted to use duralumin , an aluminium alloy, throughout the aircraft due to its familiarity, cost and ease of construction. The highest temperature that aluminium could sustain over the life of the aircraft was 260 °F (127 °C), which limited the top speed to Mach 2.02. Concorde went through two cycles of heating and cooling during a flight, first cooling down as it gained altitude, then heating up after going supersonic. The reverse happened when descending and slowing down. This had to be factored into the metallurgical modelling. A test rig was built that repeatedly heated up a full-size section of the wing, and then cooled it, and periodically samples of metal were taken for testing. Owing to the heat generated by compression of air as Concorde travelled supersonically, the fuselage would extend by as much as 300 mm (almost 1 ft), the most obvious manifestation of this being a gap that opened up on the flight deck between the flight engineer 's console and the bulkhead. On all Concordes that had a supersonic retirement flight, the flight engineers placed their hats in this gap before it cooled, where the hats remain to this day. To keep the cabin cool, Concorde used the fuel as a heat sink for the heat from the air conditioning, the same method also cooled the hydraulics. During supersonic flight the surfaces forward from the cockpit became heated, a visor was used to deflect much of this heat from directly reaching the cockpit. Concorde had livery restrictions; the majority of the surface had to be covered with a highly reflective white paint to avoid overheating the aluminium structure due to heating effects from supersonic flight at Mach 2. In 1996, Air France briefly painted F-BTSD in a predominantly blue livery (with the exception of the wings) in a promotional deal with Pepsi . In this paint scheme, Air France were advised to remain at Mach 2 for no more than 20 minutes at a time, but there was no restriction at speeds under Mach 1.7. F-BTSD was used because it was not scheduled for any long flights that required extended Mach 2 operations. Structural issues Due to the high speeds at which Concorde travelled, large forces were applied to the aircraft's structure during banks and turns. This caused twisting and the distortion of the aircraft’s structure. In addition there were concerns over maintaining precise control at supersonic speeds; both of these issues were resolved by active ratio changes between the inboard and outboard elevons , varying at differing speeds including supersonic. Only the innermost elevons, which are attached to the stiffest area of the wings, were active at high speed. Additionally, the narrow fuselage meant that the aircraft flexed. This was visible from the rear passengers’ viewpoints. Range In order to travel between London and New York, or Washington, non-stop, Concorde was developed to have the greatest supersonic range of any aircraft. This was achieved by a combination of engines which were highly efficient at supersonic speeds (The world's most energy-efficient jet engine ), a slender fuselage with high fineness ratio , and a complex wing shape delivering a high lift to drag ratio . This also required carrying only a modest payload and a high fuel capacity, and the aircraft was trimmed with precision to avoid unnecessary drag. Nevertheless, soon after Concorde began flying, a Concorde "B" model was designed with slightly larger fuel capacity and slightly larger wings with leading edge slats to improve aerodynamic performance at all speeds. It featured more powerful engines with sound deadening and without the fuel-hungry and noisy reheat. It was speculated that it was reasonably possible to create an engine with up to 25% gain in efficiency over the Rolls-Royce/Snecma Olympus 593. This would have given 500 mi (805 km) additional range and a greater payload, making new commercial routes possible. This was cancelled due in part to poor sales of Concorde, but also to the rising cost of aviation fuel in the 1970s. Increased radiation exposure Concorde fuselage The high altitude at which Concorde cruised meant passengers received almost twice the flux of extraterrestrial ionising radiation as those travelling on a conventional long-haul flight. Upon Concorde's introduction, it was speculated that this exposure during supersonic travels would increase the likelihood of skin cancer. However, due to the proportionally reduced flight time, the overall equivalent dose would normally be less than a conventional flight over the same distance. Unusual solar activity might lead to an increase in incident radiation. To prevent incidents of excessive radiation exposure the flight deck had a radiometer and an instrument to measure the rate of decrease of radiation. If the radiation level became too high, Concorde would descend below 47,000 feet (14,000 m). Cabin pressurisation British Airways Concorde interior. The narrow fuselage permitted only 4 seats across the aircraft with limited headroom and locker space. Airliner cabins were usually maintained at a pressure equivalent to 6,000–8,000 feet (1,800–2,400 m) elevation. Concorde’s pressurisation was set to an altitude at the lower end of this range, 6,000 feet (1,800 m). Concorde’s maximum cruising altitude was 60,000 feet (18,000 m); subsonic airliners typically cruise below 40,000 feet (12,000 m). Above 50,000 feet (15,000 m), the lack of air pressure would give a " time of useful consciousness " in even a conditioned athlete of no more than 10–15 seconds. A sudden reduction in cabin pressure is hazardous to all passengers and crew. At Concorde’s altitude, the air density is very low; a breach of cabin integrity would result in a loss of pressure severe enough so that the plastic emergency oxygen masks installed on other passenger jets would not be effective, and passengers would quickly suffer from hypoxia despite quickly donning them. Concorde was equipped with smaller windows to reduce the rate of loss in the event of a breach, a reserve air supply system to augment cabin air pressure, and a rapid descent procedure to bring the aircraft to a safe altitude. The FAA enforces minimum emergency descent rates for aircraft and made note of Concorde’s higher operating altitude, concluding that the best response to a loss of pressure would be a rapid descent. The Continuous Positive Airway Pressure would have delivered pressurised oxygen directly to the pilots through masks. Flight characteristics Concorde performing a low-level flypast at an air show While commercial jets take eight hours to fly from New York to Paris, the average supersonic flight time on the transatlantic routes was just under 3.5 hours. Concorde had a maximum cruise altitude of 18,300 metres (60,039 ft) and an average cruise speed of Mach 2.02, about 1155 knots (2140 km/h or 1334 mph), more than twice the speed of conventional aircraft. With no other civil traffic operating at its cruising altitude of about 56,000 ft (17,000 m), dedicated oceanic airways or "tracks" were used by Concorde to cross the Atlantic. Due to the nature of high altitude winds, these SST tracks were fixed in terms of their co-ordinates, unlike the North Atlantic Tracks at lower altitudes whose co-ordinates alter daily according to forecast weather patterns. Concorde would also be cleared in a 15,000-foot (4,600 m) block, allowing for a slow climb from 45,000 to 60,000 ft (18,000 m) during the oceanic crossing as the fuel load gradually decreased. In regular service, Concorde employed an efficient cruise-climb flight profile following take-off. The delta-shaped wings forced Concorde to attain a higher angle of attack at low speeds than conventional aircraft, but it allowed the formation of large low pressure vortices over the entire upper wing surface, maintaining lift. The normal landing speed was 170 miles per hour (274 km/h). Because of this high angle, during a landing approach Concorde was on the "back side" of the drag force curve, where raising the nose would increase the sink rate, the aircraft was thus largely flown on the throttle and was fitted with an autothrottle to reduce the pilot's workload. Droop nose Concorde’s drooping nose enabled the aircraft to switch between being streamlined to reduce drag and achieve optimum aerodynamic efficiency, and not obstructing the pilot's view during taxi, takeoff, and landing operations. Due to the high angle of attack the long pointed nose obstructed the view and necessitated the capability to droop. The droop nose was accompanied by a moving visor that retracted into the nose prior to being lowered. When the nose was raised to horizontal, the visor would raise in front of the cockpit windscreen for aerodynamic streamlining. Concorde with droop nose in fully down position during rollout after landing A controller in the cockpit allowed the visor to be retracted and the nose to be lowered to 5° below the standard horizontal position for taxiing and takeoff. Following takeoff and after clearing the airport, the nose and visor were raised. Shortly before landing, the visor was again retracted and the nose lowered to 12.5° below horizontal for maximum visibility. Upon landing the nose was raised to the five-degree position to avoid the possibility of damage. On rare occasions, the aircraft could take off with the nose fully down. A final position had the visor retracted into the nose but the nose in the standard horizontal position. This setup was used for cleaning the windscreen and for short subsonic flights. The two prototype Concordes had two fixed "glass holes" on their retractable visors. The Federal Aviation Administration objected to the restrictive visibility and demanded a design change before it would permit Concorde to serve US airports, which led to the redesigned visor used on the production and the four pre-production aircraft (101, 102, 201, and 202). The nose window and visor glass needed to endure temperatures in excess of 100°C at supersonic flight were developed by Triplex . Brakes and undercarriage Concorde tyres and brakes Tail bumper of Concorde G-BOAG at the Museum of Flight in Seattle Because of the way Concorde's delta-wing generated lift, the undercarriage had to be unusually strong. At rotation , Concorde would rise to a high angle of attack, about 18 degrees. Prior to rotation the wing generated almost no lift, unlike typical aircraft wings. Combined with the high airspeed at rotation (199 KIAS ), this increased the stresses on the rear undercarriage in way that was initially unexpected during the development and required a major redesign. Due to the high alpha needed at rotation, a small set of wheels were added aft to prevent tailstrikes. The rear main undercarriage units swing towards each other to be stowed but due to their great height also need to retract telescopically before swinging in order to clear each other when stowed. Additionally, due to the high average takeoff speed of 250 miles per hour (400 km/h), Concorde needed upgraded brakes. Like most airliners, Concorde has anti-skid braking – a system which prevents the tyres from losing traction when the brakes are applied for greater control during roll-out. The brakes, developed by Dunlop , were the first carbon-based brakes used on an airliner. They could bring Concorde to a stop from an aborted takeoff within one mile (1600 m) when weighing up to 185 tons (188 tonnes ) and travelling at 190 miles per hour (310 km/h). This braking manoeuvre brought the brakes to temperatures of 300–500 °C, requiring several hours for cooling. Operational history See also: Concorde aircraft histories Scheduled flights Scheduled flights began on 21 January 1976 on the London–Bahrain and Paris– Rio (via Dakar ) routes, with BA flights using the " Speedbird Concorde " callsign to notify air traffic control of the aircraft’s unique abilities and restrictions, but the French using their normal callsigns. The Paris- Caracas route (via Azores ) began on 10 April of the same year. The US Congress had just banned Concorde landings in the US, mainly due to citizen protest over sonic booms , preventing launch on the coveted transatlantic routes. However, the US Secretary of Transportation , William Coleman , gave permission for Concorde service to Washington Dulles International Airport , and Air France and British Airways simultaneously began service to Dulles on 24 May 1976. Air France Concorde in 1977 When the US ban on JFK Concorde operations was lifted in February 1977, New York banned Concorde locally. The ban came to an end on 17 October 1977 when the Supreme Court of the United States declined to overturn a lower court’s ruling rejecting efforts by the Port Authority and a grass-roots campaign led by Carol Berman to continue the ban. In spite of complaints about noise, the noise report noted that Air Force One , at the time a Boeing VC-137 , was louder than Concorde at subsonic speeds and during takeoff and landing. Scheduled service from Paris and London to New York’s John F. Kennedy Airport began on 22 November 1977. In 1977, British Airways and Singapore Airlines shared a Concorde for flights between London and Singapore International Airport via Bahrain. The aircraft, BA’s Concorde G-BOAD, was painted in Singapore Airlines livery on the port side and British Airways livery on the starboard side. The service was discontinued after three return flights because of noise complaints from the Malaysian government; it could only be reinstated on a new route bypassing Malaysian airspace in 1979. A dispute with India prevented Concorde from reaching supersonic speeds in Indian airspace, so the route was eventually declared not viable and discontinued in 1980. British Airways Concorde making a low pass at Farnborough Airshow , 1978 During the Mexican oil boom , Air France flew Concorde twice weekly to Mexico City’s Benito Juárez International Airport via Washington, DC, or New York City, from September 1978 to November 1982. The worldwide economic crisis during that period resulted in this route’s cancellation; the last flights were almost empty. The routing between Washington or New York and Mexico City included a deceleration, from Mach 2.02 to Mach 0.95, to cross Florida subsonically and avoid creating a sonic boom over the state; Concorde then re-accelerated back to high speed while crossing the Gulf of Mexico. On 1 April 1989, on an around-the-world luxury tour charter, British Airways implemented changes to this routing that allowed G-BOAF to maintain Mach 2.02 by passing around Florida to the east and south. Periodically Concorde visited the region on similar chartered flights to Mexico City and Acapulco. From 1978 to 1980, Braniff International Airways leased 10 Concordes, five each from Air France and British Airways. These were used on subsonic flights between Dallas-Fort Worth and Washington Dulles International Airport , flown by Braniff flight crews. Air France and British Airways crews then took over for the continuing supersonic flights to London and Paris. The aircraft were registered in both the United States and their home countries; the European registration was covered while being operated by Braniff, retaining full AF/BA liveries. The flights were not profitable and typically less than 50% booked, forcing Braniff to end its tenure as the only US Concorde operator in May 1980. BA buys its Concordes outright By around 1981 in the UK, the future for Concorde looked bleak. The British government had lost money operating Concorde every year, and moves were afoot to cancel the service entirely. A cost projection came back with greatly reduced metallurgical testing costs because the test rig for the wings had built up enough data to last for 30 years and could be shut down. Despite this, the government was not keen to continue. In late 1983, the managing director of BA, Sir John King , convinced the government to sell the aircraft outright to (the then state owned, later privatised) BA for 16.5 million plus the first year’s profits. An Air France Concorde at John F. Kennedy International Airport in 1987 Sir John King realised that he had a premier product that was underpriced, and after carrying out a market survey, British Airways discovered that customers thought Concorde was more expensive than it actually was (because most customers' companies paid for flights). Ticket prices were progressively raised to match these perceptions. It is reported that British Airways then ran Concorde at a profit, unlike their French counterpart. British Airways's profits have been reported to be up to 50 million in the most profitable years, with a total revenue of 1.75 billion, before costs of 1 billion. Between 1984 and 1991, British Airways flew a thrice-weekly Concorde service between London and Miami, stopping at Washington’s Dulles International Airport. Until 2003, Air France and British Airways continued to operate the New York services daily. Concorde routinely flew to Grantley Adams International Airport , Barbados , during the winter holiday season. Air France also used Concorde on flights to Denpasar , Indonesia, from early 1988 into the 1990s, when the route to Denpasar was terminated and replaced by conventional services to Jakarta . The Jakarta route was considered for service by Concorde, but Jakarta's airport did not meet the requirements for the aircraft. Prior to the Air France Paris crash, several UK and French tour operators operated charter flights to European destinations on a regular basis; the charter business was viewed as lucrative by British Airways and Air France. Concorde Flight 4590 crash Main article: Air France Flight 4590 On 25 July 2000, Air France Flight 4590, registration F-BTSC, crashed in Gonesse , France, killing all 100 passengers and nine crew members on board the flight, and four people on the ground. It was the only fatal incident involving Concorde. According to the official investigation conducted by the French accident investigation bureau (BEA), the crash was caused by a titanium strip that fell from a Continental Airlines DC-10 that had taken off minutes earlier. This metal fragment punctured a tyre on the Concorde's left main wheel bogie during takeoff. The tyre exploded, a piece of rubber hit the fuel tank, and while the fuel tank was not punctured, the impact caused a shock-wave which caused one of the fuel valves in the wing to burst open. This caused a major fuel leak from the tank, which then ignited due to sparking electrical landing gear wiring severed by another piece of the same tyre. The crew shut down engine number 2 in response to a fire warning, and with engine number 1 surging and producing little power, the aircraft was unable to gain height or speed. The aircraft entered a rapid pitch-up then a violent descent, rolling left and crashing tail-low into the Hotelissimo Hotel in Gonesse. On 6 December 2010, Continental Airlines and John Taylor, one of their mechanics, were found guilty of involuntary manslaughter. Prior to the accident, Concorde had been arguably the safest operational passenger airliner in the world in terms of passenger deaths-per-kilometres travelled with zero, but with a history of tyre explosions 60 times higher than subsonic jets. Safety improvements were made in the wake of the crash, including more secure electrical controls, Kevlar lining to the fuel tanks and specially developed burst-resistant tyres. The first flight after the modifications departed from London Heathrow on 17 July 2001, piloted by BA Chief Concorde Pilot Mike Bannister . During the 3-hour 20-minute flight over the mid-Atlantic towards Iceland, Bannister attained Mach 2.02 and 60,000 ft (18,000 m) before returning to RAF Brize Norton . The test flight, intended to resemble the London–New York route, was declared a success and was watched on live TV, and by crowds on the ground at both locations. The first flight with passengers after the accident took place on 11 September 2001, which landed shortly before the World Trade Center attacks in the United States. This was not a revenue flight, as all the passengers were BA employees. Normal commercial operations resumed on 7 November 2001 by BA and AF (aircraft G-BOAE and F-BTSD), with service to New York JFK , where passengers were welcomed by the mayor Rudy Giuliani . Retirement Concorde G-BOAD on a barge beneath the Verrazano Narrows Bridge in New York City in November 2003, bound for the Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum On 10 April 2003, Air France and British Airways simultaneously announced that they would retire Concorde later that year. They cited low passenger numbers following the 25 July 2000 crash, the slump in air travel following 11 September 2001, and rising maintenance costs. Although Concorde was technologically advanced when introduced in the 1970s, 30 years later its analogue cockpit was dated. There had been little commercial pressure to upgrade Concorde due to a lack of competing aircraft, unlike other airliners of the same era such as the Boeing 747. By its retirement, it was the last aircraft in British Airways' fleet that had a flight engineer ; other aircraft, such as the modernised 747-400 , had eliminated the role. On the same day, Sir Richard Branson offered to buy British Airways’ Concorde fleet at their "original price of 1" for service with Virgin Atlantic Airways . Branson claimed this to be the same token price that British Airways had paid the British Government; however, BA denied this and refused the offer. The aircraft were bought for 26 million each with money lent from the government, who in turn took 80% of the profits. Subsequently BA bought two aircraft for a book value of 1 as part of the 16.5 million buy out in 1983. Branson wrote in The Economist (23 October 2003) that his final offer was "over 5 million" and that he had intended to operate the fleet "for many years to come". Hopes for Concorde remaining in service were thwarted by Airbus's reluctance to continue providing maintenance support. It has been suggested that Concorde was not withdrawn for the reasons usually given but that it became apparent during the grounding of Concorde that the airlines could make more revenue carrying first class passengers subsonically. Rob Lewis suggested that the Air France retirement of its Concorde fleet was the result of a conspiracy between Air France Chairman Jean-Cyril Spinetta and Airbus CEO Noel Forgeard , and stemmed as much from a fear of being found criminally liable under French law for future Concorde accidents as from simple economics. A lack of commitment to Concorde from Director of Engineering Alan MacDonald was cited as having undermined BA’s resolve to continue operating Concorde. Air France Air France made its final commercial Concorde landing in the United States in New York City from Paris on 30 May 2003. During the following week, on 2 June and 3 June 2003, F-BTSD flew a final round-trip from Paris to New York and back for airline staff and long-time employees in the airline's Concorde operations. Air France's final Concorde flight took place on 27 June 2003 when F-BVFC retired to Toulouse. Air France Concorde at Paris-Charles de Gaulle Airport An auction of Concorde parts and memorabilia for Air France was held at Christie's in Paris on 15 November 2003; 1,300 people attended, and several lots exceeded their predicted values. French Concorde F-BVFC was retired to Toulouse and kept functional after the end of service, including engine runs, for a short while, in case taxi runs were required in support of the French judicial enquiry into the 2000 crash. The aircraft is now fully retired and no longer functional. French Concorde F-BTSD has been retired to the " Musée de l'Air et de l'Espace " at Le Bourget (near Paris) and, unlike the other museum Concordes, a few of the systems are being kept functional, so that, for instance, the famous "droop nose" can still be lowered and raised. This led to rumours that they could be prepared for future flights for special occasions. French Concorde F-BVFB currently rests at the Auto Technik Museum Sinsheim at Sinsheim , Germany, after its last flight from Paris to Baden-Baden, followed by a spectacular transport to Sinsheim via barge and road. The museum also has a Tu-144 on display – this is the only place where both supersonic airliners can be seen together. British Airways British Airways Concorde in the initial BA livery at Heathrow Airport British Airways conducted a North American farewell tour in October 2003. G-BOAG visited Toronto Pearson International Airport on 1 October, after which it flew to New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport . G-BOAD visited Boston ’s Logan International Airport on 8 October, and G-BOAG visited Washington Dulles International Airport on 14 October. Misleading claims were made that G-BOAD’s flight to Boston set a record for the fastest transatlantic flight from east to west, making the trip from London Heathrow in 3 hours, 5 minutes, 34 seconds. However the fastest transatlantic flight was from London Heathrow to New York JFK airport on 7 February 1996 which took 2 hours, 52 minutes, 59 seconds from takeoff to touchdown. In a week of farewell flights around the United Kingdom , Concorde visited Birmingham on 20 October, Belfast on 21 October, Manchester on 22 October, Cardiff on 23 October and Edinburgh on 24 October. Each day the aircraft made a return flight out and back into Heathrow to the cities, often overflying them at low altitude. Concorde G-BOAC at the Manchester International Airport Aviation Viewing Park (Now housed indoors) On 22 October , Heathrow ATC arranged for the inbound flight BA9021C, a special from Manchester , and BA002 from New York to land simultaneously on the left and right runways respectively. On the evening of 23 October 2003, the Queen consented to the illumination of Windsor Castle , an honour normally reserved for major state events and visiting dignitaries, as Concorde's last west-bound commercial flight departed London. British Airways retired its Concorde fleet on 24 October. G-BOAG left New York to a fanfare similar to that given for Air France’s F-BTSD, while two more made round trips, G-BOAF over the Bay of Biscay, carrying VIP guests including former Concorde pilots, and G-BOAE to Edinburgh. The three aircraft then circled over London, having received special permission to fly at low altitude, before landing in sequence at Heathrow. The captain of the New York to London flight was Mike Bannister . G-BOAE (212) took its retirement flight on 17 November 2003 from Heathrow to Grantley Adams International Airport on Barbados, where the plane is now on display. Mike Bannister (left) in the cockpit of BA002 All of BA's Concorde fleet have been grounded, drained of hydraulic fluid and their airworthiness certificates withdrawn. Jock Lowe, ex-chief Concorde pilot and manager of the fleet estimated in 2004 that it would cost 10–15 million to make G-BOAF airworthy again. BA maintain ownership and have stated that they will not fly again as Airbus ended support of the aircraft in 2003. On 1 December 2003, Bonhams held an auction of British Airways’ Concorde artefacts, including a nose cone, at Kensington Olympia in London. Proceeds of around 750,000 were raised, with the majority going to charity. In 2007, BA announced that the advertising spot at the entrance to Heathrow Airport where a 40% scale model of Concorde was located would not be retained, the model is now on display at the Brooklands Museum . The last commercial Concorde flight took place on 24 October 2003. On its way to The Museum of Flight the Alpha Golf set a New York City-to-Seattle speed record of 3 hours, 55 minutes, and 12 seconds. The Museum's aircraft, registration code G-BOAG, is referred to as "Alpha Golf." It was first flown in April 1978, and delivered to British Airways in 1980. Equipped with four powerful Rolls-Royce/SNECMA Olympus 593 Mk. 610 turbojet engines, the Alpha Golf logged more than 5,600 takeoffs and over 16,200 flight hours while in service. This aircraft is on loan from British Airways. Restoration Although only used for spares after being retired from test flying and trials work in 1981, Concorde G-BBDG was dismantled and transported by road from Filton then restored from essentially a shell at the Brooklands Museum in Surrey . One of the youngest Concordes (F-BTSD) is on display at Le Bourget Air and Space Museum in Paris. In February 2010, it was announced that the museum and a group of volunteer Air France technicians intend to restore F-BTSD so it can taxi under its own power. On 29 May 2010, it was reported that a group comprising the British Save Concorde Group and the French Olympus 593 had begun work on inspecting the engines of a Concorde at Le Bourget Air and Space Museum, with the intent to restore the plane to be able to fly again in demonstrations and air shows. Flying in the opening ceremony for the 2012 London Olympics is also a goal. Impact Environmental Prior to Concorde’s flight trials, the developments made by the civil aviation industry were largely accepted by governments and their respective electorates. The opposition to Concorde’s noise, particularly on the eastern coast of the United States, forged a new political agenda on both sides of the Atlantic, with scientists and technology experts across a multitude of industries beginning to take the environmental and social impact more seriously. Although Concorde led directly to the introduction of a general noise abatement programme for aircraft flying out of John F. Kennedy Airport , many found that Concorde was quieter than expected, partly due to the pilots temporarily throttling back their engines (known as "noise abatement" – spoken by the pilots as the command "Noise" during take off) to reduce noise during overflight of residential areas. Even before the launch of revenue earning services, it had been noted that Concorde was quieter than several aircraft already commonly in service at that time. Concorde fuel efficiency comparison Aircraft Concorde Gulfstream G550 business jet Boeing 747 -400 passenger miles/imperial gallon 17 19 109 passenger miles/US gallon 14 16 91 litres/passenger 100 km 16.6 14.8 3.1 Concorde produced nitrogen oxides in its exhaust, which, despite complicated chemical interactions with other ozone-depleting chemicals, are understood to result in degradation to the ozone layer at the stratospheric altitudes it cruised. It has been pointed out that other, lower-flying, airliners produce ozone during their flights in the troposphere, but vertical transit of gases between the layers is restricted. The small fleet operated meant overall ozone-layer degradation caused by Concorde was negligible. Concorde’s technical leap forward boosted the public’s understanding of conflicts between technology and the environment as well as the awareness of the complex decision analysis processes that surround such conflicts. In France, the use of acoustic fencing alongside TGV tracks might not have been achieved without the 1970s controversy over aircraft noise. In the UK, the CPRE have issued tranquillity maps since 1990. Public perception Parade flight at Queen’s Golden Jubilee HM The Queen and HRH The Duke of Edinburgh disembark Concorde. Concorde was normally perceived as a privilege of the rich, but special circular or one-way (with return by other flight or ship) charter flights were arranged to bring a trip within the means of moderately well-off enthusiasts. It is a symbol of great national pride to many in the UK and France; in France it was thought of as a French aircraft, in the UK as British. The aircraft was usually referred to by the British as simply "Concorde". Whilst in France it was known as "le Concorde" due to "le", the definite article, used in French grammar to introduce the name of a ship or aircraft, and the capital being used to distinguish a proper name from a common noun of the same spelling. In French, the common noun concorde means "agreement, harmony, or peace". Concorde’s pilots and British Airways in official publications often refer to Concorde both in the singular and plural as "she" or "her". As a symbol of national pride, an example from the BA fleet made occasional flypasts at selected Royal events, major air shows and other special occasions, sometimes in formation with the Red Arrows . On the final day of commercial service, public interest was so great that grandstands were erected at Heathrow Airport. Significant numbers of people attended the final landings; the event received widespread media coverage. 37 years after her first test flight, Concorde was announced the winner of the Great British Design Quest organised by the BBC and the Design Museum . A total of 212,000 votes were cast with Concorde beating design icons such as the Mini , mini skirt , Jaguar E-type , Tube map and the Supermarine Spitfire . Records The fastest transatlantic airliner flight was from New York JFK to London Heathrow on 7 February 1996 by British Airways' G-BOAD in 2 hours, 52 minutes, 59 seconds from takeoff to touchdown. Concorde also set other records, including the official FAI "Westbound Around the World" and "Eastbound Around the World" world air speed records. On 12–13 October 1992, in commemoration of the 500th anniversary of Columbus’ first New World landing, Concorde Spirit Tours (USA) chartered Air France Concorde F-BTSD and circumnavigated the world in 32 hours 49 minutes and 3 seconds, from Lisbon, Portugal, including six refuelling stops at Santo Domingo , Acapulco , Honolulu , Guam, Bangkok , and Bahrain . The eastbound record was set by the same Air France Concorde (F-BTSD) under charter to Concorde Spirit Tours in the USA on 15–16 August 1995. This promotional flight circumnavigated the world from New York/ JFK International Airport in 31 hours 27 minutes 49 seconds, including six refuelling stops at Toulouse , Dubai , Bangkok, Andersen AFB in Guam , Honolulu, and Acapulco . By its 30th flight anniversary on 2 March 1999 Concorde had clocked up 920,000 flight hours, with more than 600,000 supersonic, much more than all of the other supersonic aircraft in the Western world combined. The last commercial Concorde flight took place on 24 October 2003. The New York City-to-Seattle speed record of 3 hours, 55 minutes, and 12 seconds was set, on its way to The Museum of Flight. Comparison with other supersonic aircraft Tu-144 as a research aircraft for NASA in 1997 The only other supersonic airliner in direct competition with Concorde was the Soviet Tupolev Tu-144 , which was nicknamed "Concordski" by Western Europeans for its outward similarity to Concorde. It had been alleged that Soviet espionage efforts had resulted in the theft of Concorde blueprints, ostensibly to assist in the design of the Tu-144. As a result of a rushed development programme, the first prototype of the Tu-144 was substantially different from the preproduction machines, but both were cruder and less refined than Concorde. The Tu-144 S had a significantly shorter range than Concorde, due to its low-bypass turbofan engines. The vehicle had poor control at low speeds because of a simpler supersonic wing design; in addition the Tu-144 required parachutes to land while Concorde had sophisticated anti-lock brakes. The Tu-144 had two crashes, one at the 1973 Paris Air Show , and another during a pre-delivery test flight in May 1978. Later production versions had retractable canards for better low-speed control, and a 126-seat research version used turbojet engines that gave them nearly the fuel efficiency and similar range to Concorde. With a top speed of Mach 2.35 it was potentially a more competitive aircraft – but was quickly taken out of service due to severe safety defects. The American designs, the Boeing 2707 and the Lockheed L-2000 were to have been larger, with seating for up to 300 people. Running a few years behind Concorde, the winning Boeing 2707 was redesigned to a cropped delta layout; the extra cost of these changes helped to kill the project. The operation of US military aircraft such as the XB-70 Valkyrie and B-58 Hustler had shown that sonic booms were quite capable of reaching the ground, and the experience from the Oklahoma City sonic boom tests led to the same environmental concerns that hindered the commercial success of Concorde. The American government cancelled the project in 1971, after having spent more than $1 billion. The only other large supersonic aircraft comparable to Concorde are strategic bombers , principally the Russian Tupolev Tu-22 / Tu-22M and Tu-160 and the American B-1B Lancer . Replacements in development The desire for a second-generation supersonic aircraft has remained within some elements of the aviation industry, and several concepts emerged quickly following the retirement of Concorde. In November 2003, EADS —the parent company of Airbus —announced that it was considering working with Japanese companies to develop a larger, faster replacement for Concorde. In October 2005, JAXA , the Japan Aerospace eXploration Agency, undertook aerodynamic testing of a scale model of an airliner designed to carry 300 passengers at Mach 2 (working name NEXST ). If pursued to commercial deployment, it would be expected to be in service around 2020–2025. On 18 June 2011, the Zero Emission High Speed Transport or ZEHST concept aircraft was unveiled by EADS at the Paris Air Show . The ZEHST, a hypersonic aircraft to be capable of 3,000 mph (4,800 km/h), is a result of the collaboration efforts between EADS and Japan. The British company Reaction Engines Limited , with 50% EU money, has been engaged in a research programme called LAPCAT , which examined a design for a hydrogen-fuelled plane carrying 300 passengers called the A2 , potentially capable of flying at Mach 5+ non-stop from Brussels to Sydney in 4.6 hours. The follow-on research effort, LAPCAT II began in 2008 and is to last four years. In May 2008, it was reported that Aerion Corporation had $3 billion of pre-order sales on its Aerion SBJ supersonic business jet. In late 2010, the project continued with a testbed flight of a section of the wing. Supersonic Aerospace International 's Quiet Supersonic Transport was a 12 passenger design from Lockheed Martin that was to cruise at Mach 1.6, and was to have created a sonic boom only 1% as strong as that generated by Concorde. Operators · Air France · British Airways · Braniff International Airways (short term lease) · Singapore Airlines (short term wet lease ) Specifications Concorde G-BOAC Data from Wall Street Journal , Kelly (2005) , concordesst.com , Richard Seamen aircraft museum General characteristics · Crew: 3 (2 Pilots and a flight engineer ) · Capacity: 92–120 passengers (128 in high-density layout) · Length: 202 ft 4 in (61.66 m) · Wingspan : 84 ft 0 in (25.6 m) · Height: 40 ft 0 in (12.2 m) · Fuselage internal length: 129 ft 0 in (39.32 m) · Fuselage width: maximum of 9 ft 5 in (2.87 m) external 8 ft 7 in (2.62 m) internal · Fuselage height: maximum of 10 ft 10 in (3.30 m) external 6 ft 5 in (1.96 m) internal) · Wing area: 3,856 ft 2 (358.25 m 2 ) · Empty weight : 173,500 lb (78,700 kg) · Useful load: 245,000 lb (111,130 kg) · Powerplant : 4 × Rolls-Royce/SNECMA Olympus 593 Mk 610 afterburning turbojets o Dry thrust: 32,000 lbf (140 kN) each o Thrust with afterburner : 38,050 lbf (169 kN) each · Maximum fuel load: 210,940 lb (95,680 kg) · Maximum taxiing weight: 412,000 lb (187,000 kg) Performance · Maximum speed : Mach 2.04 (≈1,350 mph, 2,172 km/h) at cruise altitude · Cruise speed : Mach 2.02 (≈1,320 mph, 2,124 km/h) at cruise altitude · Range : 3,900 nmi (4,500 mi, 7,250 km) · Service ceiling : 60,000 ft (18,300 m) · Rate of climb : 5,000 ft/min (25.41 m/s) · lift-to-drag : Low speed– 3.94, Approach– 4.35, 250 kn, 10,000 ft– 9.27, Mach 0.94– 11.47, Mach 2.04– 7.14 · Fuel consumption : 46.85 lb/mi (13.2 kg/km) operating for maximum range · Thrust/weight : 0.373 · Maximum nose tip temperature : 260 °F (127 °C) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concorde
个人分类: 摄影图片集锦(10-11)|8571 次阅读|0 个评论
波音公司展览馆大厅中的早期发展展示片段
黄安年 2011-9-6 03:24
波音公司展览馆大厅中的早期发展展示片段
波音公司展览馆大厅中的早期发展展示片段 黄安年文 黄安年的博客 /2011 年 9 月 5 日发布 8 月 28 日 , 我在西雅图美国波音公司的总部,较为全面地浏览了波音公司的展览大厅和实物展示以及公司试飞现场外景。由于时间关系,早期发展的展览厅两层不能详细拍摄,但进行了全部展品的快速录像。 展品片段照片 28 张为即时拍摄。
个人分类: 美国纪行见闻(09-11)|2949 次阅读|0 个评论
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(十一)
热度 1 黄安年 2011-9-5 23:55
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(十一)
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥 ( 十一 ) 黄安年文 黄安年的博客 /2011 年 9 月 5 日发布 几年前 , 我在美国参观过莱特兄弟博物馆(为期两天)和多佛空军博物馆, 8 月 28 日 , 我在西雅图美国波音公司的总部,又参观美国乃至全球最大的飞机制造公司 -- 波音公司。由于时间关系 , 我们没有时间参观波音公司的生产车间 , 不过较为全面地浏览了波音公司的展览大厅和实物展示以及公司试飞现场外景 , 并且在这个开放的允许拍照的地方尽情地拍摄了主要是供自己回顾的照片,这些照片不按照展览顺序,而是按照我本人的参观兴趣拍摄的 , 不过大体上包括了展览的主要展品。照片分多部分陆续发布。 (一) 26 张 , (二) 26 张 ,( 以上 9 月 3 日 )( 三 )26 张 ,( 四 )26 张 , (五) 26 张 , (六) 26 张 ,( 七 )26 张 ,( 八 )26 张 ( 以上 9 月 4 日 ), (九) 26 张 , (十) 26 张 , (十一) 10 张续完。
个人分类: 美国纪行见闻(09-11)|2802 次阅读|1 个评论
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(十)
热度 1 黄安年 2011-9-5 23:46
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(十)
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥 ( 十 ) 黄安年文 黄安年的博客 /2011 年 9 月 5 日发布 几年前 , 我在美国参观过莱特兄弟博物馆(为期两天)和多佛空军博物馆, 8 月 28 日 , 我在西雅图美国波音公司的总部,又参观美国乃至全球最大的飞机制造公司 -- 波音公司。由于时间关系 , 我们没有时间参观波音公司的生产车间 , 不过较为全面地浏览了波音公司的展览大厅和实物展示以及公司试飞现场外景 , 并且在这个开放的允许拍照的地方尽情地拍摄了主要是供自己回顾的照片,这些照片不按照展览顺序,而是按照我本人的参观兴趣拍摄的 , 不过大体上包括了展览的主要展品。照片分多部分陆续发布。 (一) 26 张 , (二) 26 张 ,( 以上 9 月 3 日 )( 三 )26 张 ,( 四 )26 张 , (五) 26 张 , (六) 26 张 ,( 七 )26 张 ,( 八 )26 张 ( 以上 9 月 4 日 ), (九) 26 张 , (十) 26 张 , (十一) 11 张续完。
个人分类: 美国纪行见闻(09-11)|1994 次阅读|1 个评论
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(九)
黄安年 2011-9-5 23:33
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(九)
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥 ( 九 ) 黄安年文 黄安年的博客 /2011 年 9 月 5 日发布 几年前 , 我在美国参观过莱特兄弟博物馆(为期两天)和多佛空军博物馆, 8 月 28 日 , 我在西雅图美国波音公司的总部,又参观美国乃至全球最大的飞机制造公司 -- 波音公司。由于时间关系 , 我们没有时间参观波音公司的生产车间 , 不过较为全面地浏览了波音公司的展览大厅和实物展示以及公司试飞现场外景 , 并且在这个开放的允许拍照的地方尽情地拍摄了主要是供自己回顾的照片,这些照片不按照展览顺序,而是按照我本人的参观兴趣拍摄的 , 不过大体上包括了展览的主要展品。照片分多部分陆续发布。 (一) 26 张 , (二) 26 张 ,( 以上 9 月 3 日 )( 三 )26 张 ,( 四 )26 张 , (五) 26 张 , (六) 26 张 ,( 七 )26 张 ,( 八 )26 张 ( 以上 9 月 4 日 ), (九) 26 张 , (十) 26 张 , (十一) 11 张续完。
个人分类: 美国纪行见闻(09-11)|2475 次阅读|0 个评论
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(八)
黄安年 2011-9-5 10:16
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(八)
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥 ( 八 ) 黄安年文 黄安年的博客 /2011 年 9 月 4 日发布 几年前 , 我在美国参观过莱特兄弟博物馆(为期两天)和多佛空军博物馆, 8 月 28 日 , 我在西雅图美国波音公司的总部,又参观美国乃至全球最大的飞机制造公司 -- 波音公司。由于时间关系 , 我们没有时间参观波音公司的生产车间 , 不过较为全面地浏览了波音公司的展览大厅和实物展示以及公司试飞现场外景 , 并且在这个开放的允许拍照的地方尽情地拍摄了主要是供自己回顾的照片,这些照片不按照展览顺序,而是按照我本人的参观兴趣拍摄的 , 不过大体上包括了展览的主要展品。照片分多部分陆续发布。 (一) 26 张 , (二) 26 张 ,( 以上 9 月 3 日 )( 三 )26 张 ,( 四 )26 张 , (五) 26 张 , (六) 26 张 ,( 七 )26 张 ,( 八 )26 张 ( 以上 9 月 4 日 ), 待续。
个人分类: 美国纪行见闻(09-11)|2159 次阅读|0 个评论
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(七)
黄安年 2011-9-5 09:25
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(七)
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥 ( 七 ) 黄安年文 黄安年的博客 /2011 年 9 月 4 日发布 几年前 , 我在美国参观过莱特兄弟博物馆(为期两天)和多佛空军博物馆, 8 月 28 日 , 我在西雅图美国波音公司的总部,又参观美国乃至全球最大的飞机制造公司 -- 波音公司。由于时间关系 , 我们没有时间参观波音公司的生产车间 , 不过较为全面地浏览了波音公司的展览大厅和实物展示以及公司试飞现场外景 , 并且在这个开放的允许拍照的地方尽情地拍摄了主要是供自己回顾的照片,这些照片不按照展览顺序,而是按照我本人的参观兴趣拍摄的 , 不过大体上包括了展览的主要展品。照片分多部分陆续发布。 (一) 26 张 , (二) 26 张 ,( 以上 9 月 3 日 )( 三 )26 张 ,( 四 )26 张 , (五) 26 张 , (六) 26 张 ,( 七 )26 张 ,( 八 )26 张 ( 以上 9 月 4 日 ), 待续。
个人分类: 美国纪行见闻(09-11)|1968 次阅读|0 个评论
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(六)
黄安年 2011-9-5 09:13
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(六)
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥 ( 六 ) 黄安年文 黄安年的博客 /2011 年 9 月 4 日发布 几年前 , 我在美国参观过莱特兄弟博物馆(为期两天)和多佛空军博物馆, 8 月 28 日 , 我在西雅图美国波音公司的总部,又参观美国乃至全球最大的飞机制造公司 -- 波音公司。由于时间关系 , 我们没有时间参观波音公司的生产车间 , 不过较为全面地浏览了波音公司的展览大厅和实物展示以及公司试飞现场外景 , 并且在这个开放的允许拍照的地方尽情地拍摄了主要是供自己回顾的照片,这些照片不按照展览顺序,而是按照我本人的参观兴趣拍摄的 , 不过大体上包括了展览的主要展品。照片分多部分陆续发布。 (一) 26 张 , (二) 26 张 ,( 以上 9 月 3 日 )( 三 )26 张 ,( 四 )26 张 , (五) 26 张 , (六) 26 张 ,( 七 )26 张 ,( 八 )26 张 ( 以上 9 月 4 日 ), 待续。
个人分类: 美国纪行见闻(09-11)|2073 次阅读|0 个评论
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(五)
黄安年 2011-9-5 08:53
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(五)
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥 ( 五 ) 黄安年文 黄安年的博客 /2011 年 9 月 4 日发布 几年前 , 我在美国参观过莱特兄弟博物馆(为期两天)和多佛空军博物馆, 8 月 28 日 , 我在西雅图美国波音公司的总部,又参观美国乃至全球最大的飞机制造公司 -- 波音公司。由于时间关系 , 我们没有时间参观波音公司的生产车间 , 不过较为全面地浏览了波音公司的展览大厅和实物展示以及公司试飞现场外景 , 并且在这个开放的允许拍照的地方尽情地拍摄了主要是供自己回顾的照片,这些照片不按照展览顺序,而是按照我本人的参观兴趣拍摄的 , 不过大体上包括了展览的主要展品。照片分多部分陆续发布。 (一) 26 张 , (二) 26 张 ,( 以上 9 月 3 日 )( 三 )26 张 ,( 四 )26 张 , (五) 26 张 , (六) 26 张 ,( 七 )26 张 ,( 八 )26 张 ( 以上 9 月 4 日 ), 待续。
个人分类: 美国纪行见闻(09-11)|2254 次阅读|0 个评论
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(四)
黄安年 2011-9-5 08:31
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(四)
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥 ( 四 ) 黄安年文 黄安年的博客 /2011 年 9 月 4 日发布 几年前 , 我在美国参观过莱特兄弟博物馆(为期两天)和多佛空军博物馆, 8 月 28 日 , 我在西雅图美国波音公司的总部,又参观美国乃至全球最大的飞机制造公司 -- 波音公司。由于时间关系 , 我们没有时间参观波音公司的生产车间 , 不过较为全面地浏览了波音公司的展览大厅和实物展示以及公司试飞现场外景 , 并且在这个开放的允许拍照的地方尽情地拍摄了主要是供自己回顾的照片,这些照片不按照展览顺序,而是按照我本人的参观兴趣拍摄的 , 不过大体上包括了展览的主要展品。照片分多部分陆续发布。 (一) 26 张 , (二) 26 张 ,( 以上 9 月 3 日 )( 三 )26 张 ,( 四 )26 张 , (五) 26 张 , (六) 26 张 ,( 七 )26 张 ,( 八 )26 张 ( 以上 9 月 4 日 ), 待续。
个人分类: 美国纪行见闻(09-11)|2154 次阅读|0 个评论
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(三)
黄安年 2011-9-5 07:32
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(三)
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥 ( 三 ) 黄安年文 黄安年的博客 /2011 年 9 月 4 日发布 几年前 , 我在美国参观过莱特兄弟博物馆(为期两天)和多佛空军博物馆, 8 月 28 日 , 我在西雅图美国波音公司的总部,又参观美国乃至全球最大的飞机制造公司 -- 波音公司。由于时间关系 , 我们没有时间参观波音公司的生产车间 , 不过较为全面地浏览了波音公司的展览大厅和实物展示以及公司试飞现场外景 , 并且在这个开放的允许拍照的地方尽情地拍摄了主要是供自己回顾的照片,这些照片不按照展览顺序,而是按照我本人的参观兴趣拍摄的 , 不过大体上包括了展览的主要展品。照片分多部分陆续发布。 (一) 26 张 , (二) 26 张 ,( 以上 9 月 3 日 )( 三 )26 张 ,( 四 )26 张 , (五) 26 张 , (六) 26 张 ,( 七 )26 张 ,( 八 )26 张 ( 以上 9 月 4 日 ), 待续。
个人分类: 美国纪行见闻(09-11)|2280 次阅读|0 个评论
波音公司The Museum of Flight Visitor Guide
黄安年 2011-9-4 09:16
波音公司The Museum of Flight Visitor Guide
波音公司 The Museum of Flight Visitor Guide 黄安年文 黄安年的博客 /2011 年 9 月 3 日发布 西雅图美国波音公司的总部,是值得一看的 , 对于从事航空航天事业的科研人员尤其需要来认真看一看 , 这里是开放的 , 是一所开放式的大学。这里发布的是 The Museum of Flight Visitor Guide 和 Boeing Tour 。 照片 21 张为即时拍摄 ,
个人分类: 美国纪行见闻(09-11)|2710 次阅读|0 个评论
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(二)
黄安年 2011-9-3 20:21
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(二)
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥 ( 二 ) 黄安年文 黄安年的博客 /2011 年 9 月 3 日发布 几年前 , 我在美国参观过莱特兄弟博物馆(为期两天)和多佛空军博物馆, 8 月 28 日 , 我在西雅图美国波音公司的总部,又参观美国乃至全球最大的飞机制造公司 -- 波音公司。由于时间关系 , 我们没有时间参观波音公司的生产车间 , 不过较为全面地浏览了波音公司的展览大厅和实物展示以及公司试飞现场外景 , 并且在这个开放的允许拍照的地方尽情地拍摄了主要是供自己回顾的照片,这些照片不按照展览顺序,而是按照我本人的参观兴趣拍摄的 , 不过大体上包括了展览的主要展品。照片分多部分陆续发布。 (一) 26 张 , (二) 26 张 ,
个人分类: 美国纪行见闻(09-11)|2711 次阅读|0 个评论
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(一)
黄安年 2011-9-3 20:02
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥(一)
波音公司展览馆大厅一瞥 ( 一 ) 黄安年文 黄安年的博客 /2011 年 9 月 3 日发布 几年前 , 我在美国参观过莱特兄弟博物馆(为期两天)和多佛空军博物馆, 8 月 28 日 , 我在西雅图美国波音公司的总部,又参观美国乃至全球最大的飞机制造公司 -- 波音公司。由于时间关系 , 我们没有时间参观波音公司的生产车间 , 不过较为全面地浏览了波音公司的展览大厅和实物展示以及公司试飞现场外景 , 并且在这个开放的允许拍照的地方尽情地拍摄了主要是供自己回顾的照片,这些照片不按照展览顺序,而是按照我本人的参观兴趣拍摄的 , 不过大体上包括了展览的主要展品。照片分多部分陆续发布。 (一) 26 张 , (二) 26 张 ,
个人分类: 美国纪行见闻(09-11)|2673 次阅读|0 个评论
[转载]倪军:中美大学及中美创新体系的比较
tangminqian 2011-6-11 17:06
求是新闻网 首页 听课在浙大 大师论道 http://www.news.zju.edu.cn/lecture.php?id=30748 倪军 机械制造及自动化专家。男,1961年出生。上海交通大学第一批“长江学者奖励计划”特聘教授。从事制造科学领域的精密测量技术及精密制造工程的建模与补偿控制等方面的研究。现主持设在密西根大学的“吴贤铭制造研究中心”及美国国家科学基金会“产学联合研究中心”的工作。承担了美国三大汽车公司、波音公司、美国空军及国家科学基金等40多项科研项目。提出并负责实施了车身制造质量控制的“2mm工程”计划,以及机加工过程热变形误差补偿理论、切削力学模型及通过尺度测量和误差补偿改进产品质量的方法,创造性地将统计方法与制造理论相结合,获得了巨大的经济效益。发表论文130多篇。荣获“美国国家优秀青年制造工程师奖”和“美国总统教授奖”。 非常高兴今天有机会来到浙大,讲关于中美大学之间和中美创新体系的比较。我之所以想讲这个题目,和我本人的经历有关。我到美国已经27年了,1999年以后,也花了很多时间与国内大学交流。每次往返都有很多的感触,觉得在这两个方面的差异确实挺蛮大的。所以,从那时开始,我就开始思考和搜集一些资料。最近四年,在上海交大密西根学院,作为院长,我作了一些实践。今天,我想把这些讲一讲。先对创新体系中美两国科研科技创新体系作一个比较,再讲讲中国高等教育面临的挑战,最后把密西根学院的办学经验介绍一下,最后做个总结。 先讲讲 中美创新体系的比较 。 创新基本上可以分成两类:一种是目标导向型创新。这是为了解决某一个具体问题的创新,它可以协调各方面的力量来达到某些技术目标,一般针对性很强,而且能很有效地完成某些设定的技术目标。另一种是兴趣驱动式创新。一般是非常广泛的知识创新,由个人按自己的兴趣爱好去做,但结果不一定马上能应用。这种创新鼓励各种形式的创新,一旦成功很可能产生非常广泛的发现。特别是在一些很难预料的领域,因为这些发现,就会有新的方向、新的产业、新的技术出现。 我觉得,第一种创新类似于每个人当团队里的一颗螺丝钉,把个体的作用发挥好就可以了。这种创新培养出来的是工程人才,而第二类才是培养真正的创新人才。在美国很多大学,很多学生做完研究会找我座谈,我就问他们,为什么做这个?他们回答是因为兴趣,而不是因为哪个企业委托他做这个研究。 我自己做了一个表格,对两者进行了比较。这仅是我自己的看法。 从 创新机制 来讲,中国目前主要的创新形式还是国家战略目标导向型的,在有些大学也做一些兴趣驱动式的创新。在美国,更多的创新形式是以个人意愿、兴趣驱动为主的。当然,美国也有以国家目标为主的,像现在美国对再生能源的研究。 从 资源分配 来讲,中国主要的资源还是集中使用。因为国家在发展过程中需要办的事情很多,国家就根据最大需要来使用资源。比如国家十六个重大专项,每个都是上百个亿。但美国是和个人兴趣驱动有关,资金比较分散。 从 组织结构 上讲,国内高校现在很多还是以大梯队为特色的,很多的研究所或者研究队伍里几十个人员,甚至上百个人员非常普遍。但在美国基本上是小组形式,一般都是一个教授带五、六个学生或者七、八个学生,但是教授和教授之间的动态结合非常好。以密西根大学机械工程系为例。机械系只有60位正教授、副教授和助教授,但创新点基本上有六十多个,这样动态排列组合就有很多。但在国内,像交大机械动力学院有300多个教授、副教授,被划分到18个所,进行原创性研究的基本上就这18支大队伍,这对原创研究是个很大的制约。 在 优先领域的确立 方面,中国大部分是从上而下的,组成一些专家组,确定一些优先领域,这些指南就发布了。但美国很多是从下而上的。 从 创新文化 上讲,这要联系到教育特别是大学教育了。在现在中国的大学里,老师和学生的关系一般是学生服从、跟踪老师,别人在做,我们也做,或者是老师让我做,我就做。而在国外,从小开始,挑战的思维训练就比较多。哪怕是我们上课做研究,学生会提出异议:是不是有别的办法可以做?这种对他的创新比较有利。 在 教育的重点 方面——这是最重要的方面,我们国内大学教育的重点,特别是工科类的,更注重知识的传授;但在美国大学里,不光是知识的传授——因为知识可以通过Google这些搜索引擎马上能够知道、了解,而是更注重能力的建立,特别是各种批判思维能力的建立。 接下来,我分三个层次来讲 中国进行源创性研究面临的挑战 。一是创新环境,第二是创新机制,第三是创新基础。 从 创新环境 上说,我觉得应该解决对接国家需求与兴趣驱动式知识发现的矛盾关系。中国不可能全搞目标导向式的,也不可能像美国都搞兴趣驱动式的,我们国家两者都要有。 中国大学现在正在面临一个过渡期。一方面,国家要求我们“985”高校往世界一流大学的目标上迈进,但是学校做的事情并不像一流大学要做的,这是一个矛盾;另外,我们中国大学目前所从事的很多科研,从研究总数和SCI论文数等来看已经很高了,基本在世界前列了,但有影响的源创型研究还是和世界一流的地位不匹配。当然,这和教师队伍、科研队伍所从事的工作有关。我们大部分人员还在为企业做一些工程性研究、产品开发性研究或者加工过程的研究等等。这在美国大学里基本很少发现,因为美国企业内部的研发能力特别强,它一定要把核心技术掌握在自己手里,一般不会依赖于大学为它做产品开发、售后服务等等。我觉得这个过渡期在5到10年内。企业一旦具备研发能力的时候,就不依靠大学了,那时候大学可能就会找不到方向。因为我们擅长的别人不再需要了,别人需要我们做的我们还不具备那种能力。所以,我觉得大学,特别是“985”的大学,在这个转型期内谁先考虑到这个问题——就像下围棋一样,谁先下第一步棋——转型就会比较快。一旦我们需要前沿性、开创性的研究的时候,如果我们的人才、师资队伍和结构都跟不上,可能就落后了。 从 创新机制 来讲,大梯队模式与课动态协作的众多小组模式如何结合好,这也是中国创新体系所面临的一个挑战。按现行的行政制度,像上海交大,是把行政分研究所,教师的考核等都是以这个所为单位的——你也就绑在这了。其实,从学术上和技术上讲,大家应该和另外所的人合作,但有这个无形的障碍拴在那,这是一个问题。 从 创新基础 来讲,就是大学培养人才的问题。如果下一代科研人员没有这种创新能力、创新习惯,我觉得问题很大,对中国开展源创性研究是个挑战。我经常比较中美两国培养出来的学生各自的优势在哪。我觉得,我们培养出来的学生,他们的突出优势就是解方程的能力特别强,数学、物理功底非常强。给他一个很复杂的方程式,他可以比美国学生更快更好、更巧妙地解出来。但是,一旦给他一个科研的实际问题,他反而无从下手——不知道方程式是怎么来的,这个能力我觉得在大学高等教育里就应该建立。另外一个是批判性思维,我觉得这个方面我们没有特别注重。 再给大家谈谈 中国一流大学所面临的变革 问题。 一个转变是怎样 从为工业界服务到引领工业界的需求 。这个转型是高校应该考虑,也是刻不容缓的一件事。为工业界服务是企业提出需求我们帮它解决,引领他们的需求就是这种未来的需求可能工业界还不知道,还没有这种产品,没有这种市场。中国工业如果要在世界上参与竞争的话,靠廉价劳动力、靠资源、靠市场来竞争的时代不可能延续太长时间,以后还是要依靠高新技术。 举一个例子。十六个国家重大专项里,04专项就是高级数控机床,但我看了看,我们这方面研发的技术是在跟踪、缩短和国外的差距。中国是需要这个的,但我认为更要考虑国外现在在做什么。国外特别是发达国家下一步准备用低碳排放、绿色技术来抑制中国。按照现在要求,就算5年以后达到甚至超过外国水平,如果遇到碳排放指标,也可能无法进入欧洲市场。从这方面看,虽然现在还没有这种市场需求,但是欧洲已经在引领。这也是中国大学面临的第二个转变—— 从跟踪型研究到源创型研究 。 第三个转变是 从培养工程师到培养创新人才 。中国高等教育现在面临的主要问题是——当然这只是我个人的看法——师资队伍的建设是关键中的关键,特别是对一流大学来说师资建设是灵魂与核心。另外,光凭用人本身,像国内“985”院校已经吸收了不少从海外名校毕业的师资,以我的看法,这些人到国内不到一、两年就基本上本土化了,如果管理体系跟不上改革的话,这些本土化是必然的。 下面我讲第二个问题, 中美高等教育的比较 。 这个比较仅局限于一流大学,比如中国的前十所大学和美国的前十所大学来比较。我按生源和学生质量、办学设施、办学经费、师资质量、管理体系、办学理念和培养模式等六个方面来比较,我认为这些方面是比较关键的因素。 先比较 生源和学生质量 。我认为,从生源来说中国前十所大学绝不亚于美国前十所大学,从各个方面来评价,打分都是很高的。但是,经过大学4年培养出来的学生,差距就拉开了。第一,解决实际问题的能力,中国比较弱美国比较强;第二,创新方面,美国学生比较强一些;第三,自信心方面,拿在我那学习的国内学生和美国的一些学生比,自信心方面就欠缺了。一个没有自信心的人他肯定不敢创新,不敢走另外的路;第四,领导能力,国内学校太注重知识的传授,而对学生其他能力的培养比较忽视;另外,团队合作能力,还有书面、技术、口头表达等各种表达能力,国内学生比美国学生差些。当然,中国的学生也有强处,比如,中国的学生挺用功的,数学、物理知识非常扎实,这点是美国学生赶不上的。然而,美国学生的弱势由现代的计算机技术弥补了,因为只需要知道方程,计算机直接可以算出,这样中国学生的优势不一定还是优势了。 第二个方面, 办学设施 。从硬件上来说,中国高校的校舍远远超过美国的前十所大学;从实验室条件来说,我认为也相差不大,美国能建的实验室条件,除非进口有限制的,我们也都能建好;另外,图书馆也很多是很新的,我们的差异在于服务,设施非常好,但是服务不到位,等于没有用。我看过很多国内大学的实验室,很贵的设备都用红布盖在那,看的时候,门都还是锁着的:就怕弄坏,因为太贵了,学生用的机会不多。不像在美国,学生经过培训就可以进去用,用坏是肯定会有的,但是学校的办学目的是培养人,就应该让学生去用。 第三个因素, 办学经费 。据我了解,交大是一年30亿,过去两年已经涨到了45亿人民币。密西根大学是一年55亿美金。从绝对量来说有很大的差异,但我觉得这个不是主要因素。 总的来讲,前三个因素并不是造成中国一流大学与美国一流大学差异的主要原因。差异在于后面将要讲的三个因素。 第四、 师资质量 。我是搞制造的,如果把人才培养比做一个制造工厂,原材料一样,出来的产品有差异,那肯定是制造工艺不对、设备不好、操作人员技能不够。师资队伍质量不高的原因是什么呢?当然有历史原因,以前我们按照苏联大学的模式办学,博士恢复也只有20年左右。但我认为首先是国内教师的聘用标准太低、太随意。与密西根大学相比,国内聘用的师资水平还不够高。第二,很多老师缺乏独立性。用密西根大学的评判标准,有很多人不能被聘。另外,还有创新性、科研水平、对培养教学的重视程度等。我读大学的时候,我觉得老师们对教学还是非常重视的,他们都兢兢业业;但是现在,中国的教师普遍很浮躁。再者,国际意识。在国际影响上,现在差距还是很大。我们的老师,只是考虑国内影响怎么样,活动的圈子也就只是在国内,这和拿项目有关,和评审有关,很少有教授到国外、活跃在国外的学术团体里。在交大,我们请了很多海外的有名的教授来做报告,很多情况下教师不参加,只是派一些学生坐在后面,因为他觉得这个和我无关,和我的项目无关就不来了。最后一点,我觉得我们培养出来的博士生质量比较差。中国培养出来的本科生和国外有差异,但还不是那么明显,我们培养的硕士比国外一流大学的更强。差距最大的在于博士,我们中国培养出来的博士和国外大学比差距还比较大。 第五, 管理体系 。我们都有很多从国外引进的师资,这些师资都是国外名校培养出来的,因为我们的管理体制所限,这些人很快就本土化了。为什么?首先这些人在国外知名大学的时候并不了解国外大学的管理,这些人一般是从学生的角度看。比如,我在威斯康森大学接受了四年教育,我的经历大概是考试考好、快快发表文章毕业,这是我所关心的。其他教授层面所关心的问题与我一点关系也没有。这些人毕业以后,如果继续留在国外的名校,经过管理体系与老师的熏陶培养,可能若干年后也成了著名学者,但是这些人毕业后很快就回来了,在国内的管理体系考核体系下,为了体面地生存,自己找不到项目,就赶快加入一个大教授的团队,赶快分派一个任务,分碗羮,这样在很短的时间内,他就会失去原有的成为一个世界著名学者的能力。这个就是我讲的我们的学术氛围很差。为什么我请来那么有名的教授来做报告都没什么人来听,除非你请来的人做的项目和我的完完全全一样我来听。反而在国外,学术报告太多了,每天都有好多个,如果你想听报告,一天之间可以一个接着一个去听,美国教授普遍地每天或每周花几次时间听报告,这些报告可能大部分和他们的现有研究没有直接关联,但是每次报告能听回一到两个idea,这45分钟、一个小时也就值了。他们觉得,不同的学术思想,不同的领域可能会对他的研究有所启发。 另外一个是提升制度。我们现在还是按照国内的提升标准,如果想按国际一流大学的标准来建设,是不是也可以引进一些国外的提升制度、提升标准呢。美国的终生制考核非常严格,美国博士毕业以后一般6年的assisstant professor,每年都有评定,前三年一个合同,三年后还有另外一个评定,表现尚佳的话才会续签后三年的合同。六年结束前,还要进行终生制考核。终生制考核非常难。我比较了一下,我们国内评的太随意了,那边确实很难。一般评价三个方面:教学贡献、科研贡献和社会贡献。教学贡献不只看上了多少个学时的课,不只是学生对老师上课打分好就可以了,还会随机地对拿A、B、C的学生进行抽样,让他们给老师的教学打分,还有老师自己判定对教学生有哪些贡献。对于科研贡献,不只看有多少论文、多少项目,更注重校外同行的评定。在评定终生制的时候,一般有8封信,甚至12封信,其中至少一半你不知道是谁给你写的。被评者提供一般名单,另外一半则你不知道谁评的。校内的评定人员都会很仔细地读这些信,字里行间地看这个人究竟好在哪里。如果只是说这个人好,但是不说这个人究竟好在哪里,那这封信就是没有什么价值的。考核标准非常全面,奖励体制也比较全面。在美国,想要有教授的头衔,就一定要参与教学,教学非常重要。还有研究,还有公益服务,各方面都比较综合。 第六, 办学理念和培养模式 。办学理念上,国内注重书本知识的传授,国外更注重能力创新或知识运用。再者就是教学方法,国内大部分老师还是以授课为主,老师讲,学生在底下记笔记等等,现在用了PPT,PPT因为速率太快,效果不见得很好,信息量进的快出的也快。美国大学更注重学而不是授。 我觉得,我们中国包括教材、老师布置的家庭作业、考试题目等大部分是公式化的,已经提取好的问题让学生解,学生更习惯于做完作业就对答案。现在学生普遍习惯这样,考试考完了,老师答案一公布,我和老师标准答案一样我就很放心,肯定能拿高分。这样。他们的创新能力被约束了,因为我们都是追求唯一解。美国大学更强调、更鼓励用开放式问题而不是公式化了的问题,我觉得这很重要。 举一个例子。我觉得我国的工科教育,就是我们的工科教材体系也是这样的。一年级打数学、物理基础,大二的时候再打一些基础,第三年打一些专业基础,第四年专业课,第八学期是毕业设计,这是我们传统的教育体系。这体系有什么弊端呢?就是大学四年的后半学期,很多学生都不在学校,都在外面。为了减轻就业压力,很多人就先去实习,报了一个用人单位,给他们做一做、表现一下,好的话就把我留下来。实际上,他组建毕业设计的本来目的是把四年所学知识进行汇总、综合演练和应用,但我觉得这个目标没有达到;另外,学生学到第四年,很多知识已经忘掉了,很多一年级、二年级、三年级学习的知识已经还给老师了。我举个例子,中国的教育方法有点像武术。第一天做什么呢?可能是提水,提水后就是走梅花桩、蹲马步。有的时候,学徒根本不知道提水、走梅花桩、蹲马步有什么用。美国的教育体系又是怎么样的呢?先去打个架,跟人打斗一番,打斗一番之后才知道我要练防守,我要练进攻,我的腿部力量还不够等等。在美国,有些老师是这样的,学生上我的课,你拿我的A很容易,但要拿A+,你要是不surprise我,你就拿不到A+。你要敢于提出问题,敢于创新,甚至在美国的有些课堂上,老师喜欢讲一些自己也不知道答案的问题,和同学一起探讨一些自己怎样分析化解这个问题的过程,告诉学生这是没有唯一解的只有相对来说比较好的解,这个过程是带领学生开发他们的创新思维。如果你只是告诉他们一些已经提炼好的结论,而不是一个思考的过程,学生是很难学会自己去解决问题、提出问题的。这是办学理念上的差异。 美国高等教育体制对我们有些启示 。首先,教授的最高职责是教书育人、潜心研究,这点与它的管理体系有关。在美国的大学,教授拿9个月的工资就够了,不一定是追求项目而生存,所以教授花很多心思带学生和上课。另外一个是学术自由,包容不同的观点供大家讨论。还有教育的核心任务比较明确,不光是知识传授,还有能力的建立。我觉得我们有几个问题需要深思,为什么我们中国一流大学的教授不能安心培养学生,潜心做学问?为什么从国外引进的人才很快就会被本土化?为什么拥有高水平和巨大潜力的人不太愿意回国?中国大学未来10-15年的发展模式到底是怎么样的? 最后向大家介绍一下密西根大学和交大合办的 密西根学院四年来所作的一些尝试 。 我们的生源很好,所以我们做的主要是师资队伍建设、课程体系、培养体系、管理体系建设。办学特色是通过多种途径创造国际化办学的环境。课程体系和教学教材基本上是与密西根大学同步,人才培养模式上也考虑到了中国文化,不是完全搬用密西根大学的教学模式而是结合了两国的教育特色。另外,我们从国际招聘国际一流的师资,密西根大学在这方面起了很大的作用,我们的聘用标准都是由密西根大学把关的。我们对学生的能力培养也是非常注重,建立了比较合理的管理体系。 现在基本的培养模式有三种。大部分考生是4年完全在中国密西根学院里完成学习,现在有两个专业:机械和电力,基本是为这两个专业的学生创造一个不出国的留学环境。第二个是和密西根大学共同研究出的本科双学位方式,前两年在交大读书,之后可以申请转学至密西根大学,一旦录取之后两年在密西根读书。第三个是本硕连读,四年本科在交大读,第五年去密西根读。研究生培养是从今年9月开始的,也正在和密西根商讨硕博连读,可能是在密西根读1年半的硕士再回来交大读完博士。经过四年运行,我们已经基本形成了一个高水平的师资队伍,培养效果已经慢慢得到国内外同行的广泛认同。 通过这四年来的摸索,我们遇到了很多困难,但也初步走出了在国内办一流大学的路,但这个优势在现有的大学很难推广,包括在交大就很难推广。我想,国际化办学的关键有几点:一是两校高层领导的高度重视、对体制机制创新的鼓励和支持,以及足够的办学自主权。在交大密西根学院,我们都是自己聘用教授,自己给他职称,自己设立课程体系和教材,自己管理财务,很多自主权都在我们手里。二是要有好的师资队伍,这是很关键的。三是要给海外吸纳的教授一个可以做前沿科技研究的环境,保持学术的高水平,这点也非常重要。四是合理的人才培养体系和模式。 如何能够培养出比密西根大学的学生更优秀的学生?我觉得这个完全可以做成。首先我们中国有勤奋的一流学生,生源非常好,如果能加上先进的办学理念和高水平的师资,出来的效果绝对比密西根大学水平好。中国大学绝对可以做成,关键是看我们下多大的决心来做这些事情。 谢谢大家! (根据美国密西根大学教授、上海交通大学密西根学院院长 倪军 教授2010年6月25日在浙江大学党委中心组理论学习(扩大)会议上的报告录音整理。未经本人审阅。)
个人分类: 大学政策与管理|1416 次阅读|0 个评论
复合材料之战
lingzhaohua 2010-10-25 12:41
世界领先的飞机制造商波音和空客长期处于斗争之中,目前他们所使用的武器之一就是复合材料。George Marsh对此作了一番调查。 波音(Boeing)的确花了一段时间来应对空客(Airbus)的挑战,现在有了B787中型客机,波音已经开始掌握主动。20世纪80年代,空客首先在飞机上大量使用增强塑料结构,特别是方向舵、尾翼和机翼控制面。最近,比较热门的是,A380超大型飞机上,坚固轻质材料占了结构总重量的四分之一。同样,开始时,波音也只是少量应用复合材料(控制面、翼尖等),到20世纪90年代,B777上的复合材料重量已占到20%,尤其是B777的水平尾翼就是个大型的复合材料构件。然而,波音最大胆的尝试却是B787的复合材料机身,787将是第一架拥有塑料机身的主流客机。(Raytheon的Premier 1和Hawker 4000 也是复合材料机身,但它们只是商用喷气式飞机。)除了大型碳纤维机翼和尾翼,B787机体中复合材料的重量大约占50%。 但碳纤维机身是颇具争议的。因此空客没有在B787的竞争机型A350上使用复合材料,而是使用了金属机身,尽管如此,空客仍然希望在该机型上复合材料重量能占到35%左右。(为响应市场趋势并与B787有力竞争,空客考虑重新设计源于早期A330系列的A350,使其成为一个全新的机型,拥有更大的机身和机翼。) 起初,航空公司对B787(波音称之为梦想飞机)持怀疑态度,主要是担心机身维修和维护上的困难。Flight Safety Foundation公司说,地面设备对机身低处部件的损坏每年要花费航空公司100亿美元,其中二分之一是损坏维修和停航时间造成的。(人员伤亡占另外二分之一。)这种损坏通常是很严重的,其维修的确是个大问题。之前航空公司担心复合材料可能比金属更难以维修,停航时间更多。另外一个担心就是,复合材料损坏时可能表面是没有损伤的,而金属会变形或显示出明显的凹痕。 尽管空客也这么担心,但波音取得了巨大成功,通过良好的客户关系和公关的努力宣传,B787已成为公司历史上卖得最快的飞机。尽管早期空客A350也拿到了一定的订单,但空客还是落在了波音之后。 最近澳大利亚航空公司Qantas的许诺,使得B787的订单总数增加到了400架,而起步较晚的空客A350订单数量为200架。 机身的争议 关于使用塑料制造主流客机重要的机身/压力舱问题一直存在支持和回避两种立场。两大竞争者以此作为他们的主要不同之处,其它的分歧还有:在大型运输机上使用双发动机或四发动机的观点,以及对超大型飞机需求的预测。波音的机身基本原理很简单这个世界总是非常关注油耗和排放问题,而更轻的飞机将燃烧更少的燃油。复合材料结构比相应的金属结构轻,因此,复合材料机身可以使飞机的运行费用更低,污染更少。波音还列举了其它优点:复合材料可以制成更坚固的压力舱,使得B787机舱内的压力保持在6000英尺高度时的气压,而不是通常的7000~9000英尺,乘客会感觉更加舒适。因为复合材料不会腐蚀(金属机身的最大敌人),机舱内湿度可以恒定在10~15%,而金属机身内只能保持在5~10%之间,这也同样增加了乘客的舒适度。 复合材料适应载荷方式的能力,可以在不影响结构完整性或增加额外重量的情况下,安装更大的窗户(大约大出65%)。波音还相信复合材料的耐腐蚀性能和耐疲劳性能会使它们比金属更耐用。但是这家美国飞机制造商声称复合材料机身维护成本更低时,还是引起了一片争论。 在复合材料问题上,空客第一次呈现出保守姿态,认为波音在冒一个很大的风险。尽管这家美国公司过去遇到了无数的技术挑战,但欧洲人认为现在它面临着一个未知的事物。他们认为,即使成功了,研发成本也会超出预算,针对这款飞机所预期的价格和运营商所预期的利润将会作废,交货和性能保证可能也是问题。中立的分析家断定,波音不能承受太多的挫折,假如它的预期被证实,所有的可能性都可能一一成为现实。 空客也抓住争论的要害声称,尽管A350上使用的塑料少于B787,但在先进材料的使用上仍然是领先的,机身将使用铝-钛合金蒙皮。据首席商业运营官John Leahy介绍,A350将使用60%的先进材料,从这一点上来说领先于787。轻质合金用作蒙皮降低了风险和成本,使空客可以向航空公司提供较低的报价。空客还指出,当机身遭受损坏时,航空公司可以使用标准维修程序。 最近围绕机身/复合材料的争论逐渐增多。空客对787明显的诽谤,使波音感到气愤,尽管两家公司对各自产品安全性的攻击都很忌讳。这种可能的侵犯终于在一个安全研讨会中爆发了,之后,波音决定证明其复合材料机身损坏的可见性,而且只需要最小的非破坏性测试。研讨会的一个发言人认为,这种方法可能增加安全问题,因为损坏(比如分层或开裂)可能潜伏在层合板的板层中间,而表面不会有任何迹象。 波音否认对安全会有影响,坚信787结构中充分考虑了安全边际,因此未检测到的损伤不会造成灾难性的失效。正如B787项目代理首席机械师Justin Hale认为的,复合材料中的损伤倾向于停留在一个地方,相反金属中的损伤会迅速扩散。复合材料可以保持飞机结构的完整性,即使带有少量未检测到的损伤。 继续他的观点,Hale提到了波音计划制造超音速运输机Sonic Cruiser的日子,他们已经放弃这一计划转而关注是什么形成了B787。复合材料在高速喷气式飞机的设计中已大显身手。 Hale 说:我们的Sonic Cruiser任务小组建议,如果目测到的层合板表面损伤不明显,机身设计应该保证它不会妨碍结构承受它的设计载荷。 这一理念已经被用在B787中。787的机身中使用了大量的碳纤维层合板,厚度从进出口围栏和其它易损部件(包括机身下腹部)中的一英寸, 到独立制造的机身部件连接处的半英寸和机身顶部部件的1/10英寸。由于损伤容限不同,波音指出,如果没有看到损伤,就没有什么可担心的,飞机可以安全运行。 修理 重大的碰撞报告应该促进更详细的检查,包括机身内部的损伤迹象。检修人员可能会寻找横梁中的断裂迹象横梁是增强构件,在制造过程中与机身蒙皮一起固化而成。分裂迹象代表外部冲击力较高。如果仍然怀疑损伤特性和损伤程度,可能需要一次非破坏性检查。 例如,尾翼和控制面等已经证明了脉冲回波评估的有效性,因此,波音正在研发一种手持式声音设备,以提供损伤迹象。这种碰撞损伤检查器将输出信息,帮助维修队参考飞机结构维修手册来决定是否应该对显示出的损伤进行维修。 航空公司也关心结构维修手册以外的更严重明显损伤的修理。Justin Hale通过援引几个实际案例的研究来使他们安心,在这些案例中,金属飞机遭到了严重的损坏。主要的事故原因包括尾部撞击、前起落架断裂和服务车辆的碰撞。波音的一个支持团队将相同的损伤照搬到了B787结构上,然后估算了一次全面修理所需要的人工和材料成本。Hale说,每种情况下,修理成本都在相应的、有类似损伤的金属飞机修理成本的10%以内。 航空公司关心的另外一个问题是,复合材料结构的修理可能与现有的修理程序之间有很大的不同,让工程师们很难适应。Hale说,不是这样的,技术人员可以继续使用现在的方法修理机身的损伤,即他们修理螺栓连接的金属补片的方法。 我们不希望强迫操作人员使用全新的修理技术。他解释说,我们吸取了大约六年前Sonic Cruiser项目中的教训。服务工程师,包括结构专家和复合材料专家,认为让航空公司继续使用他们熟悉的修理方法是最好的。 因此,螺栓连接的补片仍然保留在维修手册中,尽管这些部件可能使用复合材料和钛制成的尽量避免使用更常用的铝,因为它与碳纤维的兼容性差。Hale说,结构维修手册将许可大型面积(最大为1m 1m)的补片修补。如果今后航空公司希望恢复复合材料完美无瑕的外观,一般当飞机着陆进行重大工程检修时,他们可以选择去掉螺栓连接的补片,代之以粘接修补。 波音已经尽可能简化了程序,确保热粘结剂可以用于固化常用的预浸料修补材料,而无需依靠高压釜或炉子固化。为大多数修补指定同样低固化温度的预浸料,不需要保存不同冷却需求和保质期的材料。波音正在努力使不同分包商所采的机身部件修理材料和程序保持统一。 在快速修补领域,B787工程团队发明了一种技术利用小型的预固化复合材料补片,一名团队成员描述为像自行车轮胎补片,但更大一些,而且是用于飞机的。一种简单的手热 式加热器足以将补片加热到固化所需的温度(大约54 ℃)。波音相信,这将比临时性的修理提供更多东西,将足够支持一架飞机直到下一次重大的工程修理。 机翼、机身和其它复合材料结构部件的相似修理技术也会出现。 在解决关键的修理问题上,波音的努力已经使潜在的运营商放了心,他们似乎也被飞机制造商的言论说服,相信复合材料B787在维护成本上比目前的机型更低,价格甚至比A350更低。复合材料的耐久性是让波音延长重大检修间隔期的一个因素。波音说B787可以比其它机型留在空中的时间更长,从而获得收益。由于维修间隔期的延长和基本结构检修需求的最小化,波音称B787的维护需求比其它竞争机型低30%。 身陷困境 对于在主流客机机身上使用复合材料的问题,尽管空客仍然持怀疑态度(至少在公开场合),但他们知道必须小心不要让自己身陷困境。不应忽略的一个事实是,在避免全复合材料机身的同时,空客已经在A350的机身后部和机身龙骨横梁上使用碳纤维增强塑料。另外,公司官员在声称复合材料可能不是目前最好的选择时,他们可能希望很快转向一种不太明确的姿态。空客说过,他们正准备推出他们最畅销的窄机身A320的后继机型。在考虑新机型时,他们可能希望重新评估复合材料机身的优点。复合材料用量更大的A320将与波音双喷气发动机客机B737的继任机型互相竞争。对于这架飞机,波音很可能为所有的基本结构选择复合材料,包括机身。 外部因素可能阻止两大对手对于复合材料日益增长的依赖性。碳纤维的供应问题及其日益升高的成本为竞争材料先进的铝、铝-钛合金以及金属/复合材料复合物提供了机会,增加了他们作为机身材料的可能性。工程师可能要寻找经济的材料组合,复合材料只是混合物中的其中一种元素。空客已经显示出他们重新定义挑战的迹象,使用先进材料而不仅仅是复合材料。很明显,目前处于优势地位的碳纤维需要不断提高它的性价比,以保持竞争地位。未来的持续斗争中,飞机制造对手可能不是仅仅为了塑料美好而斗,而是谁可以最好地利用所有先进材料,以制造出最高效和市场所需的商务飞机。 B787 在其主要结构上使用大量的 复合材料。(图片版权所有:波音公司)
个人分类: 生活点滴|8459 次阅读|1 个评论

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-6-1 15:44

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部