CERN的内部邮件： Dear colleagues, I would like to invite you to a seminar in the main auditorium on 13 December at 14:00, at which the ATLAS and CMS experiments will present the status of their searches for the Standard Model Higgs boson. These results will be based on the analysis of considerably more data than those presented at the Summer conferences, sufficient to make significant progress in the search for the Higgs boson, but not enough to make any conclusive statement on the existence or non-existence of the Higgs. The seminar will also be webcast.
Iron and steel are used widely in the world. The key processes for steelmaking including the basic oxygen steelmaking, the continuous casting and the hot rolling. As these processes are coupled to each other, integrated batch planning for each process is important for guaranteeing competitive steelmaking plant performance. we focus on one main batch planning for the processes of basic oxygen steelmaking, which are Integrated Charge Planning (ICP). ICP, for the given technical constraints (hard and soft constrains), deals with determining which slabs are assigned into one charge to minimize charge number; and maximum the sum of slab weight in all charges. As the problem is NP-hard, two new heuristics based on a variable neighborhood search (VNS) are designed, one is harmony search embedded guided VNS, and the other is simulation annealing embedded guided VNS. We highlight the summary of solutions obtained by each of them for comparisons of these algorithms. The data of the ICP are attached. README.txt Example Problem.rar Problem.rar
Title: Analysis of keyword-based tagging behaviors of experts and novices Author(s): Miss Li-Chen Tsai , Dr. Sheue-Ling Hwang , (National Tsing-Hua U.), Prof. Kuo-Hao Tang , (Feng Chia University) Citation: Miss Li-Chen Tsai, Dr. Sheue-Ling Hwang, Prof. Kuo-Hao Tang, (2011) "Analysis of keyword-based tagging behaviors of experts and novices", Online Information Review, Vol. 35 Iss: 2 Article type: Research paper Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Abstract: Purpose - Expert and novice readers tag documents with different descriptions; this study was intended to discover which readers would generate the most reliable and most representative sets of tags. Design/methodology/approach - One group of experts and one group of novices were recruited. These two groups were asked to provide tags for document bookmarks in a Mozilla Firefox browser. In the experimental analysis, we defined two measures, similarity and relevance, to describe the differences between the two groups. Findings - Tags chosen by experts yielded better similarity and relevance values in all analyses. Tags chosen by the expert group had higher commonality in pairwise similarity analysis; further, the relevance analysis showed that tags chosen by experts reflected better understanding of the content. Originality/value - Tagging behavior has become highly popular on the web, and its study has commercial merit. Tags from experts represent the structure behind the knowledge involved; expert representation may be vastly more helpful than novice representation for promoting understanding of content in an era characterized by an explosion of information.
If you are, you breath. If you breath, you talk. If you talk, you ask. If you ask, you think. If you think, you search. If you search, you experience. If you experience, you learn. If you learn, you grow. If you grow, you wish. If you wish, you find. And if you find… you doubt. If you doubt, you question. If you question, you understand. If you understand, you know. And if you know, you want to know more. And if you want to know more, you are… alive。 如果你活着，你呼吸；如果你呼吸，你说话；如果你说话，你询问；如果你询问，你思考；如果你思考，你探索；如果你探索，你体验；如果你体验，你学习；如果你学习，你成长；如果你成长，你期许；如果你 期许，你发现；如果你发现…，你质疑；如果你质疑，你提问；如果你提问，你理解；如果你理解，你知道；如果你知道，你想知道更多；如果你想知道更多，你活着！
Physics In the time of semantic web, people are no longer satisfied with just finding something. You need a ‘librarian’ who can help you to organize what you try to find. Such as, Categorizing journal papers in some well-established topics, the authors who are usually the expert in this field, and Journals which usually cover the cutting-edge research about this problem. Furthermore, it is really time-consuming and inconvenient for us to check all those journals one by one. We need a search engine which could cover APS journals, European Physics Journals and UK IOP journals. Even with ArXiv, ScienceDirect and SCOPUS, semantic web searching is still a welcomed gadget for physicists. The SCITopia is right choice for physicists: http://www.scitopia.org Fig. 1 website of SCITopia Biology Just like Physics Review serial for physicists, PubMed is the most important source for biologists. So GoPubMed is the right choice for biologists. Fig. 2 website of GoPubMed
标签: Search
