中华文化是封建文化的集大成者 许多文化学者都承认，世界上主要存在着三大文化体系，一是中华文化，辐射周边的朝鲜、日本和部分东南亚国家；另一个文化体系是印度文化，主要影响中东地区；第三个文化体系是英语国家的文化，主要代表是英美，辐射世界上主要发达国家；除了这三大文化体系，其他欧洲区的文化基本上和英美文化大同小异，只是发展阶段上的差异。 这三大文化体系背后对应着三大宗教体系，包括佛教，伊斯兰教和基督教。如果要严格相互对应的话，由于文化之间曾经多次发生融合，而宗教文化基本上却能够独善其身，所以我们会发现它们之间清晰的边界。文化的融合与宗教的融合比起来要相对容易很多。佛教在中国的传播对中国的本土文化产生了巨大的影响。因此，中华文化中有很多元素来源于印度文化。 中国的诸子百家文化与佛文化的整合，铸造了中华文化的核心，使得中华文化同时体现中华本土文化和印度文化的精华。 同时也是的这种文化辐射更为辽阔。 基督教是最后进入中国的一个教种，与佛教在中国传播相对顺利的情况相比较，基督教在中国的传播始终得不到任何政府的鼓励和支持。同时，也不能受到中国民间的更为广泛的接受和相应。 这样直接导致了中华文化和英语国家文化之间的明显差异。 中华文化脱胎于封建社会的上层建筑和经济基础，经历了漫长的封建社会，一直在封建社会架构这个舞台上演化和发育，最终使得中华文化成为封建文化的集大成者，是封建文化中最为优秀的文化体系；与此类似，英语国家的文化跨越了封建和资本社会两个阶段，这两个阶段所依附的社会基础具有明显的差异，因此，英语国家文化已经基本上剔除了其封建文化的核心，应发展成为一种典型的资本主义文化。 再加上文艺复兴的助推，英语国家的文化在其所承载的“价值”方面已经更加关注人性的素求，换言之，英语国家的文化是一种经过妥协后再生的一种文化；而对于中华文化而言，由于没有经历过类似文艺复兴式的涤荡，依然保有完整的封建文化核心要素，包括封建文化的核心价值。类似于文艺复兴运动的五四运动旨在涤荡中华文化中的封建要素，但是由于中华文化已经在把封建文化演绎到了尽致，因此成效远不如文艺复兴对英语国家文化的影响来的深远。 本质上而言，封建文化与资本主义所负载的价值差异主要在于对人的属性的诠释。 很多迹象表明，人性的生物学因素会产生很大的作用，人性中的生物因素可能会成为除生产力、生产方式之外最大的可变量。几乎可以肯定是，人类的生产能力和人性的生物学诉求相比，后者具有更为广阔的发展空间。 基于上述理解，文化之间的冲突和融合最大的前提很可能会回归到人性的生物学属性上。 如何处理人性诉求，是否能最大可能满足人性诉求标示了一种文化体系的竞争优势，甚至是生命力。 2012年08月15日于京南小镇 Chinese culture is the feudal culture of the synthesizer Many cultural scholars have recognized thatthere are three major cultural systems in the world, one of these is Chinese culture, the radiation surrounding the Korean, Japan and some Southeast Asian countries; another cultural system is the Indian culture, mainly affecting the Middle East; the third culture system is t he culture of English-speaking countries, mainly represented by Britain and the United States,which has aradiation of the world's major developed countries. In addition to these three cultural systems, other European culture is basically similar to Anglo-American culture and differs just in developmentstages. Interestingly, behind these three cultural systems,there are threecorresponding major religious systems, including Buddhism, Islam and Christianity. Should strictly correspond to each other, then had repeatedly occurred fusion between due to cultural, religious and cultural basically was able to be spared, so we will find that the integration of cultural and religious integration is relatively easy compared to many. The local culture in China has a huge influence from the spread of Buddhism in China. Thus, many elements of Chinese culture have been adopted from the Indian culture. The integration of the Chinese philosophers of culture and Buddhist culture, has largelycasted the core part of Chinese culture,givingChinese culture at the same time embodies the essence of China's local culture and Indian culture. At the same time, this culture is extended toa more extensive radiation. Christianity is the last to enter China, a teaching, and Buddhism in China spread relatively smooth compared to the spread of Christianity in China is still unable to get any government encouragement and support. At the same time, it can not by the private sector more widely accepted and the corresponding. This led directly to the significant difference between Chinese culture and the English national culture. Chinese culture born out of the superstructure and the economic base of the feudal society, has experienced a long period of feudal society, the evolution and development has been on the stage of the feudal social structure, and ultimately make the Chinese culture to become the master of feudal culture is the most outstanding feudal culture cultural system; Similarly, the culture of English-speaking countries across the two phases of the feudal and capitalist society, the social basis of these two stages are attached to the obvious differences, English-speaking countries culture has been largely removed the feudal culture of the core , should be developed into a typical capitalist culture. Plus the boost of the Renaissance, hosted by the culture of English-speaking countries in their "value" has been more attention to the prime demand of human nature, in other words, the culture of English-speaking countries is a compromise after regeneration culture; and Chinese culture, did not experience similar to the Renaissance-style cleansing, still retain the integrity of the core elements of the feudal culture, including the core values of the feudal culture. Similar to the Renaissance of the May Fourth Movement aims to wash away the feudal elements in Chinese culture, Chinese culture has been the feudal culture of interpretation to every minute of it, so the result is far better than the Renaissance to the far-reaching impact on the culture of English-speaking countries. Essentially feudal culture and capitalism load value difference lies in the interpretation of the properties of the people. Are many indications that the biological factors of human nature will have a significant role in the biological factors of human nature may be the largest addition to the productivity, production methods can be variable. Almost certainly yes, compared to the biological demands of human capacity and human nature, the latter has a broader space for development. Based on the above understanding, inter-cultural conflict and fusion of the biggest premise is likely to return to the biological properties of human nature. How to deal with the demands of human nature, to the maximum extent possible to meet human demands marked a cultural system of competitive advantage, and even vitality. Xuefeng Pan(need to be modifed) August 15, 2012 in the town of South Beijing
标签: 东南亚国家
