科学网

 找回密码
  注册

tag 标签: 类固醇药物

相关帖子

版块 作者 回复/查看 最后发表

没有相关内容

相关日志

类固醇药物可拯救重症新冠患者的生命
热度 4 zhpd55 2020-9-3 16:38
类固醇药物可拯救重症新冠患者的生命 诸平 据《 新科学家 》( New Scientist )杂志网站 2020 年 9 月 2 日报道, 冠状病毒 的最新新闻每天都会更新,包括冠状病毒的病例,来自《新科学家》最新消息莫过于 专题 报道和访谈以及有关 covid-19 大流行的 基本信息。 据 约翰 · 霍普金斯大学 ( Johns Hopkins University ) 的数据,新冠病毒已经导致全球死亡人数已超过 85.8 万;确诊病例数超过 2580 万,尽管真实的病例数可能会更高。为了拯救更多人的生命,降低死亡率。疫苗研究和新药研发也在积极展开的同时,老药新用途的探索也在不断深入之中。《新科学家》2020年9月2日报道的减轻炎症的类固醇药物( Steroid drugs )可挽救严重的 covid-19 患者的生命就是老药新用途探索的一个例证。 已经证实一组减轻炎症的药物 可以增加 严重 covid-19 患者的生存率 。在一项具有里程碑意义的研究中,到目前为止已完成的所有研究都在研究类固醇对冠状病毒的作用,世界卫生组织( WHO ) REACT 工作组的研究人员分析了 7 项随机临床试验的结果,其中包括 1703 例重度新冠患者( covid-19 ), 他们比较了接受 3 种皮质类固醇药物之一的患者的结果与那些接受标准护理或安慰剂的人的死亡率。 3 种皮质类固醇药物分别是 地塞米松 ( dexamethasone ),氢化可的松( hydrocortisone )和甲基强的松龙( methylprednisolone )。研究人员发现,接受皮质类固醇治疗的人 28 天后死于该病的患者比例为 32 %,而未接受皮质类固醇治疗的人中死于该病的比例为 40 %。 地塞米松 ( dexamethasone ) 氢化可的松( hydrocortisone ) 甲基强的松龙( methylprednisolone ) 伦敦卫生与热带医学学院(London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)的斯蒂芬·埃文斯(Stephen Evans)在一份 声明中 说:“地塞米松(dexamethasone)是最有益的证据。”这些新结果2020年9月2日发表在《 美国医学会杂志》 ( Journal of the American Medical Association , JAMA) —— The WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group. Article Information . Association Between Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19A Meta-analysis . JAMA.Published online September 2, 2020. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17023 此研究为 RECOVERY 试验的早期发现增加了分量,该试验发现地塞米松使重症 covid-19 患者的呼吸机死亡人数减少了 1/3 ,而呼吸机患者减少了 1/3 。斯蒂芬 · 埃文斯说: “ 这项分析使人们更加相信地塞米松在重症 covid-19 患者中确实具有重要的作用。 ” 研究的结果是,预期世界卫生组织将更新其治疗指南。在英国,这种 药物一直在使用 自 2020 年 6 月以来用于治疗重症 covid-19 患者。更多信息请注意浏览原文或者相关报道。 Key Points Question Is administration of systemic corticosteroids associated with reduced 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Findings In this prospective meta-analysis of 7 randomized trials that included 1703 patients of whom 647 died, 28-day all-cause mortality was lower among patients who received corticosteroids compared with those who received usual care or placebo (summary odds ratio, 0.66). Meaning Administration of systemic corticosteroids, compared with usual care or placebo, was associated with lower 28-day all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Abstract Importance Effective therapies for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are needed, and clinical trial data have demonstrated that low-dose dexamethasone reduced mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who required respiratory support. Objective To estimate the association between administration of corticosteroids compared with usual care or placebo and 28-day all-cause mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants Prospective meta-analysis that pooled data from 7 randomized clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy of corticosteroids in 1703 critically ill patients with COVID-19. The trials were conducted in 12 countries from February 26, 2020, to June 9, 2020, and the date of final follow-up was July 6, 2020. Pooled data were aggregated from the individual trials, overall, and in predefined subgroups. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Inconsistency among trial results was assessed using the I 2 statistic. The primary analysis was an inverse variance–weighted fixed-effect meta-analysis of overall mortality, with the association between the intervention and mortality quantified using odds ratios (ORs). Random-effects meta-analyses also were conducted (with the Paule-Mandel estimate of heterogeneity and the Hartung-Knapp adjustment) and an inverse variance–weighted fixed-effect analysis using risk ratios. Exposures Patients had been randomized to receive systemic dexamethasone, hydrocortisone, or methylprednisolone (678 patients) or to receive usual care or placebo (1025 patients). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality at 28 days after randomization. A secondary outcome was investigator-defined serious adverse events. Results A total of 1703 patients (median age, 60 years ; 488 women) were included in the analysis. Risk of bias was assessed as “low” for 6 of the 7 mortality results and as “some concerns” in 1 trial because of the randomization method. Five trials reported mortality at 28 days, 1 trial at 21 days, and 1 trial at 30 days. There were 222 deaths among the 678 patients randomized to corticosteroids and 425 deaths among the 1025 patients randomized to usual care or placebo (summary OR, 0.66 ; P   .001 based on a fixed-effect meta-analysis). There was little inconsistency between the trial results ( I 2  = 15.6%; P  = .31 for heterogeneity) and the summary OR was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.48-1.01; P  = .053) based on the random-effects meta-analysis. The fixed-effect summary OR for the association with mortality was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.50-0.82; P   .001) for dexamethasone compared with usual care or placebo (3 trials, 1282 patients, and 527 deaths), the OR was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.43-1.12; P  = .13) for hydrocortisone (3 trials, 374 patients, and 94 deaths), and the OR was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.29-2.87; P  = .87) for methylprednisolone (1 trial, 47 patients, and 26 deaths). Among the 6 trials that reported serious adverse events, 64 events occurred among 354 patients randomized to corticosteroids and 80 events occurred among 342 patients randomized to usual care or placebo. Conclusions and Relevance In this prospective meta-analysis of clinical trials of critically ill patients with COVID-19, administration of systemic corticosteroids, compared with usual care or placebo, was associated with lower 28-day all-cause mortality.
个人分类: 药物动态|5147 次阅读|7 个评论
中国运动员不吃肉怎么行?
热度 1 xupeiyang 2012-7-4 05:40
不吃猪肉是害怕瘦肉精,就绝非矫情。不慎吃到瘦肉精而成千古恨的教训太多了,这让主教练、运动员不能不对瘦肉精如临大敌。2008年5月,临近北京奥运会开幕,中国游泳名将欧阳鲲鹏被查出服用类固醇药物,被处以终身禁赛,究其因,有一种说法是,欧阳鲲鹏休假回家期间与家人聚餐吃烤肉,摄入了大量含瘦肉精的肉类。   体育总局下发“禁肉令”,禁止运动员在外食用猪、牛、羊肉,各训练基地在未确定肉源安全的情况下,暂停食肉。中国羽毛球队总教练李永波前不久说,“我们现在运动员吃的猪肉可都是特供的,到街上买猪肉吃到瘦肉精就麻烦了。”另有报道称,刘翔多年不敢吃猪肉。 运动员不敢吃肉,是因为猪肉里可能含有违禁药品,可普通老百姓就可以放心吃肉吗? 长期食用瘦肉精猪肉,有可能导致染色体畸变,会诱发恶性肿瘤;瘦肉精除了可造成食物中毒等身体不良反应,更可能引发基础疾病,甚至致人死亡。
个人分类: 食品问题|3323 次阅读|2 个评论

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-28 07:08

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部