means you keep on finding new things. It took us more than one year to refine the best numerical solution for our first paper, which was finally submitted last month. As I started to write the second paper, I needed to adjust the "best solution." That's when I discovered an even better solution than the one in the submitted manuscript... What would you do in this case? Leave the first paper as is, and go on to write a short paper to show how one can get a better solution, or revise the first paper using the latest best solution? For paper count, the answer is obvious. However, I don't think that will be our choice. (None of us, the first three authors, care much about publishing for the sake of publishing.) I truly enjoyed this new discovery, which seems to present itself. However, I know it's the experience that helps me to see more clearly now than ever... The good thing is my experience has been recognized by some colleagues as well. I will be visiting NOAA/PMEL, NASA/JPL, and UCLA in late September and early October to share these new results. Will you be here, Godot?