科学网

 找回密码
  注册

tag 标签: 神经毒气

相关帖子

版块 作者 回复/查看 最后发表

没有相关内容

相关日志

津爆核心区可以产生神经性毒气
热度 11 jianhuihong 2015-8-20 09:21
看了附录新闻,甚为震惊。这是什么砖家? HCN, cyanide, 氰化氢,水溶液为氢氰酸,就是公认的神经毒剂 (neurotoxin), 气态氰化氢也是神经毒气。 700吨的氰化钠,如果遇到酸,就会放出氢氰酸神经毒剂。 自然界通常的雨水都是微酸性,因为空气中有CO2, 和水结合变成碳酸,H2CO3. 雨水的PH通常是5.6。学过化学的都知道,PH7, 即为酸性。 只要那700吨的氰化钠,有散落进入土壤的,遇到雨水,就有可能放出氰化氢神经毒气。反应方程式如下: 2 NaCN + H2CO3 -- Na2CO3 + 2 HCN 根据美国OSHA, 氢氰酸的最高许可浓度(PEL, permissible exposure level)是10ppm. 如果浓度达到50 ppm, 可以立即致死(Immediate danger to life and health, IDLH= 50 ppm). 美国非盈利组织health research: https://www.healthresearch.org/technology-transfer/cyanide-exposure-assay Cyanide is a potent neurotoxin, a renowned poison, as well as a terrorist weapon. 美国NIH也把HCN当做神经毒剂: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12782099 Since cyanide is a neurotoxin that produces mitochondrial dysfunction and stimulates intracellular generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS)。。。 请砖家说明,为什么天津爆炸核心区不可能产生神经性毒气? 睁眼说瞎话。 附录: 专家:天津爆炸核心区不可能产生神经性毒气 新华网天津8月19日电(记者徐壮志、毛振华、李鲲)两天来,一则关于天津港爆炸核心区检测出神经性毒气的新闻受到了广泛关注。正在天津爆炸现场执行救援指导任务的军事医学科学院化武专家组指出,爆炸现场根本不可能产生神经性毒气,所谓“神经性毒气”之说属“重大误判”。 17日晚,一则媒体报道称,天津港爆炸现场检测出神经性毒气,指标达到了最高值,甚至认为爆炸区内的多种危化品都可能产生这类物质。国家神性经毒剂中毒救治标准的起草者,国际同类标准的主要参与人员之一的军事医学科学院王永安研究员说,神经性毒气的标准说法应该是神经性毒剂,是毒性极强的化学物质,其毒性比氰化物高几十倍,合成极为复杂,而从爆炸现场探明化学原料,结合神经性毒剂的核心原料和生产条件来看,事故现场根本没有产生神经性毒剂的可能。 军事医学科学院专家、联合国禁止化学武器组织专家丁日高认同王永安的观点:“只要具备专业常识,就知道这绝不可能。” 同在现场执行任务的总参谋部防化指挥学院专家王宁也持同样观点:“我们看到这则报道时都很吃惊。” “一般的测量仪器出现误报很常见。”王永安说,从电视来看,现场使用的仪器并非行业中认定的可以准确确定检测结果的“金标准”仪器。 军事科学院毒物药物研究所研究员聂志勇、全军中毒救治中心王汉斌主任医师同时介绍,到目前为止,专家组并没有听说有神经性毒剂中毒病例。王汉斌认为,危险化学品检测及判读应当依据科学程序来进行。“此次重大误判,源自于对仪器检测的结果没有进行常识性分析解读。” 王永安介绍,一般来说,对于这种容易发生误判的一般仪器检测出的结果,应当首先进行基于专业常识的分析判断,其次应与其他仪器检测出数据进行综合比对,如果仍有疑问,就应该用质谱等高级的“金标准”仪器进行确认,特别是神经性毒剂这种毒极性大、极易引发恐慌的化学品,尤其应该谨慎确认。 “现在民众的关注点多集中在大量危化品的危害上,应强化监测数据的实时发布,让公众能动态得知环境情况和数据。”王永安说,但监测数据必须准确可靠,建议媒体在采访时,应选择真正从事该领域研究的专家,避免因为不当解读而引发不必要的恐慌。(原标题:专家:天津港爆炸核心区所谓“神经性毒气”之说属“重大误判”)
个人分类: 环保|5792 次阅读|39 个评论
叙利亚化武中的沙林是什么?
zjcui 2013-9-2 12:25
沙林实际上是乙酰胆碱酯酶AChE的不可逆抑制剂。ACh从突触前膜释放后,通过扩散到达突触后膜,与后膜N型ACh受体NAChR结合。NAChR是典型的半胱氨酸环受体阳离子通道复合体,开放后导致突触后膜去极化。去极化达到阈值后引发神经肌肉接头处骨骼肌细胞发放动作电位,动作电位沿着骨骼肌纤维传导出接头处后,引发骨骼肌细胞兴奋收缩偶联,骨骼肌发生收缩,完成生理性动作。 正常情况下ACh从突触前膜释放后,会被乙酰胆碱酯酶AChE所分解,适时终止突触前膜所传导到突触后膜的神经冲动。但是当沙林Sarin在神经肌肉接头处出现后,突触前膜所释放的ACh不能被及时降解。突触后膜NAChR被持续激活,突触后膜处于持续去极化的状态,导致电压依赖性钠离子通道的失活并不能及时复活,从而导致神经肌肉接头处的突触传递失败。 呼吸肌神经肌肉接头处突触传递失败的直接结果是呼吸肌瘫痪,从而导致死亡。 沙林属于有机磷化合物,与有机磷杀虫剂属于同一类型化合物。作用原理也是一样的。所以有机磷农药中毒后的解毒与沙林中毒解毒原理一样。 以下转载自: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/17/sarin-deadly-history-nerve-agent-syria-un Sarin: the deadly history of the nerve agent used in Syria The UN has confirmed that the chemical used in Damascus last month was sarin – a lethal poison with no taste, no smell and no colour. Which makes it one of the most murderous weapons in modern warfare Ian Sample The Guardian , Tuesday 17 September 2013 19.10 BST An amateur photograph showing a UN weapons inspector collecting samples at Ain Terma, near Damascus. Photograph: Local Commitee of Arbeen/EPA Now we know. On the morning of 21 August, as the air above Damascus cooled, rockets filled with the nerve agent sarin fell on rebel-held suburbs of the Syrian capital and left scores of men, women and children dead or injured. UN inspectors had been in the country for three days, on a mission to investigate allegations of earlier atrocities. They quickly changed tack. They brokered a temporary ceasefire with the regime and the rebels and made straight for Ghouta. Video reports from the area showed hospital staff overwhelmed and desperate. Never before had UN inspectors worked under such pressure and in the midst of a war zone. The small team, headed by the Swedish chemical weapons expert ke Sellstrm, was threatened with harm. Their convoy was shot at. But their 41-page report was completed in record time . Sarin was that breed of accident that scientists come to regret. Its inventors worked on insecticides made from organophosphate compounds at the notorious IG Farben chemical company in Nazi Germany. In 1938, they hit on substance 146, a formula that caused massive disruption to the nervous system. The chemical name was isopropyl methylfluorophosphate, but the company renamed it sarin to honour the chemists behind the discovery – Schrader, Ambros, Ritter and Van der Linde – according to Benjamin Garrett's 2009 book The A to Z of Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Warfare. The chemical they created had the grim distinction of being many times more lethal than cyanide. Substance 146 is not hard to make, but it is hard to make without killing yourself. There are more than a dozen recipes that lead to sarin, but all require technical knowhow, proper lab equipment and a serious regard for safety procedures. One major component is isopropanol, more commonly known as rubbing alcohol. Another is made by mixing methylphosphonyl dichloride with hydrogen or sodium fluoride. But methylphosphonyl dichloride is not easy to come by. Under the Chemical Weapons Convention it is listed as a schedule 1 substance, making it one of the most restricted chemicals in existence. Last year, the US and other countries stepped up efforts to block sales to Syria of chemicals that might be used to make sarin. But the country had already amassed substantial stocks of the precursors needed to make the agent. This month, it emerged that Britain had approved export licences to Syria for the sale of more than four tonnes of sodium fluoride between 2004 and 2010, though business secretary Vince Cable said there was no evidence they had been used in the Syrian weapons programme. The exports came on top of sales approved last year for sodium and potassium fluoride under licences that were later revoked on the grounds that they could be used in the manufacture of weapons. Though referred to as a nerve gas, sarin is a liquid at temperatures below 150C. To maximise its potential as a weapon, the substance is usually dispersed from a canister, rocket or missile in a cloud of droplets that are fine enough to be inhaled into the lungs. Inevitably, some evaporates into gas, much as spilt water turns into vapour. The chemical enters the body through the eyes and skin too. Sarin has no smell or taste and is colourless, so the first people may know of its use is when victims start to fall. Sarin takes such a dreadful toll on the body by interfering with a specific but crucial aspect of the nervous system. It blocks an enzyme called acetylcholinesterase, with devastating consequences. Nerves that usually switch on and off to control muscle movements can no longer be switched off. Instead, they fire constantly. There are mild effects: the eyes become irritated, the vision blurred; people's pupils shrink, they drool and vomit. Then there are the lethal effects. Breathing becomes laboured, shallow, erratic. Unable to control their muscles, victims have convulsions. The lungs secrete fluids and when people try to breathe, foam comes from their mouths, often tinged pink with blood. A lethal dose can be as small as a drop and can kill in one to 10 minutes. If people survive the first 20 minutes of a sarin attack, they are likely to live. Soon after sarin was invented, the recipe for the agent was passed to the German army, which set about manufacturing stocks of the weapon. The agent was loaded into shells, but never used on Allied forces in the second world war. At Nuremberg in 1948, one of the inventors, Otto Ambros, was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to eight years in prison. He was released after four years, and whisked off to the US where he worked as a consultant on that country's own chemical weapons programme. In military circles, sarin came to be known by a secret name: GB. A unique document from 1952, one year after Ambros arrived in the US, describes the gruesome effects of sarin poisoning after an unfortunate military accident. On the morning of 7 November 1952, a jet aircraft sped towards Dugway Proving Ground in Tooele, Utah. The sky was clear and the wind was a gentle breeze of 3-4mph. Each of the plane's wing tanks were filled with 100 gallons of sarin. The plan was for the plane to spray the sarin over a target site, but because of a malfunction, each tank still contained 90 gallons of sarin when they were jettisoned in an isolated area of the site at 8.29am. The tanks fell from 2,000ft on to the salt crust of the open desert and burst open as they struck the ground. The sarin, dyed red to help gauge how far it had dispersed, was spread over 38,000 sq ft. An inspection crew was sent out in an ambulance to investigate the site where the tanks had landed. Half an hour before arriving, they all donned gas masks. All except one 32-year-old man. He promptly climbed out of the ambulance and walked towards a crater made by one of the falling tanks. Within 10 seconds, he turned, clutched his chest and made quickly back to the ambulance. He called for his gas mask and stumbled. According to the report: As he staggered, one arm extended and flexed in a jerky manner. He collapsed upon reaching the ambulance. Medics swiftly administered a deep injection of atropine into the man's thigh. This is the standard antidote for sarin, and it works by blocking the agent's effects on nerves. As he breathed, he made screeching sounds and low-pitched gargles. He had rapid, violent convulsions for a minute, his legs and spine extending, his arms flung above his head. He then fell into a flaccid paralysis and stared straight ahead. Two minutes later he made only the occasional gulp for air. Soon his pupils were pinpoints. No arterial pulse could be detected by the aid man, the report says. RAF engineer Ronald Maddison, who died as a result of tests using sarin at Porton Down in 1953. Photograph: PA The details of the exposure continue, recorded in minute, excruciating detail. Miraculously, the man survived after being hooked up to an iron lung resuscitator at a hospital. Nearly three hours after the accident, the report notes: The patient appeared alert and oriented although he complained of severe malaise. The man held the unenviable title of the most severe sarin casualty of the time. The US was not the only country to experiment with sarin in the cold war years. The USSR produced the agent for chemical warfare. And Britain took an interest too. A year after the incident at Dugway, a 20-year-old RAF engineer called Ronald Maddison took part in an experiment at Porton Down, the UK's chemical warfare facility in Wiltshire. At 10.17am on 6 May, Porton scientists dripped liquid sarin on to the arms of Maddison and five others who, for the scientists' safety, were held in a sealed gas chamber. Maddison fell ill and slumped over the table. He was taken to the on-site hospital but died at 11am. In 2004, more than 50 years later, an inquest found that the Ministry of Defence had unlawfully killed Maddison after one of the longest cover-ups in cold war history. Accidents and unethical experiments gave only a glimpse of the horrors that scientists had made possible with the invention of sarin. In the hands of a nation's military, sarin and other agents were a means to kill swiftly such large numbers of people that the figures are quoted as rounded hundreds, even thousands. Saddam Hussein's bombardment of Halabja in northern Iraq lasted two days in 1988 and killed 5,000 people. The attack against the Kurdish people was recognised as an act of genocide by the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal in 2010. It was the largest chemical weapons attack against civilians in history. In 1993, 162 countries signed the Chemical Weapons Convention, which outlawed the manufacture and stockpiling of chemical weapons. Gradually, nations began to destroy their stocks, itself a complex and dangerous task . Engineers came up with some blunt but effective ways of dealing with the problem. One is to strap explosives to rockets, shells or canisters filled with chemical agents and blow them up in an armoured blast chamber. Another is to burn the munitions in an armoured kiln. Stores of chemicals held in barrels are incinerated or neutralised by mixing them with other chemicals. Sophisticated facilities use airtight vessels and process their waste, but they are a luxury. In Iraq in the 1990s, chemical agents were mixed with petrol and burned in a furnace built from bricks in a trench in the desert. The emergency service tend to victims of the Aum Shinrikyo sarin attack on Tokyo's subway in 1995. Photograph: Rex Features The convention did not put the raw chemicals for sarin out of reach. Two years later, in 1995, the Aum Shinrikyo sect punctured bags of homemade sarin in the Tokyo subway. Though only a dozen people were killed, more than 5,500 sought medical help, the vast majority being the worried well who feared they had been exposed. The psychological impact did not end with the attack. Kenichiro Taneda, a doctor at St Luke's International Hospital in Tokyo, recalled the awful realisation that he would have to wheel a young woman who had died in the emergency department past a large crowd to reach the hospital mortuary. So as not to cause more worry he transferred her by keeping an oxygen mask on her face and covering her body with a blanket. Physicians who treated the victims of the Tokyo attack ran extensive tests to look for signs of sarin in blood, urine and other medical samples. The tests, and others developed by the military, have become standards for chemical weapons inspectors looking for evidence that sarin has been used. Sarin itself reacts easily with water and so it breaks down when it meets rain, moisture in the air or sweat. The agent's fragility in water led hospital staff in Syria to uses hoses to drench rooms where they received victims after chemical attacks. For the same reason, sarin does not hang around for long in the environment, or in people. Laboratories can test for the substance, but more often will find breakdown products. The first substance sarin degrades into is isopropyl methylphosphonic acid (IMPA), which is generally regarded as proof positive for sarin. But IMPA itself breaks down, into methylphosphonic acid (MPA). Finding MPA in blood or urine is not a smoking gun for sarin: it can come from other organophosphates. Knowing which one matters. The UN inspectors found concrete evidence that sarin was used with lethal effect in Ghouta on the outskirts of Damascus on 21 August. The team plans to go back soon, to visit Khan al-Assal, Sheik Maqsood and Saraqueb, before submitting a final report. That will end another grim chapter in the story of sarin, and open a new one focused on destroying the weapon.
个人分类: 教学辅导|3730 次阅读|0 个评论

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-4-20 09:59

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部