USnews2012年美国最佳商学院排名： Rank排名 University大学名称 1 Stanford University斯坦福大学 2 Harvard University哈佛大学 3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology麻省理工学院 (Sloan) 3 University of Pennsylvania宾夕法尼亚大学 (Wharton) 5 Northwestern University西北大学 (Kellogg) 5 The University of Chicago芝加哥大学 (Booth) 7 Dartmouth College达特茅斯学院 (Tuck) 7 University of California Berkeley加州大学伯克利分校 (Haas) 9 Columbia University哥伦比亚大学 10 New York University纽约大学 (Stern) 10 Yale University耶鲁大学 12 Duke University杜克大学 (Fuqua) 13 University of Virginia弗吉尼亚大学 (Darden) 14 University of California Los Angeles加州大学洛杉机分校 (Anderson) 14 University of Michigan Ann Arbor密西根大学-安娜堡分校 (Ross) 16 Cornell University康乃尔大学 (Johnson) 17 The University of Texas at Austin德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校 (McCombs) 18 Carnegie Mellon University卡内基美隆大学 (Tepper) 19 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校 (Kenan-Flagler) 20 Washington University in St Louis圣路易斯华盛顿大学 (Olin) 21 University of Minnesota Twin Cities明尼苏达大学Twin Cities分校 (Carlson) 21 University of Southern California南加州大学 (Marshall) 23 Emory University埃默里大学 (Goizueta) 23 Indiana University,Bloomington印地安那大学伯明顿分校 (Kelley) 25 Georgetown University乔治城大学 (McDonough) 25 Ohio State University (Fisher) 27 Arizona State University亚利桑那州立大学 (Carey) 28 Georgia Institute of Technology佐治亚理工学院 28 University of California Davis加州大学戴维斯分校 28 University of Wisconsin Madison威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校 28 Vanderbilt University范德堡大学 (Owen) 32 Brigham Young University杨百翰大学 (Marriott) 32 Texas AM University--College Station (Mays) 34 Boston College波士顿学院 (Carroll) 34 BOSTON University波士顿大学 34 Rice University莱斯大学 (Jones) 37 University of Illinois Urbana Champaign伊利诺伊大学厄本那―香槟分校 37 University of Notre Dame圣母大学 (Mendoza) 37 University of Washington华盛顿大学 (Foster) 40 Penn State University Park宾州州立大学-University Park Campus (Smeal) 40 Tulane University杜兰大学 (Freeman) 40 University of California Irvine加州大学欧文分校 (Merage) 40 The University of Iowa爱荷华大学 (Tippie) 40 University of Texas--Dallas 45 University of Maryland College Park马里兰大学帕克分校 (Smith) 45 University of Rochester罗切斯特大学 (Simon) 47 University of Florida佛罗里达大学 (Hough) 47 Wake Forest University维克森林大学 (Babcock) 49 Michigan State University密歇根州立大学 (Broad) 49 Purdue University,West Lafayette普渡大学西拉法叶校区 (Krannert) 51 University of Arkansas阿肯色大学--Fayetteville (Walton) 52 Babson College (Olin) 52 The George Washington University乔治华盛顿大学 54 University of Missouri Columbia密苏里大学哥伦比亚分校--Columbia (Trulaske) 54 University of South Carolina Columbia南卡罗来纳大学哥伦比亚分校 (Moore) 56 Northeastern University美国东北大学 57 Rutgers University New Brunswick罗格斯大学新伯朗士威校区 and Newark 57 Southern Methodist University南卫理公会大学 (Cox) 57 University of Georgia乔治亚大学 (Terry) 60 Baylor University贝勒大学 (Hankamer) 60 University of Massachusetts Amherst马萨诸塞大学Amherst校区 (Isenberg) 60 The University of Tennessee田纳西大学--Knoxville 63 Auburn University奥本大学 63 Claremont Graduate University (Drucker) 63 Rochester Institute of Technology罗彻斯特理工学院 (Saunders) 63 Temple University天普大学 (Fox) 63 The University of Alabama阿拉巴马大学 (Manderson) 63 The University of Arizona亚利桑那大学 (Eller) 69 Iowa State University爱荷华州立大学 69 Syracuse University雪城大学 (Whitman) 69 University of Colorado Boulder科罗拉多大学波尔得分校 (Leeds) 69 University of Connecticut康涅狄格大学 73 Bentley University (McCallum) 73 Virginia Tech (Pamplin) 75 Pepperdine University佩珀代因大学 (Graziadio) 75 Santa Clara University (Leavey) 75 Thunderbird School of Global Management 75 University at Buffalo--SUNY 75 University of Cincinnati辛辛那提大学 80 Case Western Reserve University凯斯西储大学 (Weatherhead) 80 Texas Christian University德克萨斯基督教大学 (Neeley) 80 The University of Utah犹他大学 (Eccles) 83 College of William and Mary威廉玛丽学院 (Mason) 83 North Carolina State University (Jenkins) 85 CUNY Bernard M. Baruch College (Zicklin) 85 University of Miami迈阿密大学 85 University of Pittsburgh匹兹堡大学 (Katz) 85 Worcester Polytechnic Institute伍斯特理工学院 89 DePaul University德保尔大学 (Kellstadt) 89 Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge路易斯安那州立大学 (Ourso) 91 Howard University霍华德大学 91 The University of Oklahoma俄克拉荷马大学 (Price) 91 University of Oregon俄勒冈大学 (Lundquist) 94 Florida State University佛罗里达州立大学 94 St. Louis University (Cook) 94 University of Houston休斯顿大学 (Bauer) 97 Fordham University福特汉姆大学 97 Miami University (Farmer) 97 Oklahoma State University俄克拉荷马州立大学 (Spears) 97 Pace University (Lubin) 101 Clarkson University克拉克森大学 102 University of Denver丹佛大学 (Daniels) 102 University of Kentucky肯塔基大学 (Gatton) 102 University of Mississippi密西西比大学 105 Hofstra University霍夫斯特拉大学 (Zarb) 105 The University of Kansas堪萨斯大学 107 Abilene Christian University 107 Binghamton University SUNY纽约州立大学宾汉姆顿大学 107 Drexel University德雷塞尔大学 (LeBow) 107 Portland State University 107 Rollins College (Crummer) 107 University of Hawaii--Manoa (Shidler)
最近一期的时代周刊登了一篇评论，认为美国经济的下滑与从70年代开始重用MBA是密切相关的。还举例当前如日中天的苹果公司当年最差的时候就是用MBA来管理公司的。比较有趣的是，在文章结束时，作者引用中国为例，据说中国要在未来几年内开设40多所商学院。作者说这是他听到的最好的消息了。 But the same may soon be true in China, where the state plans to open 40 new graduate schools of business in the next few years. As Lutz puts it, "That's the best news I've heard in years." 这篇文章代表了很多美国人对华尔街资本家贪得无厌的厌恶，以及期望以务实的态度改革本国工业以重现当日的辉煌。 Driven off the Road by M.B.A.s Why a Rise in M.B.A.s Coincided with the Fall of American Industry Bob Lutz, the former Vice Chairman of General Motors, is the most famous also-ran in the auto business. In the course of his 47-year rampage through the industry, he's been within swiping range of the brass ring at Ford, BMW, Chrysler and, most recently, GM, but he's never landed the top gig. It's because he "made the cars too well," he says. It might also have something to do with the fact that Maximum Bob, who could double as a character on Mad Men , is less an éminence grise than a pithy self-promoter who has a tendency to go off corporate message. That said, his new book, Car Guys vs. Bean Counters: The Battle for the Soul of American Business , has a message worth hearing. To get the U.S. economy growing again, Lutz says, we need to fire the M.B.A.s and let engineers run the show. Lutz's main argument is that companies, shareholders and consumers are best served by product-driven executives. In his book, Lutz wisecracks his way through the 1960s design- and technology-led glory days at GM to the late-1970s takeover by gangs of M.B.A.s. Executives, once largely developed from engineering, began emerging from finance. The results ranged from the sobering (managers signing off on inferior products because customers "had no choice") to the hilarious (Cadillac ashtrays that wouldn't open because of corporate mandates that they be designed to function at -40°F). It's pretty easy to imagine Car Guy Lutz removing his mirrored shades and shouting to the cowering line manager, "Well, customers in North Dakota will be happy. Too bad nobody else will!" (See five destructive myths about the U.S. economy.) The auto industry is actually a terrific proxy for a trend toward short-term, myopically balance-sheet-driven management that has infected American business. In the first half of the 20th century, industrial giants like Ford, General Electric, ATT and many others were extremely consumer-focused. They spent most of their time and money using new technologies to create the best possible products and services, regardless of development cost. The idea was, if you build it better, the customers will come. And they did. The pendulum began to swing in the postwar era, when Harvard Business School grad Robert McNamara and his "whiz kids" became famous for using mathematical modeling, game theory and complex statistical analysis for the Army Air Corps, doing things like improving fuel-transport times and scheduling more-efficient bombing raids. McNamara, who later became president of Ford, brought extreme number crunching to the business world, and soon the idea that "if you can measure it, you can manage it" took hold — and no wonder. By the late 1970s, M.B.A.s were flourishing, and engineers were relegated to the geek back rooms. (See why you should still go to college.) This is not to say that the Whiz Kidding of American business yielded no positives; things like the hyperefficient FedEx logistical hubs and the entire consulting industry were born out of it. But ultimately, moving numbers around can do only so much. Over the long haul, you've got to invent or improve real products and services to grow. In the U.S., the growth of the financial industry has only exacerbated the trend toward balance-sheet-driven management. Companies everywhere, but particularly in the U.S., where the banking sector wields the most power, are under tremendous short-term pressure to make their quarterly numbers. This often leads to planning that's reactive rather than smart: force the highest-paid engineers to retire, even if they are the best, and reduce payroll costs across all divisions rather than invest in the ones that are pushing the New New Thing through the pipeline. (See the 20 best- and worst-paid college majors.) It's interesting to note that the one area of the U.S. economy that's adding jobs and increasing productivity and wealth is also the one that is the most relentlessly product- and consumer-focused: Silicon Valley. The company off Highway 101 that best illustrates this point is, of course, Apple. The only time Apple ever lost the plot was when it put the M.B.A.s in charge. As long as college dropout Steve Jobs is in the driver's seat, customers (and shareholders) are happy. The reason is clearly the one Lutz puts forward in his book: "Shoemakers should be run by shoe guys, and software firms by software guys." Meanwhile, despite all the post-financial-crisis soul searching within the business community about the value of an M.B.A., schools are still churning them out. There are, and will be for the foreseeable future, a lot more bean counters than engineers in this country. But the same may soon be true in China, where the state plans to open 40 new graduate schools of business in the next few years. As Lutz puts it, "That's the best news I've heard in years."
标签: 商学院
