上嶋 浩順(Hironobu UESHIMA)卷入撤稿风波 诸平 一家杂志撤回了一名多产的日本麻醉师—— 上嶋 浩順( Hironobu UESHIMA ) 的两份病例报告，此人似乎卷入了一场不当行为调查。 《JA临床报告》（ JA Clinical Reports ）中的两个案例研究，是由东京昭和大学病院 （ Showa University Hospital ） 的 上嶋 浩順( Hironobu UESHIMA ) 和Hiroshi Otake撰写。 根据谷歌学学术研究， 上嶋 浩順(Hironobu UESHIMA) 大约有170篇以他的名字命名的论文，所以《撤稿观察》（ Retraction Watch ）对其十分重视，将密切关注此事的进展。 两篇被撤回的文章分别是2016年和2018年的 发表在 《JA临床报告》上。《JA临床报告》是施普林格公司出版的一份期刊，不过它隶属于日本麻醉学家协会主办的一种期刊。 通过Scopus数据库检索，昭和大学病院 （ Showa University Hospital ） 麻酔科的 上嶋 浩順 ( Hironobu UESHIMA )有162篇论文署有其名,详见截图。 关于其人撤稿信息请注意浏览《撤稿观察》（ Retraction Watch ）网站的最新报道。 近2020年以来已经发表论文10余篇。摘引于下，仅供参考。 文献标题 作者 年份 来源出版物 施引文献 Transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange can be utilized in tracheal stenosis caused by thyroid tumor Ueshima, H. , Goda, T. , Otake, H. 2020 Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 0 Clavipectoral fascial plane block in a patient with dual antiplatelet therapy undergoing emergent clavicular surgery Ueshima, H. , Ishihara, T. , Hosokawa, M. , Otake, H. 2020 Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 0 Cadaveric study of the spread of injectate in thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondral approach Ueshima, H. , Takeda, Y. , Ohtsuka, A. 2020 Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 0 Below-knee amputation following the pectineus muscle plane block and sciatic nerve block Ueshima, H. , Otake, H. 2020 Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 0 Thoraco lumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block: A systematic review of the literature Ince, I. , Shimada, T. , Ueshima, H. , Hassan, M. , Turan, A. 2020 Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 0 Cadaveric study of the spread of injectate for several types of spinal canal block Ueshima, H. , Takeda, Y. , Ohtsuka, A. 2020 Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 0 Use of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation simulator for objective evaluation of the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation objectively Ishikawa, Y. , Ueshima, H. 2020 Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 1 Blocking of the saphenous and obturator nerves using a pectineus muscle plane block Ueshima, H. , Sawada, A. , Yamakage, M. , Fujimiya, M. 2020 Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 1 Hematoma after the thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach (TAPAblock) Ueshima, H. , Otake, H. 2020 Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 0 Thoracoabdominal nerves block through the perichondral approach for effective perioperative analgesia during upper abdominal surgery Ueshima, H. , Hiroshi, O. 2020 Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 0
印麻醉学研究者 一次撤稿10篇 诸平 印度的一组麻醉学研究人员已经从一份期刊 （ Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia ，Saudi J Anaesth ） 上，一次性撤回了10篇论文，是因为这10篇论文与其他各种论文有很高的相似度，而且有大量数据造假的证据。 《 沙特麻醉杂志》（ Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia ，Saudi J Anaesth ）已经撤回了印度加尔各答（ Kolkata ）的 Anjan Das （5篇是第一作者，3篇是第二作者，2篇是第三作者）及其同事的10篇文章，详见下面 , , , , , , , , , 。这些论文分别是在2014-2018年之间在 《 沙特麻醉杂志》（Saudi J Anaesth）上 发表的 。 1. Das A, Chhaule S, Bhattacharya S, Basunia SR, Mitra T, Halder PS, Chattopadhyay S, Mandal SK. Controlled hypotension in day care functional endoscopic sinus surgery: A comparison between esmolol and dexmedetomidine: A prospective, double-blind, and randomized study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Jul-Sep;10(3):276-82. 2. Das A , Mukherje A, Chhaule S, Chattopadhyay S, Halder PS, Mitra T, Basunia SR, Mandal SK. Induced hypotension in ambulatory functional endoscopic sinus surgery: A comparison between dexmedetomidine and clonidine as premedication. A prospective, double-blind, and randomized study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Jan-Mar;10(1):74-80. 3. Banerjee D, Das A , Majumdar S, Mandal RD, Dutta S, Mukherjee A, Chakraborty A, Chattopadhyay S. PONV in Ambulatory surgery: A comparison between Ramosetron and Ondansetron: a prospective, double-blinded, and randomized controlled study. Saudi J Anaesth 2014;8:25-9. 4. Mukherjee A, Das A , Mayur N, Bhattacharyya C, Biswas H, Mitra T, Roybasunia S, Mandal SK. Comparative evaluation of analgesic sparing efficacy between dexmedetomidine and clonidine used as adjuvant to ropivacaine in thoracic paravertebral block for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2018 Oct-Dec;12(4):548-554. 5. Bhar D, RoyBasunia S, Das A , Kundu SB, Mondal RC, Halder PS, Mandal SK, Chattopadhyay S. A comparison between intrathecal clonidine and neostigmine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in the subarachnoid block for elective abdominal hysterectomy operations: A prospective, double-blind and randomized controlled study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Apr-Jun;10(2):121-6. 6. Das A, Dutta S, Chattopadhyay S, Chhaule S, Mitra T, Banu R, Mandal P, Chandra M. Pain relief after ambulatory hand surgery: A comparison between dexmedetomidine and clonidine as adjuvant in axillary brachial plexus block: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Jan-Mar;10(1):6-12. 7. Das A, Majumdar S, Halder S, Chattopadhyay S, Pal S, Kundu R, Mandal SK, Chattopadhyay S. Effect of dexmedetomidine as adjuvant in ropivacaine-induced supraclavicular brachial plexus block: A prospective, double-blinded and randomized controlled study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Nov;8(Suppl 1):S72-7. 8. Mitra T, Das A , Majumdar S, Bhattacharyya T, Mandal RD, Hajra BK. Prevention of altered hemodynamics after spinal anesthesia: A comparison of volume preloading with tetrastarch, succinylated gelatin and ringer lactate solution for the patients undergoing lower segment caesarean section. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Oct;8(4):456-62. 9. Das A , Majumdar S, Kundu R, Mitra T, Mukherjee A, Hajra BK, Dutta S, Chattopadhyay S. Pain relief in day care arthroscopic knee surgery: A comparison between intra-articular ropivacaine and levobupivacaine: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;8(3):368-73. 10. Manuar MB, Majumdar S, Das A, Hajra BK, Dutta S, Mukherjee D, Mitra T, Kundu R. Pain relief after Arthroscopic Knee Surgery: A comparison of intra-articular ropivacaine, fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;8(2):233-7. 更多信息请浏览《 撤稿观察 》（ Retraction Watch ）的相关报道。
50 年麻醉学原创性研究论文作者性别差异分析（附原文） 诸平 据《科学计量学》( Scientometrics )网站报道， 2019年10月即将出版的一期杂志刊登了一篇来自美国密尔沃基退伍军人事务医疗中心（The Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center，Milwaukee，USA）和美国密尔沃基威斯康辛医学院（The Medical College of Wisconsin，Milwaukee，USA）麻醉系的研究人员合作研究结果。该研究对美国两大麻醉学期刊在1967-2017年之间，发表的原创性研究论文作者性别差异的分析—— Pagel, P.S., Freed, J.K. Lien, C.A. A 50-year analysis of gender differences in United States authorship of original research articles in two major anesthesiology journals. Scientometrics , 2019, 121(1): 371-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03192-y 。 pagel2019.pdf 与男性相比较， 女性在许多领域有弱于男士之势，在学术医学领域也不例外。但是，最近美国的研究结果已被证明，女性比例在近半个世纪以来已经有了大幅度的提高。以作者“性别差异”为例，存在于大多数医学专业，但美国密尔沃基的研究论文作者对其性别差异问题，直到最近才在麻醉学中提了出来。研究者分析了作者发表在《麻醉学》（ Anesthesiology ）和《麻醉与镇痛》（ Anesthesia and Analgesia ）2种杂志，与麻醉学有关的原创性论文。结果发现：从1967年到2017年之间，在麻醉学研究方面发表的论文，其中有女性作者参与的研究论文，随着时间的推移有逐步增加之势,而且有越来越多的女性担任了研究成果的第一作者、最后一名作者以及通讯作者的角色。分别以1967年、1977年、1987年、1997年、2007年和2017年发表在《麻醉学》和《麻醉 与 镇痛》2种杂志上的研究论文作为研究对象。以通讯作者来确定每一篇文章的原产国;分析中只包括了来自美国的研究论文。每个作者的性别都是通过检查名字来确定的，如果有必要时通过作者的机构网站或互联网搜索来进行验证。对于每一篇论文的第一作者、最后一名作者、通信作者以及合作作者分别进行统计。如果有的话，还需要确定联邦政府的赠款支持状况。有98.2%的作者确定了性别。共发表研究论文1350篇，涉及作者6165人(其中女性1319人，占21.4%)源自美国。女性作者在《麻醉学》杂志上发表的研究论文，时间依赖性从1967年的6.2%上升到2017年的31.3%。女性第一作者、最后一名作者和通讯作者的比例分别从1967年的5.1%、8.9%和2.5%上升到2017年的37.0%、22.2%和25.9%。随着时间的推移，每篇文章的女性合著者数量也在增加。在《麻醉与镇痛》方面也观察到类似的结果。在这两种期刊中，至少包含一名女性的文章比例随着时间的推移逐渐上升(例如，《麻醉学》，1967年为12.6%，2017年为90.7%)。发表在《麻醉学》上的文章比发表在《麻醉与镇痛》上的文章更有可能得到联邦政府的资助。从1967年到2017年，美国《麻醉学》和《麻醉与镇痛》研究论文中的女性第一作者的比例有所上升，接近目前担任学术职务的比例。在过去50年里，虽然女性最后一名作者和通讯作者的比例也增加了，但女性在这些角色中的代表性仍然相对不足。更多信息请注意浏览原文( pagel2019.pdf )。 Abstract Underrepresentation of women in academic medicine is strongly linked to differences in men’s and women’s scholarship and has been shown to substantially reduce the overall quality of research. An authorship “gender gap” exists in most medical specialties, but differences in research article authorship have only been recently suggested in anesthesiology. We analyzed authorship of US research articles published in Anesthesiology and Anesthesia and Analgesia (journals that publish two-thirds of all anesthesiology-related articles) from 1967 to 2017 to test the hypothesis that publication of anesthesiology research articles by women authors has progressively increased over time along with greater involvement in first, last, and corresponding author roles. Research articles appearing in Anesthesiology and Anesthesia and Analgesia in 1967, 1977, 1987, 1997, 2007, and 2017 were identified. The corresponding author was used to determine the country of origin of each article; only articles originating from the US were included in the analysis. Each author’s gender was determined by inspection of the first name and verified using the author’s institutional website or an internet search if necessary. First, last, and corresponding authors as well as co-authors were noted for each article. Federal grant support was also identified if present. Gender was identified in 98.2% of authors. A total of 1350 research articles with 6165 authors (1319 female; 21.4%) originated from the US. The percentage of women authors increased in a time-dependent manner in Anesthesiology from 6.2% in 1967 to 31.3% in 2017. The proportion of women who were first, last, and corresponding authors increased from 5.1%, 8.9%, and 2.5%, respectively, in 1967 to 37.0%, 22.2%, and 25.9% in 2017, respectively. The number of women co-authors per article also increased over time. Similar results were observed in Anesthesia and Analgesia . The percentage of articles that included at least one woman rose progressively over time in both journals (e.g., Anesthesiology , 12.6% in 1967 versus 90.7% in 2017). Articles published in Anesthesiology were more likely to be supported by a federal grant than those in Anesthesia and Analgesia . The percentage of women first authors of US research articles in Anesthesiology and Anesthesia and Analgesia increased from 1967 to 2017 and approaches the proportion who currently hold academic appointments. Women’s last and corresponding authorship also increased during the past 50years, but women continue to be relatively underrepresented in these roles.
德国一首席麻醉学家被确认有学术不端，被开除 德国 Ludwighafen 医院的首席麻醉学家 Joachim Boldt 宣称创立了一种更为安全有效的体外循环麻醉方法， 但因为伦理问题被指控， 莱茵兰 - 普法尔茨州 医学委员会展开为期一个月调查，发现该项研究临床研究中所参与的病人有很多都没有经过伦理委员会的批准，这项不端导致德国“麻醉与无痛杂志”（ Journal Anesthesia Analgesia ）将其 22 篇相关论文全部撤除。 早在去年 12 月调查结论出来之前 Boldt 已被开除。 医学伦理问题不是个小问题，国内医学研究把这不当回事，顶多是摆摆样子。另外，把人当小白鼠，还收人钱，不少吧？ 。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。 http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/ Research misconduct confirmed at German clinic - March 04, 2011 The journal Anesthesia Analgesia has announced the retraction of 22 papers by German Joachim Boldt on results of medical studies for which he had not obtained the required ethical approval. The former chief anaesthesiologist of the Ludwighafen Hospital claimed to have developed a safe and effective method for anesthetising patients that keeps their blood circulating during surgery. The Medical Board of the state of Rheinland-Pfalz, which last month concluded an investigation into Boldt’s practices, found that he had conducted most studies involving patients without the necessary approval by an ethics committee.
标签: 麻醉学
