2011年5月20日下午，美国霍华德• 休斯医学研究所研究员、德克萨斯大学西南医学中心陈志坚教授访问我院，并做了题为Ubiquitin Signaling in Immune Defense - the magic of forming a chain学术报告。 晚上8时，陈志坚教授在院会议室与生研院全院师生们进行了热烈而深入的交流，分享了他丰富的人生经历和卓有成就的科研成功。在轻松的氛围中，学生们就如何培养自己对科学实验的研究兴趣、如何提高实验技能以及培养独立思考的能力等提出了自己的疑惑，陈教授耐心地一一作答，结合自己的成长经历，着重强调做研究要有自己的想法，用实验数据说话，并对年轻师生学子给出中肯的意见和建议。
（1）University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign伊利诺伊大学厄本那—香槟分校 （2）The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校 （3）Syracuse University雪城大学 （4）University of Washington华盛顿大学 （5）University of Michigan--Ann Arbor密西根大学-安娜堡分校 （6）Rutgers University, New Brunswick罗格斯大学新伯朗士威校区 （7）Indiana University,Bloomington印地安那大学伯明顿分校 （8）University of Pittsburgh匹兹堡大学 （9）The University of Texas at Austin德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校 （10）Florida State University佛罗里达州立大学 （11）Drexel University德雷塞尔大学 （12）University of Wisconsin–Madison威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校 （13）Simmons College (MA) （14）University of California Los Angeles加州大学洛杉机分校 （15）University of Maryland, College Park 马里兰大学帕克分校 （16）University of North Texas北德克萨斯州大学 （17）The University of Tennessee田纳西大学 （18）Wayne State University韦恩州立大学 （19）Kent State University肯特州立大学 （20）University at Buffalo State University of New York纽约州立大学水牛城分校 （21）University of South Carolina Columbia南卡罗来纳大学哥伦比亚分校 （22）University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee （23）State University of New York at Albany纽约州立大学奥尔巴尼分校 （24）Catholic University of America (DC) （25）Louisiana State University-Baton Rouge （26）University of Kentucky肯塔基大学 （27）University of Missouri Columbia密苏里大学哥伦比亚分校 （28）University of Oklahoma （29）University of South Florida南佛罗里达大学 （30）San Jose State University圣何塞州立大学 （31）University of Alabama-Tuscaloosa （32）University of Hawaii-Manoa 转自： http://www.university-list.net/meiguo/paiming/dx-1064.htm
Energy and Water：Gas Shales in Texas From Annual Report，2010 Bureau of Economic Geology，The University of Texas at Austin，TX 翻译：李庆辉 过去的十年里，一种被地质学界普遍认可存在，但苦于缺乏合适技术进行商业开采的资源使得天然气的产量有了飞速增加。经过将近一个多世纪常规油气资源的开采，1990年代水力压裂技术的突破使得生产者可以开采烃源岩中蕴含的宝贵资源。这项技术主要由水平钻井和所谓的滑溜水压裂组成，其中水平井技术极大地增加了井筒和地层的沟通面积，清水和各种添加剂通过高压注入低渗岩层，压裂岩石并建立起油气运移至井筒的裂缝网络。滑溜水压裂技术依靠快速（紊流）流动携带支撑剂（通常为细砂）到达压力降低后裂缝需要保持开启的地方。而在早先的压裂中，都是依靠压裂液的粘性来输送支撑剂。找到烃源岩的另一个影响是干井将不复存在；这种资源可以通过大面积的区域进行产气。这中产气能力与单井有限开采范围的直接结果就是比常规油气更大的钻井密度。 压裂作业过程通常需要大量清水，每次作业大约在3~6百万加仑，持续时间为数天或者更短。来自Bureau的J.P.Nicot率领团队在德州水发展基金的资助下开展对德州不同区块用水量的调查，结果表明至今约有3300万加仑的清水被用于北德州Barnett地区压裂作业中，这一速率将继续维持在660万-825万加仑每年的水平。过去两年新的区块也已展露头角包括东德州的Haynesville和南德州的Eagle Ford，这些区块2010年用水量在33万-132万加仑。Barnett地区用水量将保持在目前水平，其他区块不久的将来就会有急速增长出现。研究发现，这些用水量与煤矿和其他大型工业用水差不多，只占德州用水量的一小部分而已。天然气作业公司正在试图寻求节水的方法（如循环利用），只是目前返排水（部分携带天然气）不是被有效利用，而是通过深井注入来处置。 与此同时，受资助于GTI和RPSEA，Bureau也在调研和寻找Barnett地区代替水的资源，尤其是当作业者转向水资源稀缺的Fort Worth核心区。可供考虑的选择包括地下咸水（Brackish Aquifers），地方和工业水处理工厂的排放水。这项研究将在不久之后社会普遍极大关注页岩气开采相关问题后得到扩大。
2007年Geology 地质学专业排名 1 Stanford University斯坦福大学 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology麻省理工学院 3 California Institute of Technology加州理工学院 Penn State University Park宾州州立大学-University Park Campus 5 University of Michigan Ann Arbor密西根大学-安娜堡分校 The University of Texas at Austin德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校 7 The University of Arizona亚利桑那大学 8 University of California Berkeley加州大学伯克利分校 9 University of Wisconsin Madison威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校 10 University of Washington华盛顿大学 11 Harvard University哈佛大学 12 Columbia University,The School of General Studies哥伦比亚大学 Cornell University康乃尔大学 Princeton University普林斯顿大学 University of California Los Angeles加州大学洛杉机分校 16 University of California Santa Barbara加州大学圣塔芭芭拉分校 17 Yale University耶鲁大学 18 University of California Davis加州大学戴维斯分校 University of Colorado Boulder科罗拉多大学波尔得分校 20 Brown University布朗大学 University of Minnesota Twin Cities明尼苏达大学Twin Cities分校 22 Colorado School of Mines科罗拉多矿业大学 23 Johns Hopkins University约翰霍普金斯大学 University of California San Diego加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校 University of Southern California南加州大学 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University弗吉尼亚理工大学 2007年Earth Sciences 地球科学专业排名 1 California Institute of Technology加州理工学院 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology麻省理工学院 Stanford University斯坦福大学 4 University of California Berkeley加州大学伯克利分校 5 Columbia University,The School of General Studies哥伦比亚大学 University of Michigan Ann Arbor密西根大学-安娜堡分校 7 Penn State University Park宾州州立大学-University Park Campus 8 The University of Arizona亚利桑那大学 9 Harvard University哈佛大学 The University of Texas at Austin德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校 11 Princeton University普林斯顿大学 University of California Los Angeles加州大学洛杉机分校 University of Washington华盛顿大学 Yale University耶鲁大学 15 Cornell University康乃尔大学 University of California San Diego加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校 The University of Chicago芝加哥大学 University of Wisconsin Madison威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校 19 Brown University布朗大学 University of California Santa Cruz加州大学圣克鲁兹分校 21 Johns Hopkins University约翰霍普金斯大学 University of California Davis加州大学戴维斯分校 University of California Santa Barbara加州大学圣塔芭芭拉分校 University of Minnesota Twin Cities明尼苏达大学Twin Cities分校 25 Rice University莱斯大学 University of Colorado Boulder科罗拉多大学波尔得分校 Washington University in St Louis圣路易斯华盛顿大学 28 Stony Brook University SUNY纽约州立大学石溪分校 University of Southern California南加州大学 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University弗吉尼亚理工大学 31 Arizona State University亚利桑那州立大学 Colorado School of Mines科罗拉多矿业大学 Northwestern University西北大学 34 Duke University杜克大学 Indiana University,Bloomington印地安那大学伯明顿分校 Texas AM University德州AM大学 University of Illinois Urbana Champaign伊利诺伊大学厄本那—香槟分校 38 Rutgers University New Brunswick罗格斯大学新伯朗士威校区 University of Hawaii-Manoa University of Maryland College Park马里兰大学帕克分校 University of New Mexico University of Oregon俄勒冈大学 43 The Ohio State University,Columbus俄亥俄州立大学哥伦布分校 Oregon State University俄勒冈州立大学 Purdue University,West Lafayette普渡大学西拉法叶校区 University of Miami迈阿密大学 University of Rhode Island The University of Utah犹他大学 49 Dartmouth College达特茅斯学院 Lehigh University利哈伊大学 New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology University of Massachusetts Amherst马萨诸塞大学Amherst校区 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校 University of Wyoming 55 BOSTON University波士顿大学 Georgia Institute of Technology佐治亚理工学院 University of Alaska-Fairbanks The University of Kansas堪萨斯大学 The University of Oklahoma俄克拉荷马大学 60 Louisiana State University-Baton Rouge Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute伦斯勒理工学院 Binghamton University SUNY纽约州立大学宾汉姆顿大学 University of California Riverside加州大学河滨分校 University of Florida佛罗里达大学 University of Nevada Reno内华达大学里诺校区 University of Rochester罗切斯特大学 67 The University of Georgia乔治亚大学 University of Pennsylvania宾夕法尼亚大学 University of South Carolina 70 Colorado State University科罗拉多州立大学 Florida State University佛罗里达州立大学 Michigan State University密歇根州立大学 University of Illinois at Chicago伊利诺大学芝加哥校区 The University of Iowa爱荷华大学 University of Nebraska Lincoln内布拉斯加大学林肯分校 The University of Tennessee田纳西大学 77 Michigan Technological University密歇根理工大学 University of Cincinnati辛辛那提大学 University of Missouri Columbia密苏里大学哥伦比亚分校 University of New Hampshire新罕布什尔大学 University of Notre Dame圣母大学 Geology（Ph.D.) 1. California Institute of Technology 4.9 2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 4.8 3. Stanford University (CA) 4.5 University of California-Berkeley 4.5 Sedimentology/Stratigraphy 1. University of Texas-Austin 2. University of Michigan-Ann Arbor 3. Pennsylvania State University-University Park Tectonics/Structure 1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2. Stanford University (CA) 3. California Institute of Technology Geochemistry 1. California Institute of Technology 2. University of Michigan-Ann Arbor 3. University of California-Berkeley Hydrogeology 1. University of Arizona 2. Stanford University (CA) 3. University of Wisconsin-Madison Paleontology 1. University of California-Berkeley 2. University of Chicago 3. Harvard University (MA)
据美国华盛顿邮报10月10日报道，中海油将付给 Chesapeake Energy 公司22亿美元获得南德克萨斯石油与页岩气项目的1/3的利益，还将支付数十亿美元共享未来几年的开发费用。。。。。 Chinese oil company, Chesapeake Energy enter deal for shale project in Texas By Steven Mufson Washington Post Staff Writer Sunday, October 10, 2010; 11:06 PM The China National Offshore Oil Corp. will pay Chesapeake Energy $2.2 billion for a one-third interest in a South Texas oil and natural gas shale project and will pay billions of dollars more for its share of development costs over the next several years. Chesapeake Energy, an Oklahoma City-based domestic exploration company, announced the deal Sunday night, saying it will help speed development of resources on 600,000 acres in the Eagle Ford shale play that could help keep natural gas prices low and boost production of unconventional U.S. oil resources. They're providing the capital and we're providing the expertise and assets, and the output will be the development of American assets, less U.S. dependence on foreign oil and the creation of 20,000 jobs and tax revenues for all levels of government, Aubrey K. McClendon, Chesapeake's chief executive, said in an interview. The investment by CNOOC is one of the company's biggest. Other CNOOC investments around the world have been aimed in part at securing sources of oil for China's growing economy, but this investment will not result in any oil shipments to China. Chesapeake will sell the resources, almost certainly in the United States, and send CNOOC its share of the proceeds. Chesapeake has been seeking to raise money to help develop its extensive inventory of oil and gas acreage. The company has also been trying to pare its debt, which peaked at about 60 percent of the company's book value and which on Sept. 30 stood at about 42 percent. McClendon said the company's target was in the 30s. CNOOC will pay $1.1 billion now and another $1.1 billion over the next two years by covering 75 percent of Chesapeake's share of development costs. After that, CNOOC will pay a third of the cost of all wells, which run about $6 million each and could number 5,000 or more over the next few years as the region is developed, McClendon said. Chesapeake said CNOOC's investment will enable Chesapeake to quadruple the number of rigs it has drilling in the region to about 40 by the end of 2012. Given the cost of development, many independent companies such as Chesapeake have been looking overseas for investors. U.S.-based oil giants such as Exxon Mobil and Conoco Phillips already have stakes in the region. Last week, Statoil and Talisman bought about 100,000 acres from Denver-based Enduring Resources. They paid about the same price as CNOOC did for its interest. China has some shale gas, but the deal with Chesapeake does not involve any technology transfer or future project in China, McClendon said. He said Chesapeake has its hands full trying to develop resources in the United States. Unlike shale developments elsewhere in the United States, the Eagle Ford has greater potential to produce crude oil as well as natural gas, McClendon said. He estimated that the United States could ultimately produce half a million barrels a day from shale. The country consumes 19.5 million barrels of oil a day, most of it imported. The development of oil and gas from shale has aroused controversy over questions of how it would affect water supplies. And so far, most shale developments in the United States recently have produced natural gas, much of it from Pennsylvania and other parts of the northeast. Chesapeake's embedded safety culture and integrated environmental protection strategies will be adopted to safeguard personnel and the surface and subsurface environment, Chesapeake said in its news release.
标签: 德克萨斯
