Dear authors:

I write you in regards to manuscript 11-XXXX entitled "XXXXXXXXXXXX" which you submitted to the Journal of Mountain Science.

In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has been denied publication in the Journal of Mountain Science.

Thank you for considering the Journal of Mountain Science for the publication of your research. I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts.

Sincerely,

Journal Admin

Journal of Mountain Science Editorial Office

jms@imde.ac.cn

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

1. Lack of important results to evaluate its contribution.

2. Lack of correlation between purpose and results

3. Logistic structure of the manuscript is not clear

4. Lack of enough scientific evidences, data or materials to support author's conclusion

5. Authors have not got precisely the understanding of "Expoure, Sensitivity and Adaptation" based on sumitted manuscript;

6. Lack of image and/or table presentation.

7. Fundamentally weak hypothesis

8. Lacking in logic, initial premise not logically supported by methods and results 

………..