博文
质疑Dr Evan Kass, 皆谈肖手术
||||
科学网转载了几篇文章，题目‘[转载]Evan Kass: 肖传国是一位无与伦比的天才的外科医生’. 首先，西方人讲话往往用夸张的词来渲染效果，如 incredible, great, fantastic, awesome, 译成中文都不得了，竟然成了‘无与伦比的天才’， 简直可笑。
其次， Dr Kass的NIH项目本意是用比较系统的方法来验证肖手术的可行性， 见其标书：
这个88%, 87%从何而来？ 从肖而来？但肖亦是这个项目的co-investigator!
科学网转载的这篇Dr Kass对于肖被捕的消息的评论，本是随意写就，但竟然成了证据。 现在看来Dr Kass本人也开始下不了台了， 请看他更近期的comment:
https://m.sciencenet.cn/blog-467350-367641.html
上一篇：《坎贝尔泌尿学》对肖传国等有关反射通道的动物实验的记载
下一篇：细胞结构及一个受力模型
其次， Dr Kass的NIH项目本意是用比较系统的方法来验证肖手术的可行性， 见其标书：
Dr. Xiao developed and is performing a novel procedure in China that connects a functioning, healthy lumbar spinal nerve root to the sacral nerve that controls the bladder. The end result is the creation of a new reflex where the bladder can be emptied by scratching or stimulating the skin supplied by that spinal nerve root. He has reported that in 92 SCI patients, 88% regained bladder control within one year after the nerve rerouting surgery and in 110 children with spina bifida, reported success in 87% at one year.
这个88%, 87%从何而来？ 从肖而来？但肖亦是这个项目的co-investigator!
科学网转载的这篇Dr Kass对于肖被捕的消息的评论，本是随意写就，但竟然成了证据。 现在看来Dr Kass本人也开始下不了台了， 请看他更近期的comment:
Evan Kass
Please do not misunderstand my position. I have no information about whether or not Dr Fang committed plagerism and therefore I dd not accuse him of such an act and I do not now I was merely reporting the information that I heard from Dr Xiao because it is my understanding that the difficulties between Dr Fang and Dr Xiao was a result of this charge by Dr Xiao, and a major reason for the ongoing feud between these two men. In my opinion, when feelings of revenge, whether justified or not justified, come to motivate behavior, one can not expect that individual to be an objecive critic. It seems to me that the feud between these two men has continued long after a simple resolution of the situation was possible and now we have reached the point of no return in this feud. This battle seems to be one that no one will win, and there will be no good that results.
其实，这本是一个在动物做实验的一个结果，可能有潜在的临床价值，但离真正的临床验证到批准使用尚有很长很长的路：手术有什么风险？有什么后遗症？更进一步病理研究， 多医院，多医疗中心的clinical trial, 等等。Dr Kass既然‘趟了这趟浑水’， 我们就看事件如何进展吧。
Please do not misunderstand my position. I have no information about whether or not Dr Fang committed plagerism and therefore I dd not accuse him of such an act and I do not now I was merely reporting the information that I heard from Dr Xiao because it is my understanding that the difficulties between Dr Fang and Dr Xiao was a result of this charge by Dr Xiao, and a major reason for the ongoing feud between these two men. In my opinion, when feelings of revenge, whether justified or not justified, come to motivate behavior, one can not expect that individual to be an objecive critic. It seems to me that the feud between these two men has continued long after a simple resolution of the situation was possible and now we have reached the point of no return in this feud. This battle seems to be one that no one will win, and there will be no good that results.
其实，这本是一个在动物做实验的一个结果，可能有潜在的临床价值，但离真正的临床验证到批准使用尚有很长很长的路：手术有什么风险？有什么后遗症？更进一步病理研究， 多医院，多医疗中心的clinical trial, 等等。Dr Kass既然‘趟了这趟浑水’， 我们就看事件如何进展吧。
https://m.sciencenet.cn/blog-467350-367641.html
上一篇：《坎贝尔泌尿学》对肖传国等有关反射通道的动物实验的记载
下一篇：细胞结构及一个受力模型
