方锦清的博客天地分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/Fangjinqin 写博客我是小学生,向网友学习,建设和谐友谊乐观豁达的博客天地

博文

与敖平继续讨论统计物理问题【5】

已有 3489 次阅读 2012-3-15 08:51 |个人分类:杂谈评论|系统分类:海外观察|关键词:学者| 统计, University, 物理, Exchange, Comment

与敖平继续讨论统计物理问题【5】
 
 
11:35 PM (9 hours ago)
to me, Ping, Ping, Ping
 
 
Hi, Ao Ping,
Thanks Chen Lao Shi for introducing me to this email exchange; I am gland to
know Professor Fang.
I have one quick comment:  Frank Kelly of Cambridge University (who was just elected into US NAE this year as a foreign member) has been working on a stochastic approach to network for many years.  In some sense, he is one of the 先行者.
  
http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~frank/
In 1979, he already published a book
  
http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~frank/rsn.html
in which the issue you have emphasized constantly, the issue of detailed balance,
has been extensively discussed.  The Markov network approach (both as process and
as Gibbs measure of interacting systems) is very much in the same spirit as your
Darwinian dynamics. It puts a dynamics on the structure.
Best wishes to you all,
Hong.
 
 
Fwd: comments on Prigogine type approach to nonequilib​rium processes-​II
 
10:52 AM (26 minutes ago,2012316)
to me
 
----- 转发的邮件 -----
发件人: "Jin Wang" <
jin.d.wang@gmail.com>
收件人:
aoping@sjtu.edu.cn
抄送: hqian@u.washington.edu
发送时间: 星期四, 2012年 3 月 15日 下午 9:30:06
主题: Re: comments on Prigogine type approach to nonequilibrium processes-II
Ping,
It is great that people in China are catching up. In fact, I believe the future of development (at least a significant part) will be in China.
Cheers!
Jin
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 15, 2012, at 6:28 AM, aoping@sjtu.edu.cn wrote:
>
> Here is a second one.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Ping
>
> ................................................................


https://m.sciencenet.cn/blog-266190-547908.html

上一篇:与敖平继续讨论统计物理问题【4】
下一篇:一位老科技干部谈对“创新”的看法

0

该博文允许注册用户评论 请点击登录 评论 (0 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-6-1 21:23

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部