韬何呆韬卵谈分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/Sonny 追求理性的无知者。

博文

投稿被拒的困惑

已有 7367 次阅读 2010-5-13 21:12 |个人分类:未分类|系统分类:论文交流|关键词:学者| 拒稿, 同行审议

前阵子本人将一篇论文投给一个杂志(级别不高,IF2点多),本来抱有一些希望的,没想到外审后被拒,下面是编辑部Decision Letter的部分内容:

Dear Dr Zhan,

In addition to myself, two expert reviewers in the field have evaluated your manuscript. I regret to inform you that based on this assessment, we are unable to accept your manuscript for publication in******.This is clearly an area of great interest and potential importance, we are looking for analyses such as you have attempted. Unfortunately, as articulated by both reviewers, there are flaws with the approaches of your design. I thought it easier to reject this article in its present form as you may wish to submit elsewhere. On the other hand, if you want to do a major rewrite and perhaps reanalysis on the topic, I'd be prepared to consider it as a completely new article.*************************

Prof. ******
Editor-in-Chief
 
 

遵照编辑的意见,我按照两位reviewer的意见将论文进行了大修,再次投到原杂志,没想到这次连初审都没通过,请看编辑部回复:

Dear Dr Zhan,

You previously submitted this ms to ****** in a different format; it was reviewed and rejected. I regret to inform you that based on this assessment and earlier fair decision, we are unable to accept this particular version for publication in ************.

It is unusual to handle a resubmission of a rejected article; kindly do not send it to us again.

回复的是同一个编辑,他之前的意见并不反对我将文章大修后重投的,而后来我真这么做时却直接拒稿了。

看来是文章的内容实在太次,编辑部都懒得处理了。

一声长叹。。。。。。





投稿与审稿
https://m.sciencenet.cn/blog-321345-323966.html

上一篇:粗谈中医“号脉”
下一篇:请教专业人士:关于随机方法

0

发表评论 评论 (4 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

全部作者的精选博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-13 20:27

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部