Reaching out across the Web .. ...分享 http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/zuojun Zuojun Yu, physical oceanographer, freelance English editor

博文

Superpowers in geosciences

已有 2881 次阅读 2011-11-13 07:23 |个人分类:Thoughts of Mine|系统分类:海外观察|关键词:学者| AGU, AMS, superpowers

As a meteorologist (BS and MS) and an oceanographer (Ph.D), I have known the AGU and the AMS for a long time. As a contributing author on ocean modeling, I know where I would go to submit my manuscripts before I ever heard of the IF (impact factor).

A recent conversation with a friend prompted me to take another look at these two societies again, which made me realize what superpowers they are! (Just check out EGU and AOGS yourself. There is no comparison.)

AGU vs. AMS (where "A" stands for American)


AMS:

The AMS, founded in 1919, is the nation's leading professional society for those involved in the atmospheric and related sciences. With more than 11,000 (13,000?) members, the Society promotes the development and dissemination of information on atmospheric, oceanic, and hydrologic sciences through scientific journals, conferences, and public education programs across the country.


AGU:

The American Geophysical Union (AGU) is an international non-profit scientific association with over 60,000 members. Established in 1919 as a committee within the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences, AGU was independently incorporated in 1972. Since its founding, AGU is dedicated to furthering the sciences of geophysics through the individual efforts of our members and in cooperation with other national and international scientific organizations. These goals are met through publishing scientific journals and other technical publications, sponsoring scientific meetings of various sizes throughout the year and a variety of other educational and scientific activities.


My impression was that the AMS was more serious about publication quality than the AGU. This is probably due to my personal experiences with JPO (by AMS) and GRL/JGR (by AGU). You can also tell by the listing at the AMS below.


Editorial Staff: technical editors and copy editors

http://www.ametsoc.org/pubs/index.html


Lately, the AMS has added a new link, as many journals do nowadays.


Pre-Submission Editing Services:

http://www.ametsoc.org/PUBS/preeditservices.html


Personally, I think the AMS can do better than listing these editing companies, but that's another Blog.


The AGU has been making lots of progress. One thing I really like is their "Editors’ Highlight."


http://www.agu.org/pubs/journals/highlights.shtml


Clearly, the AGU care a lot about publications. For example, it shows the IF at its web site.
 

http://www.agu.org/pubs/journals/statistics.shtml


It also lists some editing companies at its web site, which really needs a "make over."

   Language-Editing Services
 

http://www.agu.org/pubs/authors/

 

I saw some pie charts at the AGU site, which show the publication brings in a net 2% (so does the membership).  I don't know how to run a big non-profit organization like the AGU or the AMS, but I suppose 2% is a lot of money (and a lot of work) ...



https://m.sciencenet.cn/blog-306792-507439.html

上一篇:English is impossible to master!
下一篇:Internet makes baking at home easy

1 曾新林

该博文允许实名用户评论 评论 (2 个评论)

数据加载中...
扫一扫,分享此博文

Archiver|手机版|科学网 ( 京ICP备07017567号-12 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-19 12:22

Powered by ScienceNet.cn

Copyright © 2007- 中国科学报社

返回顶部